Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a single center experience

Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a single-center experience

Purpose: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is the most preferred method for feeding in children with intact gastrointestinal system functions when oral nutrition is insufficient due to neurological, neuromuscular, or oncological diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and associated complications in the patients we followed up. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, the records of 130 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for nutritional support between January 1st 2013- December 30th 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, indications, complications, and follow-up periods of the patients were examined. Results: Of the patients, 75 were male and 55 were female. The mean age of the patients was 48 months (min 1 month-max 211 months). The evaluation of the patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in terms of diagnosis revealed that 95 patients required nutritional support due to neuromotor retardation associated with neurological disease, 19 patients due to central nervous system tumor, and 13 patients due to metabolic disease. Considering complications, the most frequent minor complication was leakage in 11of the 33 patients, while the most frequent major complication was colonic fistulation in 6 of the 9 patients. Two patients required open surgery in the early period due to intra abdominal leak. Conclusion: Although enteral nutrition with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube seems to be an appropriate and reliable method to meet the nutritional needs of pediatric patients who have normal digestive system functions but cannot be fed orally due to swallowing disorders, it is necessary to pay attention to its complications like any surgical procedure.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes Can Be Considered Safe in Children: A Single-Center 11-Year Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives: When the human body is disabled to naturally ingest food through the mouth, enteral or parenteral nutritional support should be started. Percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG) is a flexible feeding tube that is inserted into the stomach through the abdominal wall in patients who will need long-term enteral nutrient intake. The aim of this study is to analyze clinical characteristic of children at the time of PEG placement as well as to determine indications, complications and outcomes associated with PEG at the Department of Pediatrics of the University Hospital of Split. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients treated from 2010 to 2020 was performed. The following data were collected from medical records: age, gender, information about nasogastric feeding before PEG placement, indication for PEG insertion, duration of PEG, procedure-related complications and treatment outcomes. Malnutrition was determined according to the z-score range for BMI for age and sex. According to the indication for PEG placement, patients were divided into five categories: central nervous system (CNS) diseases, neuromuscular diseases, genetic disorders, metabolic diseases, and group of children with polytrauma. Results: A total of 40 patients with median age of 110 months were included in study. At the time of PEG placement, most patients had deviations in body weight and height compared to expected values for age and sex. The most common underlying diagnoses were diseases of the central nervous system. Minor complications were found in 13 (35%) of patients. One patient (2.7%) developed major complication (gastrocolic fistula) and consequently underwent reoperation. The median duration of PEG in patients with complications before the need for replacement was 27 months, and in patients without complications, 43 months. Conclusions: Negative deviations of z-score body weight, body height, and body mass index could indicate the need for possible earlier placement of PEG. PEG can be considered as a safe therapeutic option in children since PEG-related complications, mostly in minor forms, were found in a small number of patients.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: A single center experience in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the demographic data and complications in children who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) over 9 years period.

METHODS

The demographic data, complications, length of hospital admission related to PEG insertion and follow-up findings of 39 patients who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy using the standard pull-through technique between 2011 and 2020 were examined. The study took place at the Gastroenterology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia RESULTS: The most common indications of feeding with a gastrostomy tube include neurological diseases (n=30, 76.9%), followed by metabolic disorders (n=3, 7.69%), chronic diarrhea (n=2, 5.1%), chronic kidney diseases (n=2, 5.1%), cystic fibrosis (n=1, 2.56%), feeding aversion fibrosis (n=1, 2.56%). Out of the 39 patients, 20 (51%) did not have any complications. However, minor complication are expected. Most common complications included local infection (n=14, 35.89%) followed by granulation tissue (n=6, 15.38%), "buried bumper syndrome" developed in one.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is the desirable method for patients who are unable to feed orally, feeding is not adequate for demands, has special feeding requirements, or swallowing dysfunction. The technique has become more widespread because of its simplicity, safety, and low cost. Major complications are rare. The procedure is safe and effective and could be carried out by pediatric gastroenterologists after training.

Comparison of operative outcomes between surgical gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants

PURPOSE

Safety profile of different gastrostomy procedures in small children has not been well studied. This study was conducted to investigate whether complication and mortality rates differ between surgical gastrostomy (G-tube) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in infants and neonates.

METHODS

In this retrospective study utilizing the Kids' Inpatient Database, all infants who underwent either G-tube or PEG as a sole procedure were identified. Variables included age, gender, race, presence of neurological impairment, prematurity, complex chronic condition, and severity of illness/risk of mortality subclasses. Postoperative complication, reoperation, and mortality rates were compared between G-tube and PEG. A subgroup of neonates was also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1456 infants were identified (G-tube n=874, PEG n=582). In univariate analysis, the rates of adverse outcomes were not significantly different (G-tube vs PEG complication rate was 7.3% and 6.7%, p=0.65; mortality rate 1.3% and 0.7%, p=0.29, respectively). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for complication were 1.07 (G-tube vs PEG, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.700-1.620) for overall infants and 1.19 (95% CI 0.601-2.350) for the neonatal subgroup. Similarly, adjusted ORs for mortality did not differ significantly both in infants (OR 1.749, 95% CI 0.532-5.755) and in the neonatal subgroup (OR 2.153, 95% CI 0.566-8.165).

CONCLUSIONS

When G-tube and PEG were performed as the only procedure throughout a hospitalization in infants and neonates, the two techniques had comparable risks of postoperative complications and mortalities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and complications

PURPOSE

We compare the outcomes of fundoplication with gastrostomy vs gastrostomy alone and review the need for subsequent fundoplication after the initial gastrostomy alone.

METHODS

We searched studies published from 1969 to 2016 for comparative outcomes of concomitant fundoplication with gastrostomy (FGT) vs gastrostomy insertion alone (GT) in children. Gastrostomy methods included open, laparoscopic, and endoscopic procedures. Primary aims were minor and major complications. Secondary aims included post-operative reflux-related complications, fundoplication specific complications, and need for subsequent fundoplication after GT.

RESULTS

We reviewed 447 studies; 6 observational studies were included for meta-analysis, encompassing 2730 children undergoing GT (n = 1745) or FGT (n = 985). FGT was associated with more minor complications [19.9 vs 11.4%, OR 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.87, p ≤ 0.0001, I ² = 0%], minor complications requiring revision (6.8 vs 3.0%, OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.28-4.05, p = 0.005, I ² = 0%), and more overall complications (21.3 vs 12.0%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.43-2.78, p < 0.0001, I ² = 0%). Incidence of major complications (1.8 vs 2.0%, OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.62-3.11, p = 0.42, I ² = 5%) and reflux-related complications (8.8 vs 10.3%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.35-1.68, p = 0.46, I ² = 0%) in both groups was similar. Incidence of subsequent fundoplication in GT patients was 8.6% (mean).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrostomy alone is associated with fewer minor and overall complications. Concomitant fundoplication does not significantly reduce reflux-related complications. As few patients require fundoplication after gastrostomy, current evidence does not support concomitant fundoplication.