[Cespace. Cervical interbody fusion system. Preliminary retrospective study in 104 cases (120 implants)]

Correlation Between Cervical Spine Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcome After Standalone Intersomatic Titanium Cage CeSPACE for Cervical Anterior Discectomy and Fusion in Cervical Degenerative Disk Diseases

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after using a standalone intersomatic titanium cage CeSPACE for anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis. We present our clinical experience in a group of 180 patients with a mean follow-up for at least 2 years. Patients were evaluated by clinical and radiological assessment preoperatively, immediately after surgery and at regular follow-up. There were 97 male and 83 female patients (average age: 56.6 years) who were preoperatively affected by cervical radiculomyelopathy that was due to spondylosis or cervical disk herniation and who underwent surgical treatment. All patients underwent an anterior discectomy and interbody fusion through the positioning of one or more levels of the CeSPACE device. Compared with the preoperative scores, improvement was seen in postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) values. The standalone intersomatic titanium cage CeSPACE for anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis improved radiculomyelopathy and increased the probability of cervical kyphotic alignment. However, cervical sagittal alignment after surgery was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes in terms of postoperative improvement in VAS scores and NDI values. Similarly, the change in cervical sagittal alignment was not related to visual analog scale scores or Neck Disability Index values.

Follow-up of a new titaniumcoated polyetheretherketone cage for the cervical spine

Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cages have lower modulus of elasticity when compared with Titanium (TTN) cages. This suggests that PEEK-cages could show a lower rate of subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy-fusion (ACDF) and might lead to a lower loss of correction. We investigated the one to five year-results of standalone PEEK-TTN-porous coated cages in a patient cohort from 2014 to 2017. The patients underwent single-level ACDF for disc herniation and degenerative discopathy. Clinical and radiological outcome were assessed in 50 eligible patients after a mean of 27 months. Results: Solid arthrodesis was found in 84%. Neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck and arm show comparable results to the literature. Conclusions: Clinical and radiological outcomes of ACDF with PEEK-body-cages with a porous coated surface show good bony integration. The modulus of elasticity, design, shape, size, cage surface architecture, as well as bone density, endplate preparation, radical microdiscectomy and distraction during surgery should be considered as important factors influencing the clinical results. One main advantage, over titanium cages, is the absence of MRI artifacts, allowing an excellent postoperative follow-up.

Plasmapore-coated titanium cervical cages induce more rapid and complete bone fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as compared to noncoated titanium cages

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the solid bone fusion rates between Plasmapore-coated titanium cages (PPC group) and non-Plasmapore-coated titanium cages (N-PPC group) in patients who received anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Of 78 patients who received ACDF at the hospital, a follow-up period greater than 2 years was possible for 61 patients, including 30 in the PPC group and 42 in the N-PPC group. Evaluations were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Radiological stabilization (RS) was defined as the restriction of spinous process movement to <3 mm and the absence of a halo around the cages on flexion-extension radiographs. Solid bone fusion (SBF) was defined as the formation of bony bridges between the fixed vertebral bodies in sagittal computed tomography sections. The rates of RS and SBF were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

The differences in RS were not significant between the 2 groups during the follow-up period. However, the SBF rates at 6 and 12 months were significantly higher in the PPC group (26.7% and 56.7%) than in the N-PPC group (5% and 21.4%). Moreover, 63.3% (19 of 30) of patients in the PPC group demonstrated RS at 3 months, and of these patients, SBF was observed in 100% (19 patients) after 24 months, respectively. In comparison, the SBF rates in the N-PPC group were 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasmapore-coated titanium cages enabled more rapid solid bone fusion. We suggest that these types of cages might help to reduce postoperative radiograms.