Endoscopic staging of low-grade gastric malt lymphoma

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the response of MALT-Gastric lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

The link between gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (LG-MALT) and chronic Helicobacter Pylori (HP) infection had led to a real revolution in the management of the disease.

AIMS

To study the results of the HP eradication therapy and to clarify its place in the tumor response.

METHODS

A descriptive retrospective bicentric study, between January 2007 and December 2016, including patients with LG-MALT treated in the gastroenterology departments of Sahloul hospital in Sousse and Habib Bougtafa hospital in Bizerte, and having received treatment for eradication of HP.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included. The male/female sex ratio was 1.42. The average age was 58 years. The symptomatology was dominated by epigastric pain (96.8%). On digestive endoscopy, the most frequent location and appearance were gastric antrum (39.6%) and ulcerations (89%). The lymphoma was classified as stage IE and IIE1 in 81% and 19% of cases, respectively. The HP status was positive in all patients. The HP eradication rate was 82.5% after three anti-HP treatment courses. Complete remission of lymphoma was obtained in 81% of patients at 18 months. Non-response to HP eradication therapy was observed in 19% of patients. Non-responder patients had a longer diagnostic delay (p=0.02), more diffuse endoscopic involvement (p=0.001) and a more frequent appearance of large gastric folds (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The course of LG-MALT is determined by the treatment for the eradication of HP. Its success promotes remission of lymphoma.

Miniprobe Endoscopic Sonography for Gastrointestinal Tract Assessment: A Case Series of 1451 Procedures

Conventional endoscopic sonography has allowed precise diagnostics without disturbances, and miniprobes can be easily introduced through the biopsy channel of the endoscope. Miniprobe endoscopic sonography has many benefits compared with conventional endoscopic sonography. Although there are well-known indications for miniprobe endoscopic sonography in endoscopic digestive tract assessment, there is still a need for this method to be widely spread among physicians and commonly used by most endoscopists. The aim of this series was to describe a multicenter retrospective experience with 1451 procedures using miniprobes, presenting examples and the applicability and usefulness of this technology in the daily activities of an endoscopy department.

Prognostic assessment and treatment of primary gastric lymphomas: how endoscopic ultrasonography can help in tailoring patient management

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has recently gained a pivotal role in the management of gastric lymphomas, especially in the diagnostic workup. Its accuracy and reliability have overcome those of other imaging techniques, such that it represents an invaluable tool for the management of gastric lymphomas. Although this technique is operator dependent, its application in large series has proved its reliability. Thus, it has generally been considered a useful tool for providing information crucial in deciding the treatment program, especially for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas, for which EUS can provide an accurate evaluation of disease extension and treatment response probability. Limited-stage disease, confined to the submucosa, has a greater probability to respond to sole Helicobacter pylori eradication. In contrast, the value of EUS in response assessment and follow-up monitoring is still debated, with discordant opinions about its reliability and clinical advantages, because normalization of the EUS findings occurs with a considerable delay compared to the histologic evaluation. In the follow-up setting, preliminary data have indicated that persistently positive EUS findings in low-grade gastric lymphoma could represent a warning for a possible relapse. However, in high-grade gastric lymphoma, such findings do not have any clinical implications.

Endoscopic diagnosis and staging of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of endoscopy, including endoscopic ultrasound, in the diagnosis and management of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas of the stomach has evolved steadily in the last two decades. The present review summarizes recent findings and puts them in context with studies on the diagnosis and management of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma published earlier.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have emphasized the crucial role of endoscopic ultrasound in treatment planning in patients with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. This is important as early-stage gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas can be managed just by the eradication of Helicobacter pylori by appropriate antibiotic regimens. However, the more advanced lesions are treated with much more invasive treatment regimens involving radical gastrectomy, chemotherapy or radiation, or all.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic ultrasound staging is highly accurate in predicting response to Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Normalization of gastric wall thickness and architecture can be used to monitor tumor regression following treatment. Endoscopic ultrasound findings can also be used to identify treatment failures and relapses and can help identify patients who need more aggressive therapy.

[Changes in the treatment strategy of primary gastric lymphoma]

Nowadays the management strategy for primary gastric lymphoma is undergoing change due to the effectiveness of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. While earlier surgical resection was the primary treatment and chemotherapy was only a follow-on procedure, at the present time this arrangement seems to have been reversed. Early stage low-grade MALT lymphoma can be treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication. Total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and with adjuvant chemotherapy in R1 situation is proposed up to stage II.1. The strategy is similar in the case of high-grade gastric lymphoma, but resection is useful only in those cases when one can be assured the result will be an R0 situation. With the exception of these cases, the only indication for resection is chemo-resistance. There is no reason for operating in advanced stages of the disease. The only purpose can be to manage complications. Unfortunately, the exact diagnosis is difficult. The diagnosis of lymphoma can often only be made after the operation. In the 6-year period between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2005 we treated 38 patients for primary gastric lymphoma. Altogether 9 patients were operated on. Resection was performed in 6 cases. The diagnosis of lymphoma was known preoperatively only in one case. Nowadays surgery seems to be only secondary to chemotherapy and immuno-chemotherapy in the treatment of primary gastric MALT lymphoma. Our own cases also mirror this change.