1
|
O’Donnell KC, Okano L, Alpert M, Nicholas CR, Thomas C, Poulter B, Mithoefer A, Mithoefer M, Ot’alora G M. The conceptual framework for the therapeutic approach used in phase 3 trials of MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1427531. [PMID: 39559692 PMCID: PMC11571099 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Results from multiple recent studies support further evaluation of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in conjunction with psychotherapy (i.e., MDMA-Assisted Therapy) in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In two Phase 3 trials, MDMA-Assisted Therapy comprised a short-term, intensive psychotherapy that included three sessions directly facilitated by MDMA (referred to as "experimental sessions"), as well as a number of non-drug psychotherapy sessions. This treatment model aimed to harness the potential of MDMA to facilitate recall and processing of traumatic memories, and to increase learning in a social context, integrating "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches to trauma-focused care. To date, the conceptual framework for this treatment has not been described in the scientific literature. This omission has contributed to misunderstandings about both the theoretical underpinnings of this modality and the therapeutic approach that emerges from it. This paper delineates the psychotherapeutic concepts, theories, and historical antecedents underlying the inner-directed approach to MDMA-Assisted Therapy for PTSD. Broadly speaking, this therapeutic framework centered the concept of the participant's inner healing intelligence as the primary agent of change, with the therapeutic relationship being the core facilitative condition fostering the participant's self-directed movement toward recovery and growth. Corollaries to this holistic, self-directed, relational, and trauma-informed framework include a non-pathologizing approach to the participant's embodied experience (including the possibility of intense emotional and somatic expression, experiences of multiplicity, suicidal ideation, and multigenerational and transpersonal experiences), as well as the therapists' own psychodynamic, somatic, and transpersonal awareness, empathic attunement, relational skillfulness, and cultural humility. The use of MDMA in conjunction with this psychotherapy platform outperformed the use of placebo with psychotherapy in Phase 2 and 3 trials, as measured by symptom reduction in participants with PTSD. However, within-group comparisons also identified significant symptom reduction in participants who did not receive MDMA, lending empirical support to the psychotherapy model itself. In addition to comparative efficacy trials, future research should investigate which elements of the conceptual framework and therapeutic approach underlie the clinical benefit in individuals with PTSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelley C. O’Donnell
- Department of Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, New York City, NY, United States
| | - Lauren Okano
- Department of Training and Supervision, Lykos Therapeutics, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, United States
| | - Michael Alpert
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Christopher R. Nicholas
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
- Transdisciplinary Center for Research in Psychoactive Substances, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Chantelle Thomas
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
- Transdisciplinary Center for Research in Psychoactive Substances, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Bruce Poulter
- Aguazul- Bluewater, Inc., Boulder, CO, United States
| | - Ann Mithoefer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Michael Mithoefer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wodziński M, Moskalewicz M. Mental Health Experts as Objects of Epistemic Injustice-The Case of Autism Spectrum Condition. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:927. [PMID: 36900070 PMCID: PMC10000601 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This theoretical paper addresses the issue of epistemic injustice with particular reference to autism. Injustice is epistemic when harm is performed without adequate reason and is caused by or related to access to knowledge production and processing, e.g., concerning racial or ethnic minorities or patients. The paper argues that both mental health service users and providers can be subject to epistemic injustice. Cognitive diagnostic errors often appear when complex decisions are made in a limited timeframe. In those situations, the socially dominant ways of thinking about mental disorders and half-automated and operationalized diagnostic paradigms imprint on experts' decision-making processes. Recently, analyses have focused on how power operates in the service user-provider relationship. It was observed that cognitive injustice inflicts on patients through the lack of consideration of their first-person perspectives, denial of epistemic authority, and even epistemic subject status, among others. This paper shifts focus toward health professionals as rarely considered objects of epistemic injustice. Epistemic injustice affects mental health providers by harming their access to and use of knowledge in their professional activities, thus affecting the reliability of their diagnostic assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Wodziński
- Institute of Philosophy, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, M. Curie-Skłodowska sq. 4, 20-031 Lublin, Poland
- Doctoral School of Humanities, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Weteranów 18, 20-038 Lublin, Poland
| | - Marcin Moskalewicz
- Institute of Philosophy, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, M. Curie-Skłodowska sq. 4, 20-031 Lublin, Poland
- Philosophy of Mental Health Unit, Department of Social Sciences and the Humanities, Poznan University of Medical Science, Rokietnicka 7, 60-806 Poznan, Poland
- Phenomenological Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Clinic, Heidelberg University, Voßstraße 4, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson SS. Knowing Well, Being Well: well-being born of understanding: Editor’s Desk: It’s Critical to Cultivate Intellectual Humility. Am J Health Promot 2022; 36:1399-1420. [DOI: 10.1177/08901171221125326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
4
|
Johnson SS. Editor’s Desk: It’s Critical to Cultivate Intellectual Humility. Am J Health Promot 2022; 36:1399-1401. [DOI: 10.1177/08901171221125326a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|