Outcomes and complications of Hyperthermic IntraVesical Chemotherapy using mitomycin C or epirubicin for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment failure

Intravesical thermochemotherapy in the treatment of high-risk and very high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: a single-arm study

AIM

Intravesical thermochemotherapy, also known as HIVEC (Hyperthermic Intra-VEsical Chemotherapy), represents an alternative adjuvant topical treatment for non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (NMIBC). High-risk (HR) and very HR tumors carry a substantial risk of recurrence and progression. In this study, we present our own results using HIVEC as an alternative to unavailable Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine in the treatment of such groups of patients.

METHODS

During the period of November 2014-June 2022, a total of 47 patients with HR and very HR NMIBC underwent treatment with HIVEC after transurethral resection. They were given an induction of 6 instillations with/without a maintenance. The aim was to evaluate the time to recurrence, event-free survival (recurrence or progression), as measured by Kaplan-Meier analysis, the effect of maintenance treatment and other factors on survival (log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis), and complications.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for patients who did not experience an event was 32 months. The median time to HR (high grade and/or T1 tumor) recurrence in those who recurred was 15 months. The survival rate without HR recurrence at 12, 24, and 48 months was 84, 70, and 59%, respectively. Progression was detected in 10.6% of patients, which translated to 89% of patients living without progression after 24 months. Maintenance treatment (defined as more than six instillations) and presence of CIS significantly correlated with risk of HR recurrence (Hazard ratio 0.34 and 3.12, respectively). One female patient underwent salvage cystectomy due to contractory bladder, and 19.1% of patients experienced transient lower urinary tract symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience, HIVEC represents an adequate and safe alternative treatment for HR and very HR NMIBC in situations where BCG is not available or radical cystectomy is not an option for the patient. However, high-quality data from prospective randomized studies are still lacking, and thus, thermochemotherapy should still be regarded as an experimental treatment modality.

Adjuvant Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy in Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a frequently diagnosed neoplasm, which is typically managed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) eventually followed by intravesical therapies. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is used as first-line adjuvant treatment in high- (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC, although, in the latter, mitomycin C (MMC) may also be used. Multiple limitations to the use of BCG encouraged the search for therapeutic alternatives. In this context, hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy with MMC (HIVEC-MMC) emerged as a promising therapy in the adjuvant setting for NMIBC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the tolerability, compliance, and survival outcomes of HIVEC-MMC in patients with IR- and HR-NMIBC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective analysis of IR- and HR- NMIBC patients who received HIVEC-MMC after TURBT between August 2018 and August 2022. Levels of risk stratification were defined using the European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. The protocol consisted of four weekly HIVEC-MMC instillations (induction) followed by six monthly instillations (maintenance). The primary outcomes were to evaluate the tolerability and compliance with the HIVEC-MMC protocol and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For the purpose of statistical analysis, methods of descriptive statistics, survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier estimation), and multivariate analysis (Cox regression, and binary logistic regression) were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled with a median age of 67.9 (34.4-83.5) years old. In this cohort, 40 patients (70.2%) had primary tumors. At the time of referral for HIVEC-MMC, the majority of the patients had IR-NMIBC (n= 33, 57.9%). A total of 41 patients (71.9%) completed the HIVEC-MMC protocol. Disease recurrence and adverse events (AEs) were the most common reasons to stop the protocol. After a median follow-up of 31 months (95% CI, 5.0-54.0), 32 patients (61.4%) were disease-free, 22 (38.6%) experienced recurrent disease and six patients (10.5%) died, although only one death was directly attributable to bladder cancer. The median DFS was 42 months (95% CI, 28.0-56.0). Completion of the HIVEC-MMC maintenance phase protocol stood as a predictive factor for DFS (44 months, 95% CI 29.1-58.9 vs. 14 months, 95% CI 0.0-29.6, p < 0.001; HR 4.48, 95% CI 1.65-12.15). The median OS was not reached; the 24- and 48-month OS were 92.6% and 82.7%, respectively. EAU risk group, ECOG-PS, and completion of HIVEC protocol were found to be significant predictive factors of OS but lost their significance on multivariate analysis. However, if we exclude those who experienced recurrence during the maintenance phase protocol, treatment completion had a significant positive impact on OS (HR: 42.8, 95% CI 1.75-1045.072, p= 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that HIVEC is a secure and well-tolerated treatment with promising efficacy data, making this therapeutic approach a feasible option in IR- and HR-NMIBC patients, mainly in those who cannot tolerate or have contraindications to BCG therapy, but also as an alternative during BCG shortages.

Hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy acts as a promising alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a network meta-analysis

Introduction

With the shortage of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, it is important to find an alternative to BCG instillation, which is the most commonly used adjuvant treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumor treatment (TURBt) to delay tumor recurrence. Hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C (MMC) is a potential treatment choice. We aim to compare HIVEC with BCG instillation for the preventive efficacy of bladder tumor recurrence and progression.

Methods

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was taken with MMC instillation and TURBt as the attached comparators. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with NIMBC patients after TURBt were included. Articles with pure BCG unresponsive patients and combined therapies were excluded. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42023390363).

Results

It was found that HIVEC had a non-significant 22% relative reduction in bladder tumor recurrence compared with BCG instillation [HIVEC vs. BCG: HR 0.78, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.55-1.08] and a nonsignificant higher risk of bladder tumor progression (BCG vs. HIVEC: HR 0.77, 95% CrI 0.22-3.03).

Discussion

HIVEC is a potential alternative to BCG, and it is expected to be the standard therapy for NMIBC patients after TURBt during the global shortage of BCG.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO identifier, CRD42023390363.

The impact of different adjuvant intravesical therapy methods on tumor biology in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Introduction

Expression level of the cell proliferation marker Ki-67 correlates with the degree of differentiation of tumor cells and stage in primary patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but the marker is currently not used in assessing the efficacy of adjuvant intravesical therapy and risk stratification in patients with recurrent bladder tumors.

Material and methods

A retroprospective study included 107 patients with high-risk NMIBC; the patients were divided into 2 groups. The first group included patients who received adjuvant therapy after transurethral resection of the bladder using the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine (BCG therapy group; n = 54), the second group consisted of patients who received hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC^® therapy group; n = 53) using the device for local hyperthermia Combat BRS HIVEC^®.

Results

Tumor recurrences were recorded in 21 (39%) patients receiving intravesical BCG therapy and in 9 (17%) patients after intravesical hyperthermic chemotherapy (p = 0.012). The expression level of Ki-67 in primary tumors did not differ; in recurrent tumors it was significantly different in both groups (32.05 ±13.80 vs 11.00 ± 6.86). The frequency of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients receiving chemohyperthermia was significantly higher than in patients after the BCG therapy (log-rank test result: p = 0.048).

Conclusions

Assessment of Ki-67 expression in recurrent tumors can be a criterion for the effectiveness of intravesical bladder-preserving treatment. The use of hyperthermic chemotherapy can reduce the number of radical cystectomies in a separate group of patients with NMIBC.

Long-Term Experience with Hyperthermic Chemotherapy (HIVEC) Using Mitomycin-C in Patients with Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Spain

(1) Background: Intravesical mitomycin-C (MMC) combined with hyperthermia is increasingly used in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), especially in the context of a relative BCG shortage. We aim to determine real-world data on the long-term treatment outcomes of adjunct hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with MMC and a COMBAT® bladder recirculation system (BRS); (2) Methods: A prospective observational trial was performed on patients with NMIBC treated with HIVEC using BRS in nine academic institutions in Spain between 2012–2020 (HIVEC-E). Treatment effectiveness (recurrence, progression and overall mortality) was evaluated in patients treated with HIVEC MMC 40mg in the adjuvant setting, with baseline data and a clinical follow-up, that comprise the Full Analysis Set (FAS). Safety, according to the number and severity of adverse effects (AEs), was evaluated in the safety (SAF) population, composed by patients with at least one adjunct HIVEC MMC instillation; (3) Results: The FAS population (n = 502) received a median number of 8.78 ± 3.28 (range 1–20) HIVEC MMC instillations. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 ± 16.5 (range 1–81) months. Its distribution, based on EAU risk stratification, was 297 (59.2%) for intermediate and 205 (40.8%) for high-risk. The figures for five-year recurrence-free and progression-free survival were 50.37% (53.3% for intermediate and 47.14% for high-risk) and 89.83% (94.02% for intermediate and 84.23% for high-risk), respectively. A multivariate analysis identified recurrent tumors (HR 1.83), the duration of adjuvant HIVEC therapy <4 months (HR 1.72) and that high-risk group (HR 1.47) were at an increased risk of recurrence. Independent factors of progression were high-risk (HR 3.89), recurrent tumors (HR 3.32) and the induction of HIVEC therapy without maintenance (HR 2.37). The overall survival was determined by patient age at diagnosis (HR 3.36) and the treatment duration (HR 1.82). The SAF population (n = 592) revealed 406 (68.58%) patients without AEs and 186 (31.42%) with at least one AE: 170 (28.72%) of grade 1–2 and 16 (2.7%) of grade 3–4. The most frequent AEs were dysuria (10%), pain (7.1%), urgency (5.7%), skin rash (4.9%), spasms (3.7%) and hematuria (3.6%); (4) Conclusions: HIVEC using BRS is efficacious and well tolerated. A longer treatment duration, its use in naïve patients and the intermediate-risk disease are independent determinants of success. Furthermore, a monthly maintenance of adjunct MMC HIVEC diminishes the progression rate of NMIBC.

Application of intra-arterial chemotherapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To summarize the current evidence on the effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) on high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and compare oncology results with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC).

Methods

We performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest by a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in February 2021. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hazard radio (HR) with 95% CIs was used for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of six studies with 866 patients were included. For IAC combined with IVC versus IVC alone, statistically significant differences were found regarding tumor recurrence rate (OR: 0.51, 95% CI [0.36∼0.72], p = 0.0001), tumor progression rate (OR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.30∼0.72], p = 0.0006), tumor-specific death rate (OR: 0.49, 95% CI [0.25∼0.99], p = 0.05), PFS (HR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.23∼0.96], p = 0.04) and RFS (HR: 0.60, 95% CI [0.41∼0.87], p = 0.007). No significant difference between two groups was found for time to first recurrence (MD: 3.27, 95% CI [−2.37∼8.92], p = 0.26) and OS (HR: 1.20, 95% CI [0.44∼3.32], p = 0.72). For IAC alone versus IVC, There was no statistical difference in the terms of tumor-specific death rate (OR: 0.67, 95% CI [0.29∼1.53], p = 0.34), RFS (HR: 0.90, 95% CI [0.56∼1.46], p = 0.68) and PFS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI [0.32∼1.55], p = 0.39). Adverse events mainly included nausea/vomiting (36.3%), hypoleukemia (19.4%), neutropenia (16.0%), increased creatinine (9.9%), increased alanine aminotransferase (18.7%), and thrombocytopenia (9.9%).

Conclusion

The IAC combined with IVC is a safe and effective treatment for high risk NMIBC, with lower rates of recurrence, progression, tumor-specific death, PFS and RFS, and with minor and tolerable events. The effectiveness of the IAC alone is parallel to the IVC alone.