1
|
Aubry JF, Bates O, Boehm C, Butts Pauly K, Christensen D, Cueto C, Gélat P, Guasch L, Jaros J, Jing Y, Jones R, Li N, Marty P, Montanaro H, Neufeld E, Pichardo S, Pinton G, Pulkkinen A, Stanziola A, Thielscher A, Treeby B, van 't Wout E. Benchmark problems for transcranial ultrasound simulation: Intercomparison of compressional wave models. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 152:1003. [PMID: 36050189 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6020543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston operating at 500 kHz), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross-comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Francois Aubry
- Physics for Medicine Paris, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1273, ESPCI Paris, Paris Sciences and Lettres University, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8063, Paris, France
| | - Oscar Bates
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Boehm
- Institute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Kim Butts Pauly
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Douglas Christensen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
| | - Carlos Cueto
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre Gélat
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
| | - Lluis Guasch
- Earth Science and Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jiri Jaros
- Centre of Excellence IT4Innovations, Faculty of Information Technology, Brno University of Technology, Bozetechova 2, Brno 612 00, Czech Republic
| | - Yun Jing
- Graduate Program in Acoustics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - Ningrui Li
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Patrick Marty
- Institute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Hazael Montanaro
- Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Esra Neufeld
- Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Pichardo
- Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences Departments, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gianmarco Pinton
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - Aki Pulkkinen
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Antonio Stanziola
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bradley Treeby
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Elwin van 't Wout
- Institute for Mathematical and Computational Engineering, School of Engineering and Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aubry JF, Bates O, Boehm C, Butts Pauly K, Christensen D, Cueto C, Gélat P, Guasch L, Jaros J, Jing Y, Jones R, Li N, Marty P, Montanaro H, Neufeld E, Pichardo S, Pinton G, Pulkkinen A, Stanziola A, Thielscher A, Treeby B, van 't Wout E. Benchmark problems for transcranial ultrasound simulation: Intercomparison of compressional wave models. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 152:1003. [PMID: 36050189 PMCID: PMC9553291 DOI: 10.1121/10.0013426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Computational models of acoustic wave propagation are frequently used in transcranial ultrasound therapy, for example, to calculate the intracranial pressure field or to calculate phase delays to correct for skull distortions. To allow intercomparison between the different modeling tools and techniques used by the community, an international working group was convened to formulate a set of numerical benchmarks. Here, these benchmarks are presented, along with intercomparison results. Nine different benchmarks of increasing geometric complexity are defined. These include a single-layer planar bone immersed in water, a multi-layer bone, and a whole skull. Two transducer configurations are considered (a focused bowl and a plane piston operating at 500 kHz), giving a total of 18 permutations of the benchmarks. Eleven different modeling tools are used to compute the benchmark results. The models span a wide range of numerical techniques, including the finite-difference time-domain method, angular spectrum method, pseudospectral method, boundary-element method, and spectral-element method. Good agreement is found between the models, particularly for the position, size, and magnitude of the acoustic focus within the skull. When comparing results for each model with every other model in a cross-comparison, the median values for each benchmark for the difference in focal pressure and position are less than 10% and 1 mm, respectively. The benchmark definitions, model results, and intercomparison codes are freely available to facilitate further comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Francois Aubry
- Physics for Medicine Paris, National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1273, ESPCI Paris, Paris Sciences and Lettres University, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) UMR 8063, Paris, France
| | - Oscar Bates
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Boehm
- Institute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Kim Butts Pauly
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Douglas Christensen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
| | - Carlos Cueto
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre Gélat
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London NW3 2PF, United Kingdom
| | - Lluis Guasch
- Earth Science and Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jiri Jaros
- Centre of Excellence IT4Innovations, Faculty of Information Technology, Brno University of Technology, Bozetechova 2, Brno 612 00, Czech Republic
| | - Yun Jing
- Graduate Program in Acoustics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - Ningrui Li
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Patrick Marty
- Institute of Geophysics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Hazael Montanaro
- Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Esra Neufeld
- Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT'IS), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Pichardo
- Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences Departments, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gianmarco Pinton
- Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA and North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
| | - Aki Pulkkinen
- Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Antonio Stanziola
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bradley Treeby
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Elwin van 't Wout
- Institute for Mathematical and Computational Engineering, School of Engineering and Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|