1
|
Lafeuille P, Daire E, Rivory J, Rostain F, Saurin JC, Lambin T, Moll F, Subtil F, Fenouil T, Jacques J, Pioche M. Histological prediction and choice of the best resection strategy in front of a colorectal lesion > 2 cm: prospective comparison of endoscopic characterization, non-targeted and targeted biopsies. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:1622-1634. [PMID: 39775045 PMCID: PMC11870912 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11501-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/23/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate endoscopic characterization of colorectal lesions is essential to predict histology and select the best treatment strategy but remains very difficult. Instead of the recommended endoscopic characterization, many gastroenterologists routinely perform biopsies of the lesion to propose endoscopic resection with or without R0 intent. The aim of this study was to determine which of endoscopic characterization or biopsies, either targeted (TB) or non-targeted (NTB), is the most effective to determine the best treatment strategy for colorectal neoplasia > 2 cm. METHODS We prospectively assessed the best strategy between endoscopic characterization and targeted or non-targeted biopsies, so that the proposed resection technique offered a level of quality of tumor resection adapted to the definitive histology of the lesion on R0-resected specimen. RESULTS 84 patients with 88 lesions were included. "Adequate treatment" was proposed by endoscopic characterization in 52.3 to 70.5% of cases, "under treatment" in 2.3 to 9.1% and "over treatment" in 20.5 to 45.5%. Two severe events were recorded. "Adequate treatment" was proposed by TB and NTB in respectively 72.7 and 69.3% of cases, "under treatment" in respectively 27.3 and 30.7% and no case of "over treatment" was reported. TB and NTB were ineffective to evaluate the depth of invasion in the submucosa and to differentiate superficial invasive from deep invasive adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS Biopsies-based strategies are unable to predict depth of cancer invasion and could be associated with a risk of under treatment of large colorectal lesions in near a third of the cases compared to only around 5% with endoscopic characterization. Endoscopic characterization could lead to over treatment, but mainly by endoscopic submucosal dissection with low morbidity. Characterization with the CONECCT classification could decrease the risk of under treatment and avoid surgeries for non-malignant colorectal lesions. Other endoscopic criteria should be determined to better characterize colorectal lesions and to improve the best adapted treatment for each lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Lafeuille
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France.
| | - Emilien Daire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Florian Rostain
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Thomas Lambin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Frédéric Moll
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| | - Fabien Subtil
- Service de Biostatistique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Laboratoire de Biométrie Et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Tanguy Fenouil
- Institute of Pathology Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Edouard Herriot Hospital, 69437, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamamoto N, Urabe Y, Nakahara H, Nakamura T, Shimizu D, Konishi H, Ishibashi K, Ariyoshi M, Miyamoto R, Mizuno J, Takasago T, Ishikawa A, Tsuboi A, Tanaka H, Yamashita K, Hiyama Y, Kishida Y, Takigawa H, Kuwai T, Arihiro K, Shimamoto F, Oka S. Genetic Analysis of Biopsy Tissues from Colorectal Tumors in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3271. [PMID: 39409892 PMCID: PMC11475702 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Colorectal neoplasia developing from ulcerative colitis mucosa (CRNUC) can be divided into ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia (UCAN) and non-UCAN; however, it is often difficult to distinguish UCAN from non-UCAN during a biopsy diagnosis. We investigated whether a genomic analysis could improve the diagnostic accuracy of UCAN using biopsy specimens. METHODS In step 1, 14 CRNUCs were used to examine whether the genomic landscape of biopsy and resection specimens matched. In step 2, we investigated the relationship between the genomic landscapes and the pathological diagnosis of 26 CRNUCs. The cancer genome was analyzed by deep sequencing using a custom panel of 27 genes found to be mutated in our previous CRNUC analysis. RESULTS In step 1, of the 27 candidate genes, 14 were mutated. The concordance rate of the pathogenic mutations in these 14 genes between the biopsy and resection specimens was 29% (4/14), while that of the pathogenic mutations in TP53 and KRAS was 79% (11/14). In step 2, the pathological diagnosis of biopsy specimens using only hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining had a sensitivity of 33% and an accuracy of 38% for UCAN diagnosis. On the other hand, the combination of the HE pathology and p53 immunohistochemical staining had a sensitivity of 73% and an accuracy of 85% for UCAN diagnosis, while the combination of HE staining and a TP53 mutation had a sensitivity of 87% and an accuracy of 88% for UCAN diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS An evaluation of TP53 mutations in biopsy specimens may be useful for diagnosing UCAN. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are required before this can be applied in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriko Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Yuji Urabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Hikaru Nakahara
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan;
| | - Takeo Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Daisuke Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Hirona Konishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Kazuki Ishibashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Misa Ariyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Ryo Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Junichi Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Takeshi Takasago
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Akira Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan;
| | - Akiyoshi Tsuboi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Hidenori Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Ken Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Yuichi Hiyama
- Clinical Research Center in Hiroshima, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan;
| | - Yoshihiro Kishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Hidehiko Takigawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| | - Toshio Kuwai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Koji Arihiro
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan;
| | - Fumio Shimamoto
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hiroshima Cosmopolitan University, Hiroshima 734-0014, Japan;
| | - Shiro Oka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (N.Y.); (T.N.); (D.S.); (H.K.); (K.I.); (M.A.); (R.M.); (J.M.); (T.T.); (A.T.); (H.T.); (K.Y.); (Y.K.); (H.T.); (T.K.); (S.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li Z, Yu F, Wang C, Du Z. Comparing efficacy and factors of postoperative bleeding in endoscopic mucosal resection vs coagulation for intestinal polyps. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34941. [PMID: 37713827 PMCID: PMC10508480 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) and Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) as therapeutic approaches for intestinal polyps in patients, and to examine the factors associated with postoperative bleeding. This study included 132 patients diagnosed with colorectal polyps (188 polyps) who underwent endoscopic surgery at our hospital between January 2022 and December 2022. Based on the surgical method employed, the patients were divided into 2 groups: EMR (68 cases, 97 polyps) and APC (64 cases, 91 polyps). Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the clinical efficacy, surgery-related indicators, and quality of life the 2 groups. Furthermore, an investigation was carried out to identify the factors associated with postoperative bleeding. The analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the cure rate of flat and superficial raised polyps between the EMR group and the APC (P > .05). However, it was found that the EMR group exhibited a significantly higher cure rate for subpedunculated and raised-pedunculated polyps compared to the APC group (P < .05). The results of logistics analysis showed that patients with hypertension (OR = 2.876, 95% CI: 1.119-7.393), patients with diabetes (OR = 5.278, 95% CI: 1.388-20.064), patients with hyperlipidemia (OR = 2.594, 95% CI: 1.054-6.380), the polyps of right hemicolon (OR = 2.743, 95% CI: 1.003-7.504), rectal polyps (OR = 5.143, 95% CI: 1.728-7.504), pedunculated polyps (OR = 4.758, 95% CI: 1.322-17.129), adenomatous polyps (OR = 3.152, 95% CI: 1.018-9.757) were independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding in patients with colorectal polyps (P < .05). The findings suggest that for subpedunculated and pedunculated-raised polyps, EMR can be a suitable treatment approach. On the other hand, flat and superficial-raised polyps can be effectively managed with either EMR or APC. The presence of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, polyps of the right hemicolon, rectal polyps, pedunculated polyps, and adenomatous polyps has been established as independent risk factors for postoperative bleeding in patients with colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiang Li
- Department of Anal Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, P.R. China
| | - Fei Yu
- Department of Anal Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, P.R. China
| | - Chaoqian Wang
- Department of Anal Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, P.R. China
| | - Zhang Du
- Department of Anal Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hong J, Wang Y, Deng J, Qi M, Zuo W, Hao Y, Wang A, Tu Y, Xu S, Zhou X, Zhou X, Li G, Zhu L, Shu X, Zhu Y, Lv N, Chen Y. Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:1915458. [PMID: 35707387 PMCID: PMC9192244 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1915458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnosing colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and endoscopic resection (ER) specimens. METHODS A total of 918 colorectal LGINs was histopathologically diagnosed by EFB, including 162 cases with upgrade discrepancy and 756 concordant cases. We compared clinicopathological data of EFB and ER specimens between these two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for this upgrade histopathology. RESULTS The predominant upgrade discrepancy of LGINs diagnosed by EFB was upgrades to high-grade dysplasia (114/918, 12.4%), followed by upgrades to intramucosal carcinoma (33/918, 3.6%), submucosal adenocarcinoma (10/918, 1.1%), and advanced adenocarcinoma (5/918, 0.5%). NSAID history (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.27-10.27; p < 0.001), insufficient EFB number (OR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.91-4.68; p < 0.001), maximum diameter ≥ 1.0 cm (OR 6.18; 95% CI, 1.32-28.99; p = 0.021), lobulated shape (OR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.65-4.36; p < 0.001), erythema (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; p < 0.001), erosion (OR 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-12.94; p < 0.001), surface unevenness (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33-4.01; p = 0.003), and distal location of the target adenoma (OR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.68-6.41; p < 0.001) were associated with the histologically upgrade discrepancies. CONCLUSION NSAID history, insufficient EFB number, adenoma size and location, and abnormal macroscopic patterns are potential predictors for upgrade histopathology of LGINs diagnosed by EFBs. The standardization of EFB number and advanced imaging techniques could minimize the risk of neglecting the potential of this upgrade histopathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junbo Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yining Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Jiangshan Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Miao Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Wei Zuo
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
| | - Yuanzheng Hao
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Anjiang Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yi Tu
- Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
| | - Shan Xu
- Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xiaojiang Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guohua Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Liang Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xu Shu
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yin Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Nonghua Lv
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Youxiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wickham CJ, Wang J, Mirza KL, Noren ER, Shin J, Lee SW, Cologne KG. "Unresectable" polyp management utilizing advanced endoscopic techniques results in high rate of colon preservation. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2121-2128. [PMID: 33890178 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08499-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE "Endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps identified during screening colonoscopy are often referred for segmental colectomy. Application of advanced endoscopic techniques can increase endoscopic polyp resection, sparing patients the morbidity of colectomy. This retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the success of colon preserving resection of "endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps using advanced endoscopic techniques including endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoluminal surgical intervention, full-thickness laparo-endoscopic excision, and combined endo-laparoscopic resection. METHODS A prospectively maintained institutional database identified 95 patients referred for "endoscopically unresectable" benign polyps from 2015 to 2018. Cases were compared to 190 propensity score matched controls from the same database undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy for other reasons. Primary outcome was rate of complete endoscopic polyp removal. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, unplanned 30-day readmission and reoperation, 30-day mortality, and post-procedural complications. RESULTS Advanced endoscopic techniques achieved complete polyp removal without colectomy in 66 patients (70%). Failure was most commonly associated with previously attempted endoscopic resection and occult malignancy. Compared with matched colectomy controls, endoscopic polyp resection resulted in significantly shorter hospital length of stay (1.13 ± 2.41 vs 3.89 ± 4.57 days; p < 0.001), lower unplanned 30-day readmission (1.1% vs 7.7%; p < 0.05), and fewer postoperative complications (4.2% vs 33.9%; p < 0.001). Unplanned 30-day reoperation (2.1% vs 4.4%; p = 0.34) and 30-day mortality (0% vs 0.6%; p = 0.75) trended lower. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic resection of complex polyps can be highly successful, and it is associated with favorable outcomes and decreased morbidity when compared with segmental colon resection. Attempting colon preservation using these techniques is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carey J Wickham
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Jennifer Wang
- University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Kasim L Mirza
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erik R Noren
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joongho Shin
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sang W Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kyle G Cologne
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yeh JH, Tseng CH, Huang RY, Lin CW, Lee CT, Hsiao PJ, Wu TC, Kuo LT, Wang WL. Long-term Outcomes of Primary Endoscopic Resection vs Surgery for T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2813-2823.e5. [PMID: 32526343 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is controversy over the best therapeutic approach for T1 colorectal cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) vs those of primary or additional surgery. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through October 2019 for studies that reported outcomes (overall survival, disease-specific survival, recurrence-free survival at 5 years, recurrence, and metastasis) of ER vs surgery in patients with colorectal neoplasms. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated based on time to events. RESULTS In total, 17 published studies with 19,979 patients were included. The median follow-up time among the studies was 36 months. The meta-analysis found no significant differences between primary ER and primary surgery in overall survival (79.6% vs 82.1%, HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.45), recurrence-free survival (96.0% vs 96.7%, HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.87-1.88), or disease-specific survival (94.8% vs 96.5%; HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.67-1.78). Additional surgery and primary surgery did not produce significant differences in recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85-1.89). A significantly lower proportion of patients who underwent primary ER had procedure-related adverse events (2.3%) than patients who underwent primary surgery (10.9%) (P < .001). Lymphovascular invasion and rectal cancer, but not depth of submucosal invasion, were independently associated with recurrence for all T1 colorectal cancers. CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that ER should be considered as the first-line treatment for endoscopically resectable T1 colorectal cancers. In cases of noncurative resection, additional surgery can have comparable outcomes to primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Hao Yeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Da-Chung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hao Tseng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Cancer Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ru-Yi Huang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Family Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wen Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Da-Chung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Tai Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Jen Hsiao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Da-Chung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Chin Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Da-Chung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Liang-Tseng Kuo
- Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chia-Yi, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Lun Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent delayed post-EMR bleeding in the colorectum: a prospective randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:813-822. [PMID: 31175874 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Post-EMR bleeding (PEB) is the most common adverse event after EMR. However, there are no established endoscopic methods for the prevention of PEB. This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic endoscopic coagulation (PEC) using coagulation probes reduces the incidence of overall delayed PEB. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled study of patients undergoing EMR for large (≥10 mm) sessile lesions and laterally spreading tumors. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the EMR with coagulation group (n = 285) or EMR (control) group (n = 285). Immediate bleeding during colon EMR or clean-based ulcer after EMR was excluded. Clinically significant PEB was defined as bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis, hospitalization, or a decrease in the hemoglobin level >2 g/dL. RESULTS A total of 569 patients were analyzed. The incidence of overall PEB was significantly lower in the EMR with coagulation group than in the control group (12.6% [36/285] vs 18.7% [53/284], P = .048). However, this was largely because of a reduction in minor bleeding. There was no difference in clinically significant PEB (1.8% [5/285] vs 3.2% [9/284], P = .276). Rectal location was a risk factor associated with overall PEB (odds ratio, 1.256; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.41; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Although this study found reduced PEB with prophylactic cautery of visible vessels, this was largely because of a reduction in minor bleeding with no benefit observed for clinically significant bleeding. Overall, PEB was more frequent with rectal lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0000779.).
Collapse
|