Medium-term results following large diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: increasing failure after 6 years

Survival at 11 to 21 years for 779 Metasul® metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasties (THAs) bearing is one of the most important factors for hip replacement because THA survival depends on it. Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing has lower wear than metal-on-polyethylene but lot of aseptic loosening decrease utilization. We analyze the survival rate of 28 mm Metasul® bearings after a mean follow-up of 12.9 years.

METHODS

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the survival of the MoM. We evaluate 779 consecutive THAs performed between January 1995 and December 2005 for primary osteoarthritis, congenital dysplasia classified Crowe I, or rheumatoid arthritis. Survival rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meir method. The association between survival and age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and surface coating was investigated with a proportional odds model. The clinical assessment included Oxford score.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty-two THAs were reviewed. Sixty-two revisions (9.5%) were performed including 34 aseptic loosening and 11 deep infections. The survival for prosthesis with any reason at 20 years was 87% (confidence interval (CI) 83-90.2) for aseptic loosening at 20 years was 90.1% (CI 87-93.8). There was no association with age, BMI, and surface coating. Gender was significant with lower aseptic loosening for men, hazard ratio = 0.45, p value = 0.035. Oxford score was 57 ± 6.7 (19-60).

CONCLUSION

The survival rate of Metasul was well and seems to be like our clinical finding. However, radiographic aseptic loosening without surgery is not included in the survival rate. The Oxford score was very good with a lot of patients with asymptomatic hip.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV/Retrospective study.

A Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up Experience with a Specific Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Design

Purrpose  Metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been a subject of recent discussion and concern due to the early failures caused by local and systemic adverse reactions related to specific designs. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes and survival rates of a single brand of MoM implants implanted in a consecutive series of patients at a single institution.

Methods  Between 2007 and 2012, 116 (118 hips) patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years after primary THA. The diagnosis leading to surgery was osteoarthritis (80 patients) and proximal femoral fracture (36 patients). A single design of THA was implanted. All patients were evaluated before surgery and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months by clinical scores and radiographic studies. The data analysis was made using Student's t -test.

Results  The minimum follow-up was of 4 years, with a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Two aseptic loosenings of the acetabular component were recorded (one per group), which were not associated with local or systemic complications related to metal ion release. Both were revised by an isolated acetabular cup substitution with metal-on-polyethylene couplings. Nonprogressive radiolucency lines < 2 mm in zone 2 were observed in other six patients around the acetabular component without clinical manifestation (four in the arthritis group and two in the fracture group). Postoperative Harris Hip Score and SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Survey) score improved in both groups.

Conclusion  Despite several MoM implants showing early complications and failures, a specific MoM design may be associated with good clinical results at a mid- to long-term follow-up.

Level of Evidence  This is a therapeutic case series, Level 4 study.

Obesity is not associated with hip failure in patients with articular surface replacement of the hip

BACKGROUND

Our main aim was to investigate whether obese patients were at increased risk of elevated metal ion levels and/or adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) after being treated with articular surface replacement (ASR) hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

This study included 360 patients who underwent metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing (HRA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). 95 patients (26%) were underweight/normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m²), 139 (39%) were overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m²), and 126 (36%) were obese (BMI ⩾ 30 kg/m²). Blood metal ion levels and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained, and a sub-cohort of 85 patients had MARS MRI performed. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations between obesity and metal ions, as well as ALTR.

RESULTS

BMI was not associated with either elevated metal ion levels or ALTR. In HRA patients, female gender (OR 3.0; p = 0.019) and pain (OR 2.3; p = 0.046) were associated with elevated Co levels. Female patients had increased risk of elevated Cr levels (OR 3.0; p = 0.02). In THA patients, female gender (OR 2.2; p = 0.004) and VAS satisfaction (OR 2.1; p = 0.01) were associated with elevated Co levels. Female gender (OR 3.6; p = 0.001) and time from surgery (OR 1.4; p = 0.005) were associated with Cr levels. In the sub-cohort, ALTR was associated with Co levels (OR 16.1; p = 0.002) in HRA patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with BMI ⩾ 30 kg/m² present no increased risk for elevated metal ion levels or development of ALTR.

A Randomized Seven-Year Study on Performance of the Stemmed Metal M2a-Magnum and Ceramic C2a-Taper, and the Resurfacing ReCap Hip Implants

BACKGROUND

The large-diameter metal-on-metal hip prostheses were expected to have low wear and reduced dislocation rate compared to the traditional metal-on-polyethylene implants. We compare 2 such prostheses, the ReCap resurfacing implant and the M2a-Magnum stemmed implant, with the C2a ceramic-on-ceramic stemmed implant as to clinical performance, serum concentrations of prosthesis metals, and the durability of the implants in a randomized, controlled clinical trial at 7 years of follow-up.

METHODS

All included patients had osteoarthritis. Preoperatively, the size of the implants was estimated from a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Follow-up data included serum cobalt and chromium concentrations, Oxford and Harris Hip Scores, leg press and abduction force, 6-minute walk distance, WOMAC and SF-36 self-assessment scores, and from the 7th postoperative year also ultrasonography (US) examination of the soft tissue adjacent to the implant as well as MRI with metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS-MRI) when indicated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two hips in 146 patients were included. The serum cobalt and chromium concentrations were significantly higher for the 2 metal-on-metal prostheses than for the ceramic-on-ceramic, with the M2a-Magnum as the highest. No significant difference was found between the groups concerning physical performance measurements and scores as well as dislocations and prosthesis survival. Five revisions were done and concerned all groups, for reasons of pain, high serum cobalt and chromium concentrations, cystic fluid collection around the joint, and infection. Metal concentrations, US, and MARS-MRI contributed to the decision making regarding prosthesis revision.

CONCLUSION

Metal concentrations were significantly higher for the metal-on-metal prostheses than for the ceramic-on-ceramic. The clinical performance was good in all 3 prosthesis groups. Metal concentrations, US, and MARS-MRI findings were of use to identify hips needing revision. ID Number in ClinicalTrials.gov PRS: NCT00284674.