1
|
Bhindi B, Kool R, Kulkarni GS, Siemens DR, Aprikian AG, Breau RH, Brimo F, Fairey A, French C, Hanna N, Izawa JI, Lacombe L, McPherson V, Rendon RA, Shayegan B, So AI, Zlotta AR, Black PC, Kassouf W. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 15:E424-E460. [PMID: 33938798 PMCID: PMC8418246 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bimal Bhindi
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ronald Kool
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Girish S. Kulkarni
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Armen G. Aprikian
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Rodney H. Breau
- Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Fadi Brimo
- Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Adrian Fairey
- Division of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Christopher French
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Nawar Hanna
- Department of Urology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan I. Izawa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Louis Lacombe
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Victor McPherson
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Bobby Shayegan
- Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alan I. So
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alexandre R. Zlotta
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sinai Health System and Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sionov BV, Tsivian M, Taha T, Bass R, Kheifets A, Sidi AA, Tsivian A. Value of separate tumor base biopsy in transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Cent European J Urol 2020; 73:440-444. [PMID: 33552569 PMCID: PMC7848826 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of our study was to evaluate whether a biopsy from the tumor base after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) has an impact on subsequent management of patients with bladder tumors. While tumor base biopsy at the completion of TURBT is a common practice, there is no definition of its role within the major international professional guidelines. Material and methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients undergoing TURBT between 2015 and 2019 at our institution. We recorded demographic and tumor characteristics of initial TURBT, tumor base biopsy and restaging TURBT pathology outcomes. The pathologic outcomes were correlated to assess the additional value of a separate tumor base biopsy. Results A total of 532 patients underwent TURBT. A separate tumor base biopsy after completion of TURBT was performed in 154 patients. The mean patient's age was 72.8 ±11.7 years (range 48–94) and 119 (77.2%) were men. In 40 patients (25.9%) muscle was absent in the pathological specimen of the tumor resection. Muscle was present in all but 6 (3.9%) tumor base biopsies. Of the 33 patients who underwent repeated transurethral resection for pT1 tumors, 2 had residual low-grade pTa, 1 had residual high-grade pT1, and 3 patients were upstaged to pT2. Conclusions Although tumor base biopsy at the completion of TURBT is a common practice, our analysis fails to demonstrate any tangible benefit in the staging of bladder tumors. In our experience tumor base biopsy did not change the management in patients with superficial or muscle invasive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Valery Sionov
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Tarek Taha
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roman Bass
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Alexander Kheifets
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Abraham Ami Sidi
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Alexander Tsivian
- Department of Urologic Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Czech AK, Gronostaj K, Frydrych J, Fronczek J, Przydacz M, Wiatr T, Curyło Ł, Dudek P, Gąsowski J, Chłosta PL. Identification of potential prognostic factors for absence of residual disease in the second resection of T1 bladder cancer. Cent European J Urol 2019; 72:252-257. [PMID: 31720026 PMCID: PMC6830483 DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this single centre retrospective study was to analyse the results of second resection (repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumour - reTURBT) after a macroscopically complete resection of T1 urothelial bladder tumour and to identify prognostic factors for absence of residual disease (T0) in the second resection of T1 bladder cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with T1 bladder cancer diagnosed in a macroscopically complete initial resection who underwent second resection within 12 weeks were included into the retrospective analysis. Based on the presence or absence of residual disease, patients were grouped for further analysis. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify potential prognostic factors. RESULTS Among the 139 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 96 (69.1%) had no residual disease (T0) and 43 (30.9%) had residual disease in the second resection (including muscle invasive bladder cancer in 2.2%). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) of T0 status obtained from the final model were as follows: detrusor muscle presence in the first resection (OR 3.05; 95% CI 1.12-8.35, p = 0.03), immediate post-operative intravesical mitomycin C administration after the first TURBT (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.12-5.68; p = 0.03) and primary bladder cancer setting (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.10-5.47; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Our results add evidence regarding the importance of detrusor muscle presence in the first TURBT. Identification of predictors of T0 status at second resection could help design prospective studies assessing the possibility to avoid re-resection in selected patients with T1 bladder cancer without compromising oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katarzyna Gronostaj
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Jakub Frydrych
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Jakub Fronczek
- Department of Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Mikołaj Przydacz
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Tomasz Wiatr
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Łukasz Curyło
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Przemysław Dudek
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Jerzy Gąsowski
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| | - Piotr L. Chłosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|