Successful Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism during Adult Liver Transplantation

The applications of ECMO in liver transplant recipients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a vital instrument for sustaining respiratory and cardiac functions when traditional methods have failed. Its function in managing acute pulmonary and cardiac challenges during liver transplantation (LT) has expanded significantly. While ECMO was initially viewed as a rescue strategy for acute intraoperative or posttransplant complications, its application now also encompasses the pretransplant stage of LT. Our review aims to thoroughly summarize both research and specific cases where ECMO has been utilized across pre- and perioperative phases in liver transplant recipients. By assessing the published literature, we discuss specific indications, the types of ECMO employed, their outcomes, and the unique challenges of applying ECMO during LT. In particular, the pretransplant use of ECMO is increasing, and its prudent introduction prior to LT, supported by meticulous planning, has the potential to optimize patient outcomes. It is challenging to manage liver transplant patients on ECMO. More research and experience are needed to refine the techniques and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, decision-making must be tailored to each patient's unique circumstances, and a clear, practical, and well-defined plan for subsequent steps is essential.

Applications and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Life Support Use in Adult Liver Transplantation: A Case Series and Review of Literature

The use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is increasingly reported in adult liver transplantation (LT). However, neither the role of ECLS in the perioperative setting for LT nor its outcomes has been well defined. We performed a retrospective chart review of all adult LT patients at our institution who received ECLS from 2004 to 2021. We also conducted a comprehensive literature search for adult LT cases that involved perioperative ECLS for respiratory or cardiac failure. Over the study period, 11 LT patients required ECLS at our institution, two for respiratory and nine for cardiac failure. Both patients with respiratory failure received ECLS as a bridge to LT and survived to discharge. Nine patients required ECLS for acute cardiac failure either intraoperatively or postoperatively, and two survived to discharge. In the literature, we identified 35 cases of respiratory failure in LT patients requiring perioperative ECLS. Applications included preoperative bridge to LT (n = 6) and postoperative rescue (n = 29), for which overall survival was 44%. We identified 31 cases of cardiac failure in LT patients requiring either ECLS or cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac support or rescue for intraoperative or postoperative cardiac failure (n = 30). There is evidence for consideration of ECLS as a bridge to LT in patients with potentially reversible respiratory failure or as rescue therapy for respiratory failure in posttransplant patients. ECLS has a prohibitively high risk of futility in pretransplant patients with cardiac failure but may have a role in LT patients with a functioning graft and potentially reversible cardiac failure.