Risk stratification of patients with atrial fibrillation: Biomarkers and other future perspectives

[Measurement of d-dimers in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. First prospective Tunisian study]

Atrial fibrillation can expose to thrombo-embolic complications. Many biomarkers have been tested to refine the stratification of thrombo-embolic risk. The study aim was to assess the interest of the d-dimer testing in this pathology. We conducted a prospective observational study including 50 cases and 19 controls, enrolled at the cardiology department of the Mongi Slim Hospital, from July to November 2012. The d-dimer assay was performed on mini-VIDAS(®) and analyzed according to clinical, echocardiographic and biological data. The mean age of patients was 61.8±10.6years. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.58±1.31. The average of D-dimer levels was 590±506ng/ml in patients and 225.26±112.95ng/ml in controls (P=0.02). No significant difference has been found between the d-dimer level and age, sex, type and etiology of atrial fibrillation, the CHA2DS2-VASc score, the left atrial surface. Among patients on acenocoumarol, d-dimer levels was significantly higher in patients with an INR<2 compared to those with an INR≥2 (P=0.004). We identified a positive d-dimer threshold (300ng/ml) in patients distinguishing them significantly with controls (P<0.001). In conclusion, the measurement of d-dimers could help clinicians to identify patients with atrial fibrillation having an increased coagulability and, therefore, an increased thrombo-embolic risk. It could be complementary to the determination of INR in monitoring anticoagulation therapy: d-dimers level refines the thrombo-embolic risk and INR measurement assesses the level of anticoagulation and the bleeding risk.

Management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a very common clinical problem with a high prevalence that is expected to rise over time because of increasing risk factors (eg, age, obesity, hypertension). This high prevalence is also associated with high cost, because atrial fibrillation represents about 1% of overall health care spending. The management of atrial fibrillation involves multiple facets: (1) management of underlying disease if present and the management of atrial fibrillation risk factors, (2) prevention of thromboembolism, (3) control of the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation, and (4) restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm.

Biomarkers in atrial fibrillation: an overview

Atrial fibrillation (AF) confers a raised risk of stroke and death, and this risk of adverse events is increased by the coexistence of other cardiovascular risk factors. The pathophysiology of AF is complex, involving the role of inflammation, structural remodelling with apoptosis, inflammation or fibrosis. These changes confer a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state in this arrhythmia. Despite being easy to use for decision-making concerning oral anticoagulant therapy in AF, clinical risk scores used for stratification have shown modest capability in predicting thromboembolic events, and biomarkers may improve our identification of 'high risk' patients. Biomarkers, whether measured in the peripheral blood, urine or imaging-based may improve our knowledge of the pathophysiology of AF. Importantly these biomarkers could help in the assessment of AF prognosis. The aim of this review was to summarise the published data about biomarkers studied in AF, with focus on data from randomised prospective clinical trials and large community-based cohorts. We will also review the application of these biomarkers to prognosis on the main schemes used to help stratify risk in AF.