The roof step cut: A novel technique for bony reconstruction of acetabular roof deficiency during total hip replacement

Investigation of the efficacy of epidermal growth factor, boric acid and their combination in cartilage injury in rats: An experimental study

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to determine the bioefficacy of epidermal growth factor (EGF), boric acid (BA), and their combination on cartilage injury in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In in vitro setting, the cytotoxic effects of BA, EGF, and their combinations using mouse fibroblast cell (L929), human bone osteosarcoma cell (Saos-2), and human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAD-MSCs) were determined by applying MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] test. In in vivo setting, 72 rats were randomly divided into four groups. A standard chondral defect was created and microfracture was performed in all groups. Group A was determined as the control group. In addition to the standard procedure, Group B received 100 ng/mL of EGF, Group C received a combination of 100 ng/mL of EGF and 10 µg/mL of BA combination, and Group D 20 µg/mL of BA.

RESULTS

The cytotoxic effect of the combinations of EGF dilutions (1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200 ng/mL) with BA (100, 300, 500 µg/mL) was observed only in the 72-h application period and in Saos-2. The cytotoxic effect of BA was reduced when combined with EGF. There was no significant difference in the histopathological scores among the groups (p=0.13).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that EGF and low-dose BA application had a positive effect on cartilage healing in rats. Significant decreases in recovery scores were observed in the other groups. The combination of EGF and BA promoted osteoblast growth. Detection of lytic lesions in the group treated with 20 µg/mL of BA indicates that BA may have a cytotoxic effect.

A secure blood-saving protocol for Jehovah's Witnesses in primary total hip replacement

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to analyze the efficacy of the blood management protocol developed by our team for patients who are Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) presenting for primary total hip replacement (THR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty JW patients (6 males, 24 females; mean age: 70.1±9.8 years; range, 65 to 81 years) and 30 age- and sex-matched controls (6 males, 24 females; mean age: 68.7±9.1 years; range, 62 to 79 years) who underwent primary THR at our institution between January 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. While the surgical technique of THR was not different among the groups, blood loss management differed between the groups. Patients in the control group were given 1 g of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) 15 min before the surgical incision. In addition to the same TXA protocol, intraoperative cell salvage with a continuous autologous transfusion system was used for JW patients. The estimated blood loss (EBL) was determined using Meunier's formula. Hemoglobin (Hgb) decline, EBL on the first and third postoperative days, allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) requirement, and complications were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups regarding demographic and clinical characteristics (p>0.05), ABT requirement (p>0.999), and Hgb decline in the first and third postoperative days (p=0.540 and p=0.836, respectively). Furthermore, both groups did not significantly differ between EBL in the first and third postoperative days (p=0.396 and p=0.616, respectively) and the length of hospital stay (p=0.547). Similar complication rates were noted for both groups. Hemoglobin level assessments revealed that values on the first and third postoperative days were significantly lower than the baseline Hgb value in both cohorts (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A combination of intravenous administration of 1 g of TXA, meticulous hemostasis, and intraoperative use of cell saver constitutes a reasonable strategy for achieving the goal of transfusion-free primary THR with predictable levels of blood loss that are similar to non-JW patients.

Short-term outcome of artificial intelligence-assisted preoperative three-dimensional planning of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip compared to traditional surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the short-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty for treating developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning technology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2020 and July 2022, a total of 61 patients with DDH (31 males, 30 females, mean age: 59.2±10.4 years; range, 35 to 78 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as those in the observation group of AI-assisted 3D preoperative planning technology (n=34) and the control group of traditional two-dimensional X-ray template planning technology (n=27). Perioperative data of the patients were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients were followed for more than one year, and no hip dislocation, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic infection or revision occurred. The accuracy of the planning was based on the agreement between the preoperative planning model and the intraoperative model. The accuracy of preoperative planning for the acetabular prosthesis and femoral prosthesis in the observation group was significantly higher than in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found in the postoperative abduction (p=0.416) and anteversion (p=0.225) between the groups. In the observation group, 91.2% of the acetabular cups were implanted within the Lewinnek safe zone (66.7% in the control group) and 88.2% were within the Callanan safe zone (63% in the control group). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the postoperative lower-limb length discrepancy (p=0.004), which was significantly improved in both groups compared to preoperative values (p<0.01 for all). The postoperative Harris hip score in both groups was significantly improved compared to preoperative scores (p<0.01); however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.098).

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that AI-assisted 3D preoperative planning is evidently more successful than traditional 2D X-ray template planning for predicting prosthesis size. This method seems to be advantageous in acetabular cup positioning, as well as in lower-limb length restoration.

Accuracy analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted three-dimensional preoperative planning in total hip replacement

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning technology in terms of predicting prosthesis size, acetabular cup positioning, and lowerlimb length restoration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2020 and July 2022, a total of 161 patients (101 males, 60 females; mean age: 57.6±10.5 years; range, 31 to 80 years) who underwent primary unilateral THA were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as those who were treated with AI-assisted 3D preoperative planning technology (the observation group, n=95) and patients who were treated with traditional two-dimensional (2D) X-ray template planning technology (the control group, n=66).

RESULTS

The accuracy of the planning was based on the consistency of the preoperative planning and intraoperative models. The difference between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant in terms of the accuracy of the preoperative planning of acetabular prostheses (54% vs. 38%, p=0.048) and femoral prostheses (64% vs. 44%, p=0.011), with both values significantly higher in the observation group. The mean inclination angle, anteversion angle, and limb length discrepancy (LLD) in the observation group were 36.85°±4.82°, 12.10°±5.33°, and 2.18±2.70 mm, respectively, while those in the control group were 35.06°±6.07°, 10.95°±5.09°, and 4.42±3.85 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of inclination angle and LLD (p<0.05 for both), but there was no significant difference in terms of anteversion angle (p>0.05). In the observation group, 86.3% (82/95) of acetabular cups were implanted within the Lewinnek safe zone (72.7% [48/66] in the control group), while 83.2% (79/95) were within the Callanan safe zone (69.7% [46/66] in the control group), with both values higher in the observation group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, AI-assisted 3D preoperative planning is superior to traditional 2D X-ray template planning for predicting prosthesis size, and it also has the advantage in terms of acetabular cup positioning and lower-limb length restoration.