Bleeding risk with clopidogrel and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Risk factors for postoperative bleeding and early death in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Comprehensive reports on the risk factors for bleeding and early death after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) are limited. In this multicenter study, we retrospectively investigated the risk factors for bleeding and early death after PEG.

METHODS

Patients (n = 1234) who underwent PEG between 2015 and 2020 at Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University and its affiliated hospitals (11 institutions in total) were evaluated for postoperative bleeding and early death (within 60 days) after PEG according to patient characteristics, construction method, medical history, medications, preoperative hematological findings, and perioperative adverse events. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of bleeding and early death after PEG.

RESULTS

The risk factors for bleeding after PEG were PEG tube insertion using the modified introducer method (odds ratio [OR], 4.37; P = 0.0003), low platelet count (OR, 0.99; P = 0.014), antiplatelet therapy (OR, 2.11; P = 0.036), and heparinization (OR, 4.50; P = 0.007). Risk factors for early death were low body mass index (BMI) (OR, 0.89; P = 0.015), low serum albumin levels (OR, 0.50; P = 0.035), and comorbidity of active cancer (OR, 4.03; P < 0.0001). There was no significant association between bleeding and early death after PEG.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several risk factors for bleeding and early death after PEG. Risk factors for bleeding were PEG tube insertion using the modified introducer method, low platelet count, antiplatelet therapy, and heparinization. Risk factors for early death were low BMI, low serum albumin levels, and comorbidity of active cancer.

An overview of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in the intensive care unit

Critically ill patients are at increased risk for malnutrition as they often have underlying acute and chronic illness, stress related catabolism, decreased appetite, trauma and ongoing inflammation. Malnutrition is recognized as a leading cause of adverse outcomes, higher mortality, and increased hospital costs. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes provide a safe and effective route to provide supplemental enteral nutrition to these patients. PEG placement has essentially replaced surgical gastrostomy as the modality of choice for longer term feeding in patients. This is a highly prevalent procedure with 160,000 to 200,000 PEG procedures performed each year in the United States. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current knowledge and practice standards with regards to placement of PEG tube in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). When a patient is considered for a PEG tube, it is important to evaluate the treatment alternatives and identify the best option for each patient. In this review, we provide the advantages and disadvantages of various feeding modalities and devices. We review the indications and contraindications for PEG tube placement as well as the risks of this procedure. We then describe in detail the per-oral pull, per-oral push, and direct percutaneous techniques for PEG tube placement. Additionally, we review the feasibility of having interventional pulmonologists place PEG tubes in the ICU.

Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients on Antiplatelet Therapy

Background: Guidelines recommend the discontinuation of clopidogrel prior to gastrostomy tube placement. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and feasibility of performing radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube placement in patients taking clopidogrel and/or aspirin. Methods: We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of the medical records for 237 consecutive patients following RIG tube placement secondary to dysphagia from August 2017 to January 2019. Antiplatelet medications and RIG type placement techniques (push vs pull) were compared with bleeding complications. Complications were categorized based on the Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. Of the 237 patients with RIG tubes placed, 77 patients were on antiplatelet therapy: 55 on single antiplatelet therapy and 22 on dual antiplatelet therapy. Of the 55 patients on single antiplatelet therapy, 26 were taking clopidogrel and 29 were taking aspirin. Results: A total of 9 bleeding complications were observed. The most common complication was minimal bleeding or hematoma around the incision site (n=7). No statistically significant increase was seen in bleeding rates when comparing patients on any antiplatelet therapy regimen vs none (P=0.15), single antiplatelet therapy vs none (P=0.13), clopidogrel vs none (P=0.71), or dual antiplatelet therapy vs none (P=0.61). No significant increase in the bleeding complication rate was noted when comparing the aspirin-only regimen vs clopidogrel alone (P=0.34). Conclusion: These findings suggest that the risk of bleeding complications is not increased in patients taking clopidogrel and/or aspirin prior to RIG tube placement.

Relationship of early acute complications and insertion site in push method percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which is frequently used for nutrition management in patients having difficulty with oral intake, is considered a safe procedure. However, serious complications may occur depending on site of the puncture. This study aimed to clarify whether push method PEG construction at the posterior wall (PW) of the greater curvature (GC) had a higher risk of complications. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between puncture site at the PW of the GC and early acute complications in 540 patients receiving PEG. Early acute complications were defined as bleeding or perforation within 30 days after the PEG procedure. PEG-related complications were observed in 80 patients in total, with early acute complications detected in 42 patients. PEG construction at the PW of the GC in 12 cases exhibited a significantly higher occurrence of early acute complications versus PEG at other sites (41.7% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.001). Further, multivariate analysis revealed PW at the GC to be independently associated with early acute complications (OR 9.59, 95% CI 2.82-32.61; p = 0.0003). It may be desirable to avoid PEG at the PW of the GC. If performed, clinicians should pay careful attention to early acute complications.