Basic technology and proper usage of home health monitoring devices

Identifying factors shaping the behavioural intention of Nepalese youths to adopt digital health tools

The digitalization of healthcare has gained global importance, especially post-COVID-19, yet remains a challenge in developing countries due to the slow adoption of digital health tools. This study aims to identify major predictors impacting the behavioural intention of Nepalese youths to adopt digital health tools by utilizing the framework based on the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT-2). The cross-sectional data from 280 respondents was collected from youths (i.e., aged 16-40) in the Kathmandu Valley and were analyzed through PLS-SEM. Most of the respondents were using smartwatches followed by blood pressure monitors and pulse oximeters. The findings revealed hedonic motivation as the strongest predictor of behavioural intention to use digital health tools followed by facilitating conditions, social influence, habit, and performance expectancy. The behavioural intention significantly influenced actual usage behaviour. Additionally, behavioural intention mediated the relationship between the above-mentioned five constructs and usage behaviour, except for effort expectancy and price value. The study emphasizes the role of major predictors such as facilitating conditions in shaping the intention of youths to adopt digital health tools providing insights for government, hospitals, and developers to understand consumer perceptions and motivations.

An innovative method to prevent infection when measuring the arterial blood gas SpO2 saturation

Background

Patients are hospitalized for extended periods, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). As a result, the saturation probe (pulse oximeter) remains attached for an extended period and microorganisms can grow in the wet environment. If the pulse oximeters are not reprocessed, cross-infection may occur. The literature contains several studies in which gloves were used for the measurement while various SpO2 (peripheral arterial oxygen saturation) measurements were compared with each other. However, such comparisons have yet to be made with the results of arterial blood gas SpO2 measurements by pulse oximeter, considered as the gold standard. The present study aimed to compare arterial blood gas values with the fingertip saturation measurement performed by having adult patients wear gloves of different colors, one after the other, on their fingers and determining the effect of the differently colored gloves (transparent, white, black, light blue) on saturation values.

Methods

The study was conducted on 54 patients in an ICU. Intra-arterial blood gas SpO2 results were measured. Oxygen saturation was measured while the patient 1. did not wear gloves and 2. sequentially wore a series of gloves of different colors. Paired t-test, correlation analysis, and Bland Altman charts were used to evaluate the results.

Results

The mean SpO2% value of the participants' intra-arterial blood gas measurements was 97.76±2.04. The mean SpO2% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was 0.43 points lower than the mean SpO2% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=0.986, p=0.61). The mean SpO2% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a white glove was 0.93 points lower than the mean SpO2% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements (t=1.157, p=0.093).

Conclusion

Of the measurements performed with a glove, the mean SpO2% value obtained from the measurements of the fingers with a transparent glove was more consistent with the mean SpO2% value of the intra-arterial blood gas measurements than measurement of the fingers without a glove.

Emergency order allocation of e-medical supplies due to the disruptive events of the healthcare crisis

The availability of electronic (e-medical) homecare essentials, such as thermometers, oximeters, and oxygen concentrators during the peaks of the pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has been witnessed as critical in saving the lives of people across the world. This paper presents a supply order allocation strategy of e-medical homecare essentials (HCEs) in a multi-supplier environment by a distributor while ensuring sufficient and timely availability for emergency consumption during pandemic peaks. The results, based on the actual demand data of HCEs obtained from a regional HCE distributor during the pandemic peak of the second wave in India, i.e. April-May 2021, suggest that a minimum (maximum) average of 94% (98%) availability of e-medical HCEs respectively at pharmacies could be achieved during the peak demand period using the proposed emergency order allocation algorithm in this study. Conclusively, the analysis of this study could generate insightful implications for emergency operations decisions in the HCEs supply-distribution channel.

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Agreement of Perfusion Indexes Measured on Different Fingers by a Portable Pulse Oximeter in Healthy Adults

Background

Pulse oximeters measure oxygen saturation, heart rate, and perfusion index (PI) by analyzing photoplethysmographic signals. PI is an indirect measure of peripheral perfusion expressed as a percentage of pulsatile signals to non-pulsatile signals. PI measured from different sites may show variation. PI may vary when measured on different fingers. In this study, we aimed to observe the variation of PI among different fingers of both hands.

Methodology

This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using a convenience sample recruited from a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. PI was measured in apparently healthy adults in a sitting posture after a five-minute rest. The pulse oximeter probe was attached to each finger and readings were taken after one minute. The analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to compare and find agreement among PI.

Results

Data from a total of 391 (229 [58.57%] male and 162 [41.43%] female) adult research participants with a mean age of 34.88 ± 10.65 years were analyzed. The PI was the highest on the middle finger in both hands. There was a significant difference among the PI measured on different fingers, F (9, 3900) = 15.49, p <0.0001. The ICC was 0.474, 0.368, and 0.635 for overall, right-hand, and left-hand fingers, respectively, which indicate poor (ICC < 0.5) to moderate (ICC = 0.5-0.75) levels of reliability.

Conclusions

The PI measured using consumer-grade pulse oximeters on different fingers may provide different readings. The highest PI reading is found on the middle finger. Clinicians and primary care physicians should consider the differences in measured PI among different fingers and should use the readings with caution for any diagnostic purposes.

Effect of using disposable polyethylene bag as a probe cover or finger cover in pulse oximetry

Background

Consumer-grade pulse oximeters are used to monitor blood oxygen levels (SpO2) at home. Sharing a pulse oximeter with family members in isolation centers or home isolation due to COVID-19 may increase the chances of cross-infection.

Aim

We aimed to find if using commonly available disposable polyethylene covers either on the finger and/or on the pulse oximeter provides the same reading of SpO2 or not.

Methods

Two operators measured SpO2 on 10 healthy subjects with three randomly selected pulse oximeters. Six types of commonly available polythene bags (transparent, translucent, and opaque) were used to cover the fingers and/or device. After measuring the baseline SpO2 (i.e., without using covers), the measurements were taken with a covered finger, and/or covered oximeter probe.

Results

The mean age of the research participants (five male, five female) was 23.9 ± 5.11 years. Perfusion index was 9.12 ± 1.63 (males 9.6 ± 1.42, females 8.64 ± 1.85, P = 0.38). Black opaque polyethylene bag as finger or probe cover did not detect any signal. There was no difference in SpO2 reading when a pulse oximeter probe is covered, and/or a finger is covered. There was excellent inter-observer and inter-device agreement.

Conclusion

Commonly available transparent and translucent polyethylene plastic bags may be used as finger or pulse oximeter cover without compromising the SpO2 reading. However, an opaque black plastic bag is not suitable for finger or probe cover. These easily available and cheap pulse oximeter covers may be used by multiple patients or family members in an emergency like the COVID-19 pandemic with the potential to prevent cross-infection.