Significance of surgical plume obstruction during laparoscopy

State of the Science: A Concept Analysis of Surgical Smoke

Surgical smoke has not been clearly defined in the literature and often is identified using surrogate terms (eg, plume). In January 2020, a literature search was performed and a principle-based concept analysis involving four general principles (epistemological, pragmatic, linguistic, and logical) was used to define surgical smoke and identify implications for perioperative personnel, patients, researchers, and policymakers. Surgical smoke is a visible plume of aerosolized combustion byproducts produced by heat-generating surgical instruments. It consists of water vapor and gaseous substances; can carry toxic chemicals, bacteria, viruses, and tumors; can obscure the surgical field; and can be inhaled. Surgical smoke has a distinctive noxious odor and can cause physical symptoms such as watery eyes and throat irritation. Perioperative leaders should promote protection from occupational harm by educating their staff members on the use of smoke evacuators to mitigate the effects of surgical smoke on perioperative patients and personnel.

Efficacy of a Laparoscopic Saline-Coupled Bipolar Sealer in Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary Surgery

Hepatic resection presents unique surgical challenges to reduce blood loss during parenchymal division. The development of saline-coupled bipolar devices, in which hemostasis is achieved at lower temperatures than electrocautery or other bipolar sealing devices, have been employed for open hepatic resection. Saline-coupled bipolar devices have now become available for minimally invasive use. The goals of this study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a laparoscopic saline-coupled bipolar device for minimally invasive hepatectomy. Seventeen patients (median age 66 years, range 36-81) were consented for inclusion and enrolled. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, and surgeon feedback were collected. Seven robot-assisted partial hepatectomies, 9 laparoscopic partial hepatectomies, and 1 laparoscopic cholecystectomy with liver abscess resection were performed. Average operating time was 222 ± 33 minutes (median 188 minutes; range 61-564 minutes) with no difference between robotic versus laparoscopic time. Successful seals were achieved in all cases following application of 150 to 200 J energy (average 179 ± 3 J, average time to achieve a successful seal 9.3 ± 2.7 minutes). Estimated blood loss was 362 ± 74 mL (median 300 mL, range 5-1200 mL) and 3/17 patients received intraoperative blood transfusion. No bile leaks were detected in any of the patients. Median length of stay was 5 days (range 1-20 days), and there were no readmissions within 30 days. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 5/17 patients, all of which were Clavien Grade 1. There was no mortality within 90 days or complications requiring a return to the operating room, and there were no liver-specific morbidities. These data suggest the laparoscopic Aquamantys device represents a useful device for use in minimally invasive liver resection.

Postmarketing Analysis of a Novel, Cordless Ultrasonic Dissector

Introduction Tissue dissection and vessel sealing is performed using a variety of energy sources and surgical devices. We describe the postmarketing analysis of a cordless ultrasonic dissector and vessel sealer in a series of general and gynecological procedures. Methods Patients were prospectively screened and consented for participation. Data collected included demographics, device activations/seals and failures, and patient complications. Surgeons were surveyed following each case. Data was analyzed using standard statistical methods. Results A total of 110 patients were consented and participated in the study. The most frequently performed procedures were bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 48) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (n = 36). Mean age was 54.2 years and 79.2% were female. The most frequent number of device activations per case was between 26 and 50 (36.6%). Five failed seals occurred out of 4858 total estimated seals (0.11%). Failed seals were felt to be due to thickened, scarred tissue not amenable to device compression. There were no patient intraoperative complications related to the device itself. Overall, surgeons felt the device was extremely easy to use (97.6%) and no visual obstruction due to steam from the device was encountered (95%). Ninety-five percent of surgeons felt the device was beneficial for soft tissue dissection and vessel sealing. Conclusion Sonicision is safe and effective for use in dissection of soft tissues and vessel sealing in a variety of laparoscopic and open procedures. In this study, there were no complications related to the device itself. The remarkable cordless design of this device enhances its ease of use with overall excellent effectiveness.

Surgical Efficacy Among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors: Are We Advancing Safely? A Review of Literature

The specialty of laparoscopy has evolved with the advent of new technologies over the last few years. Energy-based devices and Ultrasonic dissectors are used with a lot of factors in play-including ergonomics and economics during surgery. Here an attempt is based to review the surgical efficacy and safety of these dissectors with importance to plume production and lateral thermal damage. The factors contributing to adversities to the dissectors are also to be noted. The strategy adopted was aimed at finding relevant studies from PubMed from 1995 to 2014. The basic principle of plume production and thermal damage are studied in this review. Factors contributing to the same that can lead to adversities during laparoscopic surgeries are identified. Summarizing key points that increase lateral thermal damage and plume production amongst different ultrasonic shears and suggesting a technique to identify the right balance between the existing dissectors was possible. The RF Device and USS are both useful and widely used and are more safer than monopolar devices. RF Device is considerably slower than USS, as it cannot achieve coagulation and cutting at the same time. Although USS definitely improvises dissection and has less thermal injury than RF Device, the clinical implications in balancing dissection efficacy with hemostasis need to be investigated further. The ideal haemostatic energy-based shear device would be one with excellent hemostatic results and visual acuity while allowing none or minimal thermal energy escape at the point of application. In our current setting, a combined use of both RF and USS device usage as applied in the particular situations has potential.

Current issues in patient safety in surgery: a review

Current surgical safety guidelines and checklists are generic and are not specifically tailored to address patient issues and risk factors in surgical subspecialties. Patient safety in surgical subspecialties should be templated on general patient safety guidelines from other areas of medicine and mental health but include and develop specific processes dedicated for the care of the surgical patients. Safety redundant systems must be in place to decrease errors in surgery. Therefore, different surgical subspecialties should develop a specific curriculum in patient safety addressing training in academic centers and application of these guidelines in all practices. Clearly, redundant safety systems must be in place to decrease errors in surgery, in analogy to safety measures in other high-risk industries. Specific surgical subspecialties are encouraged to develop a specific patient safety curriculum that address training in academic centers and applicability to daily practice, with the goal of keeping our surgical patients safe in all disciplines. The present review article is designed to outline patient safety practices that should be adapted and followed to fit particular specialties.