Effect of Cold Water on Esophageal Motility in Patients With Achalasia and Non-obstructive Dysphagia: A High-resolution Manometry Study

"Cold-water" immersion endoscopic resection: Novel therapeutic technique for nonampullary duodenal lesions

Watch a video of this article.

Association Between the Cool Temperature-dependent Suppression of Colonic Peristalsis and Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 8 Activation in Both a Randomized Clinical Trial and an Animal Model

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several studies have assessed the effect of cool temperature on colonic peristalsis. Transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) is a temperature-sensitive ion channel activated by mild cooling expressed in the colon. We examined the antispasmodic effect of cool temperature on colonic peristalsis in a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial and based on the video imaging and intraluminal pressure of the proximal colon in rats and TRPM8-deficient mice.

METHODS

In the clinical trial, we randomly assigned a total of 94 patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy to 2 groups: the mildly cool water (n = 47) and control (n = 47) groups. We used 20 mL of 15°C water for the mildly cool water. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with improved peristalsis after treatment. In the rodent proximal colon, we evaluated the intraluminal pressure and performed video imaging of the rodent proximal colon with cool water administration into the colonic lumen. Clinical trial registry website (Trial No. UMIN-CTR; UMIN000030725).

RESULTS

In the randomized controlled trial, after treatment, the proportion of subjects with no peristalsis with cool water was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (44.7% vs 23.4%; P < 0.05). In the rodent colon model, cool temperature water was associated with a significant decrease in colonic peristalsis through its suppression of the ratio of peak frequency (P < 0.05). Cool temperature-treated TRPM8-deficient mice did not show a reduction in colonic peristalsis compared with wild-type mice.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, this study demonstrates that cool temperature-dependent suppression of colonic peristalsis may be associated with TRPM8 activation.

Factors contributing to changes in viscosity and flow rate of a dedicated gel for gel immersion endoscopy

Background and study aims  Gel immersion endoscopy is a novel technique for securing the visual field during endoscopy. Clinical application of a dedicated gel for this technique with an appropriate viscosity to prevent mixing with blood and its efficacy was reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in gel viscosity and flow rate under different conditions. Methods  The viscosity of the gel after injection and flow rate were measured under various conditions changing the injection route and method. Gel viscosity was measured at 25, 10, and 4 °C. Results  A decrease in gel viscosity was found when the gel was injected via the water jet channel compared to the accessory channel. The flow rate and decrease in viscosity of the gel injected via the water jet channel were 220 mL/min and 63.2 %, while when injected via the accessory channel with a clip device inserted were 560 mL/min and 35.8 %. When the gel was kept at a low temperature, the viscosity increased. Conclusions  Gel injection via the accessory channel should be the first choice for efficient use considering the viscosity and flow rate.

Normative reference values for esophageal high-resolution manometry in healthy adults: A systematic review

Establishing normative values of high-resolution esophageal manometry is necessary for accurate interpretation and comparison of measurements. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize normal values for different esophageal high-resolution manometry systems. Moreover, we assessed the effect of body position, bolus consistency, and provocative maneuvers on these normative thresholds. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 1st, 2006, to January 20th, 2020, for studies that reported normative data of high-resolution manometry in healthy volunteers. We assessed methodological quality of the included studies and planned a descriptive analysis. We analyzed data from 54 articles describing normative thresholds in high-resolution manometry using solid-state or water-perfused systems. Forty-six studies performed the manometry study in the supine position with liquid swallows, whereas sixteen studies described normative values in the upright position. Twelve studies assessed normative values for different bolus consistencies, and nine studies evaluated different provocative maneuvers. There is a considerable variety of normative values for esophageal high-resolution manometry depending on the equipment used and the protocols performed to obtain measurements. This should be taken into account when evaluating measurements in clinical practice and when comparing results of published research studies.

Spectrum and Clinical Outcome of Motility Disorders on High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry: A Study From a Tertiary Center on Patients With Dysphagia in Pakistan

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in a Pakistani population. It also evaluates the outcomes of management of patients with esophageal dysphagia and no structural abnormality on endoscopy. Methods This is a cross-sectional study. Patients with symptoms of dysphagia with normal endoscopy were subjected to esophageal manometry and to barium swallow as a part of routine workup. Esophageal motility disorders diagnosed by HRM were compared to barium swallow findings. A follow-up of these patients was done after a one-year interval to evaluate improvement in their symptoms. Results A total of 202 patients underwent HRM. There were abnormal findings in 160 patients (79.2%) with achalasia being the most common diagnosis in 35.6% of the total patients. Out of 72 patients diagnosed to have achalasia on HRM, only 46 (32.6%) had similar findings on barium esophagram and this difference is statistically significant, p < 0.001). Among achalasia patients, laparoscopic surgery was performed in 22 (30.5%) patients with 59% patients reporting a good to excellent improvement (>50%) in their symptoms, balloon dilatations were done in 47 (65.27%) patients with a good to excellent improvement in symptoms in 55% patients. Only three patients (5.5%) were given botulinum toxin injections, and two of them had an improvement of >50% in their symptoms. Patients with motility disorders other than achalasia were treated with a combination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), calcium channel blockers and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Conclusion Achalasia was the most common esophageal motility disorder in our population. HRM can diagnose significantly more patients with achalasia compared to barium swallow. Likewise, HRM was helpful in detecting other esophageal motility disorders and planning their management.

Risk Factors of Prolonged Nausea and Vomiting During Pregnancy

Background

Determination of the risk factors associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVP) helps to develop prevention strategies. However, there is a lack of studies regarding risk factors of prolonged NVP. Thus, the potential risk factors of prolonged moderate and severe NVP were examined.

Methods

This is a retrospective study among pregnant women in South of China. The Pregnancy-Unique Quantification of Emesis (PUQE) scale was used to evaluate NVP. Onset before 12 weeks and persistence after 20 weeks of gestation were defined as prolonged NVP. Data on NVP and other variables were collected by standard questionnaires and medical records.

Results

A finally sample of 1739 participants were analyzed. The incidence of prolonged moderate and severe NVP was 42.1% and 1.1%, respectively. Among those with NVP, the increased risk of prolonged moderate NVP was associated with lower gestational age (OR = 0.95 per SD increase, 95% CI=0.93-0.97), being a housewife (OR = 1.30, 95% CI=1.02-1.65), pre-pregnant longer sedentary time (OR = 2.02, 95% CI=1.16-1.83), pre-pregnant lower exercise frequency (OR = 1.84, 95% CI=1.20-2.82), and history of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases (OR = 2.21, 95% CI=1.61-3.03). Persons who were a housewife (OR = 6.39, 95% CI=1.90-21.47), with pre-pregnant high frequent (always) cold drinking (OR=11.12, 95% CI=1.24-100.73), and had a history of GI diseases (OR=10.10, 95% CI=2.63-38.86) were more likely to experience prolonged severe NVP.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggested that pregnant women unemployed, with lower gestational age, pre-pregnant longer sedentary time, less exercise, high frequent (always) cold drinking and history of GI diseases had a higher risk of prolonged NVP and should be taken more care.

Assessment of Esophageal Motor Disorders Using High-resolution Manometry in Esophageal Dysphagia With Normal Endoscopy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The distribution and esophageal motor characteristics of Chinese patients with esophageal dysphagia who exhibit no structural abnormalities on esophagogastroduodenoscopy remain unclear. Our aim is to assess the esophageal motor patterns using high-resolution manometry (HRM) and classify them according to the Chicago classification version 3.0 (CC v3.0). Furthermore, we compared the CC v3.0 and the previous version 2.0 (CC v2.0) for diagnosis of motor disorders.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-six (mean age 48.4 ± 12.2 years, 61.9% female) patients with esophageal dysphagia were included for analysis of motor function using HRM. All participants were administered a questionnaire to determine Eckardt scores before HRM.

RESULTS

According to the CC v3.0, 57 (24.2%) patients showed evidence of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and were classified as Group 1. Eighteen (7.6%) patients with major disorders of peristalsis were classified as Group 2. Minor disorders of peristalsis (Group 3) were much more frequent (129 [54.7%] patients). Thirty-two (13.6%) patients had normal esophageal manometry were classified as Group 4. All patients with abnormal pH or pH impedance monitoring (n = 44) had minor motor disorders (ineffective esophageal motility [IEM] = 34, fragmented peristalsis = 10). Based on motor category, the Eckardt score was 4.7 ± 0.1 in Group 1, 4.5 ± 0.3 in Group 2, 3.5 ± 0.1 in Group 3, and 3.9 ± 0.1 in Group 4.

CONCLUSIONS

IEM was the most common esophageal motor disorder in patients with esophageal dysphagia who showed no structural abnormality on endoscopy. While a high Eckardt score suggests outflow obstruction or a major motor disorder, a low score suggests IEM.