Short and long-term outcomes of diabetes mellitus in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis after steroid therapy

Diabetes mellitus in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

A high prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) coexisting with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is observed. However, evidence on the circumstances under which corticosteroid therapy (CST) for AIP improves or worsens DM is scarce. This study aimed to demonstrate and identify predictors of DM control under the influence of CST.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with type 1 AIP were enrolled from a prospectively maintained cohort and were classified into three groups according to the chronology in which AIP and DM were diagnosed: pre-existing DM (pDM), concurrent DM (cDM), and non-DM (nDM). The responses of DM to CST were assessed when corticosteroid was ceased or tapered to a maintenance dose and classified as 'improvement' and 'non-improvement' (including 'no change' and 'exacerbation').

RESULTS

Among 101 patients with type 1 AIP, 52 (51.5%) patients were complicated with DM at the time of AIP diagnosis, with 36 patients in the cDM group and 16 patients in the pDM group. The incidences of diffuse pancreatic swelling (72.2%) and pancreatic body/tail involvement (91.7%) were significantly higher in the cDM group than in both the pDM and nDM groups. Of the 52 patients with DM, CST was administered in 48 cases. Multivariate logistic analysis identified that elevated serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) level at AIP diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) = 0.032, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.003-0.412, P = 0.008] and pancreatic atrophy after CST (OR = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.003-0.295, P = 0.003) were negatively associated with DM control improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diffuse pancreatic swelling and pancreatic body/tail involvement in pancreatitis tended to be complicated with cDM at AIP diagnosis. CST exerted a beneficial effect on the clinical course of DM in nearly half of the AIP patients complicated with DM at diagnosis, particularly in those without elevated serum GGT levels at diagnosis and who did not experience pancreatic atrophy after CST.

Relapse and side effects of steroid therapy beyond 3 years in autoimmune pancreatitis: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The impact of extended steroid administration on patients with autoimmune pancreatitis after a 3-year maintenance period remains poorly understood. This study analyzed the advantage and disadvantage of continuing steroid therapy beyond 3 years.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study across 17 institutions, patients who successfully completed 3 years of maintenance therapy without experiencing relapse were categorized into two groups: the maintenance therapy discontinuation group, who discontinued steroid therapy after the initial 3-year period, and maintenance therapy continuation group, who continued steroid therapy beyond 3 years. The cumulative relapse rate after 3 years of maintenance therapy was the primary outcome. Relapse predictors were compared using the Gray test for cumulative relapse incidence by specific factor.

RESULTS

Of 211 patients, 105 experienced no relapse during the 3-year maintenance therapy and were divided into two groups: 69 in the maintenance therapy discontinuation group and 36 in the maintenance therapy continuation group. The relapse rate was lower in the maintenance therapy continuation group than in the maintenance therapy discontinuation group (P = 0.035). Predictors of relapse after 3 years included cessation of maintenance therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.76; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-13.3, P = 0.040) and renal involvement (HR = 2.88; 95 % CI = 1.04-7.99, P = 0.042). The maintenance therapy continuation group showed a significantly higher prevalence of macrovascular complications, compared with the maintenance therapy discontinuation group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Cessation of steroid maintenance therapy and renal involvement were predictors of relapse after 3 years of maintenance therapy. However, the long-term use of steroids may increase the risk of macrovascular complications.

Long-term Outcomes after Steroid Pulse Therapy in Patients with Type 1 Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Objective Steroid pulse therapy is a regimen involving the intravenous administration of supra-pharmacological doses of corticosteroids in the short term. It is used to treat various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. However, the strengths and limitations of steroid pulse therapy for induction of remission in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) are unknown. Methods Depending on the steroid therapy regimen administered, the 104 patients with type 1 AIP included in this retrospective study were divided into three groups: conventional oral prednisolone (PSL) regimen (PSL group), intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse followed by oral PSL regimen (Pulse+PSL group), and IVMP pulse-alone regimen (Pulse-alone group). We then examined the relapse rate and adverse events among the three groups. Results The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the relapse rate at 36 months after steroid therapy were 13.6% in the PSL group, 13.3% in the Pulse+PSL group, and 46.2% in the Pulse-alone group. The log-rank test revealed that the relapse-free survival in the Pulse-alone group was significantly shorter than that in the PSL (p=0.024) and Pulse+PSL groups (p=0.014). The exacerbation of glucose tolerance after steroid therapy was less frequently observed in the Pulse-alone group (0%) than in the PSL group (17%, p=0.050) and Pulse+PSL groups (26%, p=0.011). Conclusion Although treatment with IVMP pulse alone resulted in unsatisfactory relapse prevention outcomes compared with conventional steroid therapy, the IVMP pulse-alone regimen might be an alternative treatment strategy for type 1 AIP from the perspective of avoiding adverse events from steroids.

Challenges for clinicians treating autoimmune pancreatitis: Current perspectives

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease clinically characterized by obstructive jaundice, unintentional weight loss, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, and diabetes. AIP is classified into two subtypes - type 1 and type 2 - according to pathological findings, clinical features, and serology test results, but some cases may be defined as type not otherwise in the absence of pathological findings and inflammatory bowel disease. To address the differences in diagnostic criteria by country, standard diagnostic criteria for AIP were proposed in 2011 by an international consensus of expert opinions. Differential diagnosis of AIP from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is important but remains challenging for clinicians. Fortunately, all subtypes of AIP show dramatic response to steroid treatment. This review discusses the current perspectives on the diagnosis and management of AIP in clinical practice.

Exocrine and Endocrine Insufficiency in Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Matter of Treatment or Time?

Background: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a specific form of chronic pancreatitis with a high relapse rate after treatment. AIP patients are burdened with an increased risk of long-term sequelae such as exocrine and endocrine insufficiency. Our objective was to investigate if pharmacological treatment affects both endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function in patients with AIP. Methods: We included 59 patients with definite AIP in the final analysis. Screening for diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) was performed at the time of AIP diagnosis and during follow-up. Results: There were 40 (67.8%) males and 19 (32.2%) females; median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Median follow-up after the diagnosis of AIP was 62 months. PEI prevalence at diagnosis was 72.7% and was 63.5% at follow-up. The cumulative incidence of DM was 17.9%, with a prevalence of DM at diagnosis of 32.8%. No strong association was found between pharmacological treatment and occurrence of PEI and DM. Univariate analysis identified potential risk factors for PEI (other organ involvement and biliary stenting) and for DM (overweight, blue-collar profession, smoking, weight loss or obstructive jaundice as presenting symptoms, imaging showing diffuse pancreatic enlargement, smoking). In a multivariate analysis, only obstructive jaundice was identified as a risk factor for DM both at diagnosis and during follow-up. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the prevalence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in AIP is high at diagnosis with an additional risk of PEI and DM during follow-up despite pharmacological treatment.

Incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis at diagnosis and after treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare form of pancreatitis that may lead to endocrine and exocrine insufficiency if left untreated. AIP clinically responds to glucocorticoids (GCs) therapy, but multiple GCs courses are often required to maintain remission with detrimental effects on glycaemic control.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the rate of endocrine and of exocrine insufficiency at diagnosis and at follow up in patients with AIP as well as the impact of GC therapy on pancreatic function in the long-term.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to August 2021 to identify studies reporting data on endocrine and exocrine insufficiency in patients with AIP. Pooled events were calculated using a random-effect model and expressed in terms of pooled prevalence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 6522 AIP patients and sixty-two studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate rate for the overall prevalence of diabetes in AIP at baseline was 37% (95% CI 32-42, I² 96%). The pooled prevalence rate of exocrine insufficiency was 45% (95%CI 32.9-57.4; I² 97%). The pooled estimate rate of diabetes at follow-up was 44% (95%CI 26.1-62.4) in studies where GCs were given to 100% of patients and 42% (95%CI 30.6-52.9) in studies where GCs were given to less than 100% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of patients with AIP displays concomitant exocrine and endocrine insufficiency at the time of diagnosis. The incidence of diabetes at the longest available follow up tends to increase in patients treated with GCs.

Factors affecting glycemic control in diabetes mellitus complicated by autoimmune pancreatitis

Aims/Introduction

To investigate factors influencing glycemic control in diabetes mellitus complicated by autoimmune pancreatitis.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective cohort study investigated 33 patients with diabetes mellitus complicated by autoimmune pancreatitis who had received steroid therapy at Toranomon Hospital between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. The course of glycemic control at 12 months after starting steroids was classified into three groups: Improved, Unchanged, or Worsened. Factors affecting these groups were investigated. Furthermore, we created two scores: (1) time of diabetes mellitus onset and baseline body mass index; (2) time of diabetes mellitus onset and baseline C‐peptide index. Diabetes mellitus occurring at the same time as autoimmune pancreatitis, body mass index ≥22 kg/m², and C‐peptide index ≥1.1 were each worth 1 point. Scores were summed and totals of 0–2 were compared between groups.

Results

Ten patients were in the Improved group, 10 were in the Unchanged group, and 13 were in the Worsened group. The baseline body mass index and baseline C‐peptide index were lower in the Worsened group than in the Improved group (P < 0.05 each). In addition, the scores were lower in the Worsened group than in the other groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with a lower baseline body mass index and a decreased baseline C‐peptide index may experience worse glycemic control on steroid therapy.

Amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for autoimmune pancreatitis, 2020

In response to the latest knowledge and the amendment of the Japanese diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in 2018, the Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP in 2013 were required to be revised. Three committees [the professional committee for developing clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists; the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method; and the evaluating committee of moderators] were organized. Twenty specialists in AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from a total of 5218 articles (1963-2019) from a search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The professional committee made 14, 9, 5, and 11 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis, extra-pancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis, and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded the statements as valid after a two-round modified Delphi approach with individually rating these clinical statements, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. After evaluation by the moderators, the amendment of the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP has been proposed in 2020.

Corticosteroids prevent the progression of autoimmune pancreatitis to chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) sometimes progress to chronic pancreatitis (CP). We evaluated the ability of corticosteroids to prevent the progression to CP.

METHODS

We defined patients with definitive findings of CP (stones in the main pancreatic duct [MPD] or multiple pancreatic calcifications) as having severe calcification (SC). A total of 145 AIP patients were enrolled. We measured the duration between AIP diagnosis and SC development and retrospectively compared the time to SC development between patients with and without steroids. Multivariate analysis for factors associated with SC were performed.

RESULTS

Nineteen (13%) patients progressed to SC. Since 95 patients had pancreatic head swelling and SC was found in these patients only, our analysis focused mainly on these at-risk populations. In Kaplan-Meier analysis limited to patients with pancreatic head swelling, the incidence of SC was significantly lower in patients with steroids than in those without (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.52; p < 0.001). Multivariate testing of patients with pancreatic head swelling confirmed that steroid therapy was significantly associated with a lower incidence of SC (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03-0.34; p < 0.001), while MPD dilation at AIP diagnosis was related to a higher incidence of SC (HR 4.02, 95% CI 1.43-11.7; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids appeared to prevent progression to CP in AIP patients, especially in those with pancreatic head swelling. Patients with both pancreatic head swelling and MPD dilation at diagnosis have a higher incidence of progression to CP. Steroid therapy is suggested for these high-risk cases.

European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations

The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.

Multicentric Italian survey on daily practice for autoimmune pancreatitis: Clinical data, diagnosis, treatment, and evolution toward pancreatic insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare, and relatively new, form of chronic pancreatitis. The management of AIP can vary considerably among different centres in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to present a picture of epidemiological, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and the real-life practice in terms of management in several academic and non-academic centres in Italy.

METHODS

Data on the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, treatments, frequency of relapses, and long-term outcomes were retrospectively collected in a cohort of AIP patients diagnosed at 14 centres in Italy.

RESULTS

One hundred and six patients were classified as type 1 AIP, 48 as type 2 AIP, and 19 as not otherwise specified. Epidemiological, clinical, radiological, and serological characteristics, and relapses were similar to those previously reported for different types of AIP. Endoscopic cytohistology was available in 46.2% of cases, and diagnostic for AIP in only 35.2%. Steroid trial to aid diagnosis was administered in 43.3% cases, and effective in 93.3%. Steroid therapy was used in 70.5% of cases, and effective in 92.6% of patients. Maintenance therapy with low dose of steroid (MST) was prescribed in 25.4% of cases at a mean dose of 5 (±1.4) mg/die, and median time of MST was 60 days. Immunosuppressive drugs were rarely used (10.9%), and rituximab in 1.7%. Faecal elastase-1 was evaluated in only 31.2% of patients, and was pathological in 59.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of AIP patients, diagnosis and classification for subtype was frequently possible, confirming the different characteristics of AIP1 and AIP2 previously reported. Nevertheless, we observed a low use of histology and steroid trial for a diagnosis of AIP. Steroid treatment was the most used therapy in our cohort. Immunosuppressants and rituximab were rarely used. The evaluation of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency is underemployed considering its high prevalence.

Insulin secretion improvement during steroid therapy for autoimmune pancreatitis according to the onset of diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is frequently complicated by diabetes mellitus (DM), but DM associated with AIP is reported to improve after steroid therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate glucose intolerance during steroid therapy according to the onset of DM.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients who underwent steroid therapy for AIP were included into this study. We evaluated C peptide index (CPI), homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-R), and the pancreatic diameter at AIP diagnosis and after 4 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years of steroid therapy. Patients were categorized into three groups according to DM onset: Pre-existing DM (pDM), concurrent DM (cDM), and non-DM (nDM).

RESULTS

Forty-three patients (71%) had DM: 15 pDM and 28 cDM. At AIP diagnosis, CPI was lower in patients with pDM (0.7, P = 0.007) and cDM (0.9, P = 0.018) than nDM (1.3). After 4 weeks of steroid therapy, CPI improved in cDM (P < 0.001) and in nDM (P = 0.021). After 2 years of steroid therapy, HOMA-R increased (2.1-3.0, P = 0.007) but CPI gradually improved (1.0-2.1, P = 0.004). DM improved in 23% of cDM, and 55% of insulin users in cDM discontinued using insulin. Pancreatic atrophy was seen in 30%, and was associated with DM.

CONCLUSION

DM in patients with AIP was associated with impaired insulin secretion rather than insulin resistance. Insulin secretion improved during steroid therapy for AIP in patients with concurrent DM. Thus, glucose intolerance can be an indication for AIP treatment.

Steroid Therapy and Steroid Response in Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a unique subtype of pancreatitis, is often accompanied by systemic inflammatory disorders. AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes on the basis of the histological subtype: immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (type 1) and idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (type 2). Type 1 AIP is often accompanied by systemic lesions, biliary strictures, hepatic inflammatory pseudotumors, interstitial pneumonia and nephritis, dacryoadenitis, and sialadenitis. Type 2 AIP is associated with inflammatory bowel diseases in approximately 30% of cases. Standard therapy for AIP is oral corticosteroid administration. Steroid treatment is generally indicated for symptomatic cases and is exceptionally applied for cases with diagnostic difficulty (diagnostic steroid trial) after a negative workup for malignancy. More than 90% of patients respond to steroid treatment within 1 month, and most within 2 weeks. The steroid response can be confirmed on clinical images (computed tomography, ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography). Hence, the steroid response is included as an optional diagnostic item of AIP. Steroid treatment results in normalization of serological markers, including IgG4. Short- and long-term corticosteroid treatment may induce adverse events, including chronic glycometabolism, obesity, an immunocompromised status against infection, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and myopathy. AIP is common in old age and is often associated with diabetes mellitus (33-78%). Thus, there is an argument for corticosteroid therapy in diabetes patients with no symptoms. With low-dose steroid treatment or treatment withdrawal, there is a high incidence of AIP recurrence (24-52%). Therefore, there is a need for long-term steroid maintenance therapy and/or steroid-sparing agents (immunomodulators and rituximab). Corticosteroids play a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of AIP.

Combination Therapy with Empagliflozin and Insulin Results in Successful Glycemic Control: A Case Report of Uncontrolled Diabetes Caused by Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Subsequent Steroid Treatment

A 66-year-old Japanese male presented with thirst, polyuria, and hemoglobin A1c and postprandial glucose levels (13.1% and 529 mg/dL, respectively) that indicated severe hyperglycemia. Based on his high immunoglobulin G4 level and the results of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, we diagnosed him with autoimmune pancreatitis. Insulin was initiated to control his diabetes. One month later, the patient commenced on prednisolone therapy for the treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis, after which his total insulin dosage increased to a maximum of 52 units/day. When the prednisolone dosage was later tapered, the patient's total dosage of insulin was reduced to 42 units/day. However, he had gained 3.6 kg from the start of prednisolone therapy, and 42 units/day was insufficient for maintaining glycemic control. Thus, empagliflozin, a sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, was added. Thereafter, we were able to reduce the patient's total dosage of insulin; it was eventually discontinued with good glycemic control and weight loss. Such results suggest that the combination of insulin with an SGLT2 inhibitor may be a viable option for the treatment of diabetic patients on prednisolone therapy.

IgG4-related disease in endocrine practice

IgG4-related disease is a set of symptoms resulting from a chronic, usually multiple organ inflammatory condition which affects various organs. It consists of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrations with attendant fibrosis and deep vein thrombosis. Frequently observed tissue lesions are accompanied by elevated IgG4 levels in serum. The etiopathogenesis of the lesions is of multifactor character and the clinical manifestation of the disease is highly diverse. The diagnostic process is based on the patient's medical history, clinical examination and additional tests, including a histopathological examination of the infected organ's tissues. Almost forty different locations of the disease have been reported, including disorders of the endocrine system. IgG4-related endocrinopathies are quite rare. However, it is likely that the diagnosis is under-reported due to lack of awareness of this clinical entity. Despite increasing interest in the subject, there are not enough reliable studies evaluating the link between IgG4-RD and endocrine disorders.

Impact of hyperglycemia on autoimmune pancreatitis and regulatory T-cells

AIM

To evaluate the influence of hyperglycemia on the progression of autoimmune pancreatitis.

METHODS

We induced hyperglycemia by repetitive intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 50 mg/kg streptozotocin in MRL/MpJ mice, which develop autoimmune pancreatitis due to a genetic predisposition. We compared the extent of inflammation (histological score, CD3+ lymphocytes, CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells, Foxp3+ T-helper cells) in the pancreas of hyperglycemic and normoglycemic mice. We also analyzed the number of leukocytes, lymphocytes, granulocytes and monocytes in the blood. In addition, we determined the percentage of CD3+ lymphocytes, CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells, Foxp3+ T-helper cells, Foxp3+ CD25+ T-helper and Foxp3- T-helper cells in the spleen by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Treatment with streptozotocin caused a strong induction of hyperglycemia and a reduction in body weight (P < 0.001). Severe hyperglycemia did not, however, lead to an aggravation, but rather to a slight attenuation of autoimmune pancreatitis. In the pancreas, both the histological score of the pancreas as well as the number of CD3+ lymphocytes (P < 0.053) were decreased by hyperglycemia. No major changes in the percentage of CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells, Foxp3+ T-helper cells were observed between hyperglycemic and normoglycemic mice. Hyperglycemia increased the numbers of leukocytes (P < 0.001), lymphocytes (P = 0.016), granulocytes and monocytes (P = 0.001) in the blood. Hyperglycemia also moderately reduced the percentage of CD3+ lymphocytes (P = 0.057), significantly increased the percentage of Foxp3+ T-helper cells (P = 0.018) and Foxp3+ CD25+ T-helper cells (P = 0.021) and reduced the percentage of Foxp3- T-helper cells (P = 0.034) in the spleen.

CONCLUSION

Hyperglycemia does not aggravate but moderately attenuates autoimmune pancreatitis, possibly by increasing the percentage of regulatory T-cells in the spleen.

Predominant Improvement of Alpha Cell Function after Steroid Therapy in a Patient with Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a subset of inflammatory pancreatic disease, responsive to corticosteroid therapy. It is prone to being affected by diabetes mellitus, but the effectiveness of steroid therapy on pancreatic endocrine function is still controversial. We present a case of AIP, focusing on pancreatic endocrine function after steroid therapy.

CASE REPORT

The patient was referred to our hospital with exacerbation of diabetic control and pancreatic swelling. By admission, the insulin secretory capacity was severely impaired. The patient was diagnosed with AIP and treated with prednisolone, resulting in marked improvement of the pancreatic swelling. Glycemic control worsened transiently after initiation of steroid therapy, but insulin requirements decreased along with tapering prednisolone dosage. Pancreatic cytology showed that the acinar structure had been destroyed, and the islets had disappeared. Insulin and glucagon immunostaining revealed slightly scattered alpha and beta cells within the fibrotic stroma. The patient notably showed improved pancreatic alpha cell function predominantly after steroid therapy, despite partial improvement of beta cell function.

CONCLUSION

An imbalance between alpha and beta cell function may contribute to insufficient diabetic control in some patients with AIP. The pancreatic endocrine function test in combination with pancreatic cytology could be helpful when considering the treatment strategy for diabetic control in patients with AIP.

Monitoring and predicting disease activity in autoimmune pancreatitis with the M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AiP) is treated by immunosuppressive therapy. Exact description of disease activity of AiP is essential in clinical practice and research, but a score to describe the disease activity is missing. Thus, we aimed to establish an activity score of AiP.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied long-term disease courses of 29 patients with AiP (Mannheim, Germany), receiving corticosteroid treatment (CST) by analyzing 613 treatment appointments. Two assumptions were made: First, disease activity is higher at emergency treatments; second, disease activity drops under CST. In all patients, we evaluated established activity- and classification-systems of chronic pancreatitis (cP). Based on the most suitable system, we established an activity score of AiP by including AiP-specific parameters identified from our long-term disease courses and the literature. The new AiP-specific activity score was validated in an external cohort of 14 patients with AiP (Stockholm, Sweden).

RESULTS

Within published activity indexes of cP, the M-ANNHEIM-classification most significantly correlated with emergency- and treatment-dependent disease activities (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, conditional-logistic-regression-analysis). Significant correlations of disease activity were found for several clinical parameters (biliary involvement, extrapancreatic lesions, acute pancreatitis, focal pancreatic mass, pancreatic sausage/mass, focal enlargement, ascites; p < 0.05, Wilcoxon-signed-rank-test). Based on these data and disease features from the literature, the M-ANNHEIM-AiP-Activity-Score (MAAS) was established. CST-induced reduction of MAAS disease activity of more than 60% was associated with lower relapse rates (p < 0.05; Chi-Square-test). The results were validated in the external patient cohort.

CONCLUSION

The MAAS might represent a useful tool to monitor AiP.

Prognosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis after corticosteroid therapy-induced remission in terms of relapse and diabetes mellitus

Background and aim

Relapse and diabetes mellitus (DM) are major problems for the prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). We examined the prognosis of type 1 AIP after corticosteroid therapy (CST)-induced remission in terms of relapse and DM.

Methods

The study enrolled 82 patients diagnosed with type 1 AIP who achieved remission with CST. We retrospectively evaluated the relapse rate in terms of the administration period of CST, clinical factors associated with relapse, and the temporal change in glucose tolerance.

Results

During follow-up, 32 patients (39.0%) experienced relapse. There was no significant clinical factor that could predict relapse before beginning CST. AIP patients who ceased CST within 2 or 3 years experienced significantly earlier relapse than those who had the continuance of CST (p = 0.050 or p = 0.020). Of the 37 DM patients, 15 patients (40.5%) had pre-existing DM, 17 (45.9%) showed new-onset DM, and 5 (13.5%) developed CST-induced DM. Patients with new-onset DM were significantly more likely to show improvement (p = 0.008) than those with pre-existing DM.

Conclusions

It was difficult to predict relapse of AIP based on clinical parameters before beginning CST. Relapse was likely to occur within 3 years after the beginning of CST and maintenance of CST for at least 3 years reduced the risk of relapse. The early initiation of CST for AIP with impaired glucose tolerance is desirable because pre-existing DM is refractory to CST.

Randomised controlled trial of long-term maintenance corticosteroid therapy in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

Corticosteroid has been established as the standard therapy for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), but the requirement for maintenance corticosteroid therapy is controversial. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to clarify the efficacy of maintenance corticosteroid therapy in patients with AIP.

DESIGN

We conducted a multicentre, tertiary setting, randomised controlled trial. After the induction of remission with the initial oral prednisolone (PSL) treatment, maintenance therapy with PSL at 5-7.5 mg/day was continued for 3 years or withdrawn at 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival over 3 years and the secondary endpoint was serious corticosteroid-related complications. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Between April 2009 and March 2012, 49 patients with AIP were randomly assigned to the maintenance therapy group (n=30) or the cessation group (n=19). Baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups. Relapses occurred within 3 years in 11 out of 19 (57.9%) patients assigned to the cessation group, and in 7 of 30 (23.3%) patients in the maintenance therapy group. The relapse rate over 3 years was significantly lower in the maintenance therapy group than that in the cessation group (p=0.011). The relapse-free survival was significantly longer in the maintenance therapy group than that in the cessation group (p=0.007). No serious corticosteroid-related complications requiring discontinuation of PSL were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance corticosteroid therapy for 3 years may decrease relapses in patients with AIP compared with those who discontinued the therapy at 26 weeks.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000001818; Results.

Long-term outcomes of autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) has been considered a favorable-prognosis disease; however, currently, there is limited information on natural course of AIP during long-term follow-up. Recently published studies regarding the long-term outcomes of AIP has demonstrated the developments of pancreatic stone formation, exocrine insufficiency, and endocrine insufficiency are observed in 5%-41%, 34%-82%, and 38%-57% of patients having the disease. Furthermore, the incidence rate of developing pancreatic cancer ranges from 0% to 4.8% during the long-term follow-up. The event of death from AIP-related complications other than accompanying cancer is likely to be rare. During follow-up of AIP patients, careful surveillance for not only relapse of the disease but also development of complications at regular intervals is needed.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis Can Transform Into Chronic Features Similar to Advanced Chronic Pancreatitis With Functional Insufficiency Following Severe Calcification

OBJECTIVES

Because several studies for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have revealed pancreatic calcification resembling that in chronic pancreatitis (CP), we sought to clarify whether AIP could transform into chronic features similar to advanced CP with severe pancreatic dysfunction.

METHODS

Pancreatic functions of 92 AIP patients, 47 definite CP patients, and 30 healthy controls were assessed by fecal elastase-1 concentration (FEC), fasting immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-R.

RESULTS

The 92 AIP patients included 17 (18%) with severe calcification (SC) and 75 without. The FEC levels in AIP and CP patients were significantly lower than that in controls. Exocrine insufficiency defined as FEC less than 200 μg/g was 39% in AIP without SC, 56% in AIP with SC, and 74% in CP. Fasting IRI and C-peptide reactivity values in CP were significantly lower than those in AIP, with no significant differences between AIP subgroups. The prevalence of endocrine insufficiency according to fasting IRI less than 5.0 μU/mL was 26% in AIP without SC, 31% in AIP with SC, and 59% in CP, respectively. HOMA-R values were significantly higher in all AIP groups than in CP.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune pancreatitis can transform into a state of pancreatic insufficiency after calcification that is less severe than that in definite CP.

Diagnosis, treatment and long-term outcomes of autoimmune pancreatitis in Spain based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria: A multi-centre study

OBJECTIVES

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a form of chronic pancreatitis that has been reported worldwide for the last two decades. The aim of this study is to analyse the clinical profile of patients from Spain with AIP, as well as treatments, relapses and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Data from 59 patients with suspected AIP that had been diagnosed in 15 institutions are retrospectively analysed. Subjects are classified according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC). Patients with type 1 AIP (AIP1) and type 2 AIP (AIP2) are compared. Kaplan-Meier methodology is used to estimate the overall survival without relapses.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients met ICDC, 45 patients were AIP1 (86.5%). Common manifestations included abdominal pain (65.4%) and obstructive jaundice (51.9%). Diffuse enlargement of pancreas was present in 51.0%; other organ involvement was present in 61.5%. Serum IgG4 increased in 76.7% of AIP1 patients vs. 20.0% in AIP2 (p = 0.028). Tissue specimens were obtained in 76.9%. Initial successful treatment with steroids or surgery was achieved in 79.8% and 17.3%, respectively. Maintenance treatment was given in 59.6%. Relapses were present in 40.4% of AIP1, with a median of 483 days. Successful long-term remission was achieved in 86.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

AIP1 is the most frequent form of AIP in Spain in our dataset. Regularly, ICDC allows AIP diagnosis without the need for surgery. Steroid and chirurgic treatments were effective and safe in most patients with AIP, although maintenance was required many times because of their tendency to relapse. Long-term serious consequences were uncommon.