A comparison of anticoagulation with bivalirudin and provisional GPIIb/IIIa inhibition with unfractionated heparin and mandatory GPIIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention in relation to platelet activation and the inhibition of coagulation

Bivalirudin versus Heparin in Pediatric and Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Meta-analysis

AIMS

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the primary anticoagulant of choice on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, it is debatable whether bivalirudin (BIV), a direct thrombin inhibitor, may be considered a better alternative anticoagulant option.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI, and Wanfang databases up to June 15, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analyses, including subgroup analyses, were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies containing 994 patients were enrolled. All articles were retrospective cohort studies. Compared with UFH, BIV was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (risk ratio [RR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.49), ECMO in-circuit thrombosis (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.74), stroke (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.95), in-hospital mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.99) and higher rates of survival to ECMO decannulation (RR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34). Pooled risk estimates did not show a significant association with clinical thrombotic events (RR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.07). Moreover, BIV was associated with a lower risk of ECMO in-circuit thrombosis and in-hospital mortality in the adult subgroup but not in the pediatric subgroup. However, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of stroke, survival to ECMO decannulation and in-hospital mortality should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

BIV appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in pediatric and adult patients requiring ECMO.

Soluble Platelet Release Factors as Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease

Platelets are the main players in thrombotic diseases, where activated platelets not only mediate thrombus formation but also are involved in multiple interactions with vascular cells, inflammatory components, and the coagulation system. Although in vitro reactivity of platelets provides information on the function of circulating platelets, it is not a full reflection of the in vivo activation state, which may be relevant for thrombotic risk assessment in various disease conditions. Therefore, studying release markers of activated platelets in plasma is of interest. While this type of study has been done for decades, there are several new discoveries that highlight the need for a critical assessment of the available tests and indications for platelet release products. First, new insights have shown that platelets are not only prominent players in arterial vascular disease, but also in venous thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation. Second, knowledge of the platelet proteome has dramatically expanded over the past years, which contributed to an increasing array of tests for proteins released and shed from platelets upon activation. Identification of changes in the level of plasma biomarkers associated with upcoming thromboembolic events allows timely and individualized adjustment of the treatment strategy to prevent disease aggravation. Therefore, biomarkers of platelet activation may become a valuable instrument for acute event prognosis. In this narrative review based on a systematic search of the literature, we summarize the process of platelet activation and release products, discuss the clinical context in which platelet release products have been measured as well as the potential clinical relevance.