Clinical and economic impact of infliximab one-hour infusion protocol in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A multicenter study

Direct transition from rapid-infusion originator to rapid-infusion biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in children with inflammatory bowel disease: A case series

PURPOSE

Biosimilar tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (b-TNFi) reduce healthcare costs and maintain equal efficacy when compared to their originator counterparts (o-TNFi). Current practice is to start patients on a slower standard infusion rate during the initial transition from an o-TNFi to a b-TNFi. There is a knowledge gap around switching from rapid originator infusion to rapid biosimilar infusion in the pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population.

SUMMARY

We present a case series of 8 pediatric patients with IBD who were switched from a rapid-infusion o-TNFi to a rapid-infusion b-TNFi from 2016 through 2022. Our primary interest was safety, which we evaluated based on the occurrence of infusion reactions or need for new premedications within the first 6 months of starting a b-TNFi. We also examined effectiveness through the incidence of IBD-related hospitalizations, TNFi failure, and need for co-medication or dose escalation over the same period. In our cohort, 4 patients had Crohn's disease and 4 had ulcerative colitis. All patients were switched to a biosimilar for nonmedical reasons. During the follow-up period, no patients had infusion reactions necessitating new premedications, serious adverse events, or medication nonresponse.

CONCLUSION

Patients who directly transitioned from a rapid-infusion o-TNFi to a rapid-infusion b-TNFi did not experience serious adverse events. Given the fiscal and patient experience advantages of rapid-rate infusions, larger studies are needed to consider a change in practice.

Rapid infusion of infliximab biosimilars and the incidence and severity of infusion-related reactions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Infliximab is an anti-tumour necrosis factor agent used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. While the use of infliximab is well established in the treatment of IBD, there are now four recently FDA-approved infliximab biosimilars that are increasingly used due to their cost-benefit for patients, institutions and payors. In addition, shortening the length of infliximab infusions from 120 min (standard infusion) to 60 min or less (rapid infusion) has been shown to safely provide further cost-benefit while also improving patient convenience. The safety of rapid infusions has been well-established for the infliximab reference product, however, there are limited data available regarding the safety of rapid infusions for infliximab biosimilars. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and severity of infusion reactions among patients with IBD receiving rapid infusion of infliximab reference product compared with infliximab biosimilar.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data of patients with a diagnosis of IBD receiving an infliximab reference product or infliximab biosimilar infusion between December 2020 and December 2021. Patient-level variables included demographics, immunomodulator use, IBD-related hospitalization and infliximab trough concentration and antibody levels. Infusion-related variables of interest included total number of infusions, drug, dose, dosing interval, infusion time and use of pre-medications. Infusion-related reactions were defined as safety concerns documented by the administering nurse (anaphylaxis, shortness of breath, hypotension, swelling, rash, pruritus, hives, flushing, chest pain, muscle pain, joint pain, fevers, chills, headache or hypertension) or administration of emergency medications. Fisher's exact test was used to compare reaction rates.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 188 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis, and a total of 1124 infusions were administered during the study period. There were no statistically significant differences among any of the pre-specified outcomes. There were no differences in the incidence of infusion reactions among rapid infusion (60 min) infliximab and infliximab biosimilars (p = 0.863). Additionally, there were no differences in the incidence of infusion reactions among standard infusion (120 min) infliximab and infliximab biosimilars (p = 0.993). Finally, there were no differences among the rate of infusion reactions between rapid infusion of infliximab biosimilars and standard infusion of infliximab biosimilars (p = 0.536). Eight patients experienced safety issues, with three patients requiring emergency medications (1.6% of 188 patients).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Rapid infusions of infliximab biosimilars were not associated with an increase in the incidence of infusion reactions compared with: rapid infusion of infliximab reference product, standard infusion of infliximab biosimilars, or standard infusion of infliximab reference product. This should reassure clinicians that rapid infusions of infliximab biosimilars are safe in clinical practice.

A quality improvement project reduces time spent at an inflammatory bowel disease infusion center with accelerated infliximab infusion protocol

Background and Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Rapid Infliximab Biosimilar Infusion in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OBJECTIVES

Compare prevalence of infusion reaction (IR) between infliximab (IFX) and infliximab biosimilar (IFX-abda) at standard and rapid rates and measure the impact on health care cost in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Records of subjects receiving IFX and IFX-abda were reviewed over a 21-month period. Demographics and IRs were recorded. Cost analysis utilized average wholesale pricing, infusion duration, nursing time, and infusion center throughput.

RESULTS

Fifty-six subjects received 498 infusions. Sixteen subjects received both IFX and IFX-abda. Thirteen IRs occurred for an overall prevalence of 2.6%. One outlier subject accounted for 8 of 13 (62%) of IRs. Data were analyzed with and without the outlier. Standard rate infusion of both IFX and IFX-abda was associated with increased risk of IR compared with rapid rate but only reached significance for IFX when calculated with the outlier removed. Risk of IR was not statistically significant between IFX and IFX-abda for both standard and rapid rates. IFX-abda saved an average of $2,611 per infusion. Rapid infusion saved 70 minutes of infusion time, 20 minutes of estimated nursing time per infusion, and decreased infusion center appointment length by as much as 2 hours per infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid IFX-abda appears safe without increased IRs and decreases cost.

Impact of rapid infliximab infusions on access at a large academic tertiary medical center

PURPOSE

Infliximab promotes remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatologic disease (RD). Rapid infliximab infusions (RI) reduce infusion time from 2 hours to 1 hour and can enhance access to care, as defined by capacity, safety, and patient characteristics. Our hypothesis for the study described here was that use of RI can enhance access for patients.

METHODS

Data on all patients receiving infliximab for IBD or RD at our outpatient infusion center from February 2016 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical information were collected.

RESULTS

Of 348 patients who received infliximab, 205 had IBD and 143 had RD. In terms of capacity, 40% of patients received RI, resulting in a 16.1% decrease in average daily infusion time and a 9.8% increase in average daily available scheduled infusion chair time (P = 0.720). In terms of safety, 4 patients switched back to standard infusions after RI, after 3 specifically had reactions to RI. In terms of patient characteristics, more patients with RD versus IBD received RI (P = 0.020). Among the patients with RD, a lower proportion receiving RI were female (P = 0.043). For the patients with IBD, a higher proportion receiving RI were white (P = 0.048). Among both patients with RD and patients with IBD, a higher proportion receiving RI had private insurance (P = 0.016 and P = 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

RI were safe and increased available chair time. Females with RD, patients of non-White race with IBD, and patients with public insurance were less likely to receive RI. Future directions include patient surveys and evaluation of implicit bias against patient factors that may impact access to RI.

Safety of Rapid Infliximab Infusions in Children: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess whether the incidence of infusion reactions (IR) increases after rapid (≤1 hour) infliximab (IFX) infusions, compared with standard (2-3 hour) infusions in children.

METHODS

Systematic review including studies describing the number of IR after rapid IFX infusion in children ages 0 to 18 years.

RESULTS

Four records were included (3 retrospective, n = 498, 347 standard infusions, 3703 rapid infusions). Reported incidences of IR ranged from 0% to 2% of infusions in standard groups (reported 95% confidence intervals [CIs] ranged from 0% to 7%) and from 0% to 2% of infusions in rapid groups (reported 95% CIs ranged from 0% to 12%). None of the studies included reported a significant difference in incidence of IR between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to conclude whether the rate of IR after rapid IFX increases. The consistent finding of no increase in IR in all studies and the low rate of observed IR suggests there is no significant difference in rate of IR.