Transcatheter closure of a ruptured sinus of valsalva: a systematic review of the literature

Background

Ruptured sinus of Valsalva (RSOV) is a rare pathology, and current data regarding its symptoms, anatomy, associated pathologies, and appropriate therapeutic approaches are scarce. Transcatheter closure (TCC) has been performed in multiple cases; however, the information on its success rate and complications is limited.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed an advanced search based on inclusion criteria on Scopus, PubMed, and Embase from January 1985 through July 2022. The main search terms were "Sinus of Valsalva", "Rupture/Aneurysm", and "Transcatheter/Catheter/Device".

Results

Totally, 1,017 relevant articles from the 3 databases were retrieved. After the final review and appraisal, 94 articles describing 407 patients who underwent the TCC of RSOV were included. Males comprised 65% of the studied patients, and the average age was 34.5 years. The total success rate of TCC was 95.6%. Forty-nine patients (12%) developed complications, the most significant of which were sustained residual shunts in 7 patients (1.7%), substantial new onset or progression of aortic insufficiency in 6 (1.5%), and RSOV recurrence in 6 (1.5%). Post-interventional mortality was reported in only 2 patients (0.5%).

Conclusions

The present study is the first systematic review of available data regarding the TCC of RSOV principally comprising case series and case reports. Although TCC seems a good option, precise patient selection is mandatory.

Comparison of clinical results between percutaneous closure and surgical repair of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to investigate whether percutaneous closure of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is as safe and effective as surgery repair.

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous closure of ruptured SVA has been becoming an alternative to the traditional surgical repair recently. The reports regarding direct comparison of these two treatment options are scarce.

METHODS

The medical records from the institutional database were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 134 patients were reviewed, including 26 patients undergoing percutaneous closure and 108 patients being treated surgically. To reduce the potential bias, 32 patients from Surgical Repair group were selected by propensity score matching.

RESULTS

All the ruptured SVAs were successfully closed in each group. No severe procedure-related complications were found in the perioperative period. After matching, there were no significant differences in the baseline clinical characteristics. The median postoperative hospital stays of Matched group were significantly longer than that of Percutaneous Closure group (7 days vs. 1 day, p < .001). Aortic regurgitation, residual shunt and recurrence of SVAs were common complications in both Percutaneous Closure group and Surgical Repair group.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriately selected patients with ruptured SVA could be treated by percutaneous closure with an acceptable risk of short-term complications. Though surgical repair remains the main treatment option for ruptured SVAs, percutaneous closure could be considered in patients with a small-size rupture and no associated cardiac abnormalities.

Medium- and long-term follow-up of transcatheter closure of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm in Central Europe population

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate medium- and long-term outcomes of transcatheter closure (TC) of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (RSVA), which is a rare and mostly congenital heart disease.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis included 23 patients (14 males) aged 15-79 years (y; 39.9±18.5) selected for TC of RSVA between 2007 and 2017 in two tertiary centers in Poland and Ukraine. Fifteen patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV before TC; 5 patients had acquired RSVA after previous cardiac surgery. We applied 22 duct, 3 muscular, and 1 atrial septal Amplatzer or Amplatzer-like occluders by the anterograde venous approach after arterio-venous loop creation in all but 1 patient. Mean follow-up conducted in outpatient clinic was 5.5±3.5 (1-11)y.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 19/23 patients (82.6%). Four procedures were abandoned and the device percutaneously retrieved due to coronary artery compression (1 patient), transient increase of aortic regurgitation (AR; 1 patients) or embolization (2 patients). New onset of significant AR was noted in one of the latter patients after device removal. NYHA class improved in all treated patients but 2, in whom it remained stable (p<0.05), with 10 patients in class I. Three patients needed percutaneous re-intervention during follow-up because of significant residual shunt in 1 and late recurrent RSVA in 2 patients. The follow-up of the remaining patients was uneventful. Neither erosion, embolization, new AR, nor death were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The percutaneous closure of RSVA is a safe and effective method of treatment with good clinical outcome. However, although not described previously, recurrent shunts after TC of RSVA are possible and can be treated successfully with another transcatheter intervention.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous closure of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous closure in patients with a ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (RSVA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 29 patients with RSVA were retrospectively enrolled in our study. All patients were successfully treated by percutaneous closure and had a complete closure at discharge; however, two patients had a trivial procedure-related aortic regurgitation (AR) after the procedure. On a mean follow-up of 29.7±23.8 months (range 1-83 months), the two procedure-related AR disappeared three months and two years after the procedure, respectively. Trivial residual shunt was found in one patient, sinus of Valsalva aneurysm ruptured again in one patient and trivial to moderate AR was found in two patients during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In appropriately selected patients with RSVA, percutaneous closure is an attractive alternative to surgery with high technical success and good short-term and midterm outcomes; however, long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Ruptured Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm and Gerbode Defects: Patient and Procedural Selection: the Key to Optimising Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we reflect on the historical background, clinical features and imaging techniques used to assess Gerbode defects and sinus of Valsalva aneurysms. We aim to review the evolution of treatment strategies and the progression towards less invasive management for these conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

While transthoracic echocardiography is often diagnostic, transesophageal echocardiography (2D and 3D) has improved our understanding of these defects and allowed us to more accurately define their anatomy. Cardiac MRI provides improved assessment of the physiological impact of defects by quantifying shunt volume. Transcatheter techniques are currently vying with surgery as the mainstay of treatment. New insights are being discovered regarding diagnostic modalities and treatment pathways. Defining criteria for patient selection for catheter or surgical therapy is essential when deciding on the optimum intervention for the individual patient.

Comparison of reported outcomes with percutaneous versus surgical closure of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm is a rare cardiac malformation that stems from incomplete fusion of the aortic media and the aortic valve annulus, a weakness that may result in rupture of the sinus, large left-to-right shunt, and severe congestive heart failure. Historically, this lesion has been repaired surgically, but percutaneous closure (PC) has emerged as a therapeutic intervention over the last 20 years. We review and contrast 34 studies detailing the PC approach with 16 studies on surgical closure (SC), together comprising a total of 877 patients who were treated for ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm from 1956 to 2014. Both groups had similar sites of rupture, age distribution, and clinical symptoms at presentation. Selection bias ultimately prohibits a direct comparison between the 2 groups as patients who underwent SC often had worse aortic regurgitation and more complex associated lesions, including endocarditis, bicuspid aortic valve, tunnel-type fistulous connections, larger defect size, and multiple site of rupture. In conclusion, although SC is indicated and reserved for these more complicated patients, our review of previously published reports reveals that PC in patients who are too ill to undergo bypass, with mild or no aortic regurgitation and simple associated defects (muscular ventricular septal defects, secundum atrial septal defect, small patent ductus arteriosus), can be safe, effective, and practical.

Perforated Sinus of Valsalva (PSOV) aneurysm closure with a muscular VSD occluder

We report a case of a Perforated Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysm (PSOV) closure using an Amplatzer muscular ventricular septal defect occluder (mVSD) device and describe a novel and potentially safer way for defect sizing. A literature review of the endovascular treatment of this disease is presented.