Rationalizing the use of PPIs: An unresolved matter

Proton-pump inhibitors adverse effects: a review of the evidence and position statement by the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva

INTRODUCTION

In the last few years a significant number of papers have related the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to potential serious adverse effects that have resulted in social unrest.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this paper was to provide a literature review for the development of an institutional position statement by Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) regarding the safety of long-term PPI use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to draw conclusions based on a critical assessment of the following: a) current PPI indications; b) vitamin B12 deficiency and neurological disorders; c) magnesium deficiency; d) bone fractures; e) enteric infection and pneumonia; f) interactions with thienopyridine derivatives; e) complications in cirrhotic patients.

RESULTS

Current PPI indications have remained unchanged for years now, and are well established. A general screening of vitamin B12 levels is not recommended for all patients on a PPI; however, it does seem necessary that magnesium levels be measured at therapy onset, and then monitored in subjects on other drugs that may induce hypomagnesemia. A higher risk for bone fractures is present, even though causality cannot be concluded for this association. The association between PPIs and infection with Clostridium difficile is mild to moderate, and the risk for pneumonia is low. In patients with cardiovascular risk receiving thienopyridines derivatives it is prudent to adequately consider gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks, given the absence of definitive evidence regardin potential drug-drug interactions; if gastrointestinal risk is found to be moderate or high, effective prevention should be in place with a PPI. PPIs should be cautiously indicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs are safe drugs whose benefits outweigh their potential side effects both short-term and long-term, provided their indication, dosage, and duration are appropriate.

Practical considerations in the management of proton-pump inhibitors

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most active ingredients prescribed in Spain. In recent decades there has been an overuse of these drugs in both outpatient clinics and hospitals that has lead to a significant increase in healthcare spending and to an increase in the risk of possible side effects. It is important for health professionals to know the accepted indications and the correct doses for the use of these drugs. On the market there are different types of PPI: omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole and esomeprazole. Omeprazole is the oldest and most used PPI, being also the cheapest. Although there are no important differences between PPIs in curing diseases, esomeprazole, a new-generation PPI, has proved to be more effective in eradicating H. pylori and in healing severe esophagitis compared to other PPIs. In recent years the use of generic drugs has spread; these drugs have the same bioavailability than the original drugs. In the case of PPIs, the few comparative studies available in the literature between original and generic drugs have shown no significant differences in clinical efficacy.

Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients at a Czech tertiary center: analysis of epidemiology, clinical features, and risk factors of fulminant course

OBJECTIVE

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been increasing in incidence, with significant morbidity and mortality, and is subject to geographical and institutional variability. We aimed to characterize epidemiology and clinical manifestations of CDI in a Czech tertiary care center and to identify risk factors of fulminant course.

METHODS

All adult patients hospitalized with primary CDI in a 3-year period were retrospectively identified. Epidemiological and clinically descriptive data were extracted from medical records. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors of fulminant course. The relationship between incidence of CDI and antibiotic consumption was evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 183 CDI patients, median age 67 years, were enrolled. Hospital-acquired CDI was present in 85% of cases. The incidence of CDI was 1/10,000 patient-days. Hospital-acquired CDI hospital mortality was 22.4%. Severe CDI (SCDI) was identified in 15.8% of patients, with 62% mortality. SCDI patients had longer onset of symptoms to diagnosis interval compared with mild CDI (P=0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that SCDI patients were older (P=0.018), and more frequently had abnormal abdominal physical findings (P=0.001), higher inflammatory markers (P<0.001), higher creatinine (P=0.002), and lower albumin (P<0.001) than patients with mild CDI. Analysis of antibiotic consumption at departments with the highest incidence of CDI showed a trend toward higher incidence of CDI associated with penicillin use (P=0.08) and a negative correlation of CDI incidence with nitroimidazoles consumption (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

CDI is less frequent in the conditions studied compared with literary data; however, the fulminant form has a very high mortality. Delayed recognition and treatment is a crucial determinant of the severity of CDI. The association between CDI and antibiotic consumption is less clear.