Comparison of the Baska and I-gel supraglottic airway devices: a randomized controlled study

Does Baska mask deserve its own niche among extraglottic airway devices? A prospective, single-arm study

Background and Aims

A variety of extraglottic airway devices (EADs) are available. Main concerns with EADs are protection against aspiration and ability to ventilate patients with high airway pressures. Baska mask meets these criteria and is the only third-generation device available for clinical use.

Methods

After institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained, this prospective study was performed in 100 adult patients undergoing surface surgeries at a tertiary referral centre. The primary outcome was the success rate of insertion, while the secondary outcomes were the sealing pressure, stability of the device and the perioperative complications of Baska mask. We then compared it with other currently used EADs.

Results

The first attempt at insertion and overall success rates, showed values of 81% and 98%, respectively. Insertion was quick (median 12; interquartile range [IQR] 9-15 s). The mask sealing pressure, was 35 cmH2O (median [IQR 20-50 cmH2O]). Also, the mask remained stable in 95% of patients intraoperatively. Sore throat and dysphagia were seen in 37% and 24% of patients, respectively. No patient had laryngospasm or desaturation at any time. It compared favourably well with other EADs, while achieving higher sealing pressures.

Conclusion

We found that the Baska mask performs well with excellent first attempt at insertion and overall success rates, higher sealing pressures and minimal complications compared to currently used EADs in clinical anaesthesia.

An unanticipated case of laryngeal mask failure due to hypopharyngeal mass: a case report

Supraglottic airway devices (SAD) have got popularity in the anesthetic practice owing to easy insertion, rapid airway access and lower incidence of complications. Igel® is a second generation SAD with a non‐inflatable cuff and gastric drainage channel. Despite ease of insertion, there are still cases of failure of Igel® insertion to secure airway. We are hereby presenting a case of unanticipated difficulty in Igel® insertion in a 35-years-old female due to a hypopharyngeal growth. This article aims to send a reminder that despite anticipated easy airway, definitive plan for securing airway should always be ready.

Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask® versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study

Background and Aims:

Oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP) achieved by a supraglottic airway device holds due importance as it indicates the feasibility of positive pressure ventilation, the degree of airway protection from supra-cuff soiling and also relates to postoperative morbidity. The primary outcome measure was to assess and compare OSP in different head and neck positions with Baska mask^® and I-gel™. Secondary outcome measures were to compare peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), exhaled tidal volume (ETV), ease of insertion, time taken for insertion, number of attempts, intraoperative manipulations, and postoperative airway morbidity with both the devices.

Materials and Methods:

Seventy consenting adults scheduled for a variety of surgical procedures under general anesthesia were allocated to Group B and Group G using Baska mask^® and I-gel™ respectively. All statistical calculations were done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science). The comparison of quantitative variables between the study groups was done using Student t-test and within the variables was done by paired t-test. For comparing categorical data, Chi-square (χ²) test was performed.

Results:

OSP was significantly higher in group B than in group G in all head and neck positions (neutral 33 ± 2.8 vs. 23.2 ± 1.8, flexion 35.5 ± 2.5 vs. 25.2 ± 1.6, extension 30.6 ± 2.7 vs. 21.4 ± 1.7, right lateral 32.6 ± 2.8 vs. 23.0 ± 1.5. left lateral 32.6 ± 2.7 vs. 23.1 ± 1.7 cm H₂O, respectively) (P = 0.000). PIP increased significantly in group G as compared to group B in flexion. (P = 0.009). Baska mask^® had significantly higher ETV in flexion compared to I-gel™. (P = 0.009).

Conclusion:

Baska mask^® may provide a useful alternative to I-gel™ where the glottic seal has precedence over ease of insertion.

Comparison of the standard and triple airway maneuvering techniques for i-gel™ placement in patients undergoing elective surgery: a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

The i-gel is a supraglottic airway device with non-inflatable cuff which can suffer insertion failure if its standard placement technique is implemented. The aim of this study was to compare the placement technique proposed by the manufacturer of i-gel with the triple airway maneuver in terms of successful device insertion time and first-attempt success.

METHODS

After ethics committee approval, 103 ASA I-III patients were randomly allocated to the standard or triple airway maneuver groups. In the standard Group, the i-gel was inserted in the sniffing position while, in the triple group, it was inserted using the triple airway maneuver consisting of head tilt, jaw thrust, and open mouth. The time taken for successful insertion, first-attempt success rate, i-gel position, airway complications, and hemodynamic responses were assessed.

RESULTS

Between the two groups patient characteristics were similar. Time for successful insertion was significantly shorter in the triple group (20 ± 7 s) than with the standard technique (32 ± 11 s; p < 0.001). Successful insertion at the first attempt was 78% and 92% for the standard and triple group, respectively (p = 0.092). The i-gel position, airway complications, and hemodynamic responses were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The triple airway maneuver required less i-gel insertion time as compared with the standard placement technique. First-attempt success rates were similar with both techniques, although the triple airway maneuver was superior to the standard method as a rescue technique in failed insertions. We therefore recommend use of the triple airway maneuver in i-gel insertion.