Management of bleeding and artificial gastric ulcers associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection

Sequential injection-electrocoagulation vs. traditional electrocoagulation haemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Electrocoagulation with an electrosurgical knife is the traditional approach to achieve haemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), as bleeding may obscure the operative field and increase the risks of muscle injury and perforation.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the sequential injection-electrocoagulation procedure during ESD.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, 69 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal ESD were randomized to either the control group (traditional electrocoagulation) or the experimental group ("Sequential injection-electrocoagulation" method) from September 2023 to June 2024. Two endoscopists scored the visibility of each bleeding point from 1 (undetectable) to 4 (easily detectable).

RESULTS

The median time to haemostasis at each bleeding point was 17 (11-23) seconds in the experimental group and 22 (14.5-41) seconds in the control group (P < 0.001). The visibility scores were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (3.24 ± 0.63 vs. 2.82 ± 0.57) (P < 0.001). Muscle injuries occurred more frequently in the control group (P = 0.003). Unfortunately, there was one case of perforation in the control group caused by haemostasis.

CONCLUSION

The sequential injection-electrocoagulation strategy shortened the time to hemostasis during ESD, improved the visibility of bleeding points, and minimized the risks of muscle injury and perforation.

Vonoprazan vs. Proton Pump Inhibitors for Treatment and Prevention of Gastric and/or Duodenal Ulcers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Although Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is superior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating Helicobacter pylori and erosive esophagitis, its efficacy for treating gastric and/or duodenal ulcers remains controversial. This meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan vs. PPI for treating and preventing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

METHODS

Only randomized controlled trials randomizing gastric and/or duodenal ulcer patients, regardless of etiology, into Vonoprazan or any PPI and indexed in Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL until March 2, 2024 were searched. Primary outcomes were ulcer healing rates at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 and recurrence rates at Week 24. Other outcomes included shrinkage rates, any adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and risks of delayed bleeding and perforation. The overall risk ratio (RR) and mean difference were pooled using the random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) Tool.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies comprising 43 reports were included in the analysis. Healing rates of gastric and/or duodenal ulcers were similar in both Vonoprazan and PPI groups at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.89-1.16]; Week 4 0.99 [95% CI 0.95-1.04]; Week 6 1.00 [95% CI 0.96-1.03]; Week 8 0.99 [95% CI 0.95-1.03]). The recurrence prevention of peptic ulcers was not different in Vonoprazan 10 mg (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.18-1.27) or 20 mg (0.60; 95% CI 0.28-1.30) to PPI. Shrinkage rates, any AEs, SAEs, and risks of delayed bleeding and perforation were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan is not significantly better than PPI in treating and preventing gastric and/or duodenal ulcers.

Spray coagulation reduces the use of hemostatic forceps for intraoperative bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Aims

During intraoperative bleeding in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), switching to spray coagulation may be beneficial compared with the continuous use of swift coagulation and can reduce the need for hemostatic forceps. We retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of spray modes on intraoperative bleeding during gastric ESD.

Methods and Results

A total of 316 bleeding events (156 in the Swift group and 160 in the Spray group) were consecutively recorded. In the Swift group, hemostasis was performed using the swift mode with a retracted tip of the needle-type knife, followed by the hemostatic forceps. In the Spray group, bleeding was treated in a stepwise manner: the swift mode, the spray mode, and the hemostatic forceps. All bleeding events were assigned to one of two groups by an endoscopist who retrospectively reviewed the videos. We compared the use of hemostatic forceps, the total hemostatic time, and the cumulative hemostasis rate between the two groups.The use of hemostatic forceps was significantly lower in the Spray group than in the Swift group (32.7% vs. 13.8%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the total hemostatic time (Swift group, 20 s.; Spray group, 16 s.; P = 0.42), whereas the cumulative hemostasis rate with the knife was significantly higher in the Spray group (P = 0.007).

Conclusion

The results suggested that spray coagulation from the tip of the needle-type knife could reduce the use of hemostatic forceps. In gastric ESD, spray coagulation may facilitate the hemostasis of intraoperative bleeding.

Red dichromatic imaging improves visibility of bleeding during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Bleeding frequently occurs during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and bleeding points are sometimes difficult to detect. Red dichromatic imaging (RDI) was recently developed to improve the visibility of bleeding. Our study aimed at examining the efficacy of RDI in improving the visibility of bleeding during gastric ESD. We retrospectively evaluated the visibility score and color difference of bleeding spot during gastric ESD during September 2020-January 2021. The visibility score was evaluated as four numeric values by operators, and the color difference between the bleeding spot and surroundings was evaluated using RDI and white light imaging (WLI). A further analysis to evaluate bleeding characteristics was performed to evaluate the possible beneficial effects of RDI. Twenty patients with a total of 85 bleedings were analyzed. The mean visibility score in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (3.69 ± 0.60 vs 3.20 ± 0.84, p < 0.01). The color difference with RDI was also significantly higher than that with WLI (19.51 ± 15.18 vs 14.80 ± 7.41, p < 0.01). Furthermore, in the bleedings with a higher visibility score in RDI, the color difference in RDI was significantly higher than that in WLI (23.99 ± 19.29 vs 14.33 ± 7.08, p < 0.01). The multivariate analysis of visibility scores revealed that submergence of bleeding points was independently associated with the superiority of RDI (odds ratio 10.35, 95% confidence interval: 2.76-38.81, p < 0.01). Our study demonstrates that RDI can improve the visibility of bleeding during gastric ESD.

Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

METHODS

This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n = 204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n = 200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non-inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI.

RESULTS

The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n = 860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n = 1049) (62.3 ± 108.1 vs. 56.2 ± 74.6 s; P = 0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 [18.0-71.0] vs. 28.0 [14.0-66.0] s; P = 0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71 ± 0.935 vs. 2.03 ± 1.038; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ESD treatment time between RDI (n = 161) and WLI (n = 168) (58.0 [35.0-86.0] vs. 60.0 [38.0-88.5] min; P = 0.855). Four perforations were observed, but none of them took place during the hemostatic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemostatic treatment using RDI does not shorten the hemostasis time. RDI, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during ESD. UMIN000025134.

Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Cancer

With improvements in the early detection of early gastric cancer (EGC) and advances in therapeutic techniques, endoscopic resection (ER) for EGC has become widely adopted in East Asian and Western countries. Endoscopic submucosal dissection has higher rates of en bloc, complete, and curative resections with lower rates of local recurrence than that of endoscopic mucosal resection. ER is a minimally invasive method with low morbidity that provides excellent outcomes. ER for EGC is a safe, effective method, preserving organ function and thus maintaining the patient's quality of life, and is recognized as the first-line treatment of EGC in selected patients.

The risk factors for prolonged hemostatic clip retention after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic hemostatic clipping is a safe and efficient treatment used to manage bleeding or perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasm. However, the natural history of applied hemoclips during ESD has not been elucidated. As prolonged clip retention limits the use of magnetic resonance imaging and may impede the ulcer healing process, we investigated the factors associated with prolonged hemoclip retention during gastric ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 199 patients who underwent gastric ESD with hemoclip application from January 2006 to January 2019. The primary outcome was the prolonged hemoclip retention rate 3 months after ESD. We examined the records of subjects followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually after ESD to monitor clip retention.

RESULTS

The prolonged hemoclip retention rate at 3 months was 27.1% (54/199). The risk of hemoclip retention was significantly lower at the antrum (19.6%, P = 0.03). Hemoclips at the angle tended to remain longer than other locations in the stomach (40.6%, P = 0.081) while there was no difference in the number of applied clips depending upon the location of the lesion. By Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, clips at the antrum detached significantly earlier than those at other locations (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the hemostatic clips attached during ESD were spontaneously removed by 3 months after gastric ESD. However, clips positioned at angle are suspected to have a high probability of prolonged retention. With this in mind, more attention is needed when using hemoclips on angle.

Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer (second edition)

In response to the rapid and wide acceptance and use of endoscopic treatments for early gastric cancer, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, in collaboration with the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, produced "Guidelines for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Early Gastric Cancer" in 2014, as a set of basic guidelines in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine. At the time, a number of statements had to be established by consensus (the lowest evidence level), as evidence levels remained low for many specific areas in this field. However, in recent years, the number of well-designed clinical studies has been increasing. Based on new findings, we have issued the revised second edition of the above guidelines that cover the present state of knowledge. These guidelines are divided into the following seven categories: indications, preoperative diagnosis, techniques, evaluation of curability, complications, long-term postoperative surveillance, and histology.

Efficacy of a new image-enhancement technique for achieving hemostasis in endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hemostasis during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can sometimes be challenging and stressful for the endoscopist. Therefore, we aimed to assess the usefulness of dual red imaging (DRI), a new image enhancement technique that uses 3 wavelengths (540, 600, and 630 nm) to visualize bleeding points and to examine the efficacy of DRI in shortening the time required to achieve hemostasis (hemostasis time) during ESD.

METHODS

DRI and white-light imaging (WLI) were used alternately for managing 378 bleeding events in 97 patients undergoing ESD. Hemostasis time for each hemostasis event was measured. Using portable eye-tracking glasses, 4 experienced endoscopists were shown random videos of intraoperative bleeding during ESD (20 cases each on WLI and DRI) and identified the bleeding point in each video. The mean distances of eye movement per unit of time until the bleeding point were identified in each video and compared between the WLI and DRI groups.

RESULTS

Average hemostasis time was significantly shorter in the DRI group. The mean distance of eye movement was significantly shorter in the DRI group than in the WLI group for all endoscopists.

CONCLUSIONS

DRI can offer useful images to help in clearly detecting bleeding points and in facilitating hemostasis during ESD. It is feasible and may help in successfully performing ESD that is safer and faster than WLI. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000018309.).

Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is generally used to treat gastric mucosal and submucosal lesions. Nevertheless, ESD is more difficult and complicated to perform than a traditional endoscopic mucosal resection, which can increase the incidence of various complications including hemorrhage, perforation and infection. Hemorrhage is a major post-ESD complication. Prevention and early diagnosis of post-ESD bleeding for gastric lesions are closely associated with the efficacy and safety of the operation. Many studies have reported the risks of and the preventative measures for hemorrhage after gastric ESD, but there remain some issues to be solved. We thus reviewed the risk factors, precautions and treatments for hemorrhage after ESD of gastric lesions.

A case of gastric pseudoaneurysm following endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer

A woman in her 80s underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for a 20-mm-sized early gastric cancer lesion in the posterior wall of the upper gastric body. The lesion was resected en bloc with no adverse events. However, bleeding was observed in a post-ESD mucosal defect the day after ESD, so endoscopic hemostasis was performed. Moreover, hematemesis occurred 4 days after ESD, when the bleeding site showed a sign of pulsatile aneurysm. Therefore, endoscopic hemostasis was considered difficult, and angiographic treatment was chosen. Since angiography revealed a pseudoaneurysm in a portion of a branch of the left gastric artery, embolization with microcoils was performed. Thereafter, no bleeding occurred. To the best of our knowledge, there is no case report about the formation of a pseudoaneurysm in a post-gastric ESD mucosal defect. Thus, this case is being reported to document valuable information.

Efficacy and safety of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the treatment of patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), there is no consensus on the optimum time to start Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy or on whether eradication therapy improves ulcer healing rate after ESD. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of immediate eradication of H. pylori on ulcer healing after ESD in patients with early gastric neoplasms.

METHODS

A total of 330 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric neoplasms were enrolled. Patients were assigned to either H. pylori eradication group (Group A: H. pylori eradication + proton pump inhibitor 7 weeks) or non-eradication group (Group B: proton pump inhibitor 8 weeks). The primary end point was gastric ulcer healing rate (Group A vs Group B) determined on week 8 after ESD.

RESULTS

Patients in Group A failed to meet non-inferiority criteria for ulcer scarring rate after ESD compared with that in Group B (83.0% vs 86.5%, P for non-inferiority = 0.0599, 95% confidence interval: -11.7% to 4.7%). There were, however, neither large differences between the two groups in the ulcer scarring rate nor the safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of immediate H. pylori eradication therapy after ESD to the non-eradication therapy in the healing rate of ESD-caused ulcers. However, because the failure is likely to attribute to small number of patients enrolled, immediate eradication therapy may be a treatment option for patients after ESD without adverse effects on eradication therapy in comparison with the standard therapy.

The Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

There are two treatment modalities for early gastric cancer (EGC)-surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of ESD with surgery.

METHOD

The article was performed by searching PubMed databases. Data were extracted using predefined form and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated and P value.

RESULTS

13 studies were identified. The incidence of perforation in two groups was different [OR = 6.18 (95% CI: 1.37-27.98), P = 0.02]. The prevalences of synchronous and metachronous cancer in the ESD group were higher than those in the surgery group [OR = 8.52 (95% CI: 1.99-36.56), P = 0.004 and OR = 7.15 (95% CI: 2.95-17.32), P < 0.0001]. The recurrence and complete resection rates were different [OR = 6.93 (95% CI: 2.83-16.96), P < 0.0001 and OR = 0.32 (95% CI: 0.20-0.52), P < 0.00001]. Compared with the surgery group, the hospital stay was shorter [IV = -7.15 (95% CI: -9.08-5.22), P < 0.00001], the adverse event rate was lower, and the quality of life (QOL) was better in the ESD group. The difference of bleeding was not found.

CONCLUSION

ESD appears to be preferable for EGC, due to a lower rate of adverse events, shorter hospital stay, cheaper cost, and higher QOL.

Guidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) has compiled a set of guidelines for endoscopic management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding using evidence-based methods. The major cause of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is peptic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. As a result, these guidelines mainly focus on peptic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding, although bleeding from other causes is also overviewed. From the epidemiological aspect, in recent years in Japan, bleeding from drug-related ulcers has become predominant in comparison with bleeding from Helicobacter pylori (HP)-related ulcers, owing to an increase in the aging population and coverage of HP eradication therapy by national health insurance. As for treatment, endoscopic hemostasis, in which there are a variety of methods, is considered to be the first-line treatment for bleeding from almost all causes. It is very important to precisely evaluate the severity of the patient's condition and stabilize the patient's vital signs with intensive care for successful endoscopic hemostasis. Additionally, use of antisecretory agents is recommended to prevent rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis, especially for gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding. Eighteen statements with evidence and recommendation levels have been made by the JGES committee of these guidelines according to evidence obtained from clinical research studies. However, some of the statements that are supported by a low level of evidence must be confirmed by further clinical research.

Usefulness of the Forrest Classification to Predict Artificial Ulcer Rebleeding during Second-Look Endoscopy after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Background/Aims:

Delayed post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) bleeding (DPEB) is difficult to predict and there is controversy regarding the usefulness of prophylactic hemostasis during second-look endoscopy. This study evaluated the risk factors related to DPEB, the relationship between clinical outcomes and the Forrest classification, and the results of prophylactic hemostasis during second-look endoscopy.

Methods:

Second-look endoscopy was performed on the day after ESD to check for recent hemorrhage or potential bleeding and the presence of artificial ulcers in all patients.

Results:

DPEB occurred in 42 of 581 patients (7.2%). Multivariate analysis determined that a specimen size ≥40 mm (odds ratio [OR], 3.03; p=0.003), and a high-risk Forrest classification (Forrest Ib+IIa+IIb; OR, 6.88; p<0.001) were risk factors for DPEB. DPEB was significantly more likely in patients classified with Forrest Ib (OR, 24.35; p<0.001), IIa (OR, 12.91; p<0.001), or IIb (OR, 8.31; p<0.001) ulcers compared with Forrest III ulcers. There was no statistically significant difference between the prophylactic hemostasis and non-hemostasis groups (Forrest Ib, p=0.938; IIa, p=0.438; IIb, p=0.397; IIc, p=0.773) during second-look endoscopy.

Conclusions:

The Forrest classification of artificial gastric ulcers during second-look endoscopy seems to be a useful tool for predicting delayed bleeding. However, routine prophylactic hemostasis during second-look endoscopy seemed to not be useful for preventing DPEB.

Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer

In response to the rapid and wide acceptance and use of endoscopic treatments for early gastric cancer, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES), in collaboration with the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA), has produced 'Guidelines for ESD and EMR for Early Gastric Cancer', as a set of basic guidelines in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine. These Guidelines cover the present state of knowledge and are divided into the following seven categories: Indications, Preoperative diagnosis, Techniques, Evaluation of curability, Complications, Long-term postoperative surveillance, and Histology. Twenty-three statements were finally accepted as guidelines, and the majority of these were obtained from descriptive studies with lower evidence levels. A number of statements had to be created by consensus (the lowest evidence level), as evidence levels remain low for many specific areas in this field.

Effective healing of endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcers by a single week of proton pump inhibitor treatment: a retrospective study

Background

Although artificial ulcers generally heal faster than Helicobacter pylori-related or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related peptic ulcers, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced gastric ulcers are usually treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 4–8 weeks. The effect of oral administration of a PPI for 1 week on ESD-induced gastric ulcers has not yet been evaluated. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of oral PPI for 1 week in patients with ESD-induced ulcers.

Methods

We selected 45 patients who underwent ESD for gastric mucosal tumors between June 2005 and July 2006 at Toyama University Hospital, and who met our inclusion criteria. All patients received omeprazole intravenously for 2 days after ESD and then orally for 1 week to prevent bleeding. Twenty two patients received no further omeprazole therapy (1-week group) and the rest received omeprazole orally for 7 more weeks (8-week group). Follow-up endoscopy was performed at 1 day, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after ESD. We compared the ulcer healing rates between both groups.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups in the ulcer-healing rate, because ulcers healed in 22 (96%) and 20 (91%) patients from the 8-week and 1-week groups, respectively.

Conclusions

In our study, oral administration of omeprazole for 1 week was sufficient to achieve healing of ESD-induced artificial gastric ulcers. A larger prospective trial will be required to confirm these findings.

Second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms

Routine second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy of second-look endoscopy for gastric ESD. PubMed, the Cochrane library, and the Igaku-chuo-zasshi database were searched in order to identify randomized trials eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Data were combined to calculate a pooled odds ratio (OR) for developing post-ESD bleeding. The database search yielded three randomized trials (854 patients). Compared with second-look endoscopy, the pooled OR for post-ESD bleeding without second-look endoscopy was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.26, P = 0.228), without significant heterogeneity. There were no significant differences between second-look endoscopy and no second-look endoscopy with regard to large tumor size (>20 mm). This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that second-look endoscopy had no advantage for the prevention of post-ESD bleeding in patients without a high risk of bleeding.

Transcatheter arterial embolization for uncontrolled bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection of the stomach

Bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an important complication. Here, we report a case of early gastric cancer in which endoscopic hemostasis during ESD failed, hemostasis by transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was performed, and ESD was subsequently completed. ESD was scheduled for an 89-year-old male with a type IIa + IIc lesion located on the anterior wall of the gastric antrum. During ESD, bleeding started and then increased. Hemoclips were used but the bleeding could not be controlled. ESD could not be continued because of a poor field of vision. We decided on TAE for hemostasis of the bleeding. Celiac angiography clearly showed extravasation in a branch of the right gastric artery. TAE with a microcoil and gelfoam was performed through the right gastric artery. ESD was started again directly after TAE. We were able to completely resect the lesion with a good field of vision. No complications occurred after therapy. He was alive without recurrence at 18 months after ESD. Thus, TAE is suggested to be a useful hemostatic method during ESD.

The need for second-look endoscopy to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a prospective randomized trial

Background/Aims

Many authors recommend performing a second-look endoscopy (SLE) to reduce the frequency of delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms, but these recommendations have been made despite a lack of reliable evidence supporting the effectiveness of SLE.

Methods

From January 2012 to May 2013, we investigated 441 gastric neoplasms treated by ESD to assess the risk factors for delayed bleeding. Delayed bleeding occurred in four of these lesions within 1 postoperation day. Therefore, we enrolled the patients with the remaining 437 lesions to determine the utility of SLE performed on the morning of postoperative day 2. All lesions were randomly assigned to SLE (220 lesions) groups or non-SLE (217 lesions) groups.

Results

Delayed bleeding occurred in 18 lesions (4.1%). A large tumor size (>20 mm) was the only independent risk factor for delayed bleeding (p=0.007). The chance of delayed bleeding was not significantly different between the patients receiving a SLE (eight cases) and those patients not receiving a SLE (six cases, p=0.787). Furthermore, SLE for lesions with a large tumor size did not significantly decrease delayed bleeding (p=0.670).

Conclusions

SLE had little or no influence on the prevention of delayed bleeding, irrespective of the risk factors.

Preventing and controlling bleeding in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Although techniques and instruments for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have improved, bleeding is still the most common complication. Minimizing the occurrence of bleeding is important because blood can interfere with subsequent procedures. Generally, ESD-related bleeding can be divided into intraprocedural and postprocedural bleedings. Postprocedural bleeding can be further classified into early post-ESD bleeding which occurs within 48 hours after ESD and late post-ESD bleeding which occurs later than 48 hours after ESD. A basic principle for avoiding intraprocedural bleeding is to watch for vessels and coagulate them before cutting. Several countertraction devices have been designed to minimize intraprocedural bleeding. Methods for reducing postprocedural bleeding include administration of proton-pump inhibitors or prophylactic coagulation after ESD. Medical adhesive spray such as n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate is also an option for preventing postprocedural bleeding. Various endoscopic treatment modalities are used for both intraprocedural and postprocedural bleeding. However, hemoclipping is infrequently used during ESD because the clips interfere with subsequent resection. Bleeding that occurs as a result of ESD can usually be managed easily. Nonetheless, more effective ways to prevent bleeding, including reliable ESD techniques, must be developed.

Second-look endoscopy is not associated with better clinical outcomes after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial analyzed on an as-treated basis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of routine second-look endoscopy (SLE) to detect or prevent bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not yet been validated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether SLE affects clinical outcomes including bleeding and morbidity after gastric ESD.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, controlled study with consecutive data analyzed on an as-treated basis.

SETTING

A single, tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 182 patients.

INTERVENTION

Gastric ESD and SLE.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Incidence of and risk factors related to bleeding after ESD and outcomes by univariate or multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 182 patients enrolled, 74 and 81 patients were assigned to the SLE and no-SLE groups, respectively. Two groups were observed closely for 4 weeks. Bleeding occurred after ESD in 21 patients (13.5%). Hemoglobin loss (≥2.0 g/dL) was observed in 20 patients, and melena developed in 1 patient after ESD. However, only 1 patient needed a transfusion. Twelve patients (16.2%) in the SLE group and 9 in the no-SLE group (11.1%) experienced bleeding after ESD. The frequency of bleeding after ESD was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .66). There were no risk factors related to bleeding after ESD.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center analysis.

CONCLUSION

SLE is not routinely necessary because it does not affect clinical outcomes, including bleeding and morbidity after ESD. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

KCT0000146.).

Half-dose rabeprazole has an equal efficacy to standard-dose rabeprazole on endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers heal faster and recur less often than non-iatrogenic gastric ulcers, the optimal dosage and duration of proton pump inhibitor treatment for ESD-induced ulcers remain unclear.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of half-dose rabeprazole on endoscopic submucosal dissection-induced ulcer compared with standard dose rabeprazole.

METHODS

The study was a prospective randomized controlled double-blind trial at a single tertiary hospital. A total of 80 patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. Of these patients, 10 were not followed to completion. Final analysis included the remaining 70 patients. Rabeprazole 20 or 10 mg, depending on randomization, was given orally for 4 weeks after ESD.

RESULTS

Of the 70 patients, 45 (64 %) were men, and the median age was 65.2 ± 9.7 years. The mean ESD-induced ulcer area was 673 mm(2). No significant differences in ulcer area reduction ratio (p = 0.49) or ulcer-related symptoms (p = 0.91) were observed between the two groups at 4 weeks after ESD.

CONCLUSION

For ESD-induced ulcers, treatment with 10 mg of rabeprazole daily produces a similar outcome as 20 mg of rabeprazole with regard to healing efficacy and symptom resolution.

Role of antisecretory agents for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) causes artificial gastric ulcers and there is no consensus regarding the optimal perioperative management in terms of prevention of intra- or postoperative bleeding and promotion of healing. Traditionally, 8-week administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and mucosal protective agents were used in the same way as for peptic ulcer management. However, recent studies have revealed that prior use of PPI might reduce intraoperative bleeding or early-phase postoperative bleeding, and combination of histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), and second-look endoscopy might have a similar effect on postoperative bleeding to PPI. Additionally, the advantage of PPI over H2RA is not proven and the optimal duration of PPI may be shortened until 2 weeks when the deteriorating factors for ESD ulcer are excluded. Furthermore, mucosal protective agents may facilitate ulcer healing. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment protocol before and after ESD for both prevention of bleeding complication and promotion of ulcer healing, by using available antisecretory agents and mucosal protective agents.

Complications of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic resection is now a widely accepted treatment for early gastric cancer, having a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a relatively new endoscopic resection method developed in the mid-1990 s that facilitates en-bloc resection even in patients with large or ulcerative lesions difficult to resect using conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, compared to EMR, ESD requires a longer procedure time and a higher level of technical expertise, in addition to having a slightly greater risk of complications. Endoscopists must be aware of not only the risk factors for, and incidence of, complications, but also how to effectively treat such complications. Perforation and bleeding are the major complications associated with gastric ESD. The perforation and delayed bleeding rates have been reported to range from 1.2% to 5.2% and 0% to 15.6%, respectively, and can usually be managed with appropriate endoscopic treatment. Immediate bleeding during gastric ESD is quite common and controlling such bleeding, which is primarily achieved by carrying out electrocautery, plays a critical role in the successful completion of ESD.

Postprocedural combined treatment using the coagulation plus artery-selective clipping (2C) method for the prevention of delayed bleeding after ESD

BACKGROUND

The incidence of delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms is reported to be approximately 5 %. We examined whether postprocedural combined treatment using the coagulation plus artery-selective clipping (2C) method is a useful measure for preventing delayed bleeding after ESD.

METHODS

A total of 234 gastric epithelial neoplasms were treated from June 2007 to May 2012. Post-ESD coagulation (PEC) and clipping for part of the vessels was performed for 154 lesions from June 2007 to June 2010. A total of 80 lesions were treated using the 2C method from July 2010 to May 2012. During ESD, the locations of the arteries were recorded on a schematic diagram of the lesion. Arteries were defined as regions of arterial bleeding that required coagulation or apparent arteries in which preventive coagulation was performed. When ESD was completed, soft coagulation was performed for arteries in the resection area using hemostatic forceps, followed by arterial clipping for additional strength. Coagulation also was performed continuously for visible vessels in the resection area. This was a retrospective study. The incidence rates of delayed bleeding after ESD, as evidenced by hematemesis or melena, or the presence of anemia (decline in Hb >2 g/dl) that required emergency endoscopy were recorded.

RESULTS

Delayed bleeding occurred in 7 (4.5 %) of the 154 cases treated using PEC and in 1 (1.3 %) of the 80 cases treated using the 2C method. The mean time required for the 2C method was 15.0 ± 7.0 min (range, 5-44 min). The mean number of clippings per lesion was 3.8 ± 2.8 (range, 0-13). Almost all clips fell off within 2 months of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Coagulation plus artery-selective clipping (the 2C method) of post-ESD ulcers might effectively reduce the incidence of delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric neoplasms.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection--current success and future directions

More than 10 years have passed since endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was first developed in Japan. ESD enables en bloc complete resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms regardless of the size and location of the lesions. With improvements in techniques and devices, excellent therapeutic results have been achieved despite the inherent technical difficulties of this procedure. ESD aiming for curative treatment can be performed for gastrointestinal neoplasms without risk of lymph node metastasis. Accurate histopathologic examination of the resected specimen is required to determine the risk of lymph node metastasis, for which en bloc resection is beneficial. Owing to the high success rate of en bloc complete resection and accurate histopathologic examination, tumour recurrence rates after ESD are reported to be very low in Japan. Excellent results of ESD in a large number of cases have also been reported from other Asian countries such as South Korea, Taiwan and China. Although scepticism exists among Western clinicians regarding the application of ESD, it is developing slowly and reports indicate promising results in some European countries. With further development of technologies, such as endoscopic robotics, ESD could become the worldwide treatment of choice for early gastrointestinal neoplasms.