Real-world evidence generation from patients, their caregivers and physicians supporting clinical, regulatory and guideline decisions: an update on Disease Specific Programmes

OBJECTIVE

To update on and describe the role of Disease Specific Programmes (DSPs), a multi-perspective real-world data (RWD) source, in the context of the evolution of the value and acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in clinical, regulatory and guideline decision-making.

METHODS

DSPs are multi-national, multi-subscriber, multi-therapy cross-sectional surveys incorporating retrospective data collection from patient, caregiver and physician perspectives. Information collected covers the patient journey, including treatment/prescribing patterns and rationale, patient-reported outcomes, impact on work and everyday activities, attitudes towards and perceptions of the condition, adherence to treatment and burden of illness. Published peer-reviewed DSP papers were aligned with current key RWE themes identified in the literature, alongside their contribution to RWE.

RESULTS

RWE themes examined were: using RWE to inform clinical practice, patient and caregiver engagement, RWE role in supporting health technology assessments and regulatory submissions, informing value-driven healthcare decisions, real-world patient subgroup differences and therapeutic inertia/unmet needs; highlighting patients' and caregivers' experience of living with a disease, disconnect from their physicians, unmet needs and educational gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

DSPs provide a wealth of RWD in addition to evidence generated by registries, clinical trials and observational research, with wide use for the pharmaceutical industry, government, funding/regulatory bodies, clinical practice guideline insights and, most importantly, informing improvements in people's lives. The depth, breadth and heritage of information collected via DSPs since 1995 is unparalleled, extending understanding of how diseases are managed by physicians in routine clinical practice and why treatment choices are made, patients' perceptions of their disease management, and caregiver burden.

Real-World Satisfaction with Secukinumab in Clearing the Skin of Patients with Plaque Psoriasis through 24 Months of Follow-Up: Results from US Dermatology Electronic Medical Records

INTRODUCTION

Information on the long-term treatment satisfaction with secukinumab for patients with plaque psoriasis in real-world settings is limited. The objective of this study was to describe real-world treatment satisfaction in patients with plaque psoriasis who initiated secukinumab using data from an electronic medical records-based dermatology database.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with plaque psoriasis in Modernizing Medicine Data Services' affiliate's database who received secukinumab 3/1/2018-1/21/2020 were included. Satisfaction with the treatment's effectiveness in clearing the skin of psoriasis was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale during the 12-month baseline period and at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month postindex visits for the overall population and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month postindex visits for subgroups stratified by prior biologic and systemic therapy use. Additionally, satisfaction levels were assessed among patients who were unsatisfied with treatment at baseline.

RESULTS

Overall, 82.3% agreed that secukinumab was effective in clearing their skin at 6 months, which was maintained through 12 (81.7%), 18 (83.3%), and 24 months (81.4%). Similar results were observed in biologic-experienced/naive and systemic-experienced/naive patients. Overall mean (SD) treatment satisfaction improved from 2.49 (1.36) at baseline to 1.77 (1.06) at 6 months, with similar improvements in satisfaction scores reported at each follow-up period up through 24 months. Of the patients who were not satisfied at baseline, 77.9% reported being satisfied with their treatment at 6 months, which continued through 12 (74.4%), 18 (82.8%), and 24 months (71.4%). Patients receiving secukinumab experienced meaningful changes in percent affected body surface area and Physician Global Assessment scores that were sustained through 24 months, regardless of prior treatment experience.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world findings highlight the high level of sustained satisfaction with secukinumab treatment for improving and maintaining skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe disease, regardless of prior treatment experience.

Feasibility and Utility of the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) in Clinical Care Settings: A Study from the International Psoriasis Council

Background

The Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess psoriasis signs and symptoms.

Objectives

The aim was to assess the usefulness of the PSI in enhancing patient care in the clinical setting.

Methods

Eight dermatology clinics in six countries enrolled adults representing the full spectrum of psoriasis severity who regularly received care at the clinic. Patients were administered the eight-item PSI (score range 0–32; higher scores indicate greater severity) while waiting for the physician; the physician conducted a static physician global assessment (sPGA) and estimated psoriasis-affected body surface area (BSA) at the same visit. Physicians completed a brief questionnaire after each patient visit, and were interviewed about the PSI after all patients were seen.

Results

The clinics enrolled 278 patients; mean [standard deviation (SD)] psoriasis-affected BSA was 7.6% (11.4). Based on BSA, 47.8% had mild psoriasis, 29.1% had moderate psoriasis, and 23.0% had severe psoriasis. Based on sPGA, 18.7% were clear/almost clear, 67.3% were mild/moderate, and 14.0% were severe/very severe. The mean (SD) PSI total score was 12.2 (8.3). Physicians spent a mean (SD) 4.9 (4.8) min discussing PSI findings with their patients (range 0–20 min). Key benefits of PSI discussions included the following: new information regarding symptom location and severity for physicians; prompting of quality-of-life discussions; better understanding of patient treatment priorities; change in treatment regimens to target specific symptoms or areas; and improvement of patient–physician relationship.

Conclusions

The PSI was useful for treated and untreated patients to enhance patient–physician communication, and influenced treatment decisions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40257-019-00458-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Canadian Patients' Preferences in Topical Psoriasis Care: Insights From the PROPEL Surveys

BACKGROUND

Patients with psoriasis of all severities employ topical treatment, either alone or in combination. Promoting Patient Engagement at the Leading Edge of Topical Psoriasis Treatment (PROPEL) surveyed Canadian dermatologists and their patients about their attitudes toward topical care.

OBJECTIVES

To identify gaps between patients and dermatologists regarding the burden of psoriasis, the burden of treatment, and priorities for topical care to Canadian patients with psoriasis.

METHODS

Two parallel surveys explored patient attitudes toward psoriasis and their experience with topical care, as expressed by patients or as perceived by their dermatologists. A third survey, addressed to patients, included additional questions regarding treatment adherence to current topical treatment regimens.

RESULTS

PROPEL dermatologists underestimated the burden associated with psoriatic itch. Otherwise, they were well aligned with patients' views, including their preference for maintaining topical care of their psoriasis over other treatment modalities, the nature of good psoriasis control, and desirable features of topical medications. Despite holding generally positive views of topical therapy, many patients self-identified as poorly adherent.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term adherence to psoriasis topical care remains a challenge. Formulations with improved acceptability might help patients maintain good adherence.