Current practices and medico-legal aspects of pre-operative consent

Digital informed consent on radical prostatectomy surgery - A turning point on patient communication means

To the Editor, Radical Prostatectomy (RP) is one of the preferred treatments for localized prostatic cancer and although surgical complications have been reduced over the years, urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction are still common and significantly impact the patient's life. Therefore, adequate patient education and counselling before RP is essential. Informed Consent (IC) is a crucial element of doctor-patient interaction, and it must ensure that patients receive and understand all the information regarding their diseases and treatments. Implicit in providing IC is assessing the patient's understanding, since accessible communication enables them to make informed decisions consciously and autonomously about their health status [...].

Pre-post implementation survey of a multicomponent intervention to improve informed consent for caesarean section in Southern Malawi

OBJECTIVE

Surgical informed consent is essential prior to caesarean section, but potentially compromised by insufficient communication. We assessed the association between a multicomponent intervention and women's recollection of information pertaining to informed consent for caesarean section in a low-resource setting, thereby contributing to respectful maternity care.

DESIGN

Pre-post implementation survey, conducted from January to June 2018, surveying women prior to discharge.

SETTING

Rural 150-bed mission hospital in Southern Malawi.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 160 postoperative women were included: 80 preimplementation and 80 postimplementation.

INTERVENTION

Based on observed deficiencies and input from local stakeholders, a multicomponent intervention was developed, consisting of a standardised checklist, wall poster with a six-step guide and on-the-job communication training for health workers.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Individual components of informed consent were: indication, explanation of procedure, common complications, implications for future pregnancies and verbal enquiry of consent, which were compared preintervention and postintervention using χ² test. Generalised linear models were used to analyse incompleteness scores and recollection of the informed consent process.

RESULTS

The proportion of women who recollected being informed about procedure-related risks increased from 25/80 to 47/80 (OR 3.13 (95% CI 1.64 to 6.00)). Recollection of an explanation of the procedure changed from 44/80 to 55/80 (OR 1.80 (0.94 to 3.44)), implications for future pregnancy from 25/80 to 47/80 (1.69 (0.89 to 3.20)) and of consent enquiry from 67/80 to 73/80 (OR 2.02 (0.73 to 5.37)). After controlling for other variables, incompleteness scores postintervention were 26% lower (Exp(β)=0.74; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96). Recollection of common complications increased with 0.25 complications (β=0.25; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.49). Recollection of the correct indication did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Recollection of informed consent for caesarean section changed significantly in the postintervention group. Obtaining informed consent for caesarean section is one of the essential components of respectful maternity care.

Portable Video Media Versus Standard Verbal Communication in Surgical Information Delivery to Nurses: A Prospective Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

Continuing education of health professionals is important for delivery of quality health care. Surgical nurses are often required to understand surgical procedures. Nurses need to be aware of the expected outcomes and recognize potential complications of such procedures during their daily work. Traditional educational methods, such as conferences and tutorials or informal education at the bedside, have many drawbacks for delivery of this information in a universal, standardized, and timely manner. The rapid uptake of portable media devices makes portable video media (PVM) a potential alternative to current educational methods.

OBJECTIVE

To compare PVM to standard verbal communication (SVC) for surgical information delivery and educational training for nurses and evaluate its impact on knowledge acquisition and participant satisfaction.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled crossover trial.

SETTING

Two hospitals: Gosford District Hospital and Wyong Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-two nursing staff (36 at each site).

INTERVENTION

Information delivery via PVM--7-minute video compared to information delivered via SVC.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Knowledge acquisition was measured by a 32-point questionnaire, and satisfaction with the method of education delivery was measured using the validated Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8).

RESULTS

Knowledge acquisition was higher via PVM compared to SVC 25.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.2-26.6) versus 24.3 (95% CI 23.5-25.1), p = .004. Participant satisfaction was higher with PVM 29.5 (95% CI 28.3-30.7) versus 26.5 (95% CI 25.1-27.9), p = .003. Following information delivery via SVC, participants had a 6% increase in knowledge scores, 24.3 (95% CI 23.5-25.1) versus 25.7 (95% CI 24.9-26.5) p = .001, and a 13% increase in satisfaction scores, 26.5 (95% CI 25.1-27.9) versus 29.9 (95% CI 28.8-31.0) p < .001, when they crossed-over to information delivery via PVM.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

PVM provides a novel method for providing education to nurses that improves knowledge retention and satisfaction with the educational process.

The quality of obtaining surgical informed consent

Background:

Informed consent goes beyond signing a form; it is a process of providing necessary information, helping patients make an informed decision, and actively participate in their treatment.

Aim/objective:

This study aimed to assess the quality of obtaining surgical informed consent in hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Research design/participants/context:

In a cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study, 300 patients were chosen through stratified sampling from seven hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed by the researchers and analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics on SPSS software.

Ethical considerations:

Ethical approval of this study was granted by Tehran University of Medical Sciences research ethics committee. Written informed consent for participation was obtained. The participants were reassured that their information will be used anonymously and their answers will not affect their treatment and care.

Findings:

The mean score of quality of acquisition of informed consent was 17.13 out of 35, indicating that the quality falls in the inappropriate category. The results indicate that 48% of the signatories do not even read the form before signing it. Among the 52% who did read the consent form, 61.3% mentioned varying degrees of incomprehensibility of the consent form and 94.2% mentioned the presence of incomprehensible technical, medical and legal vocabulary. Only 12% and 18% of respondents reported that they were not in hurry and they had no fear or anxiety, respectively, when signing the form. The quality of obtaining informed consent was higher in women, younger patients, patients with higher education, and those who had special surgeries.

Discussion:

This study shows a poor practice in obtaining surgical informed consent in Iran. It seems necessary to consider fundamental changes in the process of acquiring consent based on the temporal and local conditions of the patients.

Attitude towards informed consent practice in a developing country: a community-based assessment of the role of educational status

BACKGROUND

It has been reported by some studies that the desire to be involved in decisions concerning one's healthcare especially with regard to obtaining informed consent is related to educational status. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to assess the influence of educational status on attitude towards informed consent practice in three south-eastern Nigerian communities.

METHODS

Responses from consenting adult participants from three randomly selected communities in Enugu State, southeast Nigeria were obtained using self-/interviewer-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

There were 2545 respondents (1508 males and 1037 females) with an age range of 18 to 65 years. More than 70% were aged 40 years and below and 28.4% were married. More than 70% of the respondents irrespective of educational status will not leave all decisions about their healthcare to the doctor. A lower proportion of those with no formal education (18.5%) will leave this entire decision-making process in the hands of the doctor compared to those with tertiary education (21.9%). On being informed of all that could go wrong with a procedure, 61.5% of those with no formal education would consider the doctor unsafe and incompetent while 64.2% of those with tertiary education would feel confident about the doctor. More than 85% of those with tertiary education would prefer consent to be obtained by the doctor who will carry out the procedure as against 33.8% of those with no formal education. Approximately 70% of those who had tertiary education indicated that informed consent was necessary for procedures on children, while the greater number of those with primary (64.4%) and no formal education (76.4%) indicated that informed consent was not necessary for procedures on children. Inability to understand the information was the most frequent specific response among those without formal education on why they would leave all the decisions to the doctor.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that knowledge of the informed consent practice increased with level of educational attainment but most of the participants irrespective of educational status would want to be involved in decisions about their healthcare. This knowledge will be helpful to healthcare providers in obtaining informed consent.

Surgeon-patient information disclosure practices in southwestern Nigeria

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the practice of information disclosure to patients by surgeons in Nigeria.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A 55-item self-administered semi-structured questionnaire was sent to 150 surgeons in southwestern Nigeria in 2004-2005. The data obtained from the completed questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 150 surgeons, 102 completed the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 68.0%. Of these 102, 85 (85.3%) were men, 44 (43.1%) were consultants and 55 (54.0%) were senior and junior surgical trainees. Most were from surgical subspecialties and obstetrics and gynecology. A documented policy statement about information disclosure was not available in most hospitals. A third, i.e. 35 (34.3%), of the surgeons did not routinely engage patients in discussions about disease diagnosis, management and prognosis. Most, i.e. 73 (71.6%), would rather disclose worsening disease progression to the patient's spouse. Others would disclose such information to the patient's children, family members or clergy. This was presumably to shield the patient from psychological distress. Only 22 (21.6%) of them routinely disclose operative findings to patients or their families. Thirty (29.4%) of them had been involved in disclosing medical errors to their patients in the past while 63 (61.8%) respondents did not know if surgical errors with potentially negative consequences should be disclosed.

CONCLUSION

Most of the surgeons in southwestern Nigeria did not routinely provide detailed information to patients about their illness and possible outcome of illness even in the presence of worsening disease progression and prognosis. When surgical errors with potential negative consequences occurred, the majority did not know if such errors should be disclosed.