Stability of unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of facial asymmetry: long-term case series and literature review

Effect of Various Degrees of Anterior Disc Displacement on the Biomechanical Response of the Masticatory System

Anterior disc displacement (ADD) is one of the most prevalent temporomandibular disorders (TMD). It was widely recognized that occlusal factors could affect temporomandibular joint (TMJ). However, the impacts of ADD on the biomechanical environment of TMJ and occlusion are still unclear. This study aimed to describe the effects of ADD on the masticatory system, including TMJ and occlusion. The finite element model (FEM) was constructed based on the medical images of a healthy adult male. The complete skull, masticatory muscles, TMJs, and related ligaments were included. Three FEMs with different degrees of ADD were constructed with disc-condyle angles of 10 deg, 20 deg, and 30 deg. The muscle forces corresponding to intercuspal clenching (ICC) were applied as the loading condition. Four models were conducted: normal, mild, moderate, and severe ADD. It was found that the overall stress distribution was relatively consistent across the four models. The contact stress on the TMJ and occlusion in severe ADD was visibly different from the other three models. In addition, the contact stress on the condyle gradually increased with the increasing occlusal strength. Abnormally high-stress concentration began to appear on the condyle at 30% muscle strength. Moderate ADD was more of a transitional stage. Compared to mild and moderate ADD, severe ADD had visibly effects on the stress response of the TMJ and the entire mandible (including occlusion), such as abnormally high stresses of the condyle, stress concentration on the second molar, and prone to disc extrusion and anterior slippage during high-strength occlusion.

Three-dimensional surgical management of a patient with Pruzansky I hemifacial microsomia and severe facial asymmetry: A 4-year follow-up

Treatment of hemifacial microsomia is challenging and often requires multiple interventions to restore function and facial esthetics. In this article, the combined orthodontic-surgical treatment of a young patient exhibiting Pruzansky I hemifacial microsomia is reported. The patient was aged 15 years, but his bone age was determined to be 18 years. His facial asymmetry was severe, with the nose and a retrusive chin deviated to the left side and a canted smile. The presurgical phase was aimed at centering the mandibular midline to the center of the chin through the distal movement of the mandibular left buccal dentition. The surgery was planned with 3-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation and included a LeFort I and unilateral sagittal split osteotomies combined with a genioplasty. This report illustrates the therapeutic stages and a 4-year follow-up of a unique and complex orthognathic surgical approach, chosen among other alternatives and leading to improved function and appearance and stable results.

Biomechanical effect of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO and USSRO on temporomandibular joints: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Asymmetric mandibular prognathism is a clinically common skeletal dentomaxillofacial deformity. Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSRO) is an effective alternative procedure to bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) for some patients. However, the biomechanical effect of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of USSRO has not been fully studied. This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution changes in the TMJ of asymmetric mandibular prognathism treated with BSSRO/USSRO, to validate the clinical feasibility of USSRO. Nineteen patients with mandibular prognathism patients who were treated with BSSRO (n=12) and USSRO (n=7) had preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scanning. Preoperative and postoperative 3-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) of functional TMJ movements were made on one BSSRO patient and one USSRO patient. In all patients, the ANB angle and mandibular deviation were significantly improved postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative ANB angle and mandibular deviation between the BSSRO group and the USSRO group. In two preoperative FEA models, the maximum stresses of non-deviation side TMJ structures were greater than the deviation side during functional movements. The unbalanced stress distribution was corrected postoperatively in both BSSRO/USSRO FE models. Both BSSRO/USSRO can improve the ANB angle and mandibular deviation. The bilateral TMJ structure in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism had unbalanced stress, which could be significantly improved with the USSRO as effectively as BSSRO.

Management of Nonunion and Malunion After Primary Mandibular Condylar Fracture Treatment: A Review and Recommendations

PURPOSE

After primary treatment of mandibular condylar fractures, nonunion and malunion can result in considerable malocclusion and temporomandibular joint dysfunction owing to the integral role the condylar head plays in the temporomandibular joint. At present, the choice and timing of treatment are highly heterogeneous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature to identify possible pitfalls, discuss available treatment options, and make recommendations.

METHODS

The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, PROSPERO, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Embase were searched for content matching mandibular condylar fracture "revision surgery," "secondary surgery," "refracture," "malunion," and "malunion osteotomy." Articles in English, limited to human adults, published in the past 10 years, with abstracts and full text available and appropriate study designs, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 101 articles were retrieved for analysis, and 4 articles were included. Because of heterogeneity in these studies, a pooled analysis could not be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery can be considered as primary treatment of condylar fractures, and early detection of complications allows for early intervention, leading to better outcomes. Treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction is highly heterogeneous and ranges from nonsurgical measures to joint reconstruction. Unilateral malocclusion can often be corrected with unilateral surgery, but bilateral surgery may be indicated in select cases. Bilateral deformities often require bilateral mandibular surgery, but in cases with preserved symmetry, maxillary surgery can be performed.

Unilateral sagittal split osteotomy: effect on mandibular symmetry in the treatment of class III with laterognathia

The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy is considered the standard surgery to correct facial asymmetries. More recently, unilateral sagittal split osteotomy (USSO) was used to treat such malocclusions.

AIM

To assess facial symmetry following USSO in the treatment of class III laterognathia.

METHODS

Frontal facial photographs of four groups of patients were assessed: (1) pre-surgical group (n = 30) with skeletal asymmetry, (2) postsurgical group assessing patients of the first group 2 years after USSO, (3) control group (n = 30) of patients judged to have harmonious facial norms, and (4) mirrored group (n = 30) in which the control photographs were altered by duplicating the right half side of the face to replace the left half, thus creating perfectly symmetrical faces. All 120 photographs were distributed to 40 expert orthodontists to evaluate and score facial symmetry using the visual analog scale. Skin sensitivity and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders were also assessed clinically pre and postsurgically.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed between the pre-surgical group and each of the postsurgical and control groups (p < 0.001). The control and postsurgical groups received similar scores of symmetry (p = 0.774). The mirrored group received statistically significantly higher symmetry scores than either of the control or the postsurgical groups (p < 0.001). A reduction in TMJ disorders was noted after USSO and all patients reported normal skin sensation 2 years post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

When indicated, USSO is a dependable and practical surgical approach to correct facial asymmetries associated with class III malocclusion.

Comparison of postoperative condylar changes after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate postoperative changes in the condyle after unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSRO) and to compare them with changes occurring after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO).

STUDY DESIGN

For 50 condyles from 25 patients, positional and volumetric changes of condyle were analyzed by using computed tomography images taken before, immediately after, and 6 months after surgery and compared between the USRRO and BSSRO groups.

RESULTS

The condyle showed lateral and inferior displacement immediately after surgery and medial and superior movement at 6 months after surgery in the USSRO and BSSRO groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in the time-course positional change and rotation of the condyle. In the comparison of bodily shift and rotation between operated and nonoperated sides in USSRO group, there were no significant differences between the 2 sides, except for the perioperative rotation pattern on the coronal plane. At 6 months after surgery, the changed volume relative to preoperative condylar volume was only 5.2% in the USSRO group and 2.7% in the BSSRO group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this study suggest that USSRO can be used effectively in appropriately selected patients; however, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems may arise when condylar displacement is excessive enough to exceed physiologic tolerances.

Comparison of condylar morphology changes and position stability following unilateral and bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism

BACKGROUND

Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSRO) is not widely used given the postoperative instability caused by the inevitable rotation of the mandibular segment during surgery. However, the influence of mandibular movement on the condylar morphology and position stability has not been completely explored. The aim of the study was to quantitatively evaluate the effect of USSRO on the condylar surface morphology changes and postoperative stability in patients with mandibular lateral prognathism and compare these findings with the classic bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO).

PATIENTS/METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving 134 patients with mandibular lateral prognathism who received USSRO (n = 56) and BSSRO (n = 78) surgery. Here, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before surgery (T0), immediately after surgery (T1), and 1 year postoperatively (T2). Differences of condylar sizes, condylar surface deviation, and mandibular positioning parameters (dental midline deviation, SNB, SN-MP) were calculated from T0 to T2. Comparisons were performed at the deviated side or nondeviated side of condyles between the USSRO and BSSRO groups. The relation between the dental midline deviation and condylar surface morphology changes from T0 to T2 were investigated.

RESULTS

Condylar surface morphology changes at the deviated side of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) before and 1 year after the surgery were significantly different between the USSRO and BSSRO groups. The dental midline deviation was related to the changes of condylar volume, surface size and surface deviation at the deviated side of TMJ in patients following USSRO. No significant difference was noted between the USSRO and BSSRO groups for postoperative condylar surface morphology changes at the nondeviated side. In both groups, significant differences between T0 and T1 and no significant difference between T1 and T2 were noted for all of the mandibular positioning parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Both BSSRO and USSRO exhibit favorable postoperative stability in the correction of mandibular prognathism. After USSRO surgery, condylar surface changes occurred at the deviated side of the TMJ, and the dental midline deviation was closely related to the changes of condylar surface morphology. USSRO represents a stable alternative for minor asymmetric mandibular prognathism correction with the advantages of reduced operating time and surgical trauma.

Unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an alternative for some cases of asymmetric mandibular prognathism

The objective of this study was to propose a treatment protocol for patients with lateral prognathism based on the unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (USSRO). This was a prospective study involving 31 patients with lateral prognathism, who required a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO). Two groups were formed using the proposed protocol, with specific inclusion criteria for each group: BSSRO (n=17) and USSRO (n=14). Occlusal parameters (dental midline deviation, overbite, and overjet) were measured preoperatively (T0), at model surgery (T1), 1 month postoperative (T2), and 1year after surgery (T3) and compared. P-values of <0.05 were considered significant. No significant difference was found between the USSRO and BSSRO groups for all occlusal parameters (T0, T1, T2, and T3). In both groups, there was a significant difference between T0 and T1 and no significant difference between T1 and T2 or T1 and T3 in all of the occlusal parameters; the exception was overbite between T1 and T2 in the BSSRO group, which showed a significant difference. No patient in either group showed signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction at T0 or T3. USSRO was found to be a stable alternative in patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism. At the same time, it reduced the operating time and morbidity when compared to BSSRO.