1
|
Hascoët S, Smolka G, Blanchard D, Kloëckner M, Brochet E, Bouisset F, Leurent G, Thambo JB, Combes N, Dumonteil N, Bauer F, Nejjari M, Pillière R, Dauphin C, Bonnet G, Ciobotaru V, Kételers R, Gallet R, Hammoudi N, Mangin L, Bouvaist H, Spaulding C, Aminian A, Kilic T, Popovic B, Armero S, Champagnac D, Gérardin B. Predictors of Clinical Success After Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: An International Prospective Multicenter Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:e012193. [PMID: 36256693 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcatheter closure of a symptomatic prosthetic paravalvular leak (PVL) is feasible, but there is presently no conclusive evidence to show consistent efficacy. We aimed to identify predictors of clinical success after transcatheter PVL closure. METHODS Consecutive patients referred to 24 European centers for transcatheter PVL closure in 2017 to 2019 were included in a prospective registry (Fermeture de Fuite ParaProthétique, FFPP). Clinical success was absence of any of the following within 1 month: re-admission for heart failure, blood transfusion, open-heart valvular surgery, and death. RESULTS We included 216 symptomatic patients, who underwent 238 percutaneous PVL closure procedures on the mitral (64.3%), aortic (34.0%), or tricuspid (1.7%) valve. Symptoms were heart failure, hemolytic anemia, or both in 48.9%, 7.8%, and 43.3% of patients, respectively. One, 2, and 3 leaks were treated during the same procedure in 69.6%, 26.6%, and 3.8% of patients, respectively. The PVL was pinpoint or involved 1/8 or 1/4 of the valve circumference in 18.6%, 52.4%, and 28.1% of cases, respectively. The most frequently used devices were the Vascular Plug 3, Ventricular Septal Defect Occluder, Vascular Plug 2, and Paravalvular Leak Device (45.0%, 16.6%, 14.2%, and 13.6% of cases, respectively). Successful device(s) implantation with leak reduction to ≤grade 2 was obtained in 85.0% of mitral and 91.4% of aortic procedures, respectively (P=0.164); with major periprocedural adverse event rates of 3.3% and 1.2%, respectively (P=0.371); and clinical success rates of 70.3% and 88.0%, respectively (P=0.004). By multivariate analysis, technical failure, mechanical valve, and hemolytic anemia were independently associated with absence of clinical success (odds ratios [95% CIs], 7.7 [2.0-25.0]; P=0.002; 3.6 [1.1-11.1]; P=0.036; and 3.7 [1.2-11.9]; P=0.025; respectively). CONCLUSIONS Transcatheter PVL closure is efficient and safe in symptomatic patients but is associated with a lower clinical success rate in patients with hemolysis and/or a mechanical valve. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifiers: NCT05089136.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Hascoët
- Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, France (S.H., D.B., M.K., B.G.)
| | | | - David Blanchard
- Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, France (S.H., D.B., M.K., B.G.)
| | - Martin Kloëckner
- Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, France (S.H., D.B., M.K., B.G.)
| | - Eric Brochet
- Hôpital Bichat AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat-Paris, Paris, France (E.B.)
| | - Frederic Bouisset
- Department of Cardiology, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, UMR 1295 INSERM, Hôpital Rangueil, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France (F.B.)
| | - Guillaume Leurent
- Department of cardiology, Université Rennes, Inserm, LTSI - UMR1099, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France (G.L.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rémy Pillière
- Clinique Ambroise Paré-25-27 boulevard Victor Hugo, France (R.P.)
| | - Claire Dauphin
- Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France (C.D.)
| | - Guillaume Bonnet
- CHU Timone, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille, France (G.B.)
| | | | | | | | - Nadjib Hammoudi
- Sorbonne Université, ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMR_S 1166, and Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière AP-HP, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris, France (N.H.)
| | - Lionel Mangin
- Hôpital d'Annecy, 1 avenue de l'Hôpital, France (L.M.)
| | - Hélène Bouvaist
- CHU Grenoble, avenue du Maquis du Grésivaudan, France (H.B.)
| | | | | | - Teoman Kilic
- Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Cardiology Department, Umuttepe, Yerteskesi, Kocaeli, Turkey (T.K.)
| | - Batric Popovic
- Lorraine University, CHRU Nancy, Cardiology department, Nancy, France (B.P.)
| | | | | | - Benoît Gérardin
- Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Faculté de médecine Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, France (S.H., D.B., M.K., B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
3D-Printing to Plan Complex Transcatheter Paravalvular Leaks Closure. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164758. [PMID: 36012997 PMCID: PMC9410469 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leak (PVL) has emerged as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases. Achieving complete PVL occlusion, while respecting prosthesis function remains challenging. A multimodal imaging analysis of PVL morphology before and during the procedure is mandatory to select an appropriate device. We aim to explore the additional value of 3D printing in predicting device related adverse events including mechanical valve leaflet blockade, risk of device embolization and residual shunting. Methods: From the FFPP registries (NCT05089136 and NCT05117359), we included 11 transcatheter PVL closure procedures from three centers for which 3D printed models were produced. Cardiac CT was used for segmentation for 3D printed models (3D-heartmodeling, Caissargues, France). Technology used a laser to fuse very fine powders (TPU Thermoplastic polyurethane) into a final part-laser sintering technology (SLS) with an adapted elasticity. A simulation on 3D printed model was performed using a set of occluders. Results: PVLs were located around aortic prostheses in six cases, mitral prostheses in four cases and tricuspid ring in one case. The device chosen during the simulation on the 3D printed model matched the one implanted in eight cases. In the three other cases, a similar device type was chosen during the procedures but with a different size. A risk of prosthesis leaflet blockade was identified on 3D printed models in four cases. During the procedure, the occluder was removed before release in one case. In another case the device was successfully repositioned and released. In two patients, leaflet impingement was observed post-operatively and surgical device removal had to be performed. Conclusion: In a case-series of complex transcatheter PVL closure procedures, hands-on simulation testing on 3D printed models proved its usefulness to plan and facilitate these challenging procedures.
Collapse
|