THA conversion rate comparing decompression alone, with autologous bone graft or stem cells in osteonecrosis

Hip joint-preserving strategies for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head: From nonoperative to operative procedures

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) has an exceedingly high prevalence and disability rate, causing a tremendous socioeconomic burden. The prevalence of ONFH is increasing, while the population of the patients with ONFH is becoming younger. Once the femoral head collapses, treatment becomes difficult and often requires a hip joint replacement, which is not favorable for young patients. Therefore, hip joint-preserving treatments at an early stage of ONFH are particularly important. This study provides a comprehensive review on hip-preserving strategies for treating ONFH, including nonoperative treatments (e.g., protective weight bearing, hyperbaric oxygen, pulsed electromagnetic, extracorporeal shockwave, bisphosphonate, anticoagulants, hypolipidemics, vasodilators, and traditional Chinese medicine) and operative treatments (e.g., core decompression, osteotomy, bone grafting, mesenchymal stem cell transplantation, tantalum rods, and tissue engineering). Nonoperative treatments aim to slow down the progression of the disease and delay the need for joint replacement; however, they usually cannot effectively prevent the progression of the disease, except in cases of small necrosis areas (<10 %). Additionally, nonoperative treatments have unclear mechanisms that require further investigation. In contrast, operative treatments may stop the negative outcomes of necrosis and therefore appear to be more promising. Currently, an emerging area in operative treatments is regenerative medicine, which could promote the generation of bone tissues and blood vessels and restore hip joint function to pre-necrotic levels as much as possible. This review seeks to not only provide an important reference for clinicians when choosing appropriate strategies for treating ONFH but also offer certain guidance for future basic research in developing ONFH treatments.

The translational potential of this article

The incidence of ONFH is increasing, and patients are becoming younger on average. Therefore, the development of hip joint-preserving strategies to treat ONFH at earlier stages is urgently needed, particularly for young patients. However, a comprehensive review is lacking regarding the currently-available hip joint-preserving strategies and their effectiveness. This study is motivated to fill this gap and serve as an important reference for clinicians in choosing appropriate strategies to treat ONFH.

The efficacy of core decompression combined with regenerative therapy in early femoral head necrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 954 subjects

Background

The debate continues on whether combining core decompression (CD) with regenerative therapy provides a more effective treatment for early femoral head necrosis than CD alone. This systematic review and meta-analysis endeavored to assess its efficacy.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through July 2024 for RCTs and cohort studies evaluating the impact of core decompression (CD) with regenerative therapy versus CD alone in early-stage osteonecrosis (ARCO I, II or IIIa or Ficat I or II) of the femoral head (ONFH). Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies. The primary outcome was disease progression, measured by the incidence of staging advancement and total hip arthroplasty (THA) conversion. Clinical outcomes, including VAS, HHS, WOMAC, and Lequesne index, were secondary measures. Subgroup analyses were performed for variables such as age, BMI, follow-up period, and dosage in the bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) group, with results depicted in forest plots.

Results

This study represented a total of seven RCTs (mean follow-up time 36.57 months) and eight cohort trials (mean follow-up time 74.18 months) involving 954 hips. CD, when combined with agents, exhibited considerably enhanced efficacy over CD alone (risk ratio (RR) = 0.55 (95% CI 0.39-0.77), p < 0.001, I 2 = 54%) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.43-0.81), p = 0.001, I 2 = 51%), respectively). However, a significant difference was exclusive to the CD combined with BMAC group in terms of stage progression outcomes (stage progression, RR = 0.47 (95% CI 0.28-0.78), p = 0.004, I 2 = 67%); THA conversions, RR = 0.41 (95% CI 0.32-0.52), p < 0.001, I 2 = 43%). Secondary outcomes (VAS, HHS, WOMAC score and Lequesne index) showed improved results when CD was combined with other regenerative agents, such as bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), etc. In the reported data, the regenerative group demonstrated significantly higher rates of subjective improvement in pain and functional outcomes compared to those in the CD group (71.74% (66/92) vs. 56.38% (53/94). Subgroup analysis revealed superior outcomes in the low-dose (less than 20 mL) BMAC group and patients aged under 40 years old in stage progression rate and THA conversion rate.

Conclusion

CD, when combined with regenerative therapy, can diminish hip pain and enhance functionality, but its ability to slow disease progression remains uncertain. BMAC presents a more substantiated efficacy evidence than other agents, with low-doses of BMAC in patients under 40 years potentially slowing ONFH progression. Nonetheless, the high heterogeneity and relatively short follow-up time of these studies make it difficult to draw accurate conclusions, which necessitates verification through future trials comparing CD versus CD combined with regenerative therapy, with a focus on extended follow-up periods.

Systematic Review Registration

identifier CRD42023467873.

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Pedicled Peri-Hip Bone Flap Grafting: The Chinese Experience

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed peri-hip bone flap grafting (PBFG) and compared them with those patients undergoing primary THA for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2021, 163 Chinese patients (163 hips) were treated by conversion THA after failed PBFG (containing 94 patients who had pedicled vascularized iliac bone flap grafting and 69 patients who had pedicled vascularized greater trochanter bone flap grafting), and 178 Chinese patients were treated by primary THA. The preoperative baseline data and perioperative indicators in both groups were compared.

RESULTS

In the conversion group, patients had significantly greater blood loss, a longer length of stay, and greater changes in serum hemoglobin than those in the primary THA group (P < 0.05). The operative room time, transfusion volume, calculated blood loss, changes in serum hematocrit, and increased superficial infection (P > 0.05) in the conversion group were greater compared with the primary cohort; however, the difference was not statistically significant. The mean postoperative Harris Hip Scoring system (HHS) of the PBFG group at the 1-month follow-up was 81, and the control group had a score of 82. Importantly, subgroup analysis of the PBFG group indicated that there was no significant difference between patients who had prior pedicled vascularized iliac bone flap grafting and pedicled vascularized greater trochanter bone flap grafting (P > 0.05), except for the operative room time (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Hip-sparing surgery of ONFH did not make THA more difficult or lead to more perioperative complications, but increased blood loss and extended hospital stay from a prior PBFG are still notable problems in clinical practice. Thus, it is necessary for surgeons to focus attention on the improvement of the preoperative condition and prepare for any specific intraoperative challenges.

Tissue-Engineered Bone Regeneration for Medium-to-Large Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in the Weight-Bearing Portion: An Observational Study

Background

Stem cell therapy for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) showed promising outcomes. However, ONFH with a large lesion in the weight-bearing portion is a poor prognostic factor and still challenging issue to be solved. We aimed to evaluate the effect of tissue-engineered bone regeneration for this challenging condition to preserve the femoral head.

Methods

A total of 7 patients (9 hips) with ONFH who received osteoblasts expanded ex vivo from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMdMSCs) and calcium metaphosphate (CMP) as scaffolds from March 2002 to March 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 27.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 23.0-34.0 years), and the median follow-up period was 20.0 years (IQR, 11.0-20.0 years). After culture and expansion of stem cells, we performed core decompression with BMdMSC implantation at a median number of 10.1 ×107 (IQR, 9.9-10.9 ×107). To evaluate radiographic outcomes, the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classifications, the Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) classification, and modified Kerboul combined necrotic angle (mKCNA) were evaluated preoperatively and during follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS).

Results

The preoperative stage of ONFH was ARCO 2 in 5 hips and ARCO 3a in 4 hips. The ARCO staging was maintained in 3 hips of ARCO 2 and 4 hips of ARCO 3a. Two hips of ARCO 2 with radiographic progression underwent total hip arthroplasty. According to mKCNA, 2 hips showed medium lesions, and 7 hips showed large lesions. The size of necrotic lesion was decreased in 4 hips (2 were ARCO 2 and 2 were ARCO 3a). There were no significant changes in JIC classification in all hips (type C1: 3 hips and type C2: 6 hips) (p = 0.655). Clinically, there were no significant changes in the VAS and HHS between preoperative and last follow-up (p = 0.072 and p = 0.635, respectively).

Conclusions

Tissue engineering technique using osteoblasts expanded ex vivo from BMdMSC and CMP showed promising outcomes for the treatment of pre-collapsed and early-collapsed stage ONFH with medium-to-large size, mainly located in weight-bearing areas.

Implantation of Culture-Expanded Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

BACKGROUND

Although core decompression (CD) with stem cell for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) showed promising results in many reports, the efficacy remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CD with culture-expanded autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC) implantation in early stage ONFH.

METHODS

A total of 18 patients (22 hips) with ONFH who underwent CD with culture-expanded BM-MSC implantation from September 2013 to July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 35.0 years [interquartile range (IQR), 28.5-42.0], and the median follow-up period was 4.0 years (IQR, 2.0-5.3). The median number of MSCs was 1.06 × 108. To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes, Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classifications, Japanese Investigation Committee classification, combined necrotic angle (CNA) visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were checked at each follow-up.

RESULTS

The preoperative stage of ONFH was ARCO 2 in 14 hips and ARCO 3a in 8 hips. The ARCO staging was maintained in 7 hips in ARCO 2 and 4 hips in ARCO 3a. The radiographic failure rate of ARCO 2 and 3a was 14.3 and 50%, respectively. Furthermore, CNA decreased to more than 20° in 6 hips (four were ARCO 2 and two were ARCO 3a).There was no significant difference in the VAS and HHS (P = 0.052 and P = 0.535, respectively). Total hip arthroplasty was performed in 4 hips.

CONCLUSION

CD with culture-expanded autologous BM-MSCs showed promising results for the treatment of early stage ONFH.

Using Computed Tomography-Based Three-dimensional Modeling and Computer Navigation for Minimally Invasive Core Decompression and Adjuvant Orthobiologic Therapy of Femoral Head Avascular Necrosis

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a debilitating condition that can lead to femoral head collapse. Core decompression with adjuvant cellular therapies, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate, delays disease progression and improves outcomes. However, inconsistent results in the literature may be due to limitations in surgical technique and difficulty in targeting the necrotic lesions. Here, we present a surgical technique utilizing computed tomography-based three-dimensional modeling and instrument tracking to guide the therapy to the center of the lesion. This method minimizes the number of attempts to reach the lesion and confirms the three-dimensional positioning of the instrumentation within the lesion. Our technique may improve the outcomes of core decompression and adjuvant therapy and prevent or delay hip collapse in patients with femoral head avascular necrosis.

Updating Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a condition characterized by the presence of a necrotic bone lesion in the femoral head, is caused by a disruption in the blood supply. Its occurrence is more common in young and middle-aged adults and it is the main reason for performance of total hip arthroplasty in this age group. Its incidence is increasing along with increased use of glucocorticoids for management of adjuvant therapy for treatment of leukemia as well as organ transplantation and other myelogenous diseases. Current information on etiology and pathogenesis, as well as natural history, stage system, and treatments is provided in this review. A description of the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) criteria for classification of glucocorticoids- and alcohol-associated ONFH, 2019 ARCO staging system, and 2021 ARCO classification using computed tomography for the early stages of ONFH is also provided.

Clinical outcomes of autologous platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow mononuclear cells grafting combined with core decompression for Association Research Circulation Osseous II-IIIA stage non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) grafting combined with core decompression (CD) in the treatment of Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) II-IIIA stage non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

The clinical data of 44 patients (44 hips) with non-traumatic ONFH from December 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-four patients underwent CD combined with autologous PRP and BMMCs grafting (PRP+BMMCs group), and 20 patients underwent core decompression alone (CD group). During a minimum follow-up of 36 months, radiographic outcomes were evaluated using X-ray, radiographic failure rates were compared, and Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were selected to evaluate clinical outcomes. The percentage of patients with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in both groups was analyzed. Clinical failure was defined as further total hip arthroplasty (THA) with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Surgical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

All patients had well healed wounds, and no complications such as infection and thrombosis occurred. HHS and VAS scores in both the PRP+BMMCs and CD groups were better than those preoperatively (P<0.05). At the last follow-up, the HHS and VAS scores of the PRP+BMMCs group were significantly better than those of the CD group (P<0.05). In ARCO II-IIIA stage, 66.7% of the PRP+BMMCs group and 30.0% of the CD group achieved the MCID (P<0.05). The clinical and imaging failure rates in the PRP+BMMCs group were 12.5% and 20.8%, respectively, compared with 40.0% and 50.0% in the CD group (P<0.05). In ARCO II stage, the MCID, clinical and imaging failure rates of PRP+BMMCs group and CD group were 66.7% and 33.3% (P<0.05), 4.8% and 33.3% (P<0.05), 14.3% and 44.4% (P<0.05), respectively. The PRP+BMMCs group had better hip survival rate compared with CD group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

CD combined with autologous PRP and BMMCs grafting is a safe and effective method for the treatment of ARCO II-IIIA stage non-traumatic ONFH, especially for ARCO II stage, effectively reducing the collapse rate of the femoral head and delaying or even avoiding THA.

Comparison of current treatment strategy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head from the perspective of cell therapy

Aims: The purpose of our study is to compare the effects of core decompression (CD) and bone grafting (BG) on osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). And evaluate the efficacy of CD based on cell therapy to provide guidance for the dose and number of cells. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library between 2012 and 2022, with keywords including "osteonecrosis of the femoral head", "core decompression" and "bone grafting". We selected comparative studies of CD and BG, and the comparison of CD combined with bone marrow (BM) transplantation and CD alone. Changes in hip pain were assessed by VAS, hip function were assessed by HHS and WOMAC, and THA conversion rate was used as an evaluation tool for femoral head collapse. From these three aspects, the dose of bone marrow and the number of cells transplantation were subgroup analyzed. Results: Eleven studies were used to compare the efficacy of CD and BG. There was no significant difference in HHS, and the THA conversion rate of BG was significantly lower than that of CD. Thirteen CD studies based on cell therapy were included in the meta-analysis. Bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) can significantly improve VAS (mean difference (MD), 10.15; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 7.35 to 12.96, p < 0.00001) and reduce THA conversion rate (odds ratio (OR), 2.38; 95% CI 1.26 to 4.47, p = 0.007). Medium dose bone marrow fluid has a lower p-value in THA conversion rate. The p values of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) of 10⁹ magnitude in VAS score were lower. Conclusion: In general, there is no consensus on the use of BG in the treatment of ONFH. The enhancement of cell-based CD procedure shows promising results. Using 20 mL BMAC and 10⁹ magnitude BMMC is likely to achieve better results.

Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: an Updated Review of ARCO on Pathogenesis, Staging and Treatment

Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) usually affects adults younger than 50 years and frequently leads to femoral head collapse and subsequent arthritis of the hip. It is becoming more prevalent along with increasing use of corticosteroids for the adjuvant therapy of leukemia and other myelogenous diseases as well as management of organ transplantation. This review updated knowledge on the pathogenesis, classification criteria, staging system, and treatment of ONFH.

Modified Kerboul Angle Predicts Outcome of Core Decompression With or Without Additional Cell Therapy

BACKGROUND

Core decompression is the most common procedure for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study investigated outcomes of core decompression with/without bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), based on the Kerboul combined necrotic angles using magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

We reviewed 66 patients (83 hips) with early ONFH, Association Research Circulation Osseous stages I-IIIa, who underwent core decompression alone (26 patients, 33 hips) or in combination with BMAC (40 patients, 50 hips). Survival rate and progressive collapse were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated. Subgroup analyses based on the modified Kerboul angle were performed: grade I (<200°), grade II (200°-249°), grade III (250°-299°), and grade IV (≥300°).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 36 ± 23 months. Femoral head collapse with BMAC (16 hips, 32%) was significantly lower than without BMAC (19 hips, 58%, P = .019). Conversion THA was significantly lower with BMAC (28%) than without (58%, P = .007). Survival rates among groups showed significant differences (P = .017). In grade I, 0/12 hips with BMAC collapsed while 3/9 (33%) without BMAC collapsed (P = .063); in grade II, 2/16 hips (12%) with BMAC collapsed while 7/13 (54%) without BMAC collapsed (P = .023). There was no significant difference in collapse with (64%) or without (82%) BMAC in grade III-IV hips (P = .256).

CONCLUSION

Core decompression with/without BMAC had a high failure rate, by increasing disease progression and the necessity for THA, for combined necrotic angles >250°. In our study, addition of BMAC had more reliable outcomes than isolated core decompression for precollapse ONFH if the combined necrotic angles were <250°.

Addition of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Therapy Achieves Better Clinical Outcomes and Lower Rates of Disease Progression Compared With Core Decompression Alone for Early Stage Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a cause of hip pain and early joint arthrosis in the young patient. Nonarthroplasty interventions aim to decompress vascular congestion in the femoral head and stimulate new bone growth to prevent progression and collapse. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the available evidence on the effect of adjuvant bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) for early stage ONFH.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases in search of published reports comparing the core decompression (CD) with/without adjuvant BMSCs for ONFH. The cohort was divided into two groups: (1) CD with BMSCs (intervention) and (2) CD alone (control subject). The various outcome parameters including hip pain and function, progression of ONFH, rate of revision surgeries, and complications were analyzed. Data were extracted and aggregated for meta-analysis. Cases with staging beyond Ficat II, UPENN II, or ARCO II were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the published reports, 16 met our inclusion criteria with an aggregated 583 hips in the intervention and 468 hips in the control subject groups, respectively. Addition of bone marrow cells to CD resulted in lower hip pain score (VAS) (MD = -10.88, 95% CI = -16.84 to -4.92, P = 0.003) and higher HHS score (MD = 5.59, 95% CI = 1.13 to 10.04, P = 0.01) compared with CD alone at the 24-month follow-up. For rates of progression to higher stages, 138 progressed in the intervention group compared with 202 in the control subject group (P = 0.0002). Finally, subsequent patients who required total hip arthroplasty surgery were lower in the intervention group (22.5% versus 42.3%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite heterogeneous and poor data, there is evidence that addition of bone marrow cells to CD appears to result in better clinical outcomes and lower rates of disease progression compared with cored decompression alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for the early-stage osteonecrosis of femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) is a seriously degenerative disease with no effective therapies to slow its progression. Several studies have reported short-term efficacy of stem cells on early-stage ONFH. However, its long-term effect was still unclear especially on progression events. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stem cells and analyze its optimal age group and cell number.

METHODS

Our review was registered on PROSPERO ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ), registration number CRD42020136094. Following PRISMA guideline, we searched 8 electronic databases on January 5, 2020, and rigorous random controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing stem cell therapy on early-stage ONFH were included. Quality and bias were analyzed. Pooled analysis was performed to assess difference between various outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 13 RCTs (619 patients with 855 hips) were included. The application of stem cells significantly delayed collapse of femoral head(I2, 70%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.89; P < .00001) and total hip replacement (THR) (I2, 68%; RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.90; P = .02) in the long term. It effectively decreased the events of collapse of femoral head (≥ 60 months) (I2, 0%; RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.49; P < .00001) and THR (> 36 months) (I2, 0%; RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.44; P < .00001). There existed a beneficial effect for patients under 40 (Collapse of femoral head: I2, 56%; RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.76; P = .004) (THR: I2, 0%; RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.42; P < .00001). In addition, quantity of stem cells at 108 magnitude had better effects on disease progression events (I2, 0%; RR, 0.34; 95%CI, 0.16 to 0.74; P = .007). Besides, there were no significant differences on adverse events between the stem cell group and control group (I2, 0%; RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.73; P = .60).

CONCLUSION

Our findings build solid evidence that stem cell therapy could be expected to have a long-term effect on preventing early-stage ONFH patients from progression events, such as collapse of femoral head and total hip replacement. Furthermore, patients under 40 may be an ideal age group and the optimal cell number could be at 108 magnitude for this therapy. Further studies including strict RCTs are required to evaluate a clear effect of stem cells on ideal patient profile and the procedures of implantation.

Biologics

Biologics are a growing field that has shown immense promise for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions both in orthopedic sports medicine and interventional pain management. These procedures utilize injection of supraphysiologic levels of platelets and growth factors to invoke the body's own inflammatory cascade to augment the healing of many bony and soft tissue conditions. While many patients improve with conservative care, there is a need to address the gap between those that improve with rehabilitation alone and those who ultimately require operative management. Orthobiologic procedures have the potential to fill this void. The purpose of this review is to summarize the basic science, evidence for use, and post-injection rehabilitation concepts of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as they pertain to joints, tendons, ligaments, and the spine.

Efficacy of orthobiologic adjuvants to core decompression for hip preservation in avascular necrosis hip

Head preserving modalities in avascular necrosis (AVN) hip are variably effective in early stages, and further options that could prevent head distortion and osteoarthritis are needed. Core decompression (CD) is the most commonly used surgery in the early stages of osteonecrosis with variable rates of success. The present review aimed to determine the effectiveness of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) or their combination with CD in early stages of AVN hip, prior to collapse of femoral head. Additionally, any newer unexplored modalities were also searched for and ascertained. PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched for relevant articles in English language describing CD with aforementioned orthobiologics. We analysed a total of 20 studies published between 2011 and 2020. There were 6 retrospective and 14 prospective studies. PRP showed improved survival and functional outcomes; however, with only three studies, there is inconclusive evidence for its routine utilization. BMAC enhances the efficacy of CD which can further be increased by culture and expansion of cells or combining it with PRP to stimulate growth. In conclusion, CD with BMAC works more efficiently than CD alone prior to collapse of femoral head in AVN. However, PRP needs more evidence for extensive application. Addition of PRP to BMAC or culturing the latter could further enhance the potency of CD + BMAC combination. Very limited data is available for the efficacy of BMP-7 and the role of intraosseous bisphosphonates should be evaluated for a cheaper and potential alternative.

Treatments of avascular osteonecrosis of the hip: Current treatments

Conservative treatments for aseptic osteonecrosis of the femoral head have their ancestor in the core decompression of the femoral neck, recommended by Ficat. Due to inconsistent results, this treatment has been optimized by either vascularized fibular grafting, or by injecting autologous stem cells into the necrotic zone. The French promoters have published long-term results, showing efficacy in the early stages of the disease, where the femoral head has not yet lost its sphericity. Over the last 10years, comparative studies, sometimes randomized, opposing them to simple core decompression, have been published by non-promoters, confirming the possibility of stabilization or even regression of necrosis area. But these techniques are not easy to implement. Cell therapy requires treatment of marrow samples by centrifugation to obtain a pellet with a high concentration of haematopoietic cells. The now proven long-term efficacy as well as the safety of this technique make it the method of choice for treating young patients detected at the sub-radiological stage by MRI. Unfortunately, many are seen late with detached cephalic cartilage or collapsed femoral head and have no other option than total hip arthroplasty. This technique is very reliable. With alumina ceramics, results of more than 20years show the absence of wear and osteolysis, although other complications such as instability or periprosthetic fractures may occur in these young and active patients.

Treatment of avascular osteonecrosis of femoral head by core decompression and platelet-rich plasma: a prospective not controlled study

PURPOSE

Core decompression is a surgical option since the 1960s for hip osteonecrosis treatment. This technique promotes bone repair by reducing intramedullary pressure, but this is not often enough to stop the progression of necrosis. The aim of this study was to associate core decompression with the regenerative stimulus provided by platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and compare our results with other regenerative techniques.

METHODS

Femoral head osteonecrosis was prospectively evaluated in 30 hips (22 patients, 15-60 years) treated by core decompression and PRP graft. Patients presented monolateral or bilateral osteonecrosis in stage I-IIA-IIB according to Arlet and Ficat classification. The outcome was assessed by changes in Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the need for total hip replacement (THA).

RESULTS

The mean preoperative HHS was 64 points, at two years from surgery was roughly 84 points. Sixteen of 30 hips showed osteonecrosis progression of the femoral head and were converted to THA. At the five year follow-up, the survival rate was 100% for patients at stage I, 67% for stage IIA, and 0% for stage IIB and was 68% and 32% for idiopathic and secondary osteonecrosis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Core decompression combined with PRP could be indicated as a treatment for the I and IIA stages of osteonecrosis, as it significantly reduces joint pain and delays THA. This procedure should be avoided in AVNFH related to cortisone therapy because only a few benefits have been proven. It also has the advantage of being technically simple, minimally invasive, and free from complications.

Correlation between the efficacy of stem cell therapy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head and cell viability

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common disease that greatly affects the quality of life of patients. Repair of the necrotic area is key to successful treatment. Currently, the combination of stem cell transplantation and decompression is used clinically to promote the repair of necrotic areas based on the characteristics of stem cells. However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve a satisfactory outcome in terms of repair of the femoral head necrotic area, and it is very important to determine the reasons for the poor curative effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between stem cell viability and the repair efficacy of stem cell therapy combined with core decompression for early-stage ONFH.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with idiopathic ONFH underwent core decompression combined with autologous stem cell transplantation. The Harris hip score (HHS) and difference in necrosis area before and after surgery were measured. The mean repair ratio was set as the threshold to divide the patients into group A (ratio above the mean) and group B (ratio below the mean). The ultrastructure, proliferative capacity, and multidirectional differentiation ability were compared between the groups.

Results

At 9 months after surgery, the HHS and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings improved by varying degrees. Based on the mean repair ratio of (62.2 ± 27.0)%, the threshold for dividing the patients into groups A and B was set to 62.2%. Better repair (group A) was associated with more rapid proliferation and a healthier ultrastructure. The cells in group A showed stronger specific staining signifying osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation; alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, an indicator of osteogenic differentiation, was higher in group A than in group B (OD, 2.39 ± 0.44 and 1.85 ± 0.52; p <  0.05).

Conclusions

The quality of implanted stem cells is closely related to treatment efficacy and determines whether the defective self-repair in the necrotic area can be corrected to enhance repair and thus achieve the desired therapeutic outcome.

Trial registration

The trial registration number: ChiCTR-ORC-17011698 (retrospectively registered at 2017-06-19).

Outcomes of Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty From Free Vascularized Fibular Grafting

BACKGROUND

Conversion total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from prior free vascularized fibular grafting (FVFG) are infrequently reported in the literature. We characterized the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing conversion THA and compared them with those of a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary THA for osteonecrosis of the femoral head and neck (ONFHN).

METHODS

The institutional database was queried for patients with FVFG requiring conversion to THA. This cohort was then matched 1:1 for age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score for patients with ONFHN undergoing primary THA. Medical records were reviewed for intraoperative and postoperative complications, which were then compared between conversion and primary THA patient cohorts.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-eight THA patients were included for analysis (144 patients with FVFG matched to 144 patients with ONFHN and no prior FVFG). Patients with prior FVFG who underwent THA had significantly greater operative time and blood loss (P < .001). Although not significant, there were more intraoperative fractures in the FVFG cohort (P = .053). Postoperatively, patients with FVFG had significantly greater blood transfusions (P < .001) and hematoma formation (P = .004) than the matched cohort. There was no difference in length of stay, discharge disposition, or venous thromboembolism; however, patients who underwent conversion THA showed increased deep infection (P = .044) and rate of return to the operating room (P = .010).

CONCLUSION

Although there are numerous treatment strategies for patients with ONFHN, many patients will ultimately require THA. Patients undergoing conversion after FVFG are more likely to have complications including increased blood loss, hematoma formation, and intraoperative fractures. Consequently, surgeons should concentrate on preoperative optimization and prepare for specific technical challenges.

Clinical efficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a matched pair control study with simple core decompression

Background

To date, several trials have reported the use of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the clinical outcomes have not been conclusive. This study compared the clinical and radiological results of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (BMMSC) implantation with traditional simple core decompression (CD) using a matched pair case–control design.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients with ONFH (106 hips) who had been treated by CD alone (50 patients, 53 hips) and CD + BMMSC implantation (50 patients, 53 hips) between February 2004 and October 2014. We assessed the total hip replacement arthroplasty (THA) conversion rate and ARCO (Association Research Circulation Osseous) stage progression. Survivor rate analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and an additional THA was defined as the primary endpoints.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 4.28 years. There was a difference in the THA conversion rate between the CD (49%) and CD + BMMSC groups (28.3%) (p = 0.028). ARCO stage progression was noted in 20 of 53 hips (37.7%) in the CD group and 19 of 53 hips (35.8%) in the CD + BMMSC group. Among collapsed cases (ARCO stages III and IV), there was no difference in clinical failure rate between the two groups. Conversely, in the pre-collapse cases (ARCO stages I and II), only 6 of 30 hips (20%) progressed to clinical failure in the CD + BMMSC group, whereas 15 of 30 hips (50%) progressed to clinical failure in the CD group (p = 0.014). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a significant difference in the time to failure between the two groups up to 10-year follow-up (log-rank test p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in terms of age (p = 0.87) and gender (p = 0.51) when comparing THA conversion rates between groups. No complication was noted.

Conclusions

These results suggest that implantation of MSCs into the femoral head at an early stage of ONFH lowers the THA conversion rate. However, ARCO stage progression is not affected by this treatment.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered