Worsening of coronary spasm during the perioperative period: A case report

Intraoperative Coronary Spasm: A Potential Case of Vasospastic Angina

Prinzmetal's angina typically features spasms of the coronary arteries due to the hyperreactivity of the vascular smooth muscle cells of the vessels to a nonspecific stimulus. Reports of coronary spasm during general anesthesia are rare, but in such cases, diagnosis is suggested by a framework of angina at rest and changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) or coronary reactivity tests with ergonovine or acetylcholine. The present study describes a case of coronary spasm induced by general anesthesia associated with several cardiovascular risk factors and the usage of vasoactive drugs that was documented by angiography without using stimulating drugs and treated with intracoronary nitroglycerin. The patient was a 58-year-old male who was designated for carotid endarterectomy due to the stenosis (70%) of the right internal carotid artery by an atheromatous plaque after visiting the emergency department with a sensorimotor deficit in the left upper limb and bifrontal headaches with sudden onset. During the surgical intervention, after the administration of 10 mg of intravenous ephedrine, cardiorespiratory arrest occurred, with alternation between defibrillable and non-defibrillable heart paces. After the recovery of spontaneous circulation after 50 minutes of resuscitation maneuvers, the patient was transported to the hemodynamics laboratory, where there were recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation during the angioplasty of the anterior descending artery. After direct stent implantation, pre- and post-stent spasms were verified and reversed after the administration of intracardiac nitroglycerin. The spasm was a possible complication of anesthesia and responded to treatment with nitrates and calcium channel blockers. We would like to emphasize the importance of cardiac monitoring during surgery and anesthesia.

Successful Use of Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in a Patient With Variant Angina After Large Ventral Hernia Repair

Coronary artery spasm constitutes the primary underlying pathology of variant angina. Because provocation of coronary artery spasm may occur with both excess sympathetic and excess parasympathetic stimulation, patients with this disorder have extremely limited options for perioperative pain control. This is especially true for procedures involving extensive abdominal incision/manipulation. Whereas neuraxial analgesia might otherwise be appropriate in these cases, several studies have demonstrated that coronary artery spasm can occur as a result of epidural placement, and therefore, that this may not be an optimal choice for patients with variant angina. This report discusses the case of a patient with a preexisting diagnosis of variant angina who underwent an exploratory laparotomy with large ventral hernia repair and for whom continuous erector spinae plane blocks were successfully used as analgesic adjuncts without triggering coronary artery spasm.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Spasm in Comparison with Those in Patients with Single-Vessel Coronary Spasm

(1) Background: We have sometimes experienced patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) who presented multi-vessel spasm (MVS) on coronary angiography and spasm provocation test (SPT). However, the clinical characteristics of VSA patients with MVS and the prognosis of such patients in the clinical setting have not been clarified. Therefore, we compared the clinical characteristics and prognosis in VSA patients with MVS with those in VSA patients with single-vessel spasm (SVS). (2) Methods: A total of 152 patients (mean age, 67 years, 74 men and 78 women) with VSA, in which the presence of coronary spasm was assessed in both left coronary artery (LCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) on SPT, were enrolled. We defined VSA as the presence of >90% narrowing of the epicardial coronary artery on angiograms, accompanied by usual chest symptoms and/or ischaemic ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram. On SPT, MVS was defined as the presence of spasms on ≥2 major coronary arteries. Based on the presence of MVS, patients were divided into the MVS group and the SVS group. The frequencies of conventional coronary risk factors, blood chemical parameters, average times of anginal attack, SPT findings such as spasm provocation induced by a low dose of acetylcholine (L-ACh) and total occlusion due to coronary spasm (TOC), number of coronary vasodilators at discharge and major cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiac death and readmission due to any cause of cardiovascular diseases) were compared between the two groups. (3) Results: The MVS and SVS groups were comprised of 98 (64%) and 54 (36%) patients, respectively. The level of fasting blood glucose (FBS) was lower (p < 0.01), and the level of cystatin-C (n = 89) tended to be higher (p = 0.07) in the MVS group than in the SVS group. The frequencies of L-ACh-induced coronary spasm (33% in MVS and 17% in SVS, p = 0.04) and TOC (12% in MVS, 0% in SVS, p < 0.01) were higher in the MVS group than in the SVS group. The average number of coronary vasodilators at discharge was higher in the MVS group (1.2 ± 0.4) than in the SVS group (0.9 ± 0.5, p < 0.01). The frequency of MACE was not different between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: Patients with MVS may have higher VSA activity on SPT and have more aggressive medications, leading to a comparable prognosis in VSA patients with SVS. MVS is an important indicator of at least VSA activity, and cardiologists should confirm this in SPT whenever possible. Further studies should confirm whether lower FBS levels and higher cystatin-C levels are any markers of MVS.

Is Noncardiac Chest Pain Truly Noncardiac?

Many causes of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) have been studied and gastroesophageal reflux disease is considered to be the major cause. However, studies have reported that treatment with a proton pump inhibitor does not effectively provide relief for NCCP-related symptoms, and these symptoms frequently recur. These findings suggest that patients with cardiac disease may be excluded completely from the NCCP group. Several examinations can be conducted to verify the presence of cardiac disease. Such examinations include the assessment of biochemical markers, rest and exercise electrocardiogram, echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, stress myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and coronary angiography (CAG). However, the presence of functional coronary artery diseases (CADs), such as vasospastic angina and/or microvascular angina, cannot be detected using these modalities. These functional CADs can be diagnosed by CAG with spasm-provocation testing and/or physiological coronary measurement. Thus, when a patient who is suspected of having NCCP takes a proton pump inhibitor and does not respond well, further examination-including assessment for possible functional CADs-may be needed.

ST Elevations and Ventricular Tachycardia Secondary to Coronary Vasospasm upon Extubation

ST elevations (STE) in the perioperative setting can result from a number of different etiologies, the most common and feared being acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, other causes should be considered, as treatment may differ depending on the diagnosis. Here, we describe a case of STE and ventricular tachycardia in a patient at high risk for ACS. The patient had a prior diagnosis of coronary vasospasm; however, given pre-existing risk factors, much consideration and deliberation occurred prior to electing conservative therapy. This report provides an overview of perioperative vasospasm and other causes of STE, which anesthesiologists should be aware of.

Vasospastic Angina Diagnosed by the Spasm Provocation Test with the Combined Use of the Acetylcholine and Ergonovine Provocation Tests

The spasm provocation test (SPT) is important for diagnosing vasospastic angina (VSA), and acetylcholine (ACh) is usually used for this test in Japan. However, some patients with VSA have negative SPT results with the use of the standard ACh regimen alone. We herein report two cases in which VSA was diagnosed by the SPT with the combined use of ACh and ergonovine (EM). VSA could not be diagnosed in either case by the SPT using ACh infusions alone. For patients with negative SPT results, cardiologists should consider performing the SPT using a combination of ACh and EM.

Coronary spasm: It’s common, but it’s still unsolved

Coronary spasm is caused by a transient coronary narrowing due to the constriction of epicardial coronary artery, which leads to myocardial ischemia. More than 50 years have passed since the first recognition of coronary spasm, and many findings on coronary spasm have been reported. Coronary spasm has been considered as having pivotal roles in the cause of not only rest angina but also exertional angina, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure. In addition, several new findings of the mechanism of coronary spasm have emerged recently. The diagnosis based mainly on coronary angiography and spasm provocation test and the mainstream treatment with a focus on a calcium-channel blocker have been established. At a glance, coronary spasm or vasospastic angina (VSA) has become a common disease. On the contrary, there are several uncertain or unsolved problems regarding coronary spasm, including the presence of medically refractory coronary spasm (intractable VSA), or an appropriate use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with cardiac arrest who have been confirmed as having coronary spasm. This editorial focused on coronary spasm, including recent topics and unsolved problems.