Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy and Surgical Gastrostomy in Severely Handicapped Children

Nutritional Management of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer-A Comprehensive Review

While surgical therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) is showing improvement with the advancement of reconstruction techniques, the focus in these patients should also be shifting to supportive pre and aftercare. Due to the highly sensitive and anatomically complex region, these patients tend to exhibit malnutrition, which has a substantial impact on their recovery and quality of life. The complications and symptoms of both the disease and the therapy usually make these patients unable to orally intake food, hence, a strategy should be prepared for their nutritional management. Even though there are several possible nutritional modalities that can be administrated, these patients commonly have a functional gastrointestinal tract, and enteral nutrition is indicated over the parenteral option. However, after extensive research of the available literature, it seems that there is a limited number of studies that focus on this important issue. Furthermore, there are no recommendations or guidelines regarding the nutritional management of HNC patients, pre- or post-operatively. Henceforth, this narrative review summarizes the nutritional challenges and management modalities in this particular group of patients. Nonetheless, this issue should be addressed in future studies and an algorithm should be established for better nutritional care of these patients.

Experience with a Hybrid Procedure Involving Laparoscopic Fundoplication with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Chronically Ill Children

Gastrostomy with concurrent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is often performed as a laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) by surgeons. Since 2014, we started performing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) as gastrostomy with LNF. This study aims to compare the outcomes of LG and PEG with LNF. Patients were recruited into two groups: LNF with LG (historical control) or PEG. Demographic data, operation time, time to start feeding, time to full feeding, length of hospital stay (LOS), and complications were compared between the groups. Fourteen patients underwent LNF with LG and 49 underwent LNF with PEG. The median age and body weight of patients were 4.25 years and 14.15 kg in the LG group and 2.58 years and 10.60 kg in the PEG group, respectively. Operation times were significantly shorter in the PEG group (1.81 vs. 2.61 h). The times to start feeding and full feeding as well as LOS were shorter in the PEG group. Nevertheless, complications were similar in both groups. In conclusion, PEG with LNF was associated with significantly shorter operation times, times to start feeding and reach full feeding, and LOS. PEG is a suitable method for LNF in chronically ill children.

Concomitant gastrostomy tube insertion during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-esophageal reflux disease: analysis of risk factors for fundoplication failure

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and gastrostomy tube (GT) placement may be performed concomitantly in children with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and failure to thrive. We aimed to evaluate the rate and risk factors for LNF failure in children undergoing concomitant LNF/GT.

METHODS

A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study was conducted, reviewing patients that underwent LNF (2005-2014). Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, and type of GT (laparoscopy- or endoscopy-assisted). The primary outcome measure was LNF failure. Data was compared using contingency tables or Mann-Whitney tests, when appropriate. An exploratory analysis by Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine predictors of time to LNF failure after LNF/GT.

RESULTS

Of 189 children that underwent LNF, 99 (52%) had a concomitant GT (55% laparoscopy-, 45% endoscopy-assisted). LNF failed in 15% after LNF/GT and in 17% after LNF alone (p = 0.84), at a median age of 23 months (IQR 8-41). Using univariate analysis, we found that a younger age at the time of surgery (p = 0.05), prematurity (p = 0.0018), esophageal atresia (p = 0.01), and endoscopy-assisted GT (p = 0.02) were potential predictors of LNF failure after LNF/GT. After multivariate regression analysis, prematurity (p = 0.007) remained significantly associated with LNF failure after LNF/GT. No predictive factors for LNF failure after LNF alone were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant GT insertion and LNF is a common practice, as half of the children that undergo LNF also received GT insertion. Children born preterm or with esophageal atresia comprise a fragile population at high-risk of LNF failure after LNF/GT. Prospective, multicentric studies are needed to evaluate the best GT technique to use in children undergoing LNF.

Do Antibiotics Reduce the Incidence of Infections After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Children?

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides a long-term solution for tube dependency. Pediatric guidelines recommend prophylactic antibiotic treatment (ABT) based on adult studies.

AIM

To compare wound infection and other complications in children receiving a PEG with and without prophylactic ABT.

METHODS

Retrospective study including children 0 to 18 years undergoing PEG placement. Patients with (2010-2013) and without (2000-2010) ABT were compared with respect to the occurrence of wound infection and other complications.

RESULTS

In total, 297 patients were included (median age 2.9 years, 53% boys). Patients receiving ABT per PEG protocol (n = 78) had a similar wound infection rate (17.9% vs 21%, P = 0.625), significantly less fever (3.8% vs 14.6%, P = 0.013), leakage (0% vs 9.1%, P = 0.003) and shorter hospital admission (2 vs 4 days, P = 0.000), but more overgranulation (28.2% vs 8.7%, P = 0.000) compared with those without (n = 219). Patients receiving any ABT, per PEG protocol or clinical indication (n = 115), had similar occurrence of wound infection (19.1% vs 20.9%, P = 0.768), fever (7.8% vs 14.3%, P = 0.100) and leakage (3.5% vs 8.8%, P = 0.096), a significantly shorter hospital admission (3 vs 4 days, P = 0.000), but more overgranulation (21.7% vs 8.8%, P =0.003) compared with those without (n = 182).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic ABT does not seem to reduce the occurrence of wound infection but it might be beneficial with respect to fever, leakage and duration of hospital admission, but not overgranulation. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm our results.

Clinical Features and Advantages of a Novel Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Method

Background

To study the clinical characteristics of novel percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Material/Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the hospital records of 173 patients undergoing various methods of gastrostomy (a novel PEG, traditional PEG, and surgical gastrostomy). Clinical characteristics were analyzed. For the novel PEG, the operation was as same as the traditional method for initial steps until the annular guide wire was inserted. The following steps were different: water was injected through an injection port to expand the capsule, then the water sac was confirmed to be close to the gastric wall under endoscope, and, finally, the incision was sutured and covered.

Results

Patient ages ranged from 42 to 93 years (60.8±9.2 years, 91 males and 82 females). Among all patients, there were 27 cases of brain trauma, 42 cases of cerebral infarction, 74 cases of esophageal or cardiac carcinoma, 21 cases of laryngocarcinoma, and 9 cases of Alzheimer disease. Clinical features were significantly better for novel PEG compared to traditional PEG: duration of operation (19.75±3.14 min vs. 37.86±5.33 min and 54.12±9.48 min, P<0.001), intraoperative blood loss (27.14±3.63 ml vs. 43.53±6.24 ml and 75.78±12.41 ml, P<0.001), postoperative pain score (1.12±0.19 pts vs. 3.85±0.44 pts and 6.22±1.06 pts; P<0.001), infection rate (1.35% vs. 3.77% and 2.17%, P<0.001), length of hospital stay (3.16±0.42 d vs. 5.68±0.78 d and 8.29±1.31 d, P<0.001), and time to free activity (2.24±0.26h vs. 3.74±0.48 h and 14.85±2.38 d, P<0.001). The incidence of complications such as wound infection (1.35% vs. 3.77% and 4.76%), vomiting (1.35% vs. 5.66% and 6.52%), and nausea (2.70% vs. 1.88% and 6.52%) in the novel PEG group was lower than in the other groups (P<0.0001). Improved outcomes were obtained without increased medical costs in the novel PEG group.

Conclusions

For patients with difficult postoperative oral nutrition, the novel PEG treatment resulted in overall better clinical outcomes than traditional PEG.