A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures

Combining 3D printing technology with customized metal plates for the treatment of complex acetabular fractures: A retrospective study

PURPOSES

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of combining 3D printing technology with customized metal plates in the treatment of complex acetabular fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 42 patients with complex acetabular fractures treated at our hospital between September 1, 2020 and May 31, 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: the conventional group and the 3D printing group, with 21 individuals in each group.The conventional group underwent surgery using traditional surgical techniques, with appropriate bending and adjustment of the metal plates during the procedure. In the 3D printing group, preoperative 3D printing technology was utilized to create a physical model of the fracture, and individualized metal plates were customized based on the model after virtual reduction. Comparison was made between the two groups of patients regarding surgical approach, operative time, instrument handling time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopy scans, fracture healing time, quality of fracture reduction postoperatively, hip joint function at 12 months postoperatively, and occurrence of complications during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The 3D printing group showed significantly shorter surgical time (124.76±12.89 minutes vs. 174.05±12.51 minutes), instrument operation time (44.57±5.32 minutes vs. 62.9±7.47 minutes), intraoperative blood loss (337.38±51.95 mL vs. 545.24±74.39 mL), and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency (8.25±1.18 times vs. 10.52±1.6 times) compared to the conventional group (P<0.001). The postoperative fracture reduction quality in the 3D printing group was good in 95.24% (20/21) of cases, significantly higher than the 61.90% (13/21) in the conventional group (P = 0.02). The excellent and good hip function rate in the 3D printing group was 90.48% (19/21), which was also significantly higher than 57.14% (12/21) in the conventional group (P = 0.01). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in fracture healing time (13.95±1.07 weeks vs. 13.81±1.17 weeks) and complication rate (9.52% vs. 28.57%) (P = 0.14; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

The application of 3D printing technology in conjunction with individualized customization of metal plates for the treatment of complex acetabular fractures can shorten surgical and instrument handling time, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and improve the quality of fracture reduction as well as the recovery of hip joint function.These results provide new insights and technical support for the treatment of complex acetabular fractures.

Efficacy of 3D printing-assisted treatment for acetabular fractures

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted treatment for acetabular fractures (AFs) and to compare with conventional surgical methods.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2019 and May 2022, a total of 44 patients (33 males, 11 females; mean age: 40.6±11.8 years; range, 20 to 68 years) who were diagnosed with AFs based on clinical symptoms, X-ray and computed tomography (CT) and underwent open reduction and internal fixation in Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether 3D printing was applied as the experimental group (n=24) and control group (n=20). In the experimental group, pelvic and acetabular data were imported into a 3D printer, and an equal-scale highly simulated model was printed using photosensitive resin as the 3D printing material. The model was used to develop more specific personalized surgical plans, to determine the optimal sequence of surgical procedures for fracture reduction, and simulate surgery in vitro.

RESULTS

In the experimental group, the mean surgical duration was shorter (123.57±22.05 vs. 163.57±26.20 min, p<0.001), the mean intraoperative bleeding loss was lower (557.14±174.15 vs. 885.71±203.27 mL, p<0.001), and the frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy was lower (8.64±1.65 vs. 12.07±2.76, p<0.001) than in the control group. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the Visual Analog Scale scores after surgery or the hip function score after treatment (p>0.05). No major postoperative complications were observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional surgical treatment, preoperative 3D printing-assisted treatment for adult patients with AFs can significantly reduce surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding loss and frequency of intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy, reducing surgical difficulty and improving surgical safety.

Use of 3D Printing Technology in Fracture Management: A Review and Case Series

SUMMARY

Three-dimensional (3D) offers exciting opportunities in medicine, particularly in orthopaedics. The boundaries of 3D printing are continuously being re-established and have paved the way for further innovations, including 3D bioprinting, custom printing refined methods, 4D bioprinting, and 5D printing potential. The quality of these applications have been steadily improving, increasing their widespread use among clinicians. This article provides a review of the current literature with a brief introduction to the process of additive manufacturing, 3D printing, and its applications in fracture care. We illustrate this technology with a case series of 3D printing used for correction of complex fractures/nonunion. Factors limiting the use of this technology, including cost, and potential solutions are discussed. Finally, we discuss 4D bioprinting and 5D printing and their potential role in fracture surgery.

Management of Complex Acetabular Fractures by Using 3D Printed Models

Background and Objectives: Using 3D printed models in orthopaedics and traumatology contributes to a better understanding of injury patterns regarding surgical approaches, reduction techniques, and fracture fixation methods. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel technique implementing 3D printed models to facilitate the optimal preoperative planning of the surgical treatment of complex acetabular fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex acetabular fractures were assigned to two groups: (1) conventional group (n = 12) and (2) 3D printed group (n = 10). Both groups included participants with either a posterior column plus posterior wall fracture, a transverse plus posterior wall fracture, or a both-column acetabular fracture. Datasets from CT scanning were segmented and converted to STL format, with separated bones and fragments for 3D printing in different colors. Comparison between the two groups was performed in terms of quality of fracture reduction (good: equal to, or less than 2 mm displacement, and fair: larger than 2 mm displacement), functional assessment, operative time, blood loss, and number of intraoperative x-rays. Results: A significant decrease in operative time, blood loss, and number of intraoperative x-rays was registered in the 3D printed group versus the conventional one (p < 0.01), with 80% of the patients in the former having good fracture reduction and 20% having fair reduction. In contrast, 50% of the patients in the conventional group had good reduction and 50% had fair reduction. The functional score at 18-month follow-up was better for patients in the 3D printed group. Conclusions: The 3D printing technique can be considered a highly efficient and patient-specific approach for management of complex acetabular fractures, helping to restore patient′s individual anatomy after surgery.

Influence of direct radiography in decision making during orthopaedic trauma surgery: A prospective study

Objective

To evaluate the effects of intraoperative direct radiography on the change in the patient's treatment and the reliability of fluoroscopy in orthopaedic trauma surgery operations.

Methods

A total of 773 fractures were evaluated prospectively. The surgeons involved in the case were divided into three groups according to their experiences: less than 5 years, 5-10 years and over 10 years. After each case, the fracture classification, whether any interventions were made after the X-ray, and the interventions were recorded.

Results

There were 312(40%) intra-articular, 200(26%) metaphyseal, 161(21%) diaphyseal, 81(10%) pelvis-acetabulum, and 19(3%) vertebrae fractures. Surgeons needed to intervene in 71(9.2%) cases after direct-radiography. There was a significant difference between the location of the fracture and the number of interventions (p < 0.001). The most frequent interventions were intra-articular distal radius, acetabulum and intra-articular calcaneus fractures, respectively. Surgeons with more than 10 years of the experience felt the need to make fewer changes, it was statistically significant compared to the other two groups (p = 0.001 for both).

Conclusion

It was found that the final evaluation with x-ray images before the operation was completed in trauma surgery affected the surgeon's decision. In particular, intra-articular fractures, acetabular fractures, and vertebral fractures are recommended to evaluate fixation with direct radiography in addition to fluoroscopy images before ending the operation.

Level of evidence

LEVEL III.

Preoperative Simulation and Three-Dimensional Model for the Operative Treatment of Forearm Double Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

To assess the safety and efficacy of preoperative simulation and three-dimensional (3D) models in the treatment of ulnoradial diaphyses fracture. It was hypothesized that preoperative simulation and 3D printing might significantly shorten the mean operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and intraoperative fluoroscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty patients with forearm double fracture were divided into 3D printing group and conventional surgery group. Preoperative simulation and 3D printing were performed on patients in the 3D printing group to examine implant reduction and placement as well as preoperative plate/screw size. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and frequency of fluoroscopies were recorded.

RESULTS

In the conventional surgery group, the operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and the frequency of fluoroscopy were 106.2 ± 15.92 min, 61.45 ± 11.33 ml and 5.65 ± 1.23 times, whereas in the 3D printing group, values of all the three parameters were better than those of the conventional surgery group (91.3 ± 14.85 min, 48.6 ± 10.39 ml and 3.85 ± 1.04 times, respectively). The forearm pronation and supination of the 3D printing group improved to 79.55 ± 5.12° and 76.80 ± 3.96°, respectively. In the conventional surgery group, patients also had significant improvement in these indicators, which improved to 78.60 ± 5.18° and 75.4 ± 5.30°.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that preoperative simulation and 3D printing can enhance the safety as well as personalization of the surgical process during the treatment of forearm double fracture and therefore holds potential for future application in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Name of the registry: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100045790.

Does 3D-Assisted Acetabular Fracture Surgery Improve Surgical Outcome and Physical Functioning?-A Systematic Review

Three-dimensional technology is increasingly being used in acetabular fracture treatment. No systematic reviews are available about the added clinical value of 3D-assisted acetabular fracture surgery compared to conventional surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether 3D-assisted acetabular fracture surgery compared to conventional surgery improves surgical outcomes in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy usage, complications, and postoperative fracture reduction, and whether it improves physical functioning. Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for articles on 3D technologies in acetabular fracture surgery, published between 2010 and February 2021. The McMaster critical review form was used to assess the methodological quality. Differences between 3D-assisted and conventional surgery were evaluated using the weighted mean and odds ratios. Nineteen studies were included. Three-dimensional-assisted surgery resulted in significantly shorter operation times (162.5 ± 79.0 versus 296.4 ± 56.0 min), less blood loss (697.9 ± 235.7 mL versus 1097.2 ± 415.5 mL), and less fluoroscopy usage (9.3 ± 5.9 versus 22.5 ± 20.4 times). The odds ratios of complications and fracture reduction were 0.5 and 0.4 for functional outcome in favour of 3D-assisted surgery, respectively. Three-dimensional-assisted surgery reduces operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy usage, and complications. Evidence for the improvement of fracture reduction and functional outcomes is limited.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures

Purpose

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures.

Methods

The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots.

Results

Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33).

Conclusions

3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries.

Traditional versus mirror three-dimensional printing technology for isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 25 months

Objective

To assess the outcomes of traditional three-dimensional (3D) printing technology (TPT) versus mirror 3D printing technology (MTT) in treating isolated acetabular fractures (IAFs).

Methods

Consecutive patients with an IAF treated by either TPT or MTT at our tertiary medical centre from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. The primary outcome was the Harris hip score (HHS), and the secondary outcomes were major intraoperative variables and key orthopaedic complications.

Results

One hundred fourteen eligible patients (114 hips) with an IAF (TPT, n = 56; MTT, n = 58) were evaluated. The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 21–28 months). At the last follow-up, the mean HHS was 82.46 ±14.70 for TPT and 86.30 ± 13.26 for MTT with a statistically significant difference. Significant differences were also detected in the major intraoperative variables (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopic screenings, and anatomical reduction number) and the major orthopaedic complications (loosening, implant failure, and heterotopic ossification).

Conclusion

Compared with TPT, MTT tends to produce accurate IAF reduction and may result in better intraoperative variables and a lower rate of major orthopaedic complications.