Overnight hospital stay after colon surgery for adenocarcinoma

ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery is effective in octogenarians: A retrospective cohort study

Purpose

Evaluate the effectiveness of implementing an ERAS protocol in octogenarians.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients undergoing colorectal surgery under the ERAS protocol at Boca Raton Regional Hospital from December 1, 2019 to October 30, 2021. Patients under the age of 18, undergoing emergency surgery, and with incomplete data were excluded. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and analyses were done using EZR and R software.

Results

299 patients met inclusion criteria with 60 (20.1 %) over the age of 80 and 239 (79.9 %) younger than 80. 140 (46.8 %) of the cohort were male. When comparing octogenarians with younger patients there were no differences in compliance with ERAS protocols such as pre-operative medication (p = 1) and oral carbohydrate drink consumption (p = 0.574), oral intake in PACU (p = 0.832), PACU sit and dangle (p = 0.619), or adherence to a narcotic sparing regimen (p = 0.365). Additionally, there were no differences in complications (p = 1), time until bowel function (p = 0.401), or time to first ambulation (p = 0.883). Octogenarians were more likely to have a longer LOS (4.89 v 3.0 days; p = 0.006), disposition requiring either home health care or a skilled nursing facility (SNF) (52.5 % v 28.3 %; p = 0.008), and readmission (42.3 % v 20.8 %; p = 0.042).

Conclusion

The ERAS protocol is safe and effective when used in the octogenarian without decreased compliance or increased complications. Increased LOS, care needed on disposition, and readmission are in-line with other published data of all patients and are likely related to increased frailty among this group and not to the addition of the ERAS protocol.

Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomies: a systematic review

AIM

Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy (ALC), meaning discharge within 24 h of surgical colonic resection, has recently been proposed in a few, selected patients. This systematic review was performed with the aim of reviewing protocols for ALC and assessing feasibility, safety and outcomes after ALC.

METHOD

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and pooled analysis was performed searching all English studies published until October 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (PROSPERO, CRD42022334463). Inclusion criteria were original articles including patients undergoing ALC, specifying at least one outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were articles reporting a robotic-assisted procedure; unable to retrieve patient data from articles; the same patient series included in different studies. Primary outcomes were success, overall complications and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included mortality and specific complications such us surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, bleeding, rate of ALC acceptance, and unscheduled consultation and reoperation rate.

RESULTS

Among 1087 studies imported for screening, 11 were included (1296 patients). The success rate was 47% with an overall morbidity of 14%. Readmission and reoperation rates were 5% and 1%, respectively. No mortality was recorded. Protocols of ALC differ significantly among published studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, ALC appears to be safe and feasible in selected cases with an acceptable success rate and a low risk of readmission after hospital discharge. Future studies should evaluate patients' benefits and discharge criteria, as well as uniformity and standardization of eligibility criteria. This systematic review may help inform on ALC adoption in clinical practice.

Feasibility assessment of outpatient colorectal resections at a tertiary referral center

PURPOSE

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, particularly when paired with advanced laparoscopy, have reduced recovery time following colorectal procedures. The aim of this study was to determine if length of stay (LOS) could be reduced to an overnight observation stay (< 24 h) with comparable perioperative morbidity. The secondary aim was to establish predictive factors contributing to early discharge.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all colectomies at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and January 2019. Inclusion criteria included all colorectal resections with varying surgical approaches. Patients underwent a standardized ERAS protocol. A logistical regression model was conducted for predictive factors.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty patients were included (55.3% female). Of these, 78 (21.7%) patients were discharged within < 24 h and 112 (31.1%) were discharged within 24-48 h. The remainder comprised the > 48 h group. Age differed significantly between the < 24 h and 24-48 h groups (p < 0.0001). Patients discharged within 24 h were younger (59.4 ± 12.3 years), had a lower CCI score (3.1; p = 0.0026), and lower ASA class (p < 0.0001). Emergency department visits (p = 0.3329) and readmissions (p = 0.6453) prior to POD 30 remained comparable among all groups. Younger age, low ASA, and minimally invasive surgical approach all contributed to ultra-fast discharge.

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocols may allow for discharge within 24 h following a major colorectal resection, all with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. The predictive factors for discharge within 24 h include a low ASA (I or II), and a minimally invasive surgical approach.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Implementation on Cost and Outcomes by Type of Colectomy Performed

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are widely utilized for elective colorectal surgery to improve outcomes and decrease costs, but few studies have evaluated the impact of ERAS protocols on cost with respect to anatomic site of resection. This study evaluated the impact of ERAS protocol on elective colon resections by site and longitudinal impact over time.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study of 598 consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resection before and after implementation of ERAS protocol from 2013 to 2017 was performed. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and cost. Comparative and multivariate inferential statistics were used to assess additional outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 598 patients (100 pre-ERAS vs 498 post-ERAS) were evaluated with an overall median LOS of 4 days for right and left colectomies and 3 days for transverse colectomies. When comparing type of resection before and after ERAS protocol introduction, an increased LOS for left hemicolectomies from 3.09 to 4.03 days (P = .047) was noted, with all other comparisons failing to reach statistical significance. Over time, an initial decrease in LOS for MIS approach after protocol introduction was observed; however, this effect diminished in the ensuing years and had no significant effect overall. Total cost of care was significantly increased post-ERAS for all cohorts except transverse colectomies. No further statistically significant differences were found.

CONCLUSION

After an initial improvement in outcomes, continued utilization of ERAS protocols demonstrated no improvement in LOS compared to pre-ERAS data and increased cost overall for patients regardless of site of resection.

Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND

The best approach for cholecystocholedocholithiasis remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical aspects, learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE).

METHODS

Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with LTCBDE between January 2007 and December 2012 were identified from an institutional database. Data on preoperative investigations, intraoperative and postoperative findings were retrieved retrospectively from the patients' hospital notes.

RESULTS

There were 399 women (56·4 per cent) and 309 men (43·6 per cent), with a median age of 58 (range 18-87) years. Microincision (incision of the cystic duct at the confluence with the common bile duct (CBD) with extension of only 3-5 mm at the lateral margin of the CBD) and lithotripsy were used in the transcystic exploration in 119 patients, and increased the success rate of LTCBDE from 74·2 to 91·0 per cent. The median duration of operation was 85 (i.q.r. 65-120) min and the median postoperative hospital stay was 2 (1-3) days. Retained common bile duct stones were observed in 13 patients, and postoperative complications developed in 27 patients. The cumulative sum duration of operation learning curve comprised two phases; phase 1 included the first 250 patients and phase 2 the remaining 458 patients. Duration of operation and postoperative hospital stay decreased with increasing volume per surgeon. Recurrence of common bile duct stones was diagnosed in 26 patients during a median follow-up of 4 years.

CONCLUSION

LTCBDE with or without microincision and/or lithotripsy is a safe and effective approach.

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration with discharge less than 24 hours

BACKGROUND

Reducing the length of stay and discharge time for patients could benefit multiple hospital units by saving money, reducing waiting time, and providing the opportunity for more patients to be treated. However, no experience of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) with discharge less than 24 hours has been reported until now. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of LTCBDE with discharge less than 24 hours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review showed that 34 of 111 patients scheduled in our institution were discharged less than 24 hours after LTCBDE between June 1 and December 31, 2011. A multimodal approach including appropriate preoperative assessment, education and counseling, early postoperative oral intake, and early mobilization was carried out. Outcomes were analyzed for patient demographics, postoperative stay, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and reasons for failed LTCBDE.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients admitted for LTCBDE, 34 patients were discharged within 24 hours postoperatively. This study population comprised 11 males and 23 females with a mean age of 54.6±14.7 years (range, 28-79 years). The mean postoperative stay was 20.21±0.39 hours. There were no postoperative complications or deaths during the hospital stay or at the follow-up 12 months postoperatively in these 34 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LTCBDE with discharge less than 24 hours is feasible and safe in selected patients with common bile duct stones of no more than three in number and no more than 6 mm in size. The benefit of the multimodal approach and LTCBDE may be synergistic, allowing a quick recovery of gastrointestinal function.

Role of surgery in pediatric ulcerative colitis

Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) has a more extensive and progressive clinical course than adult UC. Therefore, more aggressive initial therapies and more frequent surgical treatments are needed. The therapeutic goal is to gain clinical and laboratory control of the disease with minimal adverse effects while permitting the patient to function as normally as possible. Approximately 5-10 % of patients with UC require acute surgical intervention because of fulminant colitis refractory to medical therapy. Mucosal proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis is currently recommended as a standard curative surgical procedure for UC in both children and adults worldwide. This review will focus on the current issues regarding the surgical indications for pediatric UC, the technical details of procedures and results of most recent published series to take the most appropriate next step to improve the surgical outcomes and patients' quality of life.

Fast-track surgery in intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the length of hospital stay (LOS) and the readmission rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery to treat intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with application of the concepts of fast-track surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of women undergoing laparoscopic treatment of intestinal DIE (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

Tertiary referral private hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

We evaluated 161 women who underwent laparoscopic surgery between January 2010 and April 2013 for complete treatment of intestinal DIE, via either conservative surgery (rectal shaving, mucosal skinning, or anterior disk resection) or radical surgery (segmental bowel resection). After surgery, all specimens were sent for pathologic examination to confirm the presence of endometriosis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were divided into 2 groups according to type of surgery (conservative [n = 102] or radical [n = 59]), and LOS and readmission rate were measured in both groups. Median LOS was shorter in the conservative group compared with the segmental bowel resection group (19 vs 28 hours; p < .001). Ninety-two patients (90.2%) in the conservative surgery group were discharged to home on the first postoperative day, compared with only 38 patients (64.4%) in the segmental bowel resection group. Overall, the readmission rate was low (3.1%): 6.8% in the segmental bowel resection group and 1% in the conservative group (p = .04; odds ratio, 7.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-67.3); however, the need for repeat operation was similar in both groups (3.4% vs 1%; p = .28; odds ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-39.95).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of fast-track concepts in the laparoscopic treatment of intestinal DIE resulted in a short LOS and low readmission rate in both the segmental bowel resection and conservative surgery groups.