Reduction of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella Typhimurium on Blueberries through Brief Exposure to Antimicrobial Solutions Coupled with Freezing

Fundamental Differences in Inactivation Mechanisms of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Between Chlorine Dioxide and Sodium Hypochlorite

Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) are two chlorinated oxidizing agents that are implemented in water treatment and postharvest processing of fresh produce. While the antibacterial mechanisms of NaClO have been investigated, there are comparatively few studies that have looked at how ClO2 kills bacteria. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the inactivation pathways of ClO2 and NaClO against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Treatments consisted of 2.5, 5, and 10 ppm ClO2 or 50, 100, and 200 ppm NaClO for 5, 10, and 15 min. Maximum log reductions of E. coli O157:H7 were 5.5 and 5.1 after treatment with ClO2 or NaClO, respectively. Bacterial inactivation was measured using log reductions, intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) using with 2′,7′–dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) or aminophenyl fluorescein (APF) probes, relative values of NAD+, NADH, NADP+, and NADPH cofactors. Additionally, the expression of three key genes involved in ROS stress was measured via RT-PCR. Levels of intracellular ROS measured by DCFDA after ClO2 treatment were significantly higher than those found after treatment in NaClO. Additionally, NaClO treatment resulted in upregulation of ROS-defense genes, while expression of the same genes was typically at base levels or downregulated after ClO2 treatment. As the concentrations of both treatments increased, the NADP+:NADPH ratio shifted to the cofactor being predominantly present as NADP+. These data indicate that ClO2 and NaClO damage E. coli O157:H7 via measurably different mechanisms and that ClO2 does not appear to cause substantial oxidative stress to E. coli O157:H7 directly.

Integrity of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 Cell Wall and Membranes After Chlorine Dioxide Treatment

Treatments of wastewater and fresh produce commonly employ chlorine as an antimicrobial. However, there are increasing levels of concerns regarding the safety and antimicrobial efficacy of chlorine treatments. Numerous studies have reported the antimicrobial properties of chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) treatment in a variety of applications but information regarding how ClO₂ affects bacteria is limited. In the present study, a mixed-method approach utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies was used to observe Escherichia coli O157:H7 membrane damage after exposure to ClO₂ (2.5, 5, or 10 mg/L) for 5, 10, or 15 min. For comparison, controls of 0.1% peptone, 70% isopropanol, and 10 mg/L NaOCl were applied for 15 min. After treatment, cells were enumerated on selective media overlaid with non-selective media and simultaneously analyzed for damage using the following fluorescent probes (1) Bis-(1,3-Dibutylbarbituric Acid) trimethine oxonol (DiBAC4(3)) for membrane polarization, (2) SYTO 9/propidium iodide (LIVE/DEAD) for membrane permeability, (3) 2-(N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)Amino)-2-Deoxyglucose (2-NBDG) for active glucose uptake, and (4) lipid peroxidation through accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA). Bacterial log reductions after ClO₂ treatment ranged from 0.2 to 5.5 and changes in relative fluorescence units after membrane permeability and glucose uptake assays were not consistent with viability, indicating membrane permeability and metabolism were not substantially altered. Depolarization was observed after NaOCl treatment, however, the polarity of cells treated with ClO₂ were like those treated with water (P < 0.05). Accumulation of MDA was detected only after 10 mg/L ClO₂ treatments, indicating that membrane peroxidation occurred at higher concentrations. Transmission electron microscopy imaging revealed that separation of the cell wall from the cytosol occurred after the 10 mg/L ClO₂ treatment, but the cell wall itself appeared to be unbroken. These data suggest that ClO₂ damage to E. coli O157:H7 is not primarily located at the cell wall and harms cells significantly different than NaOCl at comparable concentrations.