Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets

Metallic vs Ceramic Bracket Failures After 12 Months of Treatment: A Prospective Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Orthodontic treatment with fixed vestibular appliances is still widely used worldwide. When choosing the aesthetic alternative of ceramic brackets, the possibility of failure and cracking of braces should be considered. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the failure rates of ceramic and metal brackets in a 12-month clinical study.

METHODS

Eighty patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment with vestibular appliances were enrolled and divided into 2 equal groups: MET for metal brackets and CER for ceramic brackets. After bonding, bracket failures were recorded for 12 months, along with the archwire placed at the time of failure. Angle's dental class, skeletal class, Wits appraisal, Little's irregularity index, overjet, overbite, age, and gender of the patients were recorded from pretreatment cephalometric tracings and study casts. The data were statistically analysed (P < .05).

RESULTS

Significantly higher failure rates were found for ceramic brackets in the overall analysis, in the mandibular arch, and in the posterior region. Regression analysis revealed a significant influence of round nickel-titanium archwires on higher failure rates, whilst a significant influence of rectangular archwires was found on lower failure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceramic brackets showed higher failure rates. Patients should be aware that orthodontic treatment with ceramic brackets may involve delays and inconvenience due to the higher failure rate compared to metal brackets.

Shear bond strength of different bonding agents to orthodontic metal bracket and zirconia

This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of four bonding agents used to bond metal brackets to zirconia under different storage conditions. Four bonding agents were used [FLC: (Fuji ORTHO LC), XT: (Transbond^TM XT), RUC-SBU: (Rely X^TM Ultimate Clicker Adhesive Resin Cement+Single Bond Universal), and RUC-GBU: (Rely X^TM Ultimate Clicker Adhesive Resin Cement+Gluma Bond Universal)] to bond two types of metal brackets (PT/3M) to zirconia surfaces, and they were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 h or thermocycling for 3,000 cycles. The SBS data of RUC-SBU and RUC-GBU using PT brackets were significantly higher than those of 3M brackets before and after thermocycling. It could be concluded that RUC-SBU and RUC-GBU could offer sufficient bond strength between metal brackets and zirconia for the short term compared with FLC and XT. The design of brackets can significantly affect the bond strength to zirconia.

Bond assessment of enamel conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and methylene blue photosensitizer activated by photodynamic therapy to orthodontic metallic brackets

AIM

To assess bond integrity and failure mode after enamel pretreated with conventional and contemporary conditioning methods were bonded to metallic brackets (MB).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty maxillary central incisors were selected and disinfected. All specimens were mounted up to the cement-o-enamel junction and divided into four experimental groups randomly based on the enamel conditioning technique. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was used to condition enamel in group 1, Total-etch and rinse (TER) was used to treat samples in group 2, Specimens in group 3 were conditioned with ECL, and samples in group 4 surface pretreated with SEP. Bonding of MB was performed on the surfaces of all the specimens with a Transbond XT. Specimens from all investigated groups were positioned on a universal testing machine maintaining buccal surfaces similar to the direction of the force. After bracket debonding bond failure was assessed using ARI. The bond integrity of all four groups was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc Tukey test was used for pairwise comparison among different groups.

RESULTS

Group 2, TER+MB (15.38±0.14 MPa) displayed the highest bond value whereas the lowest values of SBS were exhibited by group 1, PDT+MB (10.11±0.17 MPa). The inter-group comparison revealed that specimens of group 2 and group 3, ECL+MB (14.61±0.55 MPa) demonstrated comparable bond strength (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Enamel conditioned with TER and ECL demonstrated comparable SBS. However, bond integrity after PDT and SEP (self-etch primer) surface treatment of enamel bonded with MB significantly lowered bond values.

Mean Shearing Stroke Frequency of Orthodontic Brackets under Cycling Loading: An In Vitro Study

Based on the development of many adhesive systems and bonding techniques, bonding strength of orthodontic brackets has become even more important in modern clinical orthodontics. The aim of this study was to determine mean shearing stroke frequency of different orthodontic bracket types and bonding agents under cycling loading. Therefore, 10 different types of orthodontic bracket from 4 different brands were divided into 2 groups. Two different adhesives, namely Transbond™ XT etch-and-rinse for Group 1 and Transbond™ Plus self-etching-primer adhesive for Group 2 were considered. The brackets were tested under cycling loading force of 10-N and a crosshead speed of 300 mm/min and 40 cycle/min. The frequency of strokes that the brackets failed were determined and these data were analyzed by statistical analysis using an independent sample t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Generally, differences between the frequency of shearing strokes of the bracket failures were found to be statistically significant depending on the type of adhesives and brackets (p < 0.05). The bonding technique for Group 1 was found to have a significantly higher shear bonding strength than Group 2. It is also seen that different types of bracket belonging to the same or different brands had different shear bonding strength. It may be concluded that: (i) all bracket types used in this study can be applied with both bonding techniques, (ii) in order to minimize the risk of hard tissue damage, ceramic brackets should be carefully bonded using the self-etching primary adhesive technique.

Effects of plastic bracket primer on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets

Background/purpose

To assess the usefulness of plastic bracket primer (PBP) for improving the bond strength of plastic brackets (PBs) using three types of orthodontic brackets, including PBs, metal brackets (MBs), and ceramic brackets (CBs).

Materials and methods

A total of 162 premolars were gathered and divided equally into six groups of 27. Three groups were tested with the application of PBP (PB+, MB+, and CB+), and three groups were tested without primer (groups PB-, MB-, and CB-). All the groups were bonded using BeautiOrtho Bond II self-etching adhesive. The shear bond strength (SBS) was measured and the bond failure mode was evaluated using the adhesive remnant index after debonding.

Results

There were significant differences in the mean SBS between groups PB-, MB and CB-, between PB+ and CB+, and between MB+ and CB+. Group PB + had a significantly higher mean SBS than group PB-. The occurrence of bond failure at the enamel and adhesive interface was more frequent in groups PB+ and CB- than in group PB-; and in groups PB+ and CB + than in group MB+.

Conclusion

Plastic bracket primer can increase the bond strength of PBs to the level of metal brackets, but not to the level of ceramic brackets.

Evaluation of bond strength of molar orthodontic tubes subjected to reinforcement with flowable and bonding resins

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to evaluate the adhesive shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic tubes bonded to molar teeth and reinforced with Transbond XT (3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA) and flowable resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 120 molar teeth, previously extracted from patients with a mean age of 30 were included. Orthodontic molar tubes were bonded on the vestibular surface of these teeth with one of two types of adhesive (Transbond XT [3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA] or Orthobond [Morelli, Sorocaba, Brazil]). Each of these groups was subsequently divided into four further groups: control and those subjected to the use of resin reinforcement on the occlusal surface of the bonded tubes with one of three materials (Transbond XT, Tetric N Flow [Ivoclar Vivadent, Ellwangen, Germany], Z 350 Flow [3M Science, St. Paul, MN, USA]). SBS and adhesive remnant index tests were performed to evaluate bond strength and type of fracture of the tubes bonded with the different methods.

RESULTS

The use of resin reinforcement with Transbond XT significantly increased the SBS of tubes bonded with both materials. Flowable composites did not increase the SBS when used as a reinforcement. Less than 50% of the adhesive remained on the vestibular surface after the SBS test in most samples of all groups.

CONCLUSION

Transbond XT orthodontic adhesive and Orthobond adhesive had appropriate bonding strengths for clinical use. Furthermore, the use of a resinous reinforcement with Transbond XT significantly increased the SBS of tubes bonded. However this technique with flowable adhesives (Tetric N Flow and Z350 Flow) did not significantly increase SBS when orthodontic tubes were bonded with Transbond XT or Orthobond.

Influence of phototherapy on bond strength and failure modes of enamel bonded to ceramic and metallic brackets with different surface treatment regimes

AIM

The aim of the current study was to assess efficacy of phototherapy on mode of failure and shear bond strength among different brackets in combination with dissimilar conditioning regimens on enamel surface.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety maxillary premolars were arbitrarily assigned into six groups (n = 15 each) based on surface conditioning of enamel. Group 1 and group 2 surface treated with total etch + rinse. Group 3 and group 4 surface conditioned with Er,Cr:YSGG. Group 5 and group 6 surface treated with self-etching primer (SEP). Now based on the type of bracket bonded to enamel surface. Group 1, 3 and 5 were bonded to metallic brackets (MB). Similarly, group 2,4,6 were bonded to ceramic bracket (CB). All samples from each group were positioned in a in a universal testing machine for shear bond strength testing. Ten samples from each group were used to discover the sites of bond failure using ARI with stereomicroscope. The mean shear bond strength of six groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison between groups were analysed with the Post hoc Tukey test at a significance level of (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The maximum SBS values were displayed by group 1 total etch + rinse MB (14.84 ± 1.78) whereas the minimum shear bond strength values were exhibited by group 6 SEP CB (9.99 ± 0.91). Samples treated with total etch + rinse MB (14.84 ± 1.78) and group 3 Er,Cr:YSGG MB unveiled comparable bond strength (p > 0.05). Similarly, experimental group 2 total etch + rinse CB (12.52 ± 1.28) was found to be comparable to group 4 Er,Cr:YSGG CB (12.14 ± 4.12) (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Enamel etched for bonding bracket with Er,Cr:YSGG phototherapy at (4.5 W and 30 Hz) displayed comparable bond strength to conventional Transbond XT independent on the type of brackets used.

Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives to dentin: Evaluation of NaOCl pretreatment

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of dentin pretreatment with NaOCl on shear bond strength of four one-step self-etch adhesives with different pH values.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Bovine permanent incisors were used. Four one-step self-etch adhesives were tested: Adper™ Easy Bond, Futurabond NR, G-aenial Bond, Clearfil S3 Bond. One two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) was used as control. Group 1- no pretreatment; group 2- pretratment with 5,25 % NaOCl; group 3- pretreatment with 37 % H3PO4 etching and 5,25 % NaOCl. A hybrid composite resin was inserted into the dentin surface. The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine. The examiners evaluated the fractured surfaces in optical microscope to determine failure modes, quantified with adhesive remnant index (ARI).

RESULTS

Dentin pretreatment variably influenced bond strength values of the different adhesive systems. When no dentin pretreatment was applied, no significant differences were found (P >.05) among four adhesives tested. No significant differences were recorded when comparing NaOCl pretreatment with H3PO4 + NaOCl pretreatment for all adhesive tested (P >.05) except Clearfil S3 Bond that showed higher shear bond strength values when H3PO4 was applied. Frequencies of ARI scores were calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of dentin pretreatment with NaOCl depends on the composition of each adhesive system used. There was no difference in bond strength values among self-etch adhesives with different pH values. Key words:Dentin, pretreatment, self-etch adhesives.

Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Clinical procedures when shear forces are applied to brackets suggest adhesion forces between 2.8 and 10.0 MPa as appropriate. In this study dental enamel was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after removing the brackets. Thirty bicuspids (previous prophylaxis) with metallic brackets (Roth Inovation 0.022 GAC), Transbond Plus SEP 3M Unitek adhesive and Transbond XT 3M resin were used. The samples were preserved to 37°C during 24 hr and submited to tangential forces with the Instron Universal machine 1.0 mm/min speed load strength resistance debonding. Also the Adhesive Remanent Index (ARI) test was made, evaluating the bracket base and the bicuspid surface. All the bracket SEM images were processed with AutoCAD to determine the enamel detached area. The average value was 6.86 MPa (SD ± 3.2 MPa). ARI value 1= 63.3%, value 2= 20%, value 3= 13.3% and 33% presented value 0. All those samples with dental enamel loss, presented different situations as fractures, ledges, horizontal, and vertical loss in some cases, and some scratch lines. There is no association between the debonding resistance and enamel presence. Less than half of the remanent adhesive on the dental enamel was present in most of the samples when the ARI test was applied. When the resin area increases, the debonding resistance also increases, and when the enamel loss increases, the resin free metallic area of the bracket base decreases in the debonding.

Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives

Introduction

Adult patients typically require high-quality orthodontic treatment for ceramic brackets, but some clinicians remain concerned about the bond strength of these brackets. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the shear bond strength and de-bonding characteristics of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with two types of bonding agents.

Methods

In an experimental study done in 2013 in Babol, Iran, 120 extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly divided into four groups as follows: HM group: metallic bracket/conventional bonding agent; SM group: metallic bracket/Transbond self-etching primer; HC group: ceramic bracket/conventional bonding agent; SC group: ceramic bracket/Transbond self-etching primer. Twenty-four hours after thermocycling (1000 cycle, 5 °C–55 °C), the shear bond strength values were measured. The amount of resin remaining on the tooth surface (adhesive remnant index: ARI) was determined under a stereomicroscope. Enamel detachment index was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope. To perform statistical analysis, ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and Tukey post-hoc tests were applied. The level of significance was set at p <0.05.

Results

The mean shear bond strength values (MPa ± SD) were group HM=12.59, group SM=11.15, group HC=7.7, and group SC=7.41. Bond strength differences between groups HM and SM (p=0.063) and between HC and SC (p=0.091) were not statistically significant. There were significant differences between HM and HC and between SM and SC groups (p < 0.05). Insignificant differences were found in ARI among all groups.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that the metallic brackets had higher bond strengths in comparison with ceramic brackets. In addition, self-etching primer was able to produce fewer bonds compared with the conventional technique. Many samples showed the bracket-adhesive interface failure or failure inside the adhesive.

Effect of organic solvents and ultrasound on the removal of orthodontic brackets

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of organic gel solvents (70% acetone and 90% ethanol) and ultrasound in the removal of metallic brackets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Metallic brackets were bonded with light-cured orthodontic composite (Transbond XT) in 120 human bicuspids and divided into 6 groups for the enamel etch-and-rinse adhesive system (XT) and 6 groups to self-etching system (SEPT) according to pretreatment to removal test: control, 70% acetone, 90% ethanol, ultrasound, 70% acetone+ultrasound, and 90% ethanol+ultrasound. The brackets were subjected to removal by shear testing and Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) evaluation. Some specimens were prepared and its adhesive interface and etching ability observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Only the factor 'ultrasound' and its interaction with 'adhesive' were detected as a source of variance, with the SEPT/ultrasound showing the lowest shear strength than the other groups. Regardless the factor 'ultrasound', XT showed a higher ARI than SEPT; however, when the solvents were used, no differences were detected between XT and SEPT.

CONCLUSION

The organic solvents were not effective in reducing shear bond strength. The etch-and-rinse adhesive system showed a higher and more favorable ARI score than the self-etching primer. The behavior of the organic solvents on ARI showed to be better when associated with the self-etching primer. The ultrasound was effective in reducing the shear bond strength of the self-etching adhesive system but not in affecting the ARI of the adhesive systems.

Shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with conventional acid-etch and self-etch primer systems: An in-vivo study

Background

Different in-vitro studies have reported various results regarding shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets when SEP technique is compared to conventional system. This in-vivo study was designed to compare the effect of conventional acid-etching and self-etching primer adhesive (SEP) systems on SBS and debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets.

Material and Methods

120 intact first maxillary and mandibular premolars of 30 orthodontic patients were selected and bonded with metal and ceramic brackets using conventional acid-etch or self-etch primer system. The bonded brackets were incorporated into the wire during the study period to simulate the real orthodontic treatment condition. The teeth were extracted and debonded after 30 days. The SBS, debonding characteristics and adhesive remnant indices (ARI) were determined in all groups.

Results

The mean SBS of metal brackets was 10.63±1.42 MPa in conventional and 9.38±1.53 MPa in SEP system, (P=0.004). No statistically significant difference was noted between conventional and SEP systems in ceramic brackets. The frequency of 1, 2 and 3 ARI scores and debonding within the adhesive were the most common among all groups. No statistically significant difference was observed regarding ARI or failure mode of debonded specimens in different brackets or bonding systems.

Conclusions

The SBS of metal brackets bonded using conventional system was significantly higher than SEP system, although the SBS of SEP system was clinically acceptable. No significant difference was found between conventional and SEP systems used with ceramic brackets. Total SBS of metal brackets was significantly higher than ceramic brackets. Due to adequate SBS of SEP system in bonding the metal brackets, it can be used as an alternative for conventional system.

Key words:Shear bond strength, Orthodontic brackets, Adhesive remnant index, self-etch.

Comparison of shear bond strength and bonding time of a novel flash-free bonding system

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the bonding time, shear bond strength (SBS), and adhesive residue index (ARI) of APC(TM) Flash-Free bonding system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six extracted human maxillary premolars were randomly divided into three groups (12 per group) and used for this in vitro study: group 1, APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System; group 2, Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Bracket pasted manually; group 3 (control group), 3M APC PLUS Adhesive prepasted brackets bonded with the extruded flash removed. Bonding time was measured using a stopwatch. Bond strength was measured using an Instron at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The ARI was graded on a scale from 1 to 5. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

It took significantly (P < .001) less time to bond in the APC Flash-Free Adhesive group (30.7 ± 3.3 seconds) compared with the control group (41.8 ± 4.0 seconds) and the manual group (39.2 ± 2.8 seconds). The APC Flash-Free Adhesive coated bracket had significantly (P < .001) greater SBS (13.7 ± 2.2 MPa) compared with the control group (10.8 ± 2.0 MPa) and the manual group (10.4 ± 1.4 MPa). The ARI was significantly (P < .001) greater with the APC Flash-Free Adhesive coated bracket compared with that of the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other methods of bonding, the APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated System can potentially reduce bonding time while increasing SBS.

Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives: pH influence

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of four one-step self-etch adhesives with different pH values to enamel and dentin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this in vitro study, 200 bovine permanent mandibular incisors were used. Four one-step self-etch adhesives with different pH values were tested both on enamel and on dentin: Adper™ Easy Bond Self-Etch Adhesive (pH = 0.8-1), Futurabond NR (pH=2), G-aenial Bond (pH = 1.5), Clearfil S(3) Bond (pH = 2.7). After adhesive systems application, a nanohybrid composite resin was inserted into the bonded surface. The specimens were placed in a universal testing machine. The shear bond strength was performed at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until the sample rupture. The shear bond strength values (MPa) of the different groups were compared with analysis of variance after that Kolmogorov and Smirnov tests were applied to assess normality of distributions. P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

In enamel shear bond strength, the highest shear bond strength values were reported with Futurabond NR (P < 0.01); however, no significant differences were found with Clearfil S(3) Bond. The others adhesive systems showed lower shear bond strength values with significant differences between them (P < 0.05). When comparing the dentin shear bond strength, the lowest shear bond strength values were reported with Clearfil S(3) Bond (P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences among the other three products (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The pH values of adhesive systems did not influence significantly their shear bond strength to enamel or dentin.

Effect of Self-etch Primer-adhesive and Conventional Adhesive Systems on the Shear Bond Strength and Bond Failure of Orthodontic Brackets: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Prompt-L-Pop is a sixth generation bonding system contains methacrylated phosphoric acid esters that combine an acidic component for etching the enamel and a primer, is an all-in-one adhesive. This study was undertaken to compare the bonding strength of brackets to enamel with traditional bonding technique and the new Prompt-L-Pop system using the same composite resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this in vitro experimental study, 60 human premolar teeth extracted for orthodontic treatment were collected. The samples were randomly divided into three groups comprising of 20 teeth in each group. Shear bond strength and ARI scores for the specimens were measured. Comparison was done using one way ANOVA and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Fourth generation bonding adhesive system depicted similar bond strength to fifth generation bonding adhesive system. Both fourth and fifth generation exhibited higher shear bond strength as compared to sixth generation bonding adhesive system.

CONCLUSION

Fourth and fifth generation exhibited higher shear bond strength as compared to sixth generation bonding adhesive system but the sixth generation has clinically acceptable shear bond strength. Also, it was found that sixth generation leaves less residual adhesive on the tooth after bracket removal.

Disinclusion of unerupted teeth by mean of self-ligating brackets: effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of blood contamination on the shear bond strength and failure site of three different orthodontic self-ligating brackets.

STUDY DESIGN

240 bovine permanent mandibular incisors were randomly divided into 12 groups of 20 specimens each. Orthodontic self-ligating brackets were tested under four different enamel surface conditions: a) dry, b) blood contamination before priming, c) blood contamination after priming, d) blood contamination before and after priming. Brackets were bonded to the teeth and subsequently tested using a Instron universal testing machine. Shear bond strength values and adhesive failure rate were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (strength values), and Chi squared test (ARI Scores).

RESULTS

Non-contaminated enamel surfaces showed highest bond strengths for all self ligating brackets. Under blood-contamination shear bond strengths lowered for all brackets tested. Groups contaminated before and after primer application showed the lowest shear bond strength. Significant differences in debond locations were found among the groups under the various enamel surface conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood contamination of enamel during the bonding procedure lowers bond strength values of self ligating brackets, expecially when contamination occur in different times of the bonding procedure.