Practice-based learning: an appropriate means to acquire the attitude and skills for evidence-based medicine

Exploring workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Distributed healthcare settings such as district hospitals, primary care, and public health facilities are becoming the real-life settings for workplace-based learning required to educate the future healthcare workforce. Therefore, a major focus should be on designing and developing workplace-based learning in these learning environments. Healthcare professionals and educational policymakers play a significant role in these settings as role models in workplace-based learning, and as leaders in integrating learning into their work environments. It is relevant to explore their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors towards workplace-based learning in their own settings, in order to provide context-relevant recommendations that can assist in shaping workplace-based learning environments.

METHODS

We used individual interviews to understand professionals' experiences with workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings. We - three clinicians, an educationalist, and a philosopher - thematically analyzed transcripts of 13 interviews with healthcare professionals and educational policymakers from different healthcare settings who were involved in the clinical phase of undergraduate medical education.

RESULTS

Clustering and categorizing of the data led to the construction of five overarching themes: Identification with and attitude towards medical education, Sense of ownership, Perceived time and space, Mutual preconceptions and relations, and Curriculum for a changing profession.

CONCLUSIONS

These themes accentuate aspects relevant to the development of workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings on the individual, team, or organizational level. We highlight the significance of individual professionals in the development of workplace-based learning and emphasize the need for recognition and support for those occupying the 'broker' role at the intersection of education and practice. For future research and educational practice, we recommend prioritizing initiatives that build on good-practices in workplace-based learning and involve dedicated individuals in distributed healthcare settings.

The influence of a digital clinical reasoning test on medical student learning behavior during clinical clerkships

Recently, a new digital clinical reasoning test (DCRT) was developed to evaluate students' clinical-reasoning skills. Although an assessment tool may be soundly constructed, it may still prove inadequate in practice by failing to function as intended. Therefore, more insight is needed into the effects of the DCRT in practice. Individual semi-structured interviews and template analysis were used to collect and process qualitative data. The template, based on the interview guide, contained six themes: (1) DCRT itself, (2) test debriefing, (3) reflection, (4) practice/workplace, (5) DCRT versus practice and (6) 'other'. Thirteen students were interviewed. The DCRT encourages students to engage more in formal education, self-study and workplace learning during their clerkships, particularly for those who received insufficient results. Although the faculty emphasizes the different purposes of the DCRT (assessment of/as/for learning), most students perceive the DCRT as an assessment of learning. This affects their motivation and the role they assign to it in their learning process. Although students appreciate the debriefing and reflection report for improvement, they struggle to fill the identified knowledge gaps due to the timing of receiving their results. Some students are supported by the DCRT in exhibiting lifelong learning behavior. This study has identified several ways in which the DCRT influences students' learning practices in a way that can benefit their clinical-reasoning skills. Additionally, it stresses the importance of ensuring the alignment of theoretical principles with real-world practice, both in the development and utilization of assessment tools and their content. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term impact of the DCRT on young physicians' working practice.

How to coach student professional development during times of challenges and uncertainties

BACKGROUND

What we teach our (bio)medical students today may differ from the future context under which they will operate as health professionals. This shifting and highly demanding profession requires that we equip these students with adaptive competencies for their future careers. We aimed to develop a framework to promote and facilitate professional development from day one, guided by self-awareness and self-directed learning.

APPROACH

Based on self-directed, transformative and experiential learning, patient involvement and teamwork, we developed a 3-year longitudinal personal-professional development (LPPD) program in the (bio)medical sciences undergraduate curriculum to stimulate self-driven professional development in a variable context. Through group meetings and individual coach consultations, students address topics such as self-awareness, self-directed and lifelong learning, collaboration, well-being and resilience. To drive learning students receive extensive narrative feedback on an essay assignment.

EVALUATION

Experiences and outcomes were evaluated with questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Students and coaches value personal and professional development in a safe learning environment that encourages self-exploration, diversity and connection. Over time, students show more self-awareness and self-directedness and increasingly apply trained skills, resulting in professional identity formation. Students need more clarification to understand the concept of assessment as learning.

IMPLICATIONS

With the generic content of a longitudinal program embedded in a meaningful environment, the personal and professional development of students can be facilitated and stimulated to face future challenges. When translating to other curricula, we suggest considering the complexity of professional development and the time expenditure needed for students to explore, experiment and practice. An early start and thorough integration are recommended.