1
|
Bittner NHJ, Cox BW, Davis B, King M, Lawton CAF, Merrick GS, Orio P, Ouhib Z, Rossi P, Showalter T, Small W, Schechter NR. ACR-ABS-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Transperineal Permanent Brachytherapy of Prostate Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:249-257. [PMID: 35588224 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM/OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND The American College of Radiology (ACR), American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) have jointly developed the following practice parameter for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer. Transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer is the interstitial implantation of low-dose rate radioactive seeds into the prostate gland for the purpose of treating localized prostate cancer. METHODS This practice parameter was developed according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website (https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the Commission on Radiation Oncology, in collaboration with ABS and ASTRO. RESULTS This practice parameter provides a framework for the appropriate use of low-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer either as monotherapy or as part of a treatment regimen combined with external-beam radiation therapy. The practice parameter defines the qualifications and responsibilities of all involved radiation oncology personnel, including the radiation oncologist, medical physicist, dosimetrist, radiation therapist, and nursing staff. Patient selection criteria and the utilization of supplemental therapies such as external-beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are discussed. The logistics of the implant procedure, postimplant dosimetry assessment, and best practices with regard to safety and quality control are presented. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to established standards can help to ensure that permanent prostate brachytherapy is delivered in a safe and efficacious manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Martin King
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Peter Orio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Zoubir Ouhib
- Boca Raton Regional Hospital, Lynn Cancer Institute, Boca Raton, FL
| | | | | | - William Small
- Keck Medical Center of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer, Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Naomi R Schechter
- Keck Medical Center of USC, Norris Comprehensive Cancer, Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakiri M, Ueda K, Ogasawara N, Kurose H, Uemura K, Nishihara K, Muraki K, Hattori C, Ogo E, Igawa T. Tri‐modality therapy with i‐125 brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and short‐term hormone therapy for high‐risk prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. IJU Case Rep 2022; 5:223-226. [PMID: 35795117 PMCID: PMC9249659 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We present tri‐modality therapy with i‐125 brachytherapy for high‐risk prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Case presentation A 75‐year‐old man had visited our hospital with complaints of dysuria. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate was performed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The resected histopathological prostate tissue showed malignancy (Gleason score: 3 + 3 = 6). Two years thereafter, Gleason score progressed (4 + 5 = 9) concomitantly with increased prostate‐specific antigen levels. Therefore, tri‐modality therapy, including brachytherapy, was applied. Combined androgen blockade therapy was conducted over a 9‐month period. One month after brachytherapy, external beam radiation was performed. Conclusion Brachytherapy following transurethral prostate surgery is relatively contraindicated because of increased adverse urethral event frequency and seed placement difficulties. A tri‐modality therapy, including brachytherapy, was implemented without any major problems in this patient with high‐risk prostate cancer after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, following which he had a favorable prognosis without recurrence for 6 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Nakiri
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Kosuke Ueda
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Naoyuki Ogasawara
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kurose
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Keiichiro Uemura
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Kiyoaki Nishihara
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Koichiro Muraki
- Department of Radiology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Chikayuki Hattori
- Department of Radiology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| | - Tsukasa Igawa
- Departments of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Makino T, Izumi K, Iwamoto H, Mizokami A. Treatment Strategies for High-Risk Localized and Locally Advanced and Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174470. [PMID: 34503280 PMCID: PMC8430548 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The definitions of locally advanced and oligometastatic prostate cancer are ambiguous, and there are no standard treatments for these. Although multidisciplinary treatment combining systemic and local treatment may be effective, there are many unresolved issues such as the choice of local treatment, use of new endocrine agents and chemotherapy, and selection of optimal patients. The present article discusses the definitions, diagnoses, and treatment of very high-risk prostate cancer and oligometastatic prostate cancer. Abstract Despite the significant advances in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer, patients with very high-risk features such as being locally advanced (clinical stage T3–4 or minimal nodal involvement), having a high Gleason pattern, or with oligometastasis may still have a poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Multidisciplinary treatment with both local and systemic therapies is thought to be effective, however, unfortunately, there is still no standard treatment. However, in recent years, local definitive therapy using a combination of radiotherapy and androgen deprivation is being supported by several randomized clinical trials. This study reviews the current literature with a focus on the definition of very high-risk prostate cancer, the role of modern imaging, and its treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Makino
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8640, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.M.); (H.I.); (A.M.)
- Department of Urology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa 920-8530, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Kouji Izumi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8640, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.M.); (H.I.); (A.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-76-265-2393; Fax: +81-76-234-4263
| | - Hiroaki Iwamoto
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8640, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.M.); (H.I.); (A.M.)
| | - Atsushi Mizokami
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa 920-8640, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.M.); (H.I.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okamoto K. Ten-step method of high-dose LDR 125 I brachytherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:172-182. [PMID: 33939267 PMCID: PMC8200501 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Dose escalation is key for improved outcomes in intermediate‐risk prostate cancer, including unfavorable intermediate‐risk (UIR) cases. This educational report is designed to provide information about our quality high‐dose 125I seed implantation monotherapy technique in which a biologically effective dose (BED) ≧ 200 Gy is applied for treatment of intermediate‐risk prostate cancer. This protocol is named the “Ten‐step Method,” where the rationale and principle of the method are based on the following four goals: (1) The entire prostate should be covered by the prescription isodose distribution with a sufficient margin from the prostatic capsule, achieving high D90 and V100 values by 125I seed implantation. (2) The high‐dose cloud (240 Gy) should not invade the urethra or rectum. (3) In order to achieve goals (1) and (2), make the high‐dose cloud intentionally along the periphery (bilateral wall to anterior wall) away from the urethra and rectum. (4) In order to achieve goal (3), seeds at the periphery, except those anterior to the rectal wall, should be placed just 1mm inside the capsule. The data obtained from a total of 137 patients with intermediate‐risk prostate cancer treated with low‐dose‐rate (LDR) monotherapy are shown. The dosimetry parameters were monitored at 1 month after seed implantation by using CT and MRI fusion guidance. The data at 1 month after LDR were: Average D90, BED, and V100 of 125I LDR monotherapy were 194.1 Gy, 207.3 Gy, and 99%, respectively. This ten‐step method was reproducible in 137 patients with intermediate‐risk prostate cancer, allowing administration of high‐dose monotherapy with excellent clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisei Okamoto
- Department of Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer, Shiga University of Medical Science, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rokni MB, Pointer KB, George J, Luke JJ, Chmura SJ, Redler G. Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra-High DoSes (ICARUS). J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:196-206. [PMID: 33626240 PMCID: PMC7984482 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors improve survival in metastatic diseases for some cancers. Multisite SBRT with pembrolizumab (SBRT + Pembro) was shown to be safe with promising local control using biologically effective doses (BEDs) = 95-120 Gy. Increased BED may improve response rate; however, SBRT doses are limited by surrounding organs at risk (OARs). The purpose of this work was to develop and validate methods for safe delivery of ultra-high doses of radiation (BED10 > 300) to be used in future clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS The radiation plans from 15 patients enrolled on a phase I trial of SBRT + pembro were reanalyzed. Metastatic disease sites included liver (8/15), inguinal region (1/15), pelvis (2/15), lung (1/15), abdomen (1/15), spleen (1/15), and groin (1/15). Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) ranged from 80 to 708 cc. Following the same methodology used in the Phase I trial on which these patients were treated, GTVs > 65 cc were contracted to a 65 cc subvolume (SubGTV) resulting in only a portion of the GTV receiving prescription dose. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was used to plan treatments BED10 = 360 Gy. Plans utilizing both 6FFF and 10FFF beams were compared to clinical plans delivering BED10 = 112.50 Gy. The target primary goal was V100% > 95% with a secondary goal of V70% > 99% and OAR objectives per the trial. To demonstrate feasibility, plans were delivered to a diode array phantom and evaluated for fidelity using gamma analysis. RESULTS All 30 plans met the secondary coverage goal and satisfied all OAR constraints. The primary goal was achieved in 12/15 of the 6FFF plans and 13/15 of the 10FFF plans. Average gamma analysis passing rate using criteria of 3% dose difference and 3, 2, and 1 mm were 99.1 ± 1.0%, 98.5 ± 1.6%, and 95.1 ± 3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION Novel VMAT planning approaches with clinical treatment planning software and linear accelerators prove capable of delivering radiation doses in excess of 360 Gy BED10 to tumor subvolumes, while maintaining safe OAR doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle B Rokni
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kelli B Pointer
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonathan George
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jason J Luke
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steven J Chmura
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prostate cancer with nodular bladder invasion (stage T4N1) cured by low-dose-rate brachytherapy with seminal vesicle implantation in combination with external beam radiotherapy of biologically effective dose ≥ 220 Gy: a case report. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 13:91-94. [PMID: 34025741 PMCID: PMC8117715 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2021.103591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Prostate cancer with nodular bladder invasion (stage T4 prostate cancer) is an extremely difficult clinical entity to achieve complete cure. So far, there has been no clear report demonstrating complete cure of prostate cancer with nodular bladder invasion, stage T4 prostate cancer. Case presentation In this case report, the author presents a 55-year-old man with a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer invading into the bladder wall with pelvic lymph node metastasis (T4N1M0 disease). The patient was treated with biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 220 Gy of high-dose radiotherapy, using low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in combination with whole pelvis (WP) external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): neo-adjuvant six months plus adjuvant six months ADT. There was no grade 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity during follow-up. There was no evidence of hematuria, nor rectal bleeding in the follow-up. The patient stays healthy without biochemical failure and without bowel and urinary troubles at six years. Conclusions Along with previous outstanding data of BED ≥ 220 Gy LDR-based radiotherapy for high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer patents, including pelvic lymph node metastasis, the present report, in which the patient was treated with BED ≥ 220 Gy of high-dose radiotherapy, LDR brachytherapy in combination with WP EBRT may be an optimal treatment for prostate cancer with nodular bladder invasion with lymph node metastasis (T4N1disease).
Collapse
|
7
|
Clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate brachytherapy based radiotherapy for intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:6-11. [PMID: 32190064 PMCID: PMC7073334 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.92405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To monitor the outcomes for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with biologically effective dose (BED) ≥ 200 Gy radiotherapy using low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Material and methods Between 2005 and 2016, a total of 397 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated by LDR-based radiotherapy with a BED ≥ 200 Gy. Treatments consisted of LDR brachytherapy alone (177 cases) or LDR and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (220 cases). Short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was used in 186 patients (46.9%). The median follow-up period was 72 months (range 29-165 months). Dosimetric parameters and BED were studied in each case. The numbers of intermediate-risk features were: 163 patients with 1 intermediate-risk feature (41%), 169 patients with 2 intermediate-risk features (43%), and 65 patients with 3 intermediate-risk features (16%). A total of 145 cases were diagnosed as having primary Gleason pattern 4: Gleason score 4 + 3 (36.5%). Results Three patients developed biochemical failure, thus providing a 7-year actual biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) rate of 99.1%. Biochemical failure was observed exclusively in cases with distant metastasis: two cases with lymph node metastasis and one case with bone metastasis, thus yielding a 7-year freedom from clinical failure (FFCF) rate of 99.1%. We observed eight deaths, but there was no death from prostate cancer, thus yielding a 7-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate of 100%, and an overall survival (OS) rate of 98.4%. Conclusions This study highlights excellent outcomes for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients, including unfavorable intermediate-risk cases, treated with BED ≥ 200 Gy radiotherapy using LDR brachytherapy. LDR alone with a BED of 200 Gy may be an optimal treatment for both favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients, although a longer follow-up is mandatory to confirm the present findings.
Collapse
|
8
|
Outcomes of treatment for localized prostate cancer in a single institution: comparison of radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy by propensity score matching analysis. World J Urol 2019; 38:2477-2484. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03056-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
|
9
|
Katayama N, Nakamura K, Yorozu A, Kikuchi T, Fukushima M, Saito S, Dokiya T. Biochemical outcomes and predictive factors by risk group after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2,316 patients. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:574-582. [PMID: 31153759 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) by risk group and treatment modality and the predictive factors of bFFF by risk group in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study (Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 [I-125] Seed Implantation) in Japan during the first 2 years. METHODS AND MATERIALS The analyses included 2,316 participants in 42 institutions; bFFF was evaluated using the Phoenix definition and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the factors associated with bFFF. RESULTS Median followup period was 60.0 months. The 5-year bFFF rates in all patients, 1,028 low-risk patients, 1,114 intermediate-risk patients, and 133 high-risk patients were 93.6%, 94.9%, 92.7%, and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year bFFF rates in the PI group and EBRT combination therapy group were 93.7% and 93.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, higher Gleason score (GS), higher percent positive biopsies (%PB), and lower prostate V100 (p = 0.0012, 0.0030, 0.0026, and 0.0368) in all patients; younger age, higher pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and lower prostate V100 (p = 0.0002, 0.0048, and 0.0012) in low-risk patients; higher GS, higher %PB, and no hormonal treatment (p = 0.0005, 0.0120, and 0.0022) in intermediate-risk patients; and higher GS and higher %PB (p = 0.0329 and 0.0120) in high-risk patients were significantly associated with bFFF. CONCLUSIONS PI with or without EBRT resulted in excellent short-term biochemical outcomes in all risk groups, especially in high-risk patients. Age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and prostate V100 in low-risk patients; GS, %PB, and hormonal treatment in intermediate-risk patients; and GS and %PB in high-risk patients were independently affected bFFF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norihisa Katayama
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Katsumasa Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Atsunori Yorozu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Shiro Saito
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
A Review of Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy as Practiced in Japan. Brachytherapy 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-0490-3_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
11
|
Plan reproducibility of intraoperatively custom-built linked seeds compared to loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:291-296. [PMID: 30237812 PMCID: PMC6142649 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.77948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Few studies have compared the implant quality of linked and loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare plan reproducibility of intraoperatively built custom linked seeds and loose seeds for prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods Between December 2010 and March 2014, 76 localized prostate cancer patients received Iodine-125 brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy. Linked and loose seeds were implanted in 39 and 37 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was the mean (± standard deviation) of the absolute change in the minimum dose received by 90% of the prostate volume between intraoperative and post-operative planning (ΔD90) to confirm plan reproducibility. Comparisons between the groups were evaluated using 2-sample t tests. Results The ΔD90 values were 6.95 ± 11.6% and –0.41 ± 8.5% for the loose and linked seed groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The linked seed group showed decreased post-operative D90 (118.8% vs. 127.2%), V150 (51.7% vs. 66.7%), and RV100 (0.44 ml vs. 0.61 ml) compared to the loose seed group (p < 0.01), whereas lung migration tended to be reduced (0% vs. 8%). Conclusions The plan reproducibility of the linked seed group was better than that of the loose seed group. Moreover, the linked seed group showed less migration and lower rectal dose.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zimmermann JS, Osieka R, Bruns T, Hollberg H, Wiechmann B, Netzbandt O, Sablotny J, Malade M, Heitz M, Bernhardt F, Tiemann J, Wilkens M, Brüske T, Welker U, Heinemann V, Zimmermann P, de la Maza SF, Pfeiffer D, Tauber PR, Thomas D, Moustakis C. Five-year effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: comparisons with nomogram predictions in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer presenting significant control of intra- and periprostatic disease. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:297-305. [PMID: 30237813 PMCID: PMC6142645 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.77949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer and to compare the outcome with predictions from Kattan and Partin nomograms at 60 months after seed implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS One thousand, one hundred and eighty-seven patients with localized prostate cancer at low-, intermediate-, or high-risk of progression received LDR brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds with curative intent, applied as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). At 60 months after seed implantation, data of 1,064 patients (1,058 alive + 6 who died of prostate cancer) were analyzed for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels using the Phoenix definition. Five-year bPFS probabilities were determined for various risk group classifications (d'Amico, Mt. Sinai, MSKCC/Seattle, NCCN). Outcomes were also compared to patient-individualized nomogram predictions of 5-year bPFS (Kattan 2002) and probability of organ-confined disease (Kattan 2002, Partin 2007). RESULTS Overall, 93.3% (993/1,064) of the patients were free of biochemical progression within 5 years, while the average 5-year bPFS probability according to the Kattan nomogram was significantly lower (85%, p < 0.001). Outcomes were significantly better than Kattan nomogram predictions in the subgroup of patients with monotherapy as well as in patients additionally treated with EBRT. Comparison of the overall outcome with nomogram predictions for organ-confined disease (Kattan nomogram: 50%; Partin nomogram: 65%) revealed a significant probability of LDR brachytherapy to destroy periprostatic tumor spread (p < 0.001) in all risk group constellations, even in high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate high effectiveness of LDR brachytherapy in all risk groups, significantly better than predicted with the Kattan nomogram in most subgroups. The significant superiority of LDR brachytherapy compared to nomogram predictions of organ-confined disease suggests that LDR brachytherapy effectively controls both intra- and periprostatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg S Zimmermann
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Dorothea Thomas
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Praxis für Brachytherapie, Praxiszentrum Alstertal, Hamburg
- Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Abteilung Medizinische Physik, Universitätsklinik Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy in combination with HDR boost for localized prostate cancer: patient reported quality of life outcomes. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:211-217. [PMID: 30038640 PMCID: PMC6052384 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.76980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is limited data to support the use of hypofractionated external beam radiation (HypoF) in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR). We report our quality of life (QOL) outcomes when treating intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients with external beam radiation (EBRT) plus HDR. Material and methods The charts of 54 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with standard fractionation (SF) or HypoF EBRT plus HDR boost at a single institution between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. All patients completed the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS) and Expanded Prostate Index for Prostate Cancer - Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) quality of life assessments prior to treatment and completed at least one follow-up survey. Linear mixed models were performed to test for significant changes and differences in each outcome over time. Results There was no significant difference in AUA score (p = 0.98), incontinence (urge) and urinary irritation/obstruction scores (p = 0.81 and p = 0.62, respectively), and bowel QOL (p = 0.97) between the two dosing groups over time or at any discrete time point. For both groups, AUA scores peaked at 0-2 months before improving. Likewise, sexual function, vitality score, and QOL scores were also not significantly different between the dose groups over time (p = 0.59, p = 0.37, and p = 0.71, respectively). All QOL categories, except sexual function, trended toward baseline with increasing time from intervention. Conclusions Our study suggests HypoF EBRT can be delivered in combination with HDR for patients with ntermediate-risk and high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate without increasing toxicity compared to SF with an HDR boost.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mori H, Fukumori T, Daizumoto K, Tsuda M, Kusuhara Y, Fukawa T, Yamamoto Y, Yamaguchi K, Takahashi M, Kubo A, Kawanaka T, Furutani S, Ikushima H, Kanayama HO. Predictive Factors for Prolonged Urination Disorder After Permanent 125I Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 31:755-761. [PMID: 28652453 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2017] [Revised: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the change in LUTS after prostate brachytherapy to reveal factors for prolonged urination disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four hundred and four patients received prostate brachytherapy at our institution and were followed-up for at least 2 years. We evaluated the correlation of mean IPSS changes and clinical factors. Using multivariate analysis, we also evaluated clinical factors with potential to delay IPSS resolution. RESULTS In cases with prostate volume more than 30 cm3, radiation dose to 90% of prostate volume (D90) more than 160 Gy, and radiation dose to 30% of the urethral volume (UD30) more than 240 Gy, mean IPSS levels were significantly higher, even 30 months after treatment. On multivariate analysis, baseline IPSS more than 8 points and D90 more than 160 Gy were significant predictors for delayed IPSS resolution. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that higher baseline IPSS and higher D90 were predictors for prolonged urination disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidehisa Mori
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Fukumori
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kei Daizumoto
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Megumi Tsuda
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Kusuhara
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tomoya Fukawa
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yasuyo Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kunihisa Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Masayuki Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Akiko Kubo
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawanaka
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Furutani
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ikushima
- Department of Radiology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Hiro-Omi Kanayama
- Department of Urology, Institute of Health Biosciences, The University of Tokushima Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|