Operative timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in a Japanese institute

Role of intraoperative indocyanine green roadmap as a safety measure in emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Acute cholecystitis is a growing pathology, with high surgical risk due to the related patients' comorbidity. The gold standard treatment is laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which, despite its high volume, still presents elevated rates of biliary tract injury. Standardization of the procedure and accurate identification of the anatomical structures of the biliary tree are the key in avoiding severe complications associated with this injury. Innovation in minimally invasive technologies, such as infrared indocyanine green as a radiotracer to delimit the biliary anatomy, could reduce the rate of biliary tract lesions. A single-center case-control study was conducted, including patients undergoing emergency surgery between November 2023 and November 2024 for acute cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 criteria). Eighty-seven patients were allocated into two groups: emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative indocyanine green cholangiography. The primary aim was to evaluate ICG's impact on reducing bile duct injury. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, and conversion rates. The mean operative time (93 min vs. 104.6 min, p = 0.087), ASA scale (p = 0.302) and Charlson comorbidity index (2.55 vs. 2.84; p = 0.58) were not significantly different when comparing both groups. The control group showed duplicated preoperative CRP values as compared to the ICG group (138.24 mg/l vs. 71.02 mg/l; p = 0.06), and a higher median hospital stay (5 days ± 3 vs. 3 days ± 1.75; p = 0.001). The control group showed a greater need for conversion to open surgery (14.3% vs. 0%; p = 0.015). Trends towards fewer bile duct injuries (0% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.208) and fewer complications (15.87% vs. 18.4%; p = 0.752) in the ICG group were not statistically significant. The use of ICG may reduce the need for conversion to open surgery and median hospital stay. However, its use has not been proven to reduce bile duct injury, postoperative complications, or operative time.

Outcomes of interval cholecystectomy after EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cholecystectomy (CCY) is considered the criterion standard intervention for acute cholecystitis (AC). However, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) can be performed in patients unfit for surgery. Interval CCY after EUS-GBD is typically not performed because the formation of a cholecystoenteric fistula increases the technical complexity of CCY. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the outcomes of interval CCY after EUS-GBD.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of multiple electronic databases for studies reporting on outcomes of interval CCY after EUS-GBD. Primary outcomes were pooled proportions of technical success of interval CCY and surgical techniques (rate of open, laparoscopic, and conversion from laparoscopic to open). The secondary outcome was adverse events (AEs). A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using the random-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Of 1001 citations, 15 studies with 707 patients were included. The pooled proportion of successful interval CCY was 32.9% (95% CI, 11.8-53.9%; I2 = 99%). Surgical techniques included laparoscopic CCY in 76.2% (95% CI, 61.5-91.0%; I2 = 82%), open CCY in 14.5% (95% CI, 4.2-24.8%; I2 = 82%), and conversion from laparoscopic to open CCY in 14% (95% CI, 4.1-23.8%; I2 = 77%). The pooled proportion of overall AEs was 13.2% (95% CI, 4.3-22.1%; I2 = 61%), including postoperative infection in 7.6% (95% CI, 0.7-14.6%; I2 = 65%). There was no procedure-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that interval CCY is technically feasible and safe after EUS-GBD. Endoscopists should still consider the local surgical expertise and recommendations before performing EUS-GBD in patients who could eventually become surgical candidates afterward.

Preoperative Waiting Time Affects the Length of Stay of Patients Treated via Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in an Acute Care Surgical Setting

Background/Objectives: Acute cholecystitis (AC) presents a significant burden in emergency surgical settings. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) is the standard of care for AC, yet its implementation varies. This study aims to assess the impact of preoperative waiting time (WT) on postoperative length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing urgent cholecystectomy. Methods: From June 2021 to September 2022, data on patients undergoing urgent cholecystectomy for AC or pancreatitis were collected from two university hospitals. Patients were categorized into early (ELC) or delayed (DLC) cholecystectomy groups based on WT. The primary outcome was the assessment of the variables influencing LOS via univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: This study included 170 patients, predominantly female, with a median age of 64.50 years. ELC was performed in 58.2% of cases, with a median WT of 0 days, while DLC was performed in 41.8%, with a median WT of 3 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 21.8% of cases, with LOS being significantly shorter in the ELC group (median 5 days vs. 9 days; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that WT (OR 8.08 (1.65-77.18; p = 0.033)) was the most important predictor of LOS. Conclusions: ELC is associated with a shorter LOS and with DLC, aligning with the WSES recommendations. Earlier surgery reduces the risk of complications and overall hospital costs. An extended WT contributes to a prolonged LOS, underscoring the importance of timely access to operating theaters for acute biliary pathologies.

Factors Influencing Bile Duct Injuries: A Dreaded Complication of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are dreaded complications of one of the most common general surgical procedures. The injury impacts the quality of life and may have several long-term complications. In some cases, it can also lead to mortality. This paper aims to review works that have already been published about bile duct injuries and elaborate on the factors leading to it. This includes elaborating on both surgical and non-surgical factors. It also plans to highlight practices and methods to avoid BDIs. Medical research databases were searched using cholecystectomy and bile duct injuries as keywords. Papers including pre-operative or intraoperative factors, that may cause bile duct injuries, were further shortlisted for this study. Understanding and knowledge of anatomy plays a key role in bile duct injuries and is essential before performing the surgery. Factors related to the patients, surgeons, and logistics also play a major role in causing bile duct injuries. Bile duct injuries can be reduced using certain strategies like the B SAFE strategy, R4U line, bail-out methods, imaging techniques along with referrals to Hepatobiliary specialist centers to avoid bile duct injuries.

The Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy during Minimally Invasive Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review

We conducted a systematic review to examine perioperative outcomes for adults undergoing minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with and without concurrent cholecystectomy (CCE). We reviewed the literature using OVID MEDLINE(R), Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and medRxiv and identified studies published between 1946 and May 2023. We identified a total of 2402 studies with 11 included in the final analysis (combined 149,356 patients). Studies suggested increased operative time associated with RYGB-CCE, with mixed results regarding length of stay and rates of bile duct injury. Presently available data is not robust enough to conclude whether minimally invasive RYGB with CCE harms or benefits patients compared to RYGB alone.

Is there a role for routine intraoperative cholangiogram in diagnosing CBD stones in patients with normal liver function tests? A prospective study

Objectives

Cholecystectomy with or without intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is an accepted treatment for cholelithiasis. Up to 11.6 % of cholecystectomies have incidental common bile duct (CBD) stones on IOC and 25.3 % of undiagnosed CBD stones will develop life-threatening complications. These will require additional intervention after primary cholecystectomy, further straining the healthcare system. We seek to examine the role of IOC in patients with normal LFTs by evaluating its predictive values, intending to treat undiagnosed CBD stones and therefore ameliorate these issues.

Methods

All patients who underwent cholecystectomies with normal LFTs from October 2019 to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled. IOC was done, ERCPs were performed for filling defects and documented as "true positive" if ERCP was congruent with the IOC. "False positives" were recorded if ERCP was negative. "True negative" was assigned to normal IOC and LFT after 2 weeks of follow-up. Those with abnormal LFTs were subjected to ERCP and documented as "false negative". Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.

Results

A total of 180 patients were analysed. IOC showed a specificity of 85.5 % and a NPV of 88.1 % with an AUC of 73.7 %. The positive predictive value and sensitivity were 56.5 and 61.9 % respectively.

Conclusions

Routine IOC is a specific diagnostic tool with good negative predictive value. It is useful to exclude the presence of CBD stones when LFT is normal. It does not significantly prolong the length of hospitalization or duration of the cholecystectomy hence reducing the incidence of undetected retained stones and preventing its complications effectively.

Operative timing and the safety of emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective analysis

The ideal operative timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains controversial, particularly in emergency patients. This study aimed to evaluate the necessity of operative timing for emergency LC. One hundred ninety-four patients who had undergone operative timings were classified into groups of <72h and >72h from the onset of symptoms to the operation. Baseline data, basic disease, operative bleeding, complications, and conversion rates were analyzed by Variance analysis and logistic regression analysis. The total morbidity of postoperative complication was 4.93% and 3.84% (P = .751) in the <72h and >72h groups respectively. The complication and conversion to LC were mainly influenced by age and gallbladder volume (odds ratio [OR] = 1.078, P = .013, and OR = 1.035, P = .031), but not by operative timing (P = .292). The intraoperative blood loss was closely correlated with the gallbladder volume (OR = 1.019, P = .025) by logit regression analysis, and correlation coefficient of R = 0.436, P < .01. Our results suggest that it is not necessary to confine the operative timing of LC to within 72h from the onset of symptoms, and gallbladder volume should be emphasized in the operative timing for emergency LC.

Optimal Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy After Conservative Therapy for Acute Cholecystitis

BACKGROUND/AIM

According to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018, the operation for acute cholecystitis is recommended to be performed as early as possible. However, there are cases in which early surgeries cannot be performed due to complications of patients or facility conditions, resulting in elective surgery. Hence, we retrospectively analyzed elective surgery cases in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were 345 patients who were underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 in this retrospective study. A total of 83 patients underwent LC more than 3 days after conservative treatment. The elective LC patients were divided into the Early group (4-90 days after onset, n=36) and the Delayed group [91 days or more (13 weeks or more) after onset, n=31], excluding 16 patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.

RESULTS

As for operative time, there was a significant difference between the Delayed and Early groups (91.2 vs. 117 minutes, p=0.0108). And also, there was a significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay, which was significantly shorter in the Delayed group than in the Early group (3.4 vs. 5.9 days, p=0.0436). Although there were no significant differences in either conversion rates or complication rates, both of these were decreasing in the Delayed group. In particular, there were no complications in the Delayed group.

CONCLUSION

When the conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis precedes and precludes urgent/early LC within 3 days, delaying LC for at least 91 days (13 weeks or more) after onset could reduce operative time and postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, there would be no complications after LC, and the rates of conversion during LC may be kept low.

Racial disparities in time to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Disparities in healthcare exist, yet few data are available on racial differences in time from admission to surgery. This study aimed to compare time from admission to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis from 2010 to 2020 were identified using NSQIP. Time to surgery and additional preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, 19.4% of Black patients experienced a time to surgery >1 day compared with 13.4% of White patients (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, controlling for potential confounding factors, Black patients were found to be more likely than White patients to experience a time to surgery >1 day (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.17-1.30, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Further investigation is indicated to better define the nature and significance of gender, race, and other biases in surgical care. Surgeons should be aware that biases may adversely impact patient care and should strive to identify and proactively address them to promote health equity in surgery.

Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study

Purpose

Uncertainty exists about whether early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is an appropriate surgical treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis. This study aimed to compare early vs. late LC for acute calculous cholecystitis regarding intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes.

Methods

This was a prospective randomized study carried out between December 2015 and June 2017; 60 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis were divided into two groups (early and delayed groups), each comprising 30 patients. Thirty patients treated with LC within 3 to 5 days of arrival at the hospital were assigned to the early group. The other 30 patients were placed in the delayed group, first treated conservatively, and followed by LC 3 to 6 weeks later.

Results

The conversion rates in both groups were 6.7% and 0%, respectively (p = 0.143). The operating time was 56.67 ± 11.70 minutes in the early group and 75.67 ± 20.52 minutes in the delayed group (p = 0.001), and both groups observed equal levels of postoperative complications. Early LC patients, on the other hand, required much fewer postoperative hospital stay (3.40 ± 1.99 vs. 6.27 ± 2.90 days, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Considering shorter operative time and hospital stay without significant increase of open conversion rates, early LC might have benefits over late LC.

Optimal Timing of Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed less than 72 hours from hospital admission for acute cholecystitis has shown to decrease hospital cost without an increase in length of stay (LOS). Very few studies have examined clinical and cost outcomes of performing cholecystectomy less than 24 hours from hospital admission. The aim of this study was to examine the cost and LOS of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed on an early (less than 24 hours from admission) and late (more than 24 hours from hospital admission) basis.

Methods

We performed a retrospective observational study of 569 patients at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA, who underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between January 1, 2018 and February 28, 2020. We evaluated preoperative/postoperative LOS, operative duration, hospital cost, and patient complications.

Results

468 patients underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis during our study period. Early cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours from admission) had an overall decreased LOS (43.6 hours versus 102.9 hours, p-value < 0.01) and decreased hospital cost ($23,736.70 versus $30,176.40, p-value < 0.01) compared to late cholecystectomy (more than 24 hours from admission). There was also a significantly higher rate of bile leak in patients who underwent surgery more than 24 hours from hospital admission compared to those who had surgery less than 24 hours from admission (5.9% versus 0.4%, p-value < 0.01). Additionally, those procedures performed greater than 24 hours from hospital admission were significantly more likely to be converted to an open procedure (6.9% versus 2.2%, p-value = 0.02). 

Conclusion

Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 24 hours of hospital admission for acute cholecystitis decreased hospital cost, LOS, and operative complications in our institution's patient population. Our data suggests that performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital admission would be beneficial from a patient and hospital standpoint.

An Unencumbered Acute Care Surgeon Improves Delivery of Emergent Surgical Care for Cholecystectomy Patients

Introduction:

Many patients utilize the Emergency Room (ER) for primary care, resulting in overburdened ERs, strained resources, and delays in care. To combat this, many centers have adopted a Trauma/Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service providing specialty surgeons whose primary work is the unencumbered surgical availability to emergency surgery patients. To evaluate our programs’ efficacy, we investigated cholecystectomies as a common urgent procedure representative of services provided. We hypothesized that the adoption of a TACS service would result in improved access to care as evidence by decreased ER visits prior to cholecystectomy, improved time to cholecystectomy, and decreased hospital length of stay (LOS).

Methods:

All patients that underwent urgent cholecystectomy from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 were reviewed. The unencumbered TACS surgeon was implemented on July 1, 2018. Prior ER visits involving biliary symptoms, time from admission to cholecystectomy, and hospital LOS were compared.

Results:

Of the 322 urgent cholecystectomies over the study period, 165 were performed prior and 157 following adoption of the TACS structure. The average number of ER visits for biliary symptoms prior to cholecystectomy decreased from 1.4 to 1.2 (p = 0.01). Time from admission to cholecystectomy was 28.3 hours and 27.3 hours respectively (p = 0.74). Average LOS decreased following the restructure (3.1 vs 2.5 days; p = 0.03).

Conclusion:

Implementation of an unencumbered TACS surgeon managing urgent surgical disease improves access to and delivery of surgical services for cholecystectomy patients in a safety net, level one trauma center. Further research is necessary to determine potential improvements in hospital cost and patient satisfaction.

Clinical implication of bactibilia in moderate to severe acute cholecystitis undergone cholecystostomy following cholecystectomy

There is little evidence of clinical outcome in using antibiotics during the perioperative phase of acute cholecystitis with bactibilia. The aim of current study is to examine the effect of bactibilia on patients with acute cholecystitis and their perioperative clinical outcome. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 128 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with moderate and severe grade. Patients who were positive for bactibilia were compared to bactibilia-negative group in following categories: morbidity, duration of antimicrobial agent use, in-hospital course, and readmission rate. There was no difference in morbidity when patients with bactibilia (n = 70) were compared to those without (n = 58) after cholecystectomy. The duration of antibiotics use and clinical course were also similar in both groups. In severe grade AC group (n = 18), patients used antibiotics and were hospitalized for a significantly longer period of time than those in the moderate grade AC group. The morbidity including surgical site infection, and readmission rates were not significantly different in moderate and severe grade AC groups. In moderate and severe AC groups, bactibilia itself did not predict more complication and worse clinical course. Antibiotics may be safely discontinued within few days after cholecystectomy irrespective of bactibilia when cholecystectomy is successful.

Port-sharing techniques for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and sleeve gastrectomy

In Japan, the number of bariatric surgeries performed has remained low. Thus, concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is still relatively uncommon, but is increasing. We developed new port-sharing techniques for LC and LSG, which we performed on 26 obese Japanese patients with gall bladder (GB) diseases, using the LSG trocar arrangement and one additional trocar. We performed LC first, and after exchanging a port for a liver retractor in the epigastrium, we then completed LSG. One patient with an anomalous extrahepatic bile duct required one additional port. The mean LC time was 55 min, and the transition to LSG just after LC was smooth in all the patients. One patient suffered postoperative intraperitoneal hemorrhage, which was managed conservatively. Concomitant LC with LSG using port-sharing techniques is feasible and safe for obese Japanese patients with GB diseases.

Failure to perform index cholecystectomy during acute cholecystitis results in significant morbidity for patients who present with recurrence

BACKGROUND

Although index cholecystectomy is considered the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis (AC), many hospital systems struggle to provide such a service. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of failure to perform index cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

Between June 2010 and December 2015, all patients presenting to one hospital with an initial attack of AC were enrolled into a prospective database. Patient's records were reviewed up until point of delayed cholecystectomy or for a minimum of 24 months after the initial presentation with AC. Recurrent AC was defined as early (<6 weeks from initial discharge) or late (>6 weeks from initial discharge).

RESULTS

In total 998 patients presented with AC, 409 (41%) of whom were discharged without index cholecystectomy. Eighty-three (20%) patients presented with AC recurrence (ACR). Compared to the first AC episode, patients were more likely to present with grade III AC and suffer significantly greater morbidity (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). A prior history of biliary disease was associated with ACR (p = 0.002). ACR occurred early in 48 (58%) patients and delayed in 35 (42%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty percent of patients discharged without cholecystectomy after their first attack of ACR will develop recurrence within the first two years. Half of ACR will occur within 6 weeks. Patients who present with ACR are more likely to develop more severe AC and are likely to suffer greater morbidity as compared to their first attack.

Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical effect of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) in elder acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on LC after PTGD in elder acute cholecystitis published from 1970 to July 2017. Two researchers selected RCTs, extracted data, and evaluated methodological quality independently, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. The chi-square test was used for heterogeneity analysis of RCTs included, and the funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 9 RCTs with 1000 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with the direct LC Group, the PTGD Group has significant better effect in operative duration (minutes) [standard mean difference (SMD) = -1.37, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -2.52 to -0.22, P = .02], the amount of intraoperative bleeding (mL) (SMD = -1.38, 95% CI: -2.11 to -0.65, P = .0002), conversion rate to laparotomy (%) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.31, P < .00001], postoperative complication morbidity (%) (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.51, P < .0001), and postoperative hospital stay (days) (SMD = -1.26, 95% CI: -1.94 to -0.59, P = .0003). The funnel plots were slightly asymmetric, which suggested the presence of publication bias.

CONCLUSION

The PTGD before scheduled LC can effectively not only shorten operative duration, intraoperative bleeding less, and postoperative hospital stay but also decrease the rate to laparotomy and postoperative complication morbidity in elder acute cholecystitis, and it is recommended to be regarded as the preferred therapy of the elder patients.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: comparison of results between early and late cholecystectomy

Introduction

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the gold standard in the treatment of symptomatic gallstones. The common opinion about treatment of acute cholecystitis is initially conservative treatment due to preventing complications of inflamation and following laparoscopic cholecystectomy after 6- 8 weeks. However with the increase of laparoscopic experience in recent years, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become more common.

Methods

We aimed to compare the outcomes of the patients to whom we applied early or late cholecystectomy after hospitalization from the emergency department with the diagnosis of AC between March 2012-2015.

Results

We retrospectively reviewed the files of totally 66 patients in whom we performed early cholecystectomy (within the first 24 hours) (n: 33) and to whom we firstly administered conservative therapy and performed late cholecystectomy (after 6 to 8 weeks) (n: 33) after hospitalization from the emergency department with the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The groups were made up of patients who had similar clinical and demographic characteristics. While there were no statistically significant differences between the durations of operation, the durations of hospitalization were longer in those who underwent early cholecystectomy. Moreover, more complications were seen in the patients who underwent early cholecystectomy although the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Early cholecystectomy is known to significantly reduce the costs in patients with acute cholecystitis. However, switching to open surgery as well as increase of complications in patients who admitted with severe inflammation attack and who have high comorbidity, caution should be exercised when selecting patients for early operation.

Propensity score-matching analysis of the efficacy of late cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Urgent cholecystectomy within 72 h from symptom onset is recommended. We assessed the feasibility of performing late cholecystectomy (4-7 days from symptom onset) for acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four patients with grades 1 and 2 cholecystitis, who underwent urgent cholecystectomy within 7 days from symptom onset between June 2011 and June 2015 were enrolled. One hundred thirteen patients underwent operation within 72 h from symptom onset (early operation group), and 51 underwent operation between 4 and 7 days (late operation group). Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were analyzed using propensity score-matching analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of conversion, intraoperative bleeding, and complications were comparable between the groups. After a one-to-two propensity score-matched analysis was performed, outcomes of the late operation group were not inferior to those of the early operation group.

CONCLUSION

Late cholecystectomy was acceptable for treating grades 1 and 2 acute cholecystitis.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been continued debate regarding the management of acute cholecystitis with either early or delayed LC. Nearly all studies have demonstrated that early LC has a significantly shorter total length of hospital stay compared with delayed LC. Although previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis have shown clinical outcomes to favour early surgery, clinical practice continues to vary significantly worldwide. In addition, there is much confusion in the optimal timing for early LC with definitions of early varying from 72 h to 7 days. There have been numerous case-control studies investigating the timing of LC in acute cholecystitis. The aim of this paper is to pool the results from all case-control studies to investigate outcomes including mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases was performed for case-control studies published between 1985-February 2015.

RESULTS

Results from 77 case-control studies showed statistically significant reductions in mortality, complications, bile duct leaks, bile duct injuries, wound infections, conversion rates, length of hospital stay and blood loss associated with early LC. Although LC within the 72-h window is optimal, patients operated after this window still benefit from early surgery compared to delayed surgery. The duration of symptoms in acute cholecystitis should not influence the surgeons' willingness to operate acutely.

CONCLUSIONS

Early LC is clearly superior to delayed LC in acute cholecystitis. The most recent evidence-based practice strongly suggests that early LC should be standard of care in the management of acute cholecystitis.

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is superior to delayed acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been continued debate regarding the management of acute cholecystitis with either early or delayed LC. Nearly all studies have demonstrated that early LC has a significantly shorter total length of hospital stay compared with delayed LC. Although previous randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis have shown clinical outcomes to favour early surgery, clinical practice continues to vary significantly worldwide. In addition, there is much confusion in the optimal timing for early LC with definitions of early varying from 72 h to 7 days. There have been numerous case-control studies investigating the timing of LC in acute cholecystitis. The aim of this paper is to pool the results from all case-control studies to investigate outcomes including mortality rates, complication rates, length of hospital stay and conversion rates to open procedures.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases was performed for case-control studies published between 1985-February 2015.

RESULTS

Results from 77 case-control studies showed statistically significant reductions in mortality, complications, bile duct leaks, bile duct injuries, wound infections, conversion rates, length of hospital stay and blood loss associated with early LC. Although LC within the 72-h window is optimal, patients operated after this window still benefit from early surgery compared to delayed surgery. The duration of symptoms in acute cholecystitis should not influence the surgeons' willingness to operate acutely.

CONCLUSIONS

Early LC is clearly superior to delayed LC in acute cholecystitis. The most recent evidence-based practice strongly suggests that early LC should be standard of care in the management of acute cholecystitis.

Admission after the gold interval in acute calculous cholecystitis: Should we really cool it off?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare early and delayed cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients who were diagnosed to have ACC by combined clinical and radiological examination were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two non-randomized groups according to the duration between the onset of symptoms and cholecystectomy. Group 1 included the patients who underwent cholecystectomy within the first 72 h after the onset of symptoms and Group 2 those who underwent beyond the 72nd hour after the onset of symptoms.

RESULTS

We reviewed records for 203 patients. There were 109 patients in Group 1 and 74 patients in Group 2. Access-related complications occurred in four patients. One patient in Group 1 and two patients in Group 2 had trocar site bleeding. In one patient in Group 1, liver trauma occurred. Two patients had bile duct injury in Group 1 as Type D injury according to the Strasberg classification in one patient and E2 injury in other.

CONCLUSION

Early cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with biliary stones could be performed regardless of time with similar complication, mortality and conversion rates.

Feasibility and Safety of Urgent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis After 4 Days from Symptom Onset

BACKGROUND

It is preferable to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the acute phase, within 72 h of symptom onset. The feasibility and safety of performing urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the late phase (4-7 days after symptom onset) are unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility and safety of late phase urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2014, 233 patients underwent urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis within 7 days. We compared clinical features and perioperative outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 3 days (early phase group) and 4-7 days after symptom onset (late phase group).

RESULTS

There were 193 patients in the early phase group and 40 patients in the late-phase group. Performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the late phase did not influence operation time, postoperative complications, or postoperative hospital stay. The rate of conversion to open surgery and blood loss were slightly higher in the late-phase group (8 % and 140 ml) compared with the early phase group (3 % and 69 ml) but were still acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Late phase urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was feasible and safe.

Surgical management of acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Acute cholecystitis occurs in approximately 1% of patients with known gallstones. It presents as a surgical emergency and usually requires hospitalisation for treatment. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in the elderly. Cholecystectomy is advocated for acute cholecystitis; however, the timing of cholecystectomy and the value of the additional treatments have been a matter of debate. This review examines the available evidence regarding the optimal surgical management of patients with acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE, EMBASE and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, databases for English language publications. The MeSH headings 'cholecystitis', 'acute', 'gallbladder', 'inflammation', 'surgery', 'cholecystectomy', 'laparoscopic', 'robotic', 'telerobotic' and 'computer-assisted' were used.

RESULTS

Data from eight randomised controlled trails and three population-based analyses show that early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed on the index admission is safe and not associated with increased conversion rates or morbidity in comparison to conservative treatment followed by elective cholecystectomy. Delaying cholecystectomy increases readmissions for gallstone-related events, complications, hospital stay and mortality in the elderly. Early cholecystectomy is also more cost-effective. Randomised trials addressing antibiotic use in acute cholecystitis suggest that antibiotics should be stopped on the day of cholecystectomy. Insufficient trials have been performed to address the optimal analgesia regime post cholecystectomy. Similarly, a lack of trials on intraoperative cholangiography and management of common bile duct stones in patients with acute cholecystitis means that treatment of concomitant bile duct stones should be based on institutional expertise and resource availability. As regards acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients, case series and retrospective studies would suggest that cholecystectomy is more effective and of lower mortality than percutaneous cholecystostomy. There is not enough evidence to support the routine use of robotic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial evidence would favour a policy of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy following admission with acute cholecystitis. The optimal approach to support early cholecystectomy is suggested but requires evidence from further randomised trials.

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective, randomized study

We aimed to compare the clinical outcome and cost of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Sixty patients with acute cholecystitis were randomized into early (within 24 hours of admission) or delayed (after 6-8 weeks of conservative treatment) laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups. There was no significant difference between study groups in terms of operation time and rates for conversion to open cholecystectomy. On the other hand, total hospital stay was longer (5.2 ± 1.40 versus 7.8 ± 1.65 days; P = 0.04) and total costs were higher (2500.97 ± 755.265 versus 3713.47 ± 517.331 Turkish Lira; P = 0.03) in the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded in 8 patients in the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group, whereas no complications occurred in the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (P = 0.002). Despite intraoperative and postoperative complications being associated more with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with delayed intervention, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be preferred for treatment of acute cholecystitis because of its advantages of shorter hospital stay and lower cost.

Operative outcome and patient satisfaction in early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

Introduction. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually associated with reduced hospital stay, sick leave, and health care expenditures. Early diagnosis and treatment of acute cholecystitis reduce both mortality and morbidity and the accurate diagnosis requires specific diagnostic criteria of clinical data and imaging studies. Objectives. To compare early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy regarding the operative outcome and patient satisfaction. Patients and Methods. Patients with acute cholecystitis were divided into two groups, early (A) and delayed (B) cholecystectomy. Diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was confirmed by clinical examination, laboratory data, and ultrasound study. The primary end point was operative and postoperative outcome and the secondary was patient's satisfaction. Results. The number of readmissions in delayed treatment group B was three times in 10% of patients, twice in 23.3%, and once in 66.7% while the number of readmissions was once only in patients in group A and the mean total hospital stays were higher in group B than in group A. The overall patient's satisfaction was 92.66 ± 6.8 in group A compared with 75.34 ± 12.85 in group B. Conclusion. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in significant reduction in length of hospital stay and accepted rate of operative complications and conversion rates when compared with delayed techniques.

Delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after more than 6 weeks on easily controlled cholecystitis patients

Backgrounds/Aims

There is debate on the timing of cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Although there is a recent trend toward early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (eLC), that is, within 72 hours of symptom onset, some surgeons still prefer delayed operations, or operations after several weeks, expecting subsidence of the inflammation and therefore a higher chance of avoiding open conversion and minimizing complications. Our experience of LC for 10 years was reviewed retrospectively for the timing of the operation and perioperative outcomes, focusing on evaluating the feasibility of delayed LC (dLC).

Methods

The severity of the acute cholecystitis was classified into three grades: easily responding to antibiotics and mostly symptom-free (mild, grade I), symptoms persisting during the treatment (moderate, grade II), and worsening into a septic state (severe, grade III).

Results

Among 353 cholecystectomy patients, grade I (N=224) patients had eLC in 152 cases and dLC in 72 cases. Grade II (N=117) patients had eLC in 103 cases and 12 had dLC. All grade III patients (N=12) underwent open cholecystectomy. In Grade I patients, when the operation was delayed, there were fewer open conversion cases compared to eLC patients (20.45% vs 7.69%) (p<0.05), and complications also were decreased (p>0.05). Grade II patients' rate of open conversions (58.3% vs 44.2%) and complications (25.0% vs 19.5%) increased when the operations were delayed compared with eLC patients (p<0.05). In grade I and II patients, the most common reason for open conversion was bleeding, and the most common complication was also bleeding.

Conclusions

For patients with cholecystits that easily responds to antibiotics (grade I), dLC showed a higher laparoscopic success rate than eLC at the expense of prolonged treatment time and examinations, With moderate to severe cholecystitis (grade II, III), however, there was no room for delayed operations.