Abusive head trauma: two case reports

Developmental Outcomes Following Abusive Head Trauma in Infancy: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify measures used to evaluate developmental outcomes after abusive head trauma (AHT), as well as describe outcomes among those with AHT, and explore factors and interventions influencing such outcomes.

DESIGN

This systematic review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. The protocol is in PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020179592. On April 17, 2020, OVID Medline, Embase, OVID PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched (since inception). Inclusion criteria included original, peer-reviewed study data; AHT exposure; infants younger than 24 months at time of AHT; and evaluation of developmental outcomes. Reviewers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and assessed risk of bias using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. A descriptive synthesis approach was utilized as variability of study designs, follow-up periods, and outcome assessment tools precluded a meta-analytic approach.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included; 115 assessment tools were used to evaluate developmental outcomes; and 42 studies examined factors influencing outcomes. Two studies evaluated interventions. Five percent of studies ( n = 3) were rated low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Notable variation was observed in terms of case ascertainment criteria. Developmental outcomes after AHT have been assessed in a manner that limits understanding of how AHT impacts development, as well as the efficacy of interventions intended to improve outcomes. Researchers and clinicians are encouraged to adopt consistent diagnostic and assessment approaches.

Age-related mortality in abusive head trauma

BACKGROUND

Abusive head trauma (AHT) peaks during early infancy and decreases in toddler years. Infants and toddlers experience different injuries, possibly impacting the risk of mortality. We aimed to evaluate the association of age with mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of AHT hospitalizations in 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012 from the Kid's Inpatient Claims Database. An accidental head trauma cohort was included to hypothesize that the association between age and mortality is unique to abuse. A nested multivariable logistic regression was used to perform the analysis.

RESULTS

Children aged 2 years to 4 years experienced higher mortality than those younger than 2 years (22% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2). The presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9), cerebral edema (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.9-5.4), and retinal hemorrhage (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5) were associated with an increase risk in mortality. Children younger than 2 years experienced more fractures and hemorrhage (subdural, subarachnoid, retinal) while children aged 2 years to 4 years encountered more internal injuries and cerebral edema.In children with accidental head trauma, those aged 2 years to 4 years have a lower mortality compared with those younger than 2 years (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.6). Among children younger than 2 years, AHT and accidental trauma had comparable risk of mortality (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.3). However, among those aged 22 years to 4 years, AHT had a higher risk of mortality than accidental trauma (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.1-5.1).

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable risk of mortality associated with age at diagnosis in children with AHT.Children younger than 2 years and those aged 2 years to 4 years present with different types of injuries. The high risk of mortality in the children aged 2 years to 4 years is unique to AHT. Efforts should be made to increase awareness about the risk of mortality and identify factors that can aide in a timely accurate diagnosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological study, level III.

What Do Confessions Reveal About Abusive Head Trauma? A Systematic Review

Although confessions related to abusive head trauma (AHT) are reported, no detailed analysis exists. Therefore, we systematically reviewed studies of AHT confessions and examined the details, including country of origin, mechanisms and perpetrators' characteristics [PUBLISHER - THE PRECEDING UNDERLINED TEXT IS FOR THE MARGIN]. Employing 36 search terms across three search engines, we searched Medline and CINAHL from 1963 to 2018. All relevant studies underwent two independent reviews and data extraction. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the sample; chi square and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess differences in demographic and clinical characteristics. Of 6759 identified studies, 157 full texts were reviewed and 55 articles from 15 countries spanning four continents were included. Included articles contained 434 confessions. The mechanisms of abuse included shaking alone (64.1%), impact alone (17.1%), shaking plus impact (18.0%) and other (0.9%). There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of confessions reporting shaking alone when comparing continents: North America (64.0%), Europe (64.2%) and Oceania (60.0%; P=.92), or when comparing circumstances in which the confession was obtained: medical evaluation (74.6%) vs police or judicial investigations (63.4%; P=.11). Of 119 cases with identified perpetrators, 67.2 per cent were cases with males alone. Confessions reveal striking similarities in the mechanism of AHT (predominantly shaking) and occur across the globe.