Alternative Methods of Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: State of the Art

Predictors of successful treatment of respiratory distress with aerosolized calfactant

INTRODUCTION

Predictors for successful aerosolized surfactant treatment are not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors for successful treatment in the AERO-02 trial and the AERO-03 expanded access program.

METHODS

Neonates receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) at the time of first aerosolized calfactant administration were included in this analysis. Associations between demographic and clinical predictors to need for intubation were examined using univariate testing and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty infants were included in the study. Overall, 24% required rescue by intubation. Multivariate modeling revealed that the predictors of successful treatment were a gestational age ≥31 weeks, a respiratory severity score (RSS) of <1.9, and <2 previous aerosol treatments.

CONCLUSION

Gestational age, number of aerosols, and RSS are predictive of successful treatment. These criteria will help select patients most likely to benefit from aerosolized surfactant.

Implementation of Surfactant Administration through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airways (SALSA): A Jordanian NICU's Journey to Improve Surfactant Administration

Administration of liquid surfactant through an endotracheal tube for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome has been the standard of care for decades. Surfactant administration through laryngeal or supraglottic airways (SALSA) is a simplified procedure for delivery of surfactant that is less invasive and better tolerated. The Al Bashir Maternity and Children’s Hospital NICU in Amman, Jordan, implemented SALSA as a potentially better practice in 2019 with the objective to effectively and efficiently deliver surfactant in a minimally invasive way and to decrease the adverse events associated with intubation−surfactant−extubation (InSurE) and laryngoscopy. The quality improvement initiative was conducted from March 2019 to December 2019. All infants who weighed 750 g or more who required surfactant were eligible. As physicians were trained in the technique and use expanded, we were able to use plan−do−study−act cycles to observe differences between SALSA and InSurE. The primary aim was the optimization of non-invasive ventilation by the effective and efficient delivery of surfactant. Balancing measures included episodes of bradycardia while receiving surfactant or the need for a second dose of surfactant. We evaluated 220 infants who received surfactant by SALSA or InSurE with a mean gestational age of 32 weeks and a mean birth weight of 1.8 kg. The Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) prior to surfactant administration was 2.7 in the SALSA group compared to 2.9 in the InSurE group (p = 0.024). Those in the InSurE group had a lower mean heart rate during the procedure (p =< 0.0001) and were more likely to need a second dose of surfactant (p = 0.026) or require intubation for mechanical ventilation (p = 0.022). Both groups were effectively delivered surfactant as evidenced by improvement in their RSS over an 8 h period. SALSA was a more time efficient surfactant delivery method (93 vs. 111 secs, p =< 0.0001). Implementation of SALSA into the Al Bashir NICU was successful. We found that it was equally effective to InSurE, but was a more efficient method of delivery. Infants who received surfactant by this method tolerated it well.