Reoperative Aortic Root Replacement in Patients with Previous Aortic Root or Aortic Valve Procedures

Reoperative aortic root surgery: single-center long-term outcomes and literature review

Background and Objective

Reoperative aortic root surgery has become more and more common over the years and is considered high-risk, with significantly worse outcomes compared to first-procedure root surgery. At our institution, this kind of surgery is frequently performed. The aim of the present review is to describe currently available literature on reoperative surgery on the aortic root in terms of patients' population, indications for surgery and outcomes and to present our center's experience on the matter.

Methods

A literature review was performed in order to identify pertinent studies. They were then compared and described. We also described preoperative characteristics, operative strategies and outcomes of all the patients who underwent redo aortic root surgery from January 1986 to December 2022 at our center.

Key Content and Findings

Our literature review identified 12 pertinent studies, with a total of 16,627 considered patients. The most frequent indications for redo surgery were endocarditis (35.5%), aneurysm, dissection and pseudoaneurysm. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 218 and 152 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%. When analyzing our center's data, 344 procedures were identified. Aortic root dilation was the most frequent indication (36.9%). Mean CPB and cross-clamp times were 218.0±78.8 and 158.2±49.7 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 9.6%. Survival at 5 and 15 years was 76.1% and 51.4% respectively. Freedom from further aortic reintervention was 88.1% after 5 years and 64.9% after 15 years.

Conclusions

Reoperative aortic root surgery is a difficult cardiac procedure which is linked to significantly higher mortality than first-time root replacement. If it is performed by experienced surgeons with a careful preoperative planning its result can still be satisfactory. Our results showed acceptable rates of mortality and reinterventions at follow-up. Endocarditis, however, was linked to worse outcomes.

In-hospital outcomes predictors and trends of redo sternotomy aortic root replacements: insights from a UK registry analysis

Background

Redo sternotomy aortic root surgery is technically demanding, and the evidence on outcomes is mostly from retrospective, small sample, single-centre studies. We report the trend, early clinical results and outcome predictors of redo aortic root replacement over 20 years in the United Kingdom.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed collected data from the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit (NACSA) on all redo sternotomy aortic root replacements performed between 30th January 1998 and 19th March 2019. We analysed trends in the volume of operations, characteristics of hospital survivors vs. non-survivors, and predictors of in-hospital outcomes.

Results

During the study period, 1,107 redo sternotomy aortic root replacements were performed (median age 59, 26% of patients were females). Eighty-four per cent of cases (N = 931) underwent a composite root replacement, 11% (N = 119) had homograft root replacement and valve-sparing root replacement was performed in 5.1% (N = 57) of cases. There was a steady increase in the volume of redo sternotomy root replacements beyond 2006, from an annual volume of 22 procedures in 2006 to 106 procedures in 2017. Hospital mortality was 17% (n = 192), postoperative stroke or TIA occurred in 5.2% (n = 58), and postoperative dialysis was required in 11% (n = 109) of patients. Return to the theatre for bleeding/tamponade was required in 9% (n = 102) and median in-hospital stay was 9 days. Age >59 (OR: 2.99, CI: 1.92-4.65, P < 0.001), recent myocardial infarction (OR: 6.42, CI: 2.24-18.41, P = 0.001) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Emergency surgery (OR: 3.95, 2.27-6.86, P < 0.001), surgery for endocarditis (OR: 2.05, CI: 1.26-3.33, P = 0.001), salvage coronary artery bypass grafting (OR: 2.20, CI: 1.37-3.54, P < 0.001), arch surgery (OR: 2.47, CI: 1.30-3.61, P = 0.018) and aortic cross-clamp longer than 169 min (OR: 2.17, CI: 1.00-1.01, P = 0.003) were associated with increased risk of mortality. We found no effect of the centre or surgeon volume on mortality (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Redo sternotomy aortic root replacement still carries significant morbidity and mortality and is sporadically performed across surgeons and centres in the UK.

The Sutureless Biological Bentall Procedure: A New Technique to Create a Modular Valve-Conduit Construct

The Perceval sutureless valve (Corcym, Saluggia, Italy) has been effectively adopted by surgeons for the treatment of degenerative aortic valve stenosis. Its simplified true sutureless implantation technique has proven useful for minimally invasive cases, but the use of Perceval as part of more complex root replacement has not previously been described. We present a novel technical modification to the manufactured biologic Bentall, called the sutureless biological Bentall. This technique allows for a true modular valve-conduit construction that will simplify future reintervention.

Tips and tricks in redo aortic surgery

Redo aortic surgery is challenging, and the operative risk is higher than that in primary aortic surgery. Preoperative imaging is a crucial guide for a safe re-entry. Scrutinized preparing in cannulation and organ protection strategies have affected surgical outcomes. With comprehensive planning and meticulously executed surgery, mortality and morbidity can be acceptable.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-021-01322-x.

Repeat aortic valve surgery: contemporary outcomes and risk stratification

OBJECTIVES

Redo aortic valve surgery (rAVS) is performed with increasing frequency, but operative mortality is usually higher compared to that associated with primary aortic valve surgery. We analysed our patients who had rAVS to determine the current outcomes of rAVS as a surgical benchmark in view of the growing interest in transcatheter valve techniques.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 148 consecutive patients [median age 67.7 years (interquartile range 54.9-77.6); 68.2% men] who underwent rAVS following aortic valve replacement (81.6%), aortic root replacement (15%) or aortic valve repair (3.4%) between 2000 and 2018.

RESULTS

Indications for rAVS were structural valve dysfunction (42.7%), endocarditis (37.8%), non-structural valve dysfunction (17.7%) and aortic aneurysm (2.1%). Valve replacement was performed in 69.7%, and 34 new root procedures were necessary in 23%. Early mortality was 9.5% (n = 14). Female gender [odds ratio (OR) 6.16], coronary disease (OR 4.26) and lower creatinine clearance (OR 0.95) were independent predictors of early mortality. Follow-up was 98.6% complete [median 5.9 (interquartile range 1.7-10.9) years]. Survival was 74.1 ± 3.7%, 57.9 ± 5.1% and 43.8 ± 6.1% at 5, 10 and 14 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed female gender [hazard ratio (HR) 1.73], diabetes (HR 1.73), coronary disease (HR 1.62) and peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.98) as independent determinants of late survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many urgent situations and advanced New York Heart Association functional class at presentation, rAVS could be performed with acceptable early and late outcomes. Risk factors for survival were female gender, coronary disease and urgency. In this all-comers patient cohort needing rAVS, only a minority would eventually qualify for transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures.

Prosthetic valve sparing aortic root replacement-A persuasive option in well-functioning aortic valve prosthesis

OBJECTIVES

Only limited data is available on prosthetic valve sparing aortic root replacement after aortic valve replacement. The aim of the present study was to assess the short- and midterm outcomes of the patients who underwent such procedures.

METHODS

From June 2004 to March 2018, 21 patients underwent this procedure. The mean age was 51.2 ± 10.2 years with a male predominance (85.7%). The mean time interval from aortic valve replacement to the present surgery was 10.62 years.

RESULTS

One patient died in immediate postoperative period who was taken up for emergency surgery-acute type A aortic dissection. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1, 3, and 5 year survival were 95.2% ± 0.04%, 85.7% ± 0.07% and 85.7% ± 0.07%, respectively. No cardiac or aortic reinterventions were performed during follow up with a 100% freedom from reoperation at 5 years. Fifteen patients (71.43%) had aortopathy and had borderline pathology at the time of first surgery, with all of them having a tear either in the aortic sinuses or pervious aortotomy site.

CONCLUSION

The favorable short and midterm results suggests that prosthetic valve sparing aortic root replacement is a valid option when possible. Utmost care has to be taken at the primary surgery especially in patients with aortopathy, trying to avoid the need for a second surgery.

An Alternative Approach to Build a "Biologic Bentall" From a Pericardial Tube and a Sutureless Valve

This report describes a technique to create a biologic Bentall from a pericardial tube and a rapid deployment valve. This technique facilitates reimplantation of the coronary arteries because the proximal anastomosis is sewn before valve implantation and allows suturing of the coronary ostia from inside and outside, given that there is no interference with the implanted valve. Indications for this technique include complex redo cases and patients with contraindications to a conventional Bentall procedure. This technique has been used in 2 patients with good results.

Primary or secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure: are the outcomes worse?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of a primary and secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2015 (8-year period), 308 patients underwent a Bentall-De Bono procedure in our institute. The mean age was 43 ± 13 years and 80% were men. Twenty-eight patients had prior cardiac surgery through a median sternotomy (group 1) and 280 underwent a primary Bentall-De Bono procedure (group 2). Various preoperative and perioperative parameters were analyzed before and after propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

Before propensity-score matching, patients undergoing a secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure had a worse preoperative profile, as indicated by a higher EuroSCORE II ( p < 0.0001), with hospital mortality in group 1 of 14% (4/28) and 5% (14/280) in group 2 ( p = 0.069). After propensity-score matching, there was no significant difference in EuroSCORE II ( p = 0.922) or hospital mortality ( p = 0.729). After adjusting for the different variables, repeat sternotomy could not be identified as an independent predictor of postoperative mortality or morbidity. Survival at the end of 1 and 5 years in both groups showed no significant differences before or after propensity-score matching ( p = 0.328 and p = 0.356, respectively). In Cox multivariable regression analysis, reoperation was not identified as an independent factor for survival before ( p = 0.559) or after propensity-score matching ( p = 0.365).

CONCLUSION

A secondary Bentall-De Bono procedure can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity, and with midterm survival rates comparable to those of a primary Bentall-De Bono procedure.

Use Side Branch of the Aortic Graft to Facilitate Coronary Reconstruction During Complex Aortic Surgery

The interposition graft could be used for difficult coronary reconstruction during aortic root replacement. We introduced a new technique that utilizes side branch of an aortic graft to facilitate coronary reconstruction. The present study describes this technique and its outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed 234 patient charts of those who underwent aortic root replacement between January 2013 and November 2017. Within this group, 6 patients required coronary reconstruction with branches of aortic graft and were included in this study. All patients were reoperative cases, 3 of which were for acute type A aortic dissection. The mean cardiopulmonary and aortic cross clamp times were 317.2 ± 35.1 minutes and 153.3 ± 75.4 minutes, respectively. All patients survived to discharge with a median hospital stay of 20.5 days (interquartile range: 13.75-27.75). During a median follow-up of 221 days (interquartile range: 197.78-1208), no patients experienced major adverse cardiovascular events. Four patients underwent radiographic follow-up, which confirmed patent interposition grafts (5/5). The use of branches from the aortic graft for coronary reconstruction is feasible with satisfactory outcomes.