The influence of cognitive-behavioral therapy on depression in dialysis patients - meta-analysis

Needs, barriers and facilitators for a healthier lifestyle in haemodialysis patients: The GoodRENal project

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition, sedentary lifestyle, cognitive dysfunction and poor psychological well-being are often reported in patients on haemodialysis (HD).

AIMS

We aimed to explore needs, barriers and facilitators-as perceived by patients, their carers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) for increasing the adherence to the diet, to physical activity and cognition and psychological well-being.

METHODS

This is an observational cross-sectional study following the STROBE statement. This study is part of an ERASMUS+ project, GoodRENal-aiming to develop digital tools as an educational approach to patients on HD. For that, the GoodRENal comprises HD centers located in four Belgium, Greece, Spain and Sweden. Exploratory questionnaires were developed regarding the perceived needs, barriers and facilitators regarding the diet, physical activity, cognition and psychological well-being from the perspective of patients, their carers and HCPs.

RESULTS

In total, 38 patients, 34 carers and 38 HCPs were included. Nutrition: For patients and carers, the main needs to adhere to the diet included learning more about nutrients and minerals. For patients, the main barrier was not being able to eat what they like. Physical activity: As needs it was reported information about type of appropriate physical activity, while fatigue was listed as the main barrier. For Cognitive and emotional state, it was perceived as positive for patients and carers perception but not for HCPs. The HCPs identified as needs working as a team, having access to specialised HCP and being able to talk to patients in private.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and their carers listed as needs guidance regarding nutrition and physical activity but were positive with their cognitive and emotional state. The HCPs corroborated these needs and emphasised the importance of teamwork and expert support.

Delivering Personalized, Goal-Directed Care to Older Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

An aging population living with chronic kidney disease and progressing to kidney failure, subsequently receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) is growing. A significant proportion of these patients are also living with multi-morbidities and some degree of frailty. Recent practice recommendations from the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis advocate for high-quality, goal-directed PD prescription, and the Standardized Outcomes of Nephrology-PD initiative emphasized the need for an individualized, goal-based care approach in all patients receiving PD treatment. In older patients, this approach to PD care is even more important. A frailty screening assessment, followed by a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) prior to PD initiation and when dictated by change in relevant circumstances is paramount in tailoring PD care and prescription according to the needs, life goals, as well as clinical status of older patients with kidney failure.

Summary

Our review aimed to summarize the different dimensions to be taken into account when delivering PD care to the older patient - from frailty screening and CGA in older patients receiving PD to employing a personalized, goal-directed PD prescription strategy, to preserving residual kidney function, optimizing blood pressure (BP) control, and managing anemia, to addressing symptom burden, to managing nutritional intake and promoting physical exercise, and to explore telehealth opportunities for the older PD population.

Key Messages

What matters most to older PD patients may not be simply extending survival, but more importantly, to be living comfortably on PD treatment with minimal symptom burden in a home environment and to minimize treatment complications.

Automated Digital Counseling Program (ODYSSEE-Kidney Health): A Pilot Study on Health-Related Quality of Life

Key Points

Feasibility of implementing an automated, scalable, digital self-care program for patients with CKD was established. The primary outcome of improvement in health-related quality of life improved with the ODYSSEE-Kidney Health program. A dose relationship was shown between program engagement tertile and improvement in 4-month outcomes.

Background

In-person counseling programs promote self-care behavior and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). ODYSSEE-Kidney Health (prO moting health with D igitallY based counS eling for S elf-care bE havior and quality of lifE ; ODYSSEE-KH) is an automated, scalable, digital counseling program for patients with CKD. This open-label, single-arm pilot study tested the efficacy potential of the ODYSSEE-KH program to improve HRQoL in patients with CKD.

Methods

Adults with categories G3b to 5d CKD were recruited from nephrology clinics in Toronto, Canada. Patients (N =29) received access to the ODYSSEE-KH program in conjunction with usual care. Generalized linear models and pairwise comparisons of mean change scores were conducted to assess the primary outcome: Mental Component Score (MCS) of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life–Short Form instrument. Secondary outcomes included the MCS Mental Health Scale, 36-Item Kidney Disease Quality of Life–Short Form, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire for depression, Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Instrument, and 3-Item Revised University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 53.5 years (SD=18.3); 35% were women; 56% were White; 93% had completed ≥postsecondary education; patients came from the Multi-Care Kidney Clinic (n =9), Home Peritoneal Dialysis Unit (n =12), and Home Hemodialysis Unit (n =8); and 24 participants completed the 4-month end-of-study questionnaires. Outcomes were assessed according to tertiles of program log-on minutes: median (range)=67 (62–108), 212 (119–355), and 500 (359–1573) minutes, respectively. Patients in the highest tertile of engagement showed significant improvements on the MCS versus the moderate tertile group (P = 0.01). Significant dose-response associations were observed for the MCS Mental Health Scale (P < 0.05), KDQoL Burden on Kidney Disease (P < 0.01), KDQoL Effect of Kidney Disease on Everyday Life (P < 0.01), aggregated KDQoL Summary Scale (P < 0.05), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (P < 0.01), Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression (P < 0.05), Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Instrument (P < 0.01), and 3-Item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The ODYSSEE-KH program demonstrated feasibility as an automated, scalable, digital self-care program for patients with CKD. There is evidence of its efficacy potential to improve HRQoL. Further evaluation with a larger sample is warranted.

Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Pain Management in Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review

This narrative review aims to summarize non-pharmacological interventions for pain management in hemodialysis patients, assessing their potential benefits and limitations in enhancing patient well-being and quality of life. We reviewed the current literature on five primary non-pharmacological interventions: acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy, relaxation techniques, virtual reality, and alternative methods such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, music therapy, and aromatherapy. We analyzed the evidence regarding their effectiveness, feasibility, and optimal implementation strategies. The existing evidence supports the potential benefits of these interventions in managing pain and improving the well-being of hemodialysis patients. However, further high-quality research is needed to confirm their effectiveness, establish implementation best practices, and assess their long-term impact on patient outcomes. Non-pharmacological interventions hold promise for pain management in hemodialysis patients. Additional research is required to optimize these interventions and validate their effectiveness, contributing to comprehensive pain management strategies for this vulnerable patient population.

Global research trends and mapping knowledge structure of depression in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Depression is one of the most common and important psychological issues faced by dialysis patients. It can make it more difficult for them to adhere to their treatment regimen, which, in turn, can worsen their physical symptoms and lead to poorer health outcomes.

AIM

To examine the evolution and growth of publications related to dialysis and depression. The objectives were to identify the number of publications, the top active countries, the contributed institutions, funding agencies and journals, as well as to perform citation and research theme analysis.

METHODS

The search was conducted using the Scopus database for publications related to dialysis and depression between 1970 and 2022. Subsequently, bibliometric analysis was carried out on the data obtained using VOSviewer software, version 1.6.9. This analysis included visualization analysis, co-occurrence analysis and examination of publication trends in dialysis and depression.

RESULTS

We identified 800 publications that met the search criteria. The number of publications related to dialysis and depression has increased significantly in the past two decades. The USA led the way with 144 publications, which is 18% of all publications on this topic. Turkey came second with 88 publications (11%), followed by China with 55 publications (6.88%) and Iran with 52 publications (6.5%). Analysis of the research theme identified three main clusters related to gender differences in prevalence, identification of depression as a risk factor, and effective interventions to relieve depression. Future research direction analysis shows a shift toward effective interventions to relieve depression in dialysis patients.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a comprehensive overview of growth, trends and research themes related to dialysis and depression that could help researchers identify gaps in the literature and develop future research.

Depression in dialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to examine updated prevalence rates, risk factors and the prognosis, diagnosis and treatments for depression among dialysis patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Depression influences prognosis, complications, quality of life (QOL), treatment and costs for dialysis patients worldwide. Reported prevalence of depression is 13.1-76.3%; it is higher for dialysis than transplant and higher post than predialysis. Reported depression rates with peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with in-centre haemodialysis (HD) are inconsistent. Related medical factors are known, but suspected associated patient characteristics including gender and race remain unexplored. Associations between depression in dialysis and QOL, mortality, pathophysiological mechanisms of increased mortality, infection and pathways of inflammation-mediated and psychosocial factors require clarification. Several depression screening instruments are validated for dialysis patients - the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM disorders (SCID) remains the gold standard - but authors suggest the diagnostic standard should be higher than for the general population. Short-term studies indicate nonpharmacological therapy achieves clinical effects for depression in dialysis patients, but research on long-term effects is needed.

SUMMARY

Depression management through early screening and continuous care models emphasizing dynamic relationships between healthcare teams, patients and families should be encouraged. Large-scale studies of short-term and long-term benefits of pharmacological and nonpharmacological depression management are warranted.