Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Prognostic Assessment of Non-functioning Neuroendocrine Pancreatic Neoplasms as a Basis for Risk-Adapted Resection Strategies

BACKGROUND

In contrast to exocrine pancreatic carcinomas, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN) are significantly different. The variable growth pattern and associated clinical situation of functioning and non-functioning PNEN demand an individualized surgical approach. However, due to the scarce evidence associated with the rare disease, guidelines lack detailed recommendations for indication and for the required extent of surgical resection.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-center study from 1990 to 2018, 239 patients with PNEN were identified. Clinical data were collected in the MaDoc database of the University Medical Center Mainz. A total of 155 non-functional PNEN were selected for further analysis.

RESULTS

According to the classification of NET by the WHO in 2017, 28.8% (n = 40) of the tumors were G1, 61.9% (n = 86) G2, and 9.4% (n = 13) G3. In 73 patients, hepatic metastases were present. Sixty patients had lymph node metastasis. An R0 resection was achieved in 98 cases, an R1 situation in 10 cases. Five times, a tumor debulking was carried out (R2) and 5 times the operation was aborted without any resection because of the advanced tumor stage. A relapse occurred in 29 patients. Different prognostic factors (grade, tumor size, age) were analyzed. Grade-dependent 10-year overall survival rates were 79.5% (grade 1) and 60.1% (grade 2), respectively. The survival rate of grade 3 patients was limited to 66.7% after 13 months.

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients with non-functioning PNEN had a longer overall survival after successful R0 resection. The risk analysis confirmed a Ki-67 cutoff value of 5%, which divided a high- and low-risk group. Patients with a PNEC G3 (Ki-67 index > 50%) had a very poor prognosis.

How reliable is the Ki-67 cytological index in grading pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of the cytological Ki-67 index in distinguishing intermediate and high-grade (G2 + G3) from low-grade (G1) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

METHODS

Two investigators independently searched databases to identify eligible studies using the following term: ('Ki-67') AND ('pancreatic endocrine tumor' OR 'pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor' OR 'pancreatic endocrine tumour' OR 'pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour' OR 'pancreatic endocrine tumors' OR 'pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors' OR 'pancreatic endocrine tumours' OR 'pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours'), and meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).

RESULTS

A total of 263 lesions from 13 studies were included in the study. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of Ki-67 (cut-off value: 2%) in the differential diagnosis of G2 + G3 from G1 PNETs were 64% and 87%, respectively. The pooled PLR, NLR and DOR were 3.96, 0.42 and 11.21, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.8397. While the cut-off value of Ki-67 index was set as 5%, the sensitivity and specificity were increased up to 69% and 93%, respectively, and the AUROC was increased to 0.955.

CONCLUSION

The cytological Ki-67 index is very useful in distinguishing intermediate and high-grade from low-grade PNETs, and a cut-off value of 5% had a better predictive value compared with that of 2%.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: Searching the optimal treatment strategy--A literature review

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system (GEP-NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, with different malignant potential and behavior. Many treatment options are available. Surgery should be considered for localized tumors and in some selected cases of metastatic disease. Somatostatin analogs, useful for symptoms control in functioning tumors, are also effective to inhibit tumor progression in specific settings. The multi-TKI sunitinib and of the mTOR-inhibitor everolimus are efficacy for metastatic pancreatic NET (P-NET) treatment. Chemotherapy is generally used in symptomatic and progressive NETs. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) should be recommended after failure of medical therapy. For tumors confined to the liver ablative techniques should be considered. Nevertheless a shared therapeutic sequence for GEP-NET treatment still does not exist. In this review, we analyzed available data trying to identify the better treatment strategy and to suggest potential therapeutic algorithms distinguishing P-NETs from gastrointestinal NETs (GI-NETs).

Conservative management and parenchyma-sparing resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Literature review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are uncommon entities. pNETs are often small, slow growing, clinically silent neoplasms. However, they have an almost unpredictable biological behaviour with a not negligible malignant potential. Surgery still represents the treatment of choice, but the high morbidity associated to the enucleation or the formal pancreatectomy should be considered in the decision of the proper treatment. Management of these neoplasms is still debated, and indications for a conservative observational approach and for parenchyma sparing resections are not yet standardized.

METHOD

We review the state of art on the indications for the conservative management of pNETs. Searches on MEDLINE database were performed to identify articles reporting prognostic systems, biochemical screening, observational management, medical treatment and surgical strategies for pNETs.

DISCUSSION

Currently, an accurate 'wait-and-see' policy is recommended by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) only for non-functioning pNETs (NF-pNETs) <2 cm. A biochemical screening, based on sampling of serum levels of pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and chromogranin A, can address to early conservative surgery for MEN-1 associated NF-pNETs <2 cm to prevent their malignant transformation. The subtotal (80%) distal pancreatectomy first proposed by Thompson, often with the enucleation of possible pancreatic head tumors, still represents a good compromise between oncological radicality and prevention of pancreatic endocrine/exocrine insufficiency caused by standard radical resections for the treatment of inherited syndromes associated with NF-pNETs >2 cm and symptomatic F-pNETs of any size.

CONCLUSION

More studies are needed to further clarify and predict the biologic behaviour of pNETs and increase the indications for conservative observational management and parenchyma sparing pancreas resections.