The contribution of vacuum-assisted modified Menghini type needle to diagnosis of US-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid

Fine-needle aspiration cytology for neck lesions in patients with antithrombotic/anticoagulant medications: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the true risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic (ND) specimens associated with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications.

METHODS

Using the Population Intervention Comparison and Outcome modeling, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published between January 2000 and March 2023 reporting the safety and sample adequacy of FNAC for neck lesions in patients taking AT/AC medications. The pooled incidences of bleeding and ND specimens and pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained using a fixed-effects model were compared for patients continuing AT/AC (AT/AC group) and patients not receiving AT/AC therapy (no-AT/AC group).

RESULTS

We included six original articles involving a total of 3014 patients. The pooled incidence of bleeding was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.344-2.026) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.390-1.146) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.39 (95% CI, 0.56-3.44) with no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.92). The pooled incidence of ND specimens was 7.6% (95% CI, 5.617-10.073) and 7.6% (95% CI, 6.511-8.752) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.33 (95% CI, 0.98-1.81) with moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 60.0%; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The AT/AC medication is not associated with increased risk of bleeding or ND specimens in FNAC for neck lesions. Therefore, interruption of the AT/AC medication is not recommended before FNAC even in patients taking AT/AC medications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study is the first meta-analysis evaluating risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic specimens associated with fine-needle cytology for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications. This suggests withholding AT/AC medications is not mandatory for safe and diagnostic FNACs.

KEY POINTS

• True risk of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications is still controversial. • This meta-analysis demonstrated that maintaining AT/AC medication was not associated with increased risk in terms of both bleeding and nondiagnostic samples. • Interruption of the AT/AC medication is not needed for safe and diagnostic FNAC for neck lesions even in patients taking AT/AC medications.

A Comprehensive Assessment of the Harms of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review

BACKGRUOUND

There have concerns related with the potential harms of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). We aimed to summarize the clinical complications and evaluate the safety of FNAB.

METHODS

Studies related with the harms of FNAB were searched on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library, and KoreaMed from 2012 to 2022. Also, studies reviewed in the previous systematic reviews were evaluated. Included clinical complications were postprocedural pain, bleeding events, neurological symptoms, tracheal puncture, infections, post-FNAB thyrotoxicosis, and needle tract implantation of thyroid cancers.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cohort studies were included in this review. Nine studies which were related with FNAB-related pain showed that most of the subjects had no or mild discomfort. The 0% to 6.4% of the patients had hematoma or hemorrhage after FNAB, according to 15 studies. Vasovagal reaction, vocal cord palsy, and tracheal puncture have rarely described in the included studies. Needle tract implantation of thyroid malignancies was described in three studies reporting 0.02% to 0.19% of the incidence rate.

CONCLUSION

FNAB is considered to be a safe diagnostic procedure with rare complications, which are mainly minor events. Thorough assessement of the patients' medical condition when deciding to perform FNABs would be advisable to lower potential complications.

Effectiveness of Menghini-Type Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Masses

BACKGROUND

Cutting needles are thought to be effective as biopsy needles. A few types of cutting needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and the Menghini-type needle is an end-type cutting needle.

AIMS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the results of EUS-FNA using a Menghini-type needle (needle M) versus a conventional needle (needle S).

METHODS

The main eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with a pancreatic mass referred for EUS-FNA, ≥ 20 years old, and a performance status < 4. The primary outcome was the sample quality. The secondary outcomes were factors associated with the sample quality, diagnostic accuracy, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were enrolled in this study. The sample quality for total puncture with needle M (92.8%) was significantly higher than that with needle S (81.4%) (p = 0.0305). The tumor size (p = 0.033) and type of needle (p = 0.031) were significant factors associated with adequate tissue collection in univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-6.54; p = 0.027 for tumor size, and OR 2.93; 95% CI 1.23-8.21; p = 0.0153 for type of needle). The diagnostic accuracy of each needle was 88.7% (86/97) with needle M and 73.2% (71/97) with needle S. Adverse events occurred in 2 of the 97 patients (0.02%).

CONCLUSION

A Menghini-type needle was able to obtain core tissue for histology more effectively than a conventional aspiration needle.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

UMIN registration number of 000020668.

Contribution of small tissue biopsy and flow cytometry to preoperative cytological categorization of salivary gland fine needle aspirates according to the Milan System: Single center experience on 287 cases

BACKGROUND

Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) was proposed to provide a standardized reporting system for salivary gland fine needle aspiration biopsies. Modified Menghini type semi-automatic aspiration biopsy needles provide small tissue fragments (STFs), as well as cellular smears, and immunohistochemical and molecular studies can be performed using the STFs.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the contribution of STFs and ancillary techniques to pre-operative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, smears of 287 cases with histopathological correlation were re-reviewed and assigned to one of the MSRSGC categories. In the second step, histopathological and immunohistochemical findings in STFs were evaluated together with cytological findings. Final diagnoses were obtained with the inclusion of flow cytometry (FC) results when available. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each diagnostic category.

RESULTS

In the evaluation based on smears, a specific diagnosis could be obtained in 64.8% of the cases. ROMs were 0% for nondiagnostic (ND), 5.6% for non-neoplastic (NN), 55% for atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), 0.6% for benign neoplasm (BN), 27.8% for salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), and 100% for suspicious for malignancy (SFM) and malignant (M) categories. With the addition of histopathological and immunohistochemical findings and FC results, a specific diagnosis could be obtained in 75.2% of the cases. ROMs were 0% for ND, 4.5% for NN, 53.8% for AUS, 0.6% for BN, 0% for SUMP, and 100% for SFM/M categories.

CONCLUSIONS

STFs contribute correct categorization of salivary gland lesions. The major contribution of ancillary methods is in the SUMP category.

Complications of percutaneous liver biopsy in living donor liver transplantation: Two case reports

RATIONALE

According to previously published studies, major complications arising from a percutaneous liver biopsy are rare and occur in less than 0.1% of cases. This report describes an approach to percutaneous liver biopsy that can help avoid damage to the liver in a living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) setting.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Case 1: In the first case a donor percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) of both lobes of the liver was performed for pre-LDLT evaluation. The ultrasonography (US)-guided epigastric right-angle approach and an automatic one-handed cocking disposable 18G biopsy gun was used to puncture the left liver lobe to determine the presence of fatty liver. A penetrating liver injury occurred, accompanied by massive bloody ascites (about 700 cc) and subcapsular hematoma at the left lateral segment. The bleeding was managed by bi-polar coagulation during the transplant and the following liver donation procedure proceeded smoothly without any subsequent complications. Case 2: In the second case, selective right lobe PLB for clinical assessment after LDLT was performed in the recipient. Hemorrhagic shock occurred following a puncture of the right posterior branch of the right hepatic artery when using the biopsy-gun via the right lateral intercostal approach.

DIAGNOSES

Extravasation was documented by angiography and emergent transhepatic arterial embolization was performed.

INTERVENTION

Extravasation was documented by angiography and emergent transhepatic arterial embolization with glue:lipiodol (1:4) was performed to stop bleeding.

OUTCOMES

The recipient survived after medical management.

LESSONS

To prevent complications, the right-angle approach of PLB may be changed to an oblique angle using a one-fire biopsy-gun. Use of a manual Menghini's needle should be considered for left lobe liver biopsies. Since US-guided manual Menghini's needle for PLB can be observed with the needle tip inserted in the liver, needle-mediated compromising of the major vessels or biliary tree can be prevented, and it does not penetrate the liver again. A superficial puncture less than 0.5 cm away from the liver surface should be made during right lobe liver biopsy. This approach can help to avoid damage to the hepatic artery.