1
|
Nakla T, Chow JJ, Pham K, Abi-Jaoudeh N. Non-Thermal Liver Ablation: Existing and New Technology. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023; 40:497-504. [PMID: 38274216 PMCID: PMC10807968 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Cancer has and continues to be a complex health crisis plaguing millions around the world. Alcohol ablation was one of the initial methods used for the treatment of liver lesions. It was surpassed by thermal ablation which has played a big role in the therapeutic arsenal for primary and metastatic liver tumors. However, thermal ablation has several shortcomings and limitations that prompted the development of alternative technologies including electroporation and histotripsy. Percutaneous alcohol injection in the liver lesion leads to dehydration and coagulative necrosis. This technology is limited to the lesion with relative sparing of the surrounding tissue, making it safe to use adjacent to sensitive structures. Electroporation utilizes short high-voltage pulses to permeabilize the cell membrane and can result in cell death dependent on the threshold reached. It can effectively target the tumor margins and has lower damage rates to surrounding structures due to the short pulse duration. Histotripsy is a novel technology, and although the first human trial was just completed, its results are encouraging, given the sharp demarcation of the targeted tissue, lack of thermal damage, and potential for immunomodulation of the tumor microenvironment. Herein, we discuss these techniques, their uses, and overall clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Nakla
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada
| | - Jacqueline J. Chow
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Kathleen Pham
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Papaefthymiou A, Johnson GJ, Maida M, Gkolfakis P, Ramai D, Facciorusso A, Arvanitakis M, Ney A, Fusai GK, Saftoiu A, Tabacelia D, Phillpotts S, Chapman MH, Webster GJ, Pereira SP. Performance and Safety of EUS Ablation Techniques for Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2627. [PMID: 37174092 PMCID: PMC10177078 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) represent an increasingly diagnosed condition with significant burden to patients' lives and medical resources. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) ablation techniques have been utilized to treat focal pancreatic lesions. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of EUS ablation on PCL in terms of complete or partial response and safety. METHODS A systematic search in Medline, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed in April 2023 for studies assessing the performance of the various EUS ablation techniques. The primary outcome was complete cyst resolution, defined as cyst disappearance in follow-up imaging. Secondary outcomes included partial resolution (reduction in PCL size), and adverse events rate. A subgroup analysis was planned to evaluate the impact of the available ablation techniques (ethanol, ethanol/paclitaxel, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and lauromacrogol) on the results. Meta-analyses using a random effects model were conducted and the results were reported as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS Fifteen studies (840 patients) were eligible for analysis. Complete cyst resolution after EUS ablation was achieved in 44% of cases (95%CI: 31-57; 352/767; I2 = 93.7%), and the respective partial response rate was 30% (95%CI: 20-39; 206/767; I2 = 86.1%). Adverse events were recorded in 14% (95%CI: 8-20; 164/840; I2 = 87.2%) of cases, rated as mild in 10% (95%CI: 5-15; 128/840; I2 = 86.7%), and severe in 4% (95%CI: 3-5; 36/840; I2 = 0%). The subgroup analysis for the primary outcome revealed rates of 70% (95%CI: 64-76; I2 = 42.3%) for ethanol/paclitaxel, 44% (95%CI: 33-54; I2= 0%) for lauromacrogol, 32% (95%CI: 27-36; I2 = 88.4%) for ethanol, and 13% (95%CI: 4-22; I2 = 95.8%) for RFA. Considering adverse events, the ethanol-based subgroup rated the highest percentage (16%; 95%CI: 13-20; I2 = 91.0%). CONCLUSION EUS ablation of pancreatic cysts provides acceptable rates of complete resolution and a low incidence of severe adverse events, with chemoablative agents yielding higher performance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.P.); (G.J.J.); (S.P.); (M.H.C.); (G.J.W.)
| | - Gavin J. Johnson
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.P.); (G.J.J.); (S.P.); (M.H.C.); (G.J.W.)
| | - Marcello Maida
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, S. Elia-Raimondi Hospital, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy;
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Nea Ionia “Konstantopoulio-Patision”, 14233 Athens, Greece;
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA;
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 37920 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Alexander Ney
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK;
| | - Giuseppe K. Fusai
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2QG, UK;
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 4192910 Bucharest, Romania; (A.S.); (D.T.)
| | - Daniela Tabacelia
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, 4192910 Bucharest, Romania; (A.S.); (D.T.)
| | - Simon Phillpotts
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.P.); (G.J.J.); (S.P.); (M.H.C.); (G.J.W.)
| | - Michael H. Chapman
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.P.); (G.J.J.); (S.P.); (M.H.C.); (G.J.W.)
| | - George J. Webster
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.P.); (G.J.J.); (S.P.); (M.H.C.); (G.J.W.)
| | - Stephen P. Pereira
- Pancreaticobiliary Medicine Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.P.); (G.J.J.); (S.P.); (M.H.C.); (G.J.W.)
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK;
| |
Collapse
|