Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

The Evolving Concept of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Phenotypes: Lessons From the M-TEER Trials

Conflicting results from 2 randomized clinical trials of transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair in secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) have led to the recognition that SMR is a heterogeneous disease entity presenting with different functional and morphological phenotypes. This review summarizes the current knowledge on SMR caused primarily by atrial secondary mitral regurgitation (aSMR) and ventricular SMR pathology. Although aSMR is generally characterized by severe left atrial enlargement in the setting of preserved left ventricular anatomy and function, different patterns of mitral annular distortion cause different phenotypes of aSMR. In ventricular SMR, the relation of SMR severity to left ventricular dilation as well as the degree of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction are important phenotypic characteristics, which are key for a better understanding of prognosis and treatment response.

Strategy to optimize PeriproCeduraL AnticOagulation in structural transseptal interventions: Design and rationale of the STOP CLOT trial

BACKGROUND

Both transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of mitral regurgitation or left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) require periprocedural anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) that is administered either before or immediately after transseptal puncture (TSP). The optimal timing of UFH administration (before or after TSP) is unknown. The Strategy To Optimize PeriproCeduraL AnticOagulation in Structural Transseptal Interventions trial (STOP CLOT Trial) was designed to determine if early anticoagulation is effective in reducing ischemic complications without increasing the risk of periprocedural bleeding.

METHODS

The STOP CLOT trial is a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. A total of 410 patients scheduled for TEER or LAAC will be randomized 1:1 either early UFH administration (iv. bolus of 100 units/kg UFH or placebo, given after obtaining femoral vein access and at least 5 minutes prior to the start of the TSP) or late UFH administration (iv. bolus of 100 units/kg UFH or placebo given immediately after TSP). Prespecified preliminary statistical analysis will be performed after complete follow-up of the first 196 randomized subjects. To ensure blinding, a study nurse responsible for randomization and UFH/placebo preparation is not involved in the care of the patients enrolled into the study. The primary study endpoint is a composite of (1) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, TIA, myocardial infarction, or peripheral embolization) within 30 days post-procedure, (2) intraprocedural fresh thrombus formation in the right or left atrium as assessed with periprocedural transesophageal echocardiography, or (3) occurrence of new ischemic lesions (diameter ≥4 mm) on brain magnetic resonance imaging performed 2 to 5 days after the procedure. The safety endpoint is the occurrence of moderate or severe bleeding complications during the index hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Protocols of periprocedural anticoagulation administration during structural interventions have never been tested in a randomized clinical trial. The Stop Clot trial may help reach consensus on the optimal timing of initiation of periprocedural anticoagulation.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05305612.

Valvular heart disease: from mechanisms to management

Valvular heart disease is common and its prevalence is rapidly increasing worldwide. Effective medical therapies are insufficient and treatment was historically limited to the surgical techniques of valve repair or replacement, resulting in systematic underprovision of care to older patients and those with substantial comorbidities, frailty, or left ventricular dysfunction. Advances in imaging and surgical techniques over the past 20 years have transformed the management of valvular heart disease. Better understanding of the mechanisms and causes of disease and an increasingly extensive and robust evidence base provide a platform for the delivery of individualised treatment by multidisciplinary heart teams working within networks of diagnostic facilities and specialist heart valve centres. In this Series paper, we aim to provide an overview of the current and future management of valvular heart disease and propose treatment approaches based on an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and the application of multidisciplinary treatment strategies to individual patients.

Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Advancing Treatment Options for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation

Degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) has earned great interest because of modern and innovative technologies emerging in its treatment. MR affects roughly one-tenth of those older adults over the age of 75. MR if untreated leads to adverse heart remodeling, resulting in left ventricular dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, and heart failure syndrome. Despite surgical valve repair/replacement treatment being the standard of care, a significant proportion of severe MR patients face unmet clinical needs because of high or prohibitive surgical risks. This has led to the emergence of transcatheter therapies for high- and prohibitive-risk surgical patients, most notably mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair devices.

Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral Valve Regurgitation in the Setting of Concomitant Coronary or Multivalvular Heart Disease: A Focused Review

Treatment for mixed valve disease has historically been limited, often surgery being the only option. With the recent advancement of transcatheter therapies, percutaneous approaches are quickly becoming viable therapeutic considerations in inoperable or high-risk patients, also offering the option for a staged or same-session treatment. Guidelines are primarily focused on single-valve disease. However, patients often present with multiple pathologies. This review summarizes the data and literature on transcatheter treatment of patients with mitral regurgitation who concomitantly have aortic stenosis or regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Pathophysiology, hemodynamics, available therapies as well as order and timing of interventions are discussed.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective National Inpatient Sample Study

Background The burden of mitral regurgitation is high, and studies show it is the most common valvular pathology. The management of mitral regurgitation varies and depends on the chronicity, severity, etiology, and comorbidities of the patient. Surgical repair is recommended over replacement. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been shown to improve the prognosis of patients with mitral regurgitation and appears relatively safer than surgical repair in patients with high surgical risks. In this study, we examined the outcomes of TEER in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) by retrospectively evaluating data from the 2010 to 2016 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Methodology We retrospectively evaluated data from the 2010 to 2016 NIS. TEER was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10- CM) codes of 35.97 and 02UG3JZ, respectively, from our dataset. The study sample was stratified based on renal function into two groups (CKD and no CKD). Patients with CKD were identified using ICD-9-CM codes 585.3, 585.4, 585.5, and 585.6 and ICD-10-CM codes N18.3, N18.4, N18.5, and N18.6. Results There was no significant difference in major complications and overall complications between patients with and without CKD. However, heart failure, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, and cardiogenic shock were more prevalent in the CKD group. Patients with CKD were also more likely to sustain respiratory failure, post-procedure hemothorax, and require blood product transfusions. For renal complications, analysis showed that superimposed acute kidney injury and the need for hemodialysis were more common in the CKD group. Of note, there was no difference in neurologic complications, gastrointestinal bleeding, and thromboembolic complications between both groups. Patients with CKD who underwent TEER were more likely to have prolonged hospital stays without a significant increase in hospitalization charges. These patients were also more likely to be discharged to rehabilitation facilities. Conclusions CKD confers significant morbidity and mortality to patients undergoing TEER. Providers should be aware of these discrepancies in outcomes for patients with CKD in need of TEER to help better optimize their care.

Impact of the MitraClip G4 System on Routine Practice and Outcomes in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The MitraClip G4 system is a new iteration of the transcatheter edge-to-edge repair system. We assessed the impact of the G4 system on routine practice and outcomes in secondary mitral regurgitation (2°MR).Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with 2°MR treated with either the MitraClip G2 (n=89) or G4 (n=63) system between 2018 and 2021 were included. Baseline characteristics, procedures, and outcomes were compared. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and Cox regression were used to adjust for baseline differences. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for a lower surgical risk in the G4 group (Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality ≥8: 38.1% vs. 56.2%; P=0.03). In the G4 group, more patients had short (≤2 mm) coaptation length (83.7% vs. 54.0%; P<0.001) and fewer clips were used (17.5% vs. 36.0%; P=0.02). Acceptable MR reduction was observed in nearly all patients, with no difference between the G4 and G2 groups (100% vs. 97.8%, respectively; P=0.51). The G4 group had fewer patients with high transmitral gradients (>5mmHg; 3.3% vs. 13.6%; P=0.03). At 1 year, there was no significant difference between groups in the composite endpoint (death or heart failure rehospitalization) after baseline adjustment (10.5% vs. 20.2%; hazard ratio 0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.11-1.32; P=0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

The G4 system achieved comparable device outcomes to the early-generation G2, despite treating more challenging 2°MR with fewer clips.

Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair: patient selection, current devices, and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Over the last two decades, mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has become a safe and effective therapy for severe mitral regurgitation in patients deemed at high surgical risk.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to encompass the most relevant and updated evidence in the field of M-TEER from its inception, focusing on clinical and anatomical features for proper patient and device selection.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing operator experience and device iterations have resulted in improved clinical outcomes and an expansion of the therapy to patients with complex anatomies and clinical scenarios. Future investigations are warranted to determine the best management options and the most suitable device for every patient with MR.

Combined Significant Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation: Challenges in Timing and Type of Intervention

In this narrative review, we aim to summarize the literature surrounding the assessment and management of the common, yet understudied combination of aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR), the components of which are complexly inter-related and interdependent from diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic perspectives. The hemodynamic interdependency of AS and MR confounds the assessment of the severity of each valve disease, thus underscoring the importance of a multimodal approach integrating valvular and extravalvular indicators of severity. A large body of literature suggests that baseline MR is associated with reduced survival post aortic valve (AV) intervention and that regression of MR post-AV intervention confers a mortality benefit. Functional MR is more likely to regress after AV intervention than primary MR. The respective natural courses of the 2 valve diseases are not synchronized; therefore, significant AS and MR at or above the respective threshold for intervention might not coincide. Surgery is primarily a 1-stop-shop procedure because of a considerable perioperative risk of repeat interventions, whereas transcatheter treatment modalities allow for a more tailored timing of intervention with reassessment of concomitant MR after AV replacement and a potential staged intervention in the absence of MR regression. In summary, AS and MR, when combined, are interlaced into a complex hemodynamic, diagnostic, and prognostic synergy, with important therapeutic implications. Contemporary approaches should consider stepwise intervention by exploiting the advantage of transcatheter options. However, evidence is needed to demonstrate the efficacy of different timing and therapeutic options.

Mitral Valve Intervention in Elderly or High-Risk Patients: A Review of Current Surgical and Interventional Management

Mitral regurgitation is a prevalent valvular disease, and its management has gained increasing importance because of the aging population. Although traditional surgery remains the gold standard, the field of transcatheter therapies, including transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and, more recently transcatheter mitral valve replacement are advancing and are being explored as viable alternatives, particularly for patients at high surgical risk. It is essential to emphasize the necessity of a multidisciplinary team approach, involving specialized valve teams, imaging experts, cardiac anaesthesiologists, and other relevant specialists, is crucial in achieving optimal outcomes. Furthermore, proper execution of procedures, postprocedural care, and diligent follow-up for these patients are essential components for successful results. It is essential to underscore that traditional mitral valve surgery continues to play a significant role. Simultaneously, it is important to acknowledge the expanding array of transcatheter interventions available for this specific patient population.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement as a bridge to minimally invasive endoscopic mitral valve surgery in Elderly Patients in the era of ERAS and Fast Track TAVI concepts

In this bicentric study, we report the outcomes of combined transcatheter aortic valve replacement combined with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. We included a cohort of six patients (79.6 ± 3.2 years, 83% women) with high-risk profiles and deemed to be non-operable with combined mitral and aortic valvular disease. All patients had unsuitable anatomies for transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Moreover, most of the patients (5/6) suffered a combined aortic valve lesion, which complicates the efficiency of cardioplegia in the case of CBP through minimally invasive incisions. The first stage was implanting a TAVI valve to achieve aortic valve competency and hence facilitate the infusion of cardioplegia after clamping the aorta during endoscopic mitral valve surgery. After one week, we performed the minimally invasive mitral valve repair. Most patients (n = 5; 83%) underwent successful endoscopic mitral valve repair. Intraoperatively, the mean ischemic time was 42 min, and the total bypass time was 72 min. Postoperatively, the mean intubation time was 0 h. Postoperative complications included reoperation for bleeding in one patient (16.7%) and a new heart block requiring pacemaker implantation in one patient (16.7%). There was neither in-hospital mortality nor 1-year mortality.

One-Year Outcomes According to Mitral Regurgitation Etiology Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair With the PASCAL System: Results From a Multicenter Registry

BACKGROUND

We previously reported procedural and 30-day outcomes of a German early multicenter experience with the PASCAL system for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). This study reports 1-year outcomes of mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the PASCAL system according to MR etiology in a large all-comer cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes up to 1-year were investigated according to MR etiology (degenerative [DMR], functional [FMR], or mixed [MMR]) in the first 282 patients with symptomatic MR 3+/4+ treated with the PASCAL implant at 9 centers in 2019. A total of 282 patients were included (33% DMR, 50% FMR, 17% MMR). At discharge, MR reduction to ≤1+/2+ was achieved in 58%/87% of DMR, in 75%/97% of FMR, and in 78%/98% of patients with MMR (P=0.004). MR reduction to ≤1+/2+ was sustained at 30 days (50%/83% DMR, 67%/97% FMR, 74%/100% MMR) and at 1 year (53%/78% DMR, 75%/97% FMR, 67%/91% MMR) with significant differences between etiologies. DMR patients with residual MR 3+/4+ at 1-year had at least complex valve morphology in 91.7%. Valve-related reintervention was performed in 7.4% DMR, 0.7% FMR, and 0.0% MMR (P=0.010). At 1-year, New York Heart Association Functional Class was significantly improved irrespective of MR etiology (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large all-comer cohort, mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair with the PASCAL system was associated with an acute and sustained MR reduction at 1-year in all causes. However, in patients with DMR, MR reduction was less pronounced, reflecting the high incidence of complex or very complex anatomies being referred for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation for native valve disease

Mitral regurgitation is the second most frequent heart valve disease in Europe and the most frequent in the US. Although surgery is the therapy of choice when intervention is indicated, transcatheter mitral valve repair or replacement are alternatives for patients who are not eligible for surgery. However, the development of transcatheter mitral valves is slower than expected. Although several transcatheter heart valves have been developed, only one has been commercialised. Indeed, most of these devices are being evaluated in clinical studies, with promising initial results. In this review, we propose an overview on transcatheter mitral valve replacement for the treatment of native mitral valve disease, from indication to results, including patients with severe annular calcification, and we provide you with a glimpse into the future of these therapies.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in mitral regurgitation: A comparison of device systems and recommendations for tailored device selection. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is a minimally invasive method for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with prohibitive surgical risks. The traditionally used device, MitraClip, showed both safety and effectiveness in M-TEER. PASCAL is a newer device that has emerged as another feasible option to be used in this procedure.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies that compared PASCAL to MitraClip devices in M-TEER. The electronic databases searched for relevant studies were PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcomes were technical success and the grade of MR at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, bleeding, device success and reintervention.

RESULTS

Technical success (PASCAL: 96.5% vs MitraClip: 97.6%, p = 0.24) and MR ≤ 2 at 30-day follow-up (PASCAL: 89.4vs MitraClip 89.9%, p = 0.51) were comparable between both groups. Both devices showed similar outcomes including all-cause mortality (RR: 0.68 [0.34, 1.38]; P = 0.28), major bleeding (RR: 1.87 [0.68, 5.10]; P = 0.22) and reintervention (RR: 1.02 [0.33, 3.16]; P = 0.97). Device success was more frequent with PASCAL device (PASCAL: 86% vs MitraClip 68.5%; P = 0.44), however, the results did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of PASCAL were comparable to those of MitraClip with no significant difference in safety and effectiveness. The choice between MitraClip and PASCAL devices should be guided by various factors, including mitral valve anatomy, etiology of regurgitation, and device-specific characteristics.

First-in-human study of the K-Clip™ transcatheter annular repair system for severe functional tricuspid regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Severe TR is associated with impaired prognosis while limited interventional options available. The purpose of this observational first-in-human experience with the K-Clip™ transcatheter tricuspid annular reconstruction system is to investigate its feasibility, safety as well as short-term clinical impact on patients with severe functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

METHODS

In this compassionate-use, prospective, multi-center, single-arm study, 15 patients with severe symptomatic functional TR were treated with the K-Clip™ system and followed up at 30 days after discharge. Feasibility endpoints consisted of safety (major clinical cardiovascular events (MACEs), echocardiographic, clinical and functional endpoints.

RESULTS

All the 15 patients (9 males, 72.67 ± 9.42 years of age) successfully received implants and no MACEs were reported throughout the study at 30 days. Between baseline and 30 days, echocardiography showed remarkable reduction of tricuspid annular circumference and area by 14.30% and 25.96%. Improvement of ≥ + 2 grade and ≥ +3 grade TR was presented in 9/15(60.00%) and 4/15(26.67%) respectively while 10/15(66.67%) of patients had ≤ moderate TR. Clinical evaluation indicated that 86.67% of patients were finally in NYHA functional class I or II (p<0.001) and overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved from 62.28 ± 18.97 to 77.90 ± 11.70 (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Our first-in-human results of the transcatheter tricuspid annular reconstruction using the K-Clip™ system demonstrated initial favorable procedural success, acceptable safety and remarkable TR reduction in consistent with significant clinical improvement. Larger-scaled prospective trials with longer follow-up duration are warranted to further determine whether these promising findings could be promoted to a broader population in the long term.

Emergency Transcatheter Repair for Anterior Leaflet Tear Following Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty

We present the case of a 66-year-old woman who developed severe mitral regurgitation from rupture of the anterior mitral valve leaflet following percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Emergency transcatheter mitral valve repair was used to reduce the severity of mitral regurgitation and facilitate definitive surgical treatment. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Update on Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation represents a clinical challenge. They are associated with a poor prognosis, and many patients are not eligible for conventional surgery. Transcatheter therapies have been the focus of numerous studies and devices over the past decade. Here, we provide a summary of current options for transcatheter treatment of these 2 entities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of edge-to-edge repair for increasing numbers of patients. Encouraging early results with transcatheter valve replacement are also becoming available. To date, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is currently the first-line transcatheter treatment for both mitral and tricuspid regurgitation for many patients who are not candidates for surgery. A number of transcatheter replacement devices are under development and clinical investigation but, for the most part, their current use is limited to compassionate cases or clinical trials.