Upper Airway Changes Following Different Orthognathic Surgeries, Evaluated by Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study sought to assess the upper airway changes following different orthognathic surgeries using cone-beam computed tomography.

METHODS

An electronic search of the literature was conducted in major electronic databases including Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and Open Grey for articles published up to January 20, 2018. Human studies that evaluated the changes in the volume and minimum cross-sectional area of the upper airway or its subdivisions in patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery by use of cone-beam computed tomography were included. Manual search of the bibliographies of the included articles was also conducted. The included studies underwent risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 1330 articles were retrieved. After excluding the duplicates and irrelevant articles, 41 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria for this systematic review; out of which, 30 entered the meta-analysis. The majority of studies had a medium risk of bias. Mandibular setback, and maxillary advancement + mandibular setback decreased the volume of the upper airway (-6042.87 mm3 and -1498.78 mm3, respectively) and all its subdivisions in long-term (>3 months), except for the nasopharynx, the volume of which increased following maxillary advancement + mandibular setback. Mandibular advancement and maxillomandibular advancement both increased the upper airway volume in long-term (7559.38 mm3 and 7967.06 mm3, respectively); however, only the changes after the former procedure were significant. The minimum cross-sectional area increased after maxillomandibular advancement (161.43 mm2), and decreased following maxillary advancement + mandibular setback (-23.79 mm2) in long-term.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate evidence to suggest that mandibular advancement is the only orthognathic movement that provides a statistically significant change in long-term upper airway volume.

Maxillary Expansion and Mandibular Setback Surgery With and Without Mandibular Anterior Segment Osteotomy to Correct Mandibular Prognathism With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Mandibular prognathism is usually treated with mandibular setback surgery. However, this approach reduces the pharyngeal airway space, and can aggravate obstructive phenomena in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). While maxillary expansion is known to lead to an increase in the pharyngeal airway volume (PAS), its effect on the PAS in mandibular setback surgery has not yet been reported. The authors report a surgical approach with maxillary expansion in 2 patients with mandibular prognathism that was accompanied by OSA: maxillary midsagittal expansion with minimum maxillary advancement and minor mandibular setback without mandibular anterior segmental osteotomy (ASO) or major mandibular setback with mandibular ASO. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography and polysomnography indicated that OSA was improved and pharyngeal airway space was increased or sustained, and the prognathic profile could be corrected to an acceptable facial esthetic profile. In summary, maxillary transversal expansion and mandibular setback with or without mandibular ASO can be successfully applied to treat mandibular prognathism with OSA.