Percutaneous imaging-guided interventions for acute biliary disorders in high surgical risk patients

Image-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy: a comprehensive review

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a common emergency condition with severity ranging from mild to severe. Gallstones and critical illnesses are the common predisposing factors. Mild AC is primarily managed with medical therapy and early cholecystectomy. Moderate and severe AC require individualized treatment with a preference for early cholecystectomy. However, cholecystectomy may not always be feasible due to co-morbidities. Hence, this group of patients needs minimally invasive methods to drain the gallbladder (GB). Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is the image-guided drainage of GB in the setting of moderate to severe AC. There are different approaches to PC. The technical aspects, success, and complications of PC as well as management of cholecystostomy catheter after the patient recovers from the acute episode should be thoroughly understood by the interventional radiologist. We present an extensive up-to-date review of the essential aspects of PC including indications, contraindications, techniques, and outcomes, including complications and success rates.

RISK OF BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS IN PERCUTANEOUS BILIARY DRAINAGE: THE PARADOX OF THE NORMAL HEMOSTASIS

Background:

Percutaneous biliary drainage is a safe procedure. The risk of bleeding complications is acceptable. Frequently, patients with biliary obstructions usually have coagulation disorders thus increasing risk of bleeding. For this reason, patients should always fit the parameters of hemostasis.

Aim:

To determine whether the percentage of bleeding complications in percutaneous biliary drainage is greater in adults with corrected hemostasis prior to the procedure regarding those who did not require any.

>Methods

: Prospective, observational, transversal, comparative by independent samples (unpaired comparison). Eighty-two patients with percutaneous biliary drainage were included. The average age was 64±16 years (20-92) being 38 male and 44 female. Patients who presented altered hemostasis were corrected and the presence of bleeding complications was evaluated with laboratory and ultrasound.

Results:

Of 82 patients, 23 needed correction of hemostasis. The approaches performed were: 41 right, 30 left and 11 bilateral. The amount of punctures on average was 3±2. There were 13 (15.8%) bleeding complications, 12 (20%) in uncorrected and only one (4.34%) in the corrected group with no statistical difference. There were no differences in side, number of punctures and type of drainage, but number of passes and the size of drainage on the right side were different. There was no related mortality.

Conclusion:

Bleeding complications in patients requiring hemostasis correction for a percutaneous biliary drainage was not greater than in those who did not require any.

Role of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Infection

Interventional radiology (IR) is plays a crucial role in the management of localized infections, utilizing percutaneous access to loculated fluid collections for drainage and source control. Interventions have been developed in multiple organs and systems and used over decades, allowing the IR physician to provide patient care in many cases where surgical options are not optimal. In this review, we will examine the emergent, urgent, and routine nature of various IR procedures in the infectious context and timelines for each in regards to the decision making process. An algorithmic approach should guide the clinician's decision making for IR procedures in both large academic centers and smaller community hospitals. This approach and the pertinent procedural technique are described for multiple systems and organs including the biliary tree, gallbladder, genitourinary tract, and thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic abscesses. Increased awareness of the abilities and limitations of IR physicians in clinical scenarios needs to be implemented, to allow multispecialty input in efforts to decrease morbidity and mortality.

Prospective Comparison of Bleeding Complications Between Right and Left Approaches in Percutaneous Biliary Drainage

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to determine whether the percentage of bleeding complications differs between the right and the left approaches in percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in adult patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, descriptive, nonrandomized comparative and longitudinal study. We included adult patients over 18 years of age who underwent a PBD. We excluded those with a bilateral PBD for the comparative study. Usually, but not exclusively, we performed the right approach under fluoroscopic guidance and the left one under ultrasound and fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

Of 150 cases, 63 were performed using the right approach and 61 with the left; 26 were performed with the bilateral. The right approach faced less dilated biliary ducts and more benign diseases. We experienced 20 bleeding complications (13.33%, confidence intervals of 95%=8.3-19.8), 7 in the bilateral approach, 10 in the right approach, and 3 in the left one. The difference between the right and the left approaches was statistically significant (Fisher P=0,04). No procedures were required to obtain hemostasis, and only one patient (0.66%, confidence intervals of 95%=0.009-3.66) (in the right side) required a red blood cell transfusion. We found no related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Global bleeding complications are more likely to appear in the right approach in which less dilated biliary ducts and more benign diseases probably contributed to a higher number of needle passes, portal and hepatic vein punctures, and, therefore, to an increase in the risk of bleeding complications. The significant bleeding complication rate was low (0.66%).