What is the best way to manage screening for infections and vaccination of inflammatory bowel disease patients?

Delayed Initiation of Rescue Therapy Associated with Increased Length of Stay in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Reducing hospitalization length of stay (LOS) for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) will reduce healthcare costs, mitigate hospitalization-associated risks (e.g., venous thromboembolism), and improve quality of life.

METHODS

A chart review was performed of all adult ASUC-related hospitalizations at University of California, San Francisco, from July 1, 2014, to December 31, 2017. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with LOS < 7 days versus ≥ 7 days. A subgroup analysis was performed excluding patients who underwent colectomy during hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 95 ASUC-related hospitalizations were identified. The initial univariable analysis identified the following factors associated with LOS ≥ 7 days (P < 0.05): higher maximum heart rate in the first 24 h, higher C-reactive protein, being biologic therapy naïve, and a later hospital day of biologic therapy initiation. On mixed model multivariable analysis, later hospital day of biologic initiation was associated with increased LOS ≥ 7 days (OR 3.1 95% CI 1.2-7.56, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified multiple predictors for longer hospital LOS, including factors related to disease severity (non-modifiable) and treatment (potentially modifiable). Importantly, this study identified biologic naïve treatment status and delayed inpatient biologic therapy initiation as predictors of longer LOS (≥ 7 days) in patients who did not ultimately require colectomy during their hospital stay. Potentially modifiable strategies to reduce LOS may include early communication and patient education about biologic therapy in both the inpatient and outpatient setting.

Thiopurine Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Focus on Metabolism and Pharmacogenetics

Thiopurines have been widely used for the maintenance of remission or steroid sparing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, potential drug-related adverse events frequently interfere with their use. Indeed, drug withdrawals associated with adverse reactions have been reported in approximately 25% of patients. To balance the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of thiopurines, regular monitoring of biomarkers (complete blood cell count, liver function test, and metabolic profiles), steady dose escalation, and pretreatment thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotype screening have been routinely recommended. However, the complex thiopurine metabolic pathway and individual differences attributed to pharmacogenetic diversity limit the effectiveness of these strategies in the optimization of thiopurine therapy. Recently, in an effort to facilitate more accurate and personalized prediction of thiopurine response or toxicity, novel genetic markers including NUDT15 and FTO genes were discovered. These discoveries are remarkable because TPMT screening has minimal efficacy for predicting myelosuppression especially in Asian populations, despite the fact that thee populations have a higher frequency of myelosuppression than Western populations. This review focuses on the current understanding of the metabolic pathway and the pharmacogenetics of thiopurines and suggests a personalized preventive strategy against potential adverse drug reactions to optimize their therapeutic application.

Improving immunization strategies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are susceptible to varieties of opportunistic infections due to immunological changes in the setting of their disease and drug-induced immunosuppression. Even though numerous infections can be prevented by vaccine, vaccination in IBD patients is inadequate. Data showed only 9% were vaccinated against pneumococcal infection and 28% described commonly receiving influenza vaccine. This review article discusses the recent immunizations against influenza virus; pneumococcal infection; human papilloma virus; tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis; measles, mumps and rubella; varicella zoster; and herpes zoster for individuals diagnosed with IBD and those patients with drug-related immunosuppression. In addition, this review discusses concerns about IBD patients planning to travel abroad. Immunization status and screening for opportunistic infection need to be addressed in IBD patients at the time of diagnosis and they should be vaccinated accordingly. Generally, standard vaccination strategies should be pursued in IBD patients, although live vaccines should be avoided while they are not immunocompetent.

Specific changes of enteric mycobiota and virome in inflammatory bowel disease

One of the important features of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is dysbiosis of the gut microbiota. It has been well documented that changes in the commensal bacterial population are involved in IBD development. However, the function of the fungal and viral communities in IBD remains unclear. Moreover, the optimal treatment for IBD patients with opportunistic infections is still undecided. This review focused on how the enteric mycobiota and virome changes during the pathogenesis of IBD and discussed potential treatment strategies that open new insights into the managements of IBD.

Screening, prophylaxis and counselling before the start of biological therapies: A practical approach focused on IBD patients

The standard of care in the management of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions relies on immunomodulators, glucocorticoids, and biologicals (including anti-tumour necrosis factor -α and other monoclonal antibodies). These agents have an overall favourable benefit/risk ratio; however, they modulate the immune response as part of their mechanisms of action, and therefore they may increase the risk of developing infections, particularly in older patients or in patients with concomitant corticosteroids. Some of these infections may be preventable by immunization, chemoprophylaxis or counselling.

AIM

screening for and monitoring infections throughout these therapies is so mandatory to ensure patients' safety. Still, standardized guidelines focused on these procedures have yet to be established. This review aims to fill such a gap. The authors searched for articles published in English from 2009 until 2017 using PUBMED, with the terms "immunomodulators", "biological drugs", "anti-TNF α", "inflammatory bowel diseases", "immunomediated inflammatory diseases", "risk of infection", "infection prevention", "screening", "immunization", "tuberculosis", "latent tuberculosis", "listeriosis", "endemic mycosis", "Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia", "granulomatous infection", "varicella", "herpes virus", "hepatitis B", "hepatitis A", "hepatitis C" and identified the journal articles. Based on the literature and in their own experience the authors established recommendations and a practical guide for infections' screening, monitoring and prevention before and during immunomodulatory and biological therapies.

Asymptomatic acute hepatitis E in a female patient with ulcerative colitis

We present a 60-year-old female patient with asymptomatic acute hepatitis E that was fortuitously detected during the course of ulcerative colitis (UC). She was admitted to hospital on October 30, 2015. Endoscopy and histological examination of the colon showed typical findings of UC. All parameters of liver function tests were normal on this date. Combination therapy with oral prednisolone and mesalazine was started and intravenous administration of infliximab once every 8 weeks was added later. Her symptoms gradually improved after these treatments, and she was discharged on February 7, 2016. In a periodic check-up on July 7, 2016, high levels of serum transaminases were detected in liver function tests. Although drug-induced liver injury was first suspected, anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) immunoglobulin A was positive. The genotype and subgenotype of this HEV are 3 and 3a, respectively, although the infectious route of the HEV was unclear. Within 2 weeks after the onset of acute liver injury, the HEV viremia disappeared and her liver function tests improved. Examination of serum anti-HEV immunoglobulin A should be added at the time of abnormal liver function tests in patients with UC receiving immunosuppressive and biological drugs.