Optimized visualization of focal liver lesions and vascular structures in real-time T1-weighted gradient echo sequences for magnetic resonance-guided liver procedures

Clinical benefits of MRI-guided freehand biopsy of small focal liver lesions in comparison to CT guidance

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical success, procedure time, and complication rates between MRI-guided and CT-guided real-time biopsies of small focal liver lesions (FLL) < 20 mm.

METHODS

A comparison of a prospectively collected MRI-guided cohort (n = 30) to a retrospectively collected CT-guided cohort (n = 147) was performed, in which patients underwent real-time biopsies of small FLL < 20 mm in a freehand technique. In both groups, clinical and periprocedural data, including clinical success, procedure time, and complication rates (classified according to CIRSE guidelines), were analyzed. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Pearson's chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Additionally, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using the following criteria for direct matching: age, gender, presence of liver cirrhosis, liver lobe, lesion diameter, and skin-to-target distance.

RESULTS

The median FLL diameter in the MRI-guided cohort was significantly smaller compared to CT guidance (p < 0.001; 11.0 mm vs. 16.3 mm), while the skin-to-target distance was significantly longer (p < 0.001; 90.0 mm vs. 74.0 mm). MRI-guided procedures revealed significantly higher clinical success compared to CT guidance (p = 0.021; 97% vs. 79%) as well as lower complication rates (p = 0.047; 0% vs. 13%). Total procedure time was significantly longer in the MRI-guided cohort (p < 0.001; 38 min vs. 28 min). After PSM (n = 24/n = 38), MRI-guided procedures still revealed significantly higher clinical success compared to CT guidance (p = 0.039; 96% vs. 74%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the longer procedure time, freehand biopsy of small FLL < 20 mm under MR guidance can be considered superior to CT guidance because of its high clinical success and low complication rates.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Biopsy of small liver lesions is challenging due to the size and conspicuity of the lesions on native images. MRI offers higher soft tissue contrast, which translates into a higher success of obtaining enough tissue material with MRI compared to CT-guided biopsies.

KEY POINTS

• Image-guided biopsy of small focal liver lesions (FLL) is challenging due to inadequate visualization, leading to sampling errors and false-negative biopsies. • MRI-guided real-time biopsy of FLL < 20 mm revealed significantly higher clinical success (p = 0.021; 97% vs. 79%) and lower complication rates (p = 0.047; 0% vs. 13%) compared to CT guidance. • Although the procedure time is longer, MRI-guided biopsy can be considered superior for small FLL < 20 mm.

Accuracy of 3D real-time MRI temperature mapping in gel phantoms during microwave heating

BACKGROUND

Interventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide a comprehensive setting for microwave ablation of tumors with real-time monitoring of the energy delivery using MRI-based temperature mapping. The purpose of this study was to quantify the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) real-time MRI temperature mapping during microwave heating in vitro by comparing MRI thermometry data to reference data measured by fiber-optical thermometry.

METHODS

Nine phantom experiments were evaluated in agar-based gel phantoms using an in-room MR-conditional microwave system and MRI thermometry. MRI measurements were performed for 700 s (25 slices; temporal resolution 2 s). The temperature was monitored with two fiber-optical temperature sensors approximately 5 mm and 10 mm distant from the microwave antenna. Temperature curves of the sensors were compared to MRI temperature data of single-voxel regions of interest (ROIs) at the sensor tips; the accuracy of MRI thermometry was assessed as the root-mean-squared (RMS)-averaged temperature difference. Eighteen neighboring voxels around the original ROI were also evaluated and the voxel with the smallest temperature difference was additionally selected for further evaluation.

RESULTS

The maximum temperature changes measured by the fiber-optical sensors ranged from 7.3 K to 50.7 K. The median RMS-averaged temperature differences in the originally selected voxels ranged from 1.4 K to 3.4 K. When evaluating the minimum-difference voxel from the neighborhood, the temperature differences ranged from 0.5 K to 0.9 K. The microwave antenna and the MRI-conditional in-room microwave generator did not induce relevant radiofrequency artifacts.

CONCLUSION

Accurate 3D real-time MRI temperature mapping during microwave heating with very low RMS-averaged temperature errors below 1 K is feasible in gel phantoms.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Accurate MRI-based volumetric real-time monitoring of temperature distribution and thermal dose is highly relevant in clinical MRI-based interventions and can be expected to improve local tumor control, as well as procedural safety by extending the limits of thermal (e.g., microwave) ablation of tumors in the liver and in other organs.

KEY POINTS

Interventional MRI can provide a comprehensive setting for the microwave ablation of tumors. MRI can monitor the microwave ablation using real-time MRI-based temperature mapping. 3D real-time MRI temperature mapping during microwave heating is feasible. Measured temperature errors were below 1 °C in gel phantoms. The active in-room microwave generator did not induce any relevant radiofrequency artifacts.

Feasibility and safety of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy for upper abdominal tumors: A preliminary exploration

This study investigates the use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) for upper abdominal tumors. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR (cT1w MR) using half doses of gadoterate was used to guide daily adaptive radiotherapy for tumors poorly visualized without contrast. The use of gadoterate was found to be feasible and safe in 5-fraction MRgART and could improve the contrast-to-noise ratio of MR images. And the use of cT1w MR could reduce the interobserver variation of adaptive tumor delineation compared to plain T1w MR (4.41 vs. 6.58, p < 0.001) and T2w MR (4.41 vs. 7.42, p < 0.001).