1
|
Sethi G, Rath P, Chauhan A, Ranjan A, Choudhary R, Ramniwas S, Sak K, Aggarwal D, Rani I, Tuli HS. Apoptotic Mechanisms of Quercetin in Liver Cancer: Recent Trends and Advancements. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:712. [PMID: 36840034 PMCID: PMC9960374 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to rising incidence rates of liver cancer and worries about the toxicity of current chemotherapeutic medicines, the hunt for further alternative methods to treat this malignancy has escalated. Compared to chemotherapy, quercetin, a flavonoid, is relatively less harmful to normal cells and is regarded as an excellent free-radical scavenger. Apoptotic cell death of cancer cells caused by quercetin has been demonstrated by many prior studies. It is present in many fruits, vegetables, and herbs. Quercetin targets apoptosis, by upregulating Bax, caspase-3, and p21 while downregulating Akt, PLK-1, cyclin-B1, cyclin-A, CDC-2, CDK-2, and Bcl-2. Additionally, it has been reported to increase STAT3 protein degradation in liver cancer cells while decreasing STAT3 activation. Quercetin has a potential future in chemoprevention, based on substantial research on its anticancer effects. The current review discusses quercetin's mechanisms of action, nanodelivery strategies, and other potential cellular effects in liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautam Sethi
- Department of Pharmacology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117600, Singapore
| | - Prangya Rath
- Amity Institute of Environmental Sciences, Amity University, Noida 201303, India
| | - Abhishek Chauhan
- Amity Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Safety and Management, Amity University, Noida 201303, India
| | - Anuj Ranjan
- Academy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia
| | - Renuka Choudhary
- Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala 133207, India
| | - Seema Ramniwas
- University Centre for Research and Development, University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, India
| | | | - Diwakar Aggarwal
- Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala 133207, India
| | - Isha Rani
- Department of Biochemistry, Maharishi Markandeshwar College of Medical Sciences and Research (MMCMSR), Sadopur, Ambala 134007, India
| | - Hardeep Singh Tuli
- Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Engineering College, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala 133207, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Does stereotactic body radiation improve outcomes compared to conventional radiation for liver cancer patients? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:17-20. [PMID: 35510143 PMCID: PMC9058945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been a paradigm shift to SBRT without evidence that these high-dose ultra-low fractions result in improved outcomes. This prospective cohort compares the survival of patients treated with conventional versus SBRT treatments for liver tumours. The SBRT group received an average of 5 fractions, and the conventional group received an average of 17 fractions. 397 patients were included. Overall survival was higher for SBRT patients at the 2-year time point (42% vs 27% p = 0.01).
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Gong G, Wang Y, Liu C, Su Y, Wang L, Yang B, Yin Y. Comparative Evaluation of 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography and 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Delineate the Target of Primary Liver Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2021; 20:15330338211045499. [PMID: 34617855 PMCID: PMC8504652 DOI: 10.1177/15330338211045499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) in establishing the target of primary liver cancer in comparison with 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). Methods and Materials: A total of 23 patients with primary liver cancer who received radiotherapy were selected, and 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI simulations were conducted to obtain 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI simulation images. The 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI data were sorted into 10 and 8 respiratory phase bins, respectively. The liver and gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated in all images using programmed clinical workflows under tumor delineation guidelines. The internal organs at risk volumes (IRVs) and internal target volumes (ITVs) were the unions of all the phase livers and GTVs, respectively. Then, the artifacts, liver volume, GTV, and motion range in 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI were compared. Results: The mean GTV volume based on 4DMRI was 136.42 ± 231.27 cm3, which was 25.04 cm3 (15.5%) less than that of 4DCT (161.46 ± 280.29 cm3). The average volume of ITV determined by 4DMRI was 166.12 ± 270.43 cm3, which was 22.44 cm3 (11.9%) less than that determined by 4DCT (188.56 ± 307.57 cm3). Liver volume and IRV in 4DMRI increased by 4.0% and 6.6%, respectively, compared with 4DCT. The difference in tumor motion by T2w-4DMRI based on the centroid was greater than that of 4DCT in the L/R, A/P, and S/I directions, and the average displacement differences were 2.6, 2.8, and 6.9 mm, respectively. The severe artifacts in 4DCT were 47.8% (11/23) greater than in 4DMRI 17.4% (4/23). Conclusions: Compared with 4DCT, T2-weighted and navigator-triggered 4DMRI produces fewer artifacts and larger motion differences in hepatic intrafraction tumors, which is a feasible technique for primary liver cancer treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukai Chen
- East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guanzhong Gong
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yinxing Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Chenlu Liu
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Ya Su
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Lizhen Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Bo Yang
- East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yong Yin
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Taylor PA, Alvarez PE, Mehrens H, Followill DS. Failure Modes in IROC Photon Liver Phantom Irradiations. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:e322-e328. [PMID: 33271351 PMCID: PMC8102375 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to analyze and classify the patterns of failure for irradiations of the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core photon liver phantom. METHODS AND MATERIALS Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core's anthropomorphic liver phantom simulates multitarget liver disease with respiratory motion. Two hundred forty-nine liver phantom results from 2013 to 2019 were analyzed. Phantom irradiations that failed were categorized by the error attributed to the failure. Phantom results were also compared by demographic data, such as machine type, treatment planning system, motion management technique, number of isocenters, and whether the phantom was a first time or repeat irradiation. RESULTS The failure rate for the liver phantom was 27%. From the 68 irradiations that did not pass, 5 failure modes were identified. The most common failure mode was localization errors in the direction of motion, with over 50% of failures attributed to this mode. The second-most common failure mode was systematic dose errors. The internal target volume technique performed worse than other motion management techniques. Failure modes were different by the number of isocenters used, with multi-isocenter irradiations having more failure modes in a single phantom irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Motion management techniques and proper alignment of moving targets play a large role in the successful irradiation of the liver phantom. These errors should be examined to ensure accurate patient treatment for liver disease or other sites where multiple moving targets are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paige A Taylor
- IROC Houston Quality Assurance Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paola E Alvarez
- IROC Houston Quality Assurance Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Hunter Mehrens
- IROC Houston Quality Assurance Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David S Followill
- IROC Houston Quality Assurance Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The early evaluation of ultrasound-guided iodine-125 interstitial implants for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma. Brachytherapy 2020; 18:733-739. [PMID: 31515049 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided iodine-125 interstitial implants for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS From October, 2016, to August, 2018, 49 patients suffering from a total of 66 hepatocellular carcinoma lesions were treated with ultrasound-guided iodine-125 interstitial implantation. Treatment planning system was applied to make preoperative plan. The response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were used to evaluate the curative effect. The evaluated outcomes included postoperative complications and complete disease control rate, 6-month disease-free survival, and 6-month overall survival. RESULTS All 49 patients underwent iodine-125 seed implantation successfully. Patients were followed up for 5 to 27.5 months. No patients developed serious complications and only 2 (4.1%) patients had slight pain. The complete response was seen in 21 lesions (31.8%), partial response in 26 lesions (39.4%), stable disease in eight lesions (12.1%), and progressive disease in 11 lesions (16.7%). The overall disease control rate was reached to 83.3%. The 6-month disease-free survival rate was 46.4% with a median disease-free survival time of 5.0 months. The 6-month overall survival rate was 83.6% with a median overall survival time of 15.0 months. CONCLUSIONS Iodine-125 interstitial implantation is a kind of safe and feasible treatment for high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson R, Cheung P, Chu W, Myrehaug S, Poon I, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Tseng CL, Wong S, Ung Y, Beatriz Kinupe Abrahão A, Erler D, Zhang L, Ko YJ, Chung HT. Outcomes of extra-cranial stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: Dose and site of metastases matter. Radiother Oncol 2020; 142:236-245. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
7
|
Bae SH, Park HC, Yoon WS, Yoon SM, Jung IH, Lee IJ, Kim JW, Seong J, Kim TH, Nam TK, Choi Y, Lee SY, Jang HS, Lee DS, Kim JH. Treatment Outcome after Fractionated Conformal Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh Classification B in Korea (KROG 16-05). Cancer Res Treat 2019; 51:1589-1599. [PMID: 30971065 PMCID: PMC6790850 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2018.687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is limited data on radiotherapy (RT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with Child-Pugh classification B (CP-B). This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of fractionated conformal RT in HCC patients with CP-B. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed the data of HCC patients with CP-B treated with RT between 2009 and 2014 at 13 institutions in Korea. HCC was diagnosed by the Korea guideline of 2009, and modern RT techniques were applied. Fraction size was ≤ 5 Gy and the biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 40 Gy10 (α/β = 10 Gy). A total of 184 patients were included in this study. Results Initial CP score was seven in 62.0% of patients, eight in 31.0%, and nine in 7.0%. Portal vein tumor thrombosis was present in 66.3% of patients. The BED ranged from 40.4 to 89.6 Gy10 (median, 56.0 Gy10). After RT completion, 48.4% of patients underwent additional treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months. The local progression-free survival and OS rates at 1 year were 58.9% and 39.8%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, non-classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) (p < 0.001) and additional treatment (p < 0.001) were the most significant prognostic factors of OS. Among 132 evaluable patients without progressive disease, 19.7% experienced non-classic RILD. Normal liver volume was the most predictive dosimetric parameter of non-classic RILD. Conclusion Fractionated conformal RT showed favorable OS with a moderate risk non-classic RILD. The individual radiotherapy for CP-B could be cautiously applied weighing the survival benefits and the RILD risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Hyun Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
| | - Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Hye Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Won Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Liver Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Taek-Keun Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Youngmin Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Sun Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Hong Seok Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Soo Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Jin Hee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lin YL. Proton beam therapy in apneic oxygenation treatment of an unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and review of literature. World J Hepatol 2018; 10:772-779. [PMID: 30386470 PMCID: PMC6206151 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i10.772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Presented here is the clinical course of a 63-year-old patient with a central, large and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver metastases and tumor invasion of the portal and hepatic veins. After the tumor had been diagnosed, the patient was immediately treated with proton beam therapy (PBT), at a total dose of 60 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 20 fractions administered within 4 wk. To manage the respiratory movements, at the Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, apneic oxygenation was given daily, under general anesthesia. The patient tolerated both the PBT and general anesthesia very well, and did now show any signs of acute or late toxicity. The treatment was followed by constant reductions in the tumor marker alpha-fetoprotein and the cholestatic parameters gamma-glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase. The patient commenced an adjuvant treatment with sorafenib, given at 6-wk intervals, after the PBT. Follow-up with regular magnetic resonance imaging has continued for 40 mo so far, demonstrating remarkable shrinkage of the HCC (maximal diameter dropping from approximately 13 cm to 2 cm). To date, the patient remains free of tumor recurrence. PBT served as a safe and effective treatment method for an unresectable HCC with vascular invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Lan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, Munich 81371, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mast M, Kouwenhoven E, Roos J, van Geen S, van Egmond J, van Santvoort J, de Boer L, Florijn M, Kalidien Y, Nobel N, Rovers L, van der Togt W, de Vet S, van der Voort van Zyp N, Wenmakers F, van Wingerden J, Ceha H. Two years' experience with inspiration breath-hold in liver SBRT. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2018; 7:1-5. [PMID: 32095574 PMCID: PMC7033777 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2018.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 03/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The workflow of inspiration breath-hold SBRT for liver metastases is described. Inspiration breath-hold in liver SBRT is feasible for 95% of the patients. An individual margin recipe for inspiration breath-hold liver SBRT is explained. Margin reduction of 10 mm using inspiration breath-hold compared to free breathing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mast
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - E Kouwenhoven
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - J Roos
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - S van Geen
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Egmond
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Santvoort
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - L de Boer
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - M Florijn
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Kalidien
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - N Nobel
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - L Rovers
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - W van der Togt
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - S de Vet
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - N van der Voort van Zyp
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - F Wenmakers
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Wingerden
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - H Ceha
- Radiation Therapy Department, Haaglanden Medical Center, Burg Banninglaan 1, 2262 BA Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|